495
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

On urban trajectology: algorithmic mobilities and atmocultural navigation

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Adams, R. 2014. Natura Urbans, Natura Urbanata: Ecological urbanism, circulation, and the immunization of nature. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32: 12–29.
  • Alvesson, M., and A. Spicer. 2012. A stupidity-based theory of organizations. Journal of Management Studies 49, no. 7: 1194–220.
  • Anderson, B. 2012. Affect and biopower: Towards a politics of life. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 37: 28–43.
  • Aureli, P.V. 2013. Means to an end: The rise and fall of the architectural project of the city. In The city as a project, ed. P.V. Aureli, 14–38. Berlin: Ruby Press.
  • Benjamin, R. 2019. Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the New Jim Code. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Bille, M., P. Bjerregaard, and T. Flohr Sørensen. 2015. Staging atmospheres: Materiality, culture, and the texture of the in-between. Emotion, Space and Society 14: 31–8.
  • Borch, C. 2014. Architectural atmospheres. On the experience and politics of architecture. Basel: Birkhäuser.
  • Bousquet, A. 2018. The eye of war. Military perception from the telescope to the drone. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Bragazzi, N.L., and G. Del Puente. 2014. A proposal for including nomophobia in the new DSM-V. Psychology Research and Behavior Management 7: 155.
  • Brighenti, A.M. and M. Kärrholm. 2018. Atmospheres of retail and the asceticism of civilized consumption. Geographica Helvetica 73: 203-213.
  • Brighenti, A.M. and A. Pavoni. 2018. Climbing the City. On the Corporeality of the Urban. The Journal of Urbanism 11(1): 63-80.
  • Brighenti, A.M. and A. Pavoni. 2019. City of Unpleasant Feelings. Stress, Comfort and Animosity in Urban Life. Social & Cultural Geography 20 (2): 137-156
  • Brighenti, A.M. and A. Pavoni. 2020. Vertical Vision and Atmocultural Navigation. Notes on emerging Urban Scopic Regimes” Visual Studies. Online first: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1472586X.2020.1840089
  • Budds, D. 2016a. ‘One City’s Ambitious Plan To Ease Overcrowded Trains? Pay Riders’. FastCompany.com, 19 September. https://www.fastcompany.com/3063463/one-ambitious-plan-to-ease-overcrowded-trains-pay-the-riders.
  • Budds, D. 2016b. ‘How One Florida City Is Reinventing Itself With UX Design’. FastCompany.com, 31 October https://www.fastcompany.com/3065107/how-one-florida-city-is-reinventing-itself-with-ux-design.
  • Cardon, D., J.P. Cointet, A. Mazières, and E. Libbrecht. 2018. Neurons spike back. Réseaux 5: 173–220.
  • Carter, P. 2002. Repressed spaces. The poetics of agoraphobia. London: Reaktion Books.
  • Cerdà, I. 1867. Teoría general de la urbanización, y aplicación de sus principios y doctrinas a la reforma y ensanche de Barcelona. Madrid: Imprenta Española.
  • Chamayou, G. 2014. Patterns of life: A very short history of schematic bodies. The Funambulist Papers 57. https://thefunambulist.net/history/the-funambulist-papers-57-schematic-bodies-notes-on-a-patterns-genealogy-by-gregoire-chamayou
  • Cresswell, T. 2011. Mobilities I: Catching up. Progress in Human Geography 35: 550–8.
  • Cresswell, T. 2012. Mobilities II: Still. Progress in Human Geography 36, no. 5: 645–53.
  • Cresswell, T. 2014. Mobilities III: Moving on. Progress in Human Geography 38, no. 5: 712–21.
  • Cresswell, T., and P. Merriman, eds. 2011. Geographies of mobilities: Practices, spaces, subjects. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
  • Deleuze, G. 1981. La Peinture. Cours du 12/05/1981. Online at: http://www2.univ-paris8.fr/deleuze/article.php3?id_article=198.
  • Deleuze, G. 1990. Expressionism in philosophy. Spinoza. New York: Zone Books.
  • Deleuze, G. 1992. Postscript on the societies of control. October 59: 3–7.
  • Deleuze, G. 2002[1966]. Gilbert Simondon, L’individu et sa genèse physico-biologique. In L’île déserte. Textes et entretiens 1953–1974, 120–4. Paris: Minuit.
  • Deleuze, G. 2006[1986]. Foucault. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Domingos, P. 2015. The Master Algorithm: how the quest for the ultimate learning machine will remake our world. New York: Basic Books.
  • Dourish, P., and G. Bell. 2007. The infrastructure of experience and the experience of infrastructure. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 34, no. 3: 414–30.
  • Espeland, W., and V. Yung. 2019. Ethical dimensions of quantification. Social Science Information 58, no. 2: 238–60.
  • Esposito, R. 2002. Immunitas: protezione e negazione della vita. Torino: Einaudi.
  • Farinelli, F. 2003. Geografia: un’introduzione ai modelli del mondo. Torino: Einaudi.
  • Galloway, A. 2006. Gaming. Essays on algorithmic culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Goriunova, O. 2013. New media idiocy. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 19, no. 2: 223–35.
  • Grabar, H. 2016. All maps are biased. Google Maps’ new redesign doesn’t hide it. Slate online https://slate.com/technology/2016/07/google-maps-new-redesign-doesn-t-hide-its-biases.html.
  • Halpern, O. 2015. Beautiful data: A history of vision and reason since 1945. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Holert, T., and D. Mende. 2019. Editorial: Navigation beyond vision. e-flux 101. https://www.e-flux.com/announcements/178893/e-flux-journal-issue-101-navigation-beyond-vision-guest-edited-by-tom-holert-and-doreen-mende/.
  • Hui, Y. 2015. Modulation after control. New Formations 84: 74–91.
  • Ingold, T. 1993. The temporality of the landscape. World Archaeology 25, no. 2: 152–74.
  • Johnston, J. 1999. Machinic vision. Critical Inquiry 6, no. 1: 27–48.
  • Kasy, M. 2019. The politics of machine learning, pt. I. Phenomenal World, June 27th.
  • Laerke, M. 1999. The voice and the name: Spinoza in the Badioudian critique of Deleuze. Pli: Warwick Journal of Philosophy 8: 86–99.
  • Land, M.F. 2009. Vision, eye movements, and natural behavior. Visual Neuroscience 26: 51–62.
  • Le Corbusier. 1987[1924]. The city of to-morrow and Its planning. New York: Dover Publications.
  • Lewin, K. 1936. Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Lovink, G. 2019a. Sad by design. On platform nihilism. London: Pluto Press.
  • Lovink, G. 2019b. Cybernetics for the twenty-first century: An interview with philosopher Yuk Hui. e-flux 102. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/102/282271/cybernetics-for-the-twenty-first-century-an-interview-with-philosopher-yuk-hui/.
  • Lury, C., L. Parisi, and T. Terranova. 2012. Introduction: The becoming topological of culture. Theory, Culture & Society 29, no. 4-5: 3–35.
  • Lynch, K. 1960. The image of The city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Manovich, L. 2000. Database as a genre of new media. Ai & Society 14, no. 2: 176–83.
  • McCullough, M. 2013. Ambient commons. Attention in the age of embodied information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Mattern, S. 2016. Cloud and field. Places Journal. https://placesjournal.org/article/cloud-and-field/.
  • Merriman, P., R. Jones, C. Divall, G. Mom, M. Sheller, and J. Urry. 2013. Mobility: Geographies, Histories, Sociologies. Transfers: Interdisciplinary Journal of Mobility Studies 3, no. 1: 147–65.
  • Mezzadra, S., and B. Neilson. 2019. The politics of operations. Excavating contemporary capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Morozov, E. 2014. To save everything, click here: The Folly of technological solutionism. New York: Public Affairs.
  • Noble, S.U. 2018. Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York: NYU Press.
  • Offner, J.M., A. Sander, and P. Virilio. 1991. For a geography of trajectories. An interview with Paul Virilio. FLUX: Cahiers scientifiques internationaux réseaux et territoires 7, no. 5: 48–54.
  • Pasquinelli, M. 2017. Arcana mathematica imperii: The evolution of Western computational norms. In Former West: Art and the contemporary after 1989, ed. M. Hlavajova, and S. Sheikh, 281–93. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Pasquinelli, M. 2019. Three thousand years of algorithmic rituals: The emergence of AI from the computation of space. e-flux 101. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/101/273221/three-thousand-years-of-algorithmic-rituals-the-emergence-of-ai-from-the-computation-of-space/.
  • Pasquinelli, M., and V. Joler. 2020. The nooscope manifested: Artificial intelligence as instrument of knowledge extractivism. Karlsruhe University of Arts and Design and Share Lab. At https://nooscope.ai.
  • Pavoni, A., and A.M. Brighenti. 2018. Airspacing the City. Where Technophysics meets Atmoculture. Azimuth. Philosophical Coordinates in Modern and Contemporary Age 10: 91–103.
  • Protevi, J. 2009. Political affect: Connecting the social and the somatic. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Rouvroy, A. 2013. The End(s) of Critique: Data Behaviorism versus Due Process. In Privacy, Due Process and the Computational Turn. The Philosophy of Law Meets the Philosophy of Technology, ed. M. Hildebrandt, and E. De Vries, 143–168. London: Routledge.
  • Scannell, J. 2015. What can an algorithm do. Dis Magazine, February 2015. Online http://dismagazine.com/discussion/72975/josh-scannell-what-can-an-algorithm-do/.
  • Seaver, N. 2017. Algorithms as culture: Some tactics for the ethnography of algorithmic systems. Big Data & Society 4, no. 2: 1–12.
  • Shannon, C.E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27, no. 3: 379–423.
  • Sheller, M., and J. Urry. 2006. The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A 38, no. 2: 207–26.
  • Sheller, M., and J. Urry. 2016. Mobilizing the new mobilities paradigm. Applied Mobilities 1, no. 1: 10–25.
  • Simondon, G. 1958. Du mode d’existence des objets techniques. Paris: Aubier.
  • Simondon, G. 1995[1964]. L’individu et sa genèse physico-biologique. Grenoble: Millon.
  • Simondon, G. 2013[1960]. Forme, information, potentiels. In L’individuation, 537–58. Grenoble: Millon.
  • Simone, A. 2016. The uninhabitable? In between collapsed yet still rigid distinctions. Cultural Politics 12, no. 2: 135–54.
  • Sitte, C. 1986[1889]. The birth of modern city planning. New York: Rizzoli.
  • Sloterdijk, P. 2006. The nomotop: On the emergence of law in the island of humanity. Law & Literature 18, no. 1: 1–14.
  • Sloterdijk, P. 2011. Bubbles. Spheres volume I: Microspherology. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
  • Sloterdijk, P. 2013. In the world interior of capital: For a philosophical theory of globalization. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
  • Sloterdijk, P. 2014. Globes. Spheres volume II: Macrospherology. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
  • Sloterdijk, P. 2016. Foams. Spheres volume III: Plural spherology. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
  • Smail, D.L. 2000. Imaginary cartographies: Possession and identity in late medieval Marseille. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
  • Stiegler, B. 2013. What makes life worth living: On pharmacology. London: Wiley.
  • Stiegler, B. 2018. Automatic society: The future of work. London: Wiley.
  • Tarde, G. 2012[1893]. Monadology and sociology. London: re.press.
  • Tripodi, L. 2020. Telescoping the city: Technological urbiquity, or perceiving ourselves from the above. Space and Culture 23(4): 425–442.
  • Vidler, A. 1992. The architectural uncanny: Essays in the modern unhomely. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Virilio, P. 1989. War and cinema. The logistics of perception. London: Verso.
  • Virilio, P. 2001. The time of the trajectory: Interview with Andreas Ruby. In Virilio live: Selected interviews, ed. J. Armitage, 58–65. London: Sage.
  • Weiser, M.D. 1991. The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American 265, no. 3: 66–75. Available at: http://www.ics.uci.edu/*corps/phaseii/Weiser-Computer21stCentury-SciAm.pdf.
  • Wiener, N. 1950. The human use of human beings. Cybernetics and society. New York: Anchor.
  • Wilson, P.J. 1988. The domestication of the human species. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.