‘Which side are you on – Mr. Westerberg?’ Reason, affect, and division in public debate

References

• Ahmed, Sara. 2004. The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, Jenny. 2015. A model of welfare capitalism? In The oxford handbook of Swedish politics, ed. Jon Pierre, 563–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. 1991. On rhetoric. Ed. A. George. Kennedy Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, John Langshaw. 1975. How to do things with words. Ed. Marina Sbisà and James Opie Urmson. Cambridge: Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, Mark. 2002. Great transformations: Economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boréus, Kristina. 1994. Högervåg: Nyliberalismen och kampen om språket i svensk debatt 1969–1989. PhD diss., Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Brunfelter, Ulf, Patrik Engellau, Gunnar Hökmark, Gustaf Petrén, Mats Svegfors, and Carl-Johan Westholm. 1988. En ny grundlag: ett förslag. Stockholm: Timbro.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, Patricia Ticineto, and Jean Halley, eds. 2007. The affective turn. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cossarini, Paolo, and Fernando Vallespín, eds. 2019. Populism and passions. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Cleen, Benjamin, Jana Goyvaerts, Nico Carpentier, Jason Glynos, and Yannis Stavrakakis. 2021. Moving discourse theory forward. Journal of Language and Politics 20, no. 1: 22–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derrida, Jacques. 1986. Declarations of independence. New Political Science 7, no. 1: 7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, Jacques. 1988. Limited Inc. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edlund, Jonas, and Ingemar Johansson Sevä. 2013. Is Sweden being torn apart? Privatization and old and new patterns of welfare state support. Social Policy & Administration 47, no. 5: 542–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklundh, Emmy. 2019. Emotions, protest, democracy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Feldt, Kjell-Olof. 1994. Rädda välfärdsstaten!. Stockholm: Norstedt.
   Google Scholar
• Finlayson, Alan. 2007. From beliefs to arguments: Interpretive methodology and rhetorical political analysis. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 9, no. 4: 545–63.
   Google Scholar
• Glynos, Jason, and David Howarth. 2007. Logics of critical explanation in social and political theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, Jeff, James M. Jasper, and Francesca Polletta, eds. 2001. Passionate politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gottweis, Herbert. 2007. Rhetoric in policy making: Between logos, ethos, and pathos. In Handbook of public policy analysis: theory, politics, and methods, eds. Frank Fischer, Gerald Miller, and Mara S. Sidney, 237–50. Boca Raton: CRC/Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, Deborah B. 2009. Moving politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, Elizabeth A. 1994. Volatile bodies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Cheryl. 2002. Passions and constraint: The marginalization of passion in liberal political theory. Philosophy & Social Criticism 28, no. 6: 727–48.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Cheryl. 2005. The trouble with passion: Political theory beyond the reign of reason. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, Carl, and Dag Rolander. 1993. Att leda Sverige in i krisen. Stockholm: Norstedt.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, David. 2005. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoggett, Paul, ed. 2012. Politics and the emotions. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Hort, Sven E. O. 2014a. Social policy, welfare state, and civil society in Sweden. Vol. 1, History, policies, and institutions 1884–1988. Lund: Arkiv.
   Google Scholar
• Hort, Sven E. O. 2014b. Social policy, welfare state, and civil society in Sweden. Vol. 2, The lost world of social democracy 1988–2015. Lund: Arkiv.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, David. 1896. A treatise of human nature. Ed. L. A. (Lewis Amherst) Selby-Bigge. Oxford: Clarendon press.
   Google Scholar
• Jonung, Lars. 2015. Trettio år på vägen till ett Stabilare Sverige. Lund: The Knut Wicksell Centre for Financial Studies, Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Jonung, Lars, Jaakko Kiander, and Pentti Vartia. 2009. The great financial crisis in Finland and Sweden. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jordahl, Henrik. 2008. ‘Privatiseringar av statligt ägda företag’. N 9010. Regeringskansliet.
   Google Scholar
• Korpi, Walter. 1996. Eurosclerosis and the sclerosis of objectivity. The Economic Journal 106, no. 439: 1727–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, Paul. 2008. Paul-Krugman blog. Comment posted 28 September 2008. https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/09/28/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, Ernesto. 2014. The rhetorical foundations of society. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and socialist strategy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, Bengt, Martin Letell, and Håkan Thörn, eds 2012. Transformations of the Swedish welfare state. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Maktutredningen. 1990. Demokrati och makt i Sverige. Stockholm: Allmänna förl.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James. 2013. Politics and rhetoric: A critical introduction. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, James. 2019. Psychopolitics of speech: Uncivil discourse and the excess of desire. Bielefeld: Transcipt Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Marttila, Tomas. 2015. Post-foundational discourse analysis: from political difference to empirical research. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, Brian. 1995. The autonomy of affect. Cultural Critique 31: 83–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal. 2005. On the political. Thinking in action. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal. 2013. Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal. 2018. For a left populism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal. 2020. The return of the political. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, Lennart. 1997. Offentlig sektor och privatisering 1986–1996. In Ett missnöjt folk? SOM-undersökningen 1996, eds. Sören Holmberg, and Lennart Weibull, 103–16. Göteborg: SOM-institutet.
   Google Scholar
• Nordin, Ingemar. 1988. Privat egendom: om ägande och moral. Stockholm: Timbro.
   Google Scholar
• Norval, Aletta J. 2005. Theorising hegemony. In Radical democracy: Politics between abundance and lack, eds. Lars Tønder, and Lasse Thomassen, 86–102. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norval, Aletta J. 2007. Aversive democracy: Inheritance and originality in the democratic tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palonen, Emilia. 2018. Performing the nation: The Janus-faced populist foundations of illiberalism in Hungary. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 26, no. 3: 308–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersson, Olof, and Ingrid Carlberg. 1990. Makten över tanken: en bok om det svenska massmediesamhället. Maktutredningens publikationer, 99-0641947-4. Stockholm: Carlsson.
   Google Scholar
• Pocock, John G. A. 1973. Verbalizing a political act: Toward a politics of speech. Political Theory 1, no. 1: 27–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontusson, Jonas. 1987. Radicalization and retreat in Swedish social democracy. New Left Review 165: 5–33.
   Google Scholar
• Riksdagen. 1991. Privatisering av statligt ägda företag, m.m. Näringsutskottets betänkande 1991/92: NU10.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, Tiina. 2013. The soundtrack of revolution. Culture Unbound. Journal of Current Cultural Research 5: 175–88.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, Bo, and Shirin Ahlbäck Öberg. 2010. Politik som organisation. Stockholm: SNS förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ryner, Johan Magnus. 2003. Capitalist restructuring, globalization and the third way: Lessons from the Swedish model. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ryner, Johan Magnus. 2018. Neoliberalisation of social democracy: Transmissions and dispositions. In The SAGE handbook of neoliberalism, eds. Damien Cahill, Melinda Cooper, Martijn Konings, and David Primrose, 248–59. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schnyder, Gerhard. 2012. Like a phoenix from the ashes? Reassessing the transformation of the Swedish political economy since the 1970s. Journal of European Public Policy 19, no. 8: 1126–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segerstedt, Torgny T., ed. 1988. Det politiskt omöjliga. Stockholm: Ratio.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, Stefan. 2003. Löntagarfondsfrågan – En hegemonisk vändpunkt. PhD diss., Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Quentin. 2002. Visions of politics: volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa, Ronald de. 1990. The rationality of emotion. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ståhl, Ingemar, Kurt Wickman, and Claes Arvidsson. 1993. Suedosclerosis: marknadsekonomisk rapport. Stockholm: Timbro.
   Google Scholar
• Stavrakakis, Yannis. 2007. The lacanian left: Psychoanalysis, theory, politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stolt, Ragnar, Paula Blomqvist, and Ulrika Winblad. 2011. Privatization of social services: Quality differences in Swedish elderly care. Social Science & Medicine 72, no. 4: 560–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunnercrantz, Liv. 2017. Hegemony and the intellectual function: Medialised public discourse on privatisation in Sweden 1988–1993. PhD diss., Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Sunnercrantz, Liv. 2021. Hur högern vann debatten. Nyliberal hegemoni i privatiseringsfrågan. In Klass i Sverige. Ojämlikheten, makten och politiken i det 21:a århundradet, eds. Daniel Suhonen, Göran Therborn, and Jesper Weithz, 181–201. Lund: Arkiv förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Svallfors, Stefan, and Anna Tyllström. 2018. Resilient privatization: The puzzling case of for-profit welfare providers in Sweden. Socio-Economic Review 17, no. 3: 745–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson, Torsten. 2001. Marknadsanpassningens politik: Den svenska modellens förändring 1980–2000. PISA-projektet. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
   Google Scholar
• Therborn, Göran. 2020. Sweden’s turn to economic inequality, 1982–2019. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 52, 159–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tønder, Lars, and Lasse Thomassen, eds. 2005. Radical democracy: Politics between abundance and lack. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, Jacob. 2005. Discourse theory: Achievements, arguments, and challenges. In Discourse theory in European politics, eds. David R. Howarth, and Jacob Torfing, 1–32. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, Jonathan H., and Jan E. Stets. 2005. The sociology of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, John, and George Yarrow. 1988. Privatization: An economic analysis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wennerhag, Magnus, ed. 2010. Socialdemokrati. Special issue. Fronesis nos. 32–33.
   Google Scholar
• Westholm, Carl-Johan. 1988. Borgerligheten som kyrkoruin. In Det politiskt omöjliga, ed. Torgny T. Segerstedt, 23–43. Stockholm: Ratio.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1972. On certainty. Ed. G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright. London: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, Ruth. 2009. The discourse of politics in action. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer. 2016. Methods of critical discourse studies. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar