1,006
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

(Un)Fixing habitus: affective transactions and the becoming body

ORCID Icon

References

  • Abbott, A.D. 2016. Processual sociology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Archer, M.S. 2007. Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Atkinson, W. 2015. Putting habitus back in its place? Reflections on the homines in extremis debate. Body & Society 21: 103–116. doi:10.1177/1357034X15590486
  • Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. 1990. In other words: Essays towards a reflexive sociology. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. 2000. Pascalian meditations. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Bourdieu, P. 2008a. Sketch for a self-analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. 2008b. The bachelors’ ball: The crisis of peasant society in Béarn. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Bourdieu, P. 2014. On the state. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Bryant, L.R., N. Srnicek, and G. Harman. 2011. The speculative turn: Continental materialism and realism. Melbourne, Victoria, S. Aust.: Re.press.
  • Burkitt, I. 2014. Emotions and social relations. Los Angeles; London: SAGE.
  • Butler, J. 2012. On this occasion.. In Butler on Whitehead: On the occasion, eds. R. Faber, Michael Halewood, and Deena Lin, 3–19. Lanham, Md: Lexington Books.
  • Choi, S., and M. Fara. 2012. Dispositions. The Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2012 Edition), Spring 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/dispositions/.
  • Crossley, N. 2013. Habit and habitus. Body & Society 19: 136–161.
  • Crossley, N. 2014. Embodied actors, sociability and the limits of reflexivity. Body & Society 20: 106–112. doi:10.1177/1357034X14524454
  • Dahl, R.A. 1957. The concept of power. Behavioral Science 2, no. 3: 201–215. doi:10.1002/bs.3830020303
  • Decoteau, C.L. 2016. The reflexive habitus. European Journal of Social Theory 19, no. 3: 303–321. doi:10.1177/1368431015590700
  • Deleuze, G. 1993. The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. London: Athlone Press.
  • Dépelteau, F. 2015. Relational sociology, pragmatism, transactions and social fields. International Review of Sociology 25, no. 1: 45–64. doi:10.1080/03906701.2014.997966
  • Dépelteau, F. 2018a. From the concept of “Trans-Action” to a process-relational sociology. In The palgrave handbook of relational sociology, ed. F Dépelteau, 499–519. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Dépelteau, F. 2018b. The palgrave handbook of relational sociology. Cham: Springer International Publishing. The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology [online] (n.d.) available: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007978-3-319-66005-9 [accessed 27 Jun 2022].
  • Dewey J. and A. F. Bentley. 1949. Knowing and the known. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Eastman, T.E., and H. Keeton. 2004. Physics and Whitehead: Quantum, process, and experience. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Elias, N. 1987. On human beings and their emotions: A process-sociological essay. Theory, Culture & Society 4: 339–361.
  • Emirbayer, M. 1997. Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology 103: 281–317. doi:10.1086/231209
  • Emirbayer, M., and C.A. Goldberg. 2005. Pragmatism, Bourdieu, and collective emotions in contentious politics. Theory and Society 34: 469–518. doi:10.1007/s11186-005-1619-x
  • Epperson, M. 2004. Quantum mechanics and the philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead. New York: Fordham University Press.
  • Faber, R., M. Halewood, and D. Lin. 2012. Butler on Whitehead: On the occasion. Lanham, Md: Lexington Books.
  • Fararo, T.J. 1992. The meaning of general theoretical sociology: Tradition and formalization. Cambridge [etc.]: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fararo, T.J. 2001. Social action systems: Foundation and synthesis in sociological theory. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
  • Friedman, S. 2016. Habitus clivé and the emotional imprint of social mobility. The Sociological Review 64: 129–147. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.12280
  • Gould, D. 2009. Moving politics: Emotion and act up's fight against AIDS. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Gregg, M., and G. J. Seigworth, eds., 2010. The affect theory reader. Durham NC: Duke University Press.
  • Griffin, D.R. 1993. Introduction: constructive postmodern philosophy. In Founders of constructive postmodern philosophy: Peirce, James, Bergson, Whitehead, and Hartshorne, ed D. R. Griffin, J. B. Cobb Jr, M. P. Ford, P. A. Gunter, and P. Ochs. New York: State University of New York Press.
  • Griffen, D.R. 2007. Whitehead's radically different postmodern philosophy: An argument for its contemporary relevance. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Halewood, M. 2005. On Whitehead and Deleuze: The process of materiality. Configurations 13: 57–76. doi:10.1353/con.2007.0009
  • Halewood, M. 2011. A.N. Whitehead and social theory: Tracing a culture of thought. London: Anthem Press.
  • Hamrick, W.S., and J. Van der Veken. 2011. Nature and logos a Whiteheadian Key to Merleau-Ponty’s fundamental thought. Albany, N.Y: SUNY.
  • Haraway, D.J. 2008. When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Haugaard, M. 2008. Power and habitus. Journal of Power 1: 189–206. doi:10.1080/17540290802227593
  • Haugaard, M, Hayward, C. Heaney, J.G. & Reed, I.A. (2021) Power in modernity: a discussion among Mark Haugaard, Clarissa Hayward, and Jonathan G. Heaney of Power in Modernity: agency relations and the creative destruction of the King's two bodies, by Isaac Ariail Reed, with a reply by Isaac Reed, Journal of Political Power, 14:3, 520–545, DOI:10.1080/2158379X.2021.1991697
  • Heaney, J.G. 2011. Emotions and power: reconciling conceptual twins. Journal of Political Power 4: 259–277.
  • Hopkins, D., J. Kleres, H. Flam, and H. Kutmics. 2009. Theorizing emotions: Sociological explorations and applications. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
  • Illouz, E. 2006. Cold intimacies: The making of emotional capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Jenkins, R. 1992. Pierre Bourdieu. London: Routledge
  • Keller, C., and A. Daniell. 2002. Process and difference: Between cosmological and poststructuralist postmodernisms. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Kilminster, R. 2007. Norbert Elias post-philosophical sociology. London: Routledge.
  • King, A. 2000. Thinking with Bourdieu against Bourdieu: A ‘practical’critique of the habitus. Sociological theory 18: 417–433.
  • Kivinen, O., and T. Piiroinen. 2006. Toward pragmatist methodological relationalism. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36: 303–329. doi:10.1177/0048393106289794
  • Latour, B. 2007. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Latour, B. 2008. What is the style of matters of concern?: Two lectures in empirical philosophy. Assen: Koninklijke Van Gorcum.
  • Lizardo, O. 2004. The cognitive origins of Bourdieu's habitus. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34: 375–401. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.2004.00255.x
  • Lukes, S. 2005. Power: A radical view. second edition, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Martin, J.L. 2011. The explanation of social action. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Marx, K. 1992. Early writings. London: Penguin Books Limited.
  • Massumi, B. 2002. Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Matthäus, S. 2017. Towards the role of self, worth, and feelings in (re-) producing social dominance. Explicating Pierre Bourdieu's implicit theory of affect. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 75–92.
  • Maton, K. 2008. Habitus. In Pierre Bourdieu: Key concepts, ed. M. Grenfell, 49–66. Durham: Acumen Publishing.
  • Mesle, C.R. 2008. Process-relational philosophy : An introduction to alfred north whitehead. West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.
  • Morriss, P. 2002. Power: A philosophical analysis, (Second Edition). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Mouzelis, N.P. 2008. Modern and postmodern social theorizing: Bridging the divide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Paradis, E. 2014. Sociology is a martial art. Body & Society 20: 100–105. doi:10.1177/1357034X14524453
  • Popper, K.R. 2002. The open society and its enemies. London: Routledge.
  • Reay, D. 2004. ‘‘It's all becoming a habitus’: Beyond the habitual use of habitus in educational research. British Journal of Sociology of Education 25: 431–444. doi:10.1080/0142569042000236934
  • Reay, D. 2015. Habitus and the psychosocial: Bourdieu with feelings. Cambridge Journal of Education 45: 9–23. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2014.990420
  • Reddy, W.M. 2001. The navigation of feeling: A framework for the history of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rescher, N. 1996. Process metaphysics: An introduction to process philosophy. New York: State University of New York Press.
  • Rescher, N. 2000. Process philosophy: A survey of basic issues. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Ryle, G. 2000. The concept of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Scheer, M. 2012. Are emotions a kind of practice (and is that what makes them have a history)? A Bourdieuian approach to understanding emotion. History and Theory 51: 193–220. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2303.2012.00621.x
  • Seyfert, R. 2012. Beyond personal feelings and collective emotions: Toward a theory of social affect. Theory, Culture & Society 29, no. 6: 27–46. doi:10.1177/0263276412438591
  • Shaviro, S. 2009. Without criteria: Kant, Whitehead, Deleuze, and aesthetics. Cambridge: Mass.: MIT Press.
  • Silva, E.B. 2016. Unity and fragmentation of the Habitus. The Sociological Review 64: 166–183. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.12346
  • Slaby, J. 2017. More than a feeling: Affect as radical situatedness. Midwest Studies In Philosophy 41, no. 1: 7–26. doi:10.1111/misp.12076
  • Stenner, P. 2008. A.N. Whitehead and subjectivity. Subjectivity 22: 90–109. doi:10.1057/sub.2008.4
  • Strand, M., and O. Lizardo. 2022. For a probabilistic sociology: A history of concept formation with Pierre Bourdieu. Theory and Society 51, no. 3: 399–434. doi:10.1007/s11186-021-09452-2
  • Thomas, M.L. 2016. Mead, Whitehead, and the sociality of nature. In Mead, Whitehead, and the sociality of nature, eds. Hans Joas, and Daniel R Huebner, 185–206. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Turner J.H. and J.E. Stets. 2005. The sociology of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Vandenberghe, F. 1999. ‘“The real is relational”: An epistemological analysis of Pierre Bourdieu's generative structuralism. Sociological Theory 17, no. 1: 32–67. doi:10.1177/073527519901700103
  • von Scheve, C. 2018. A social relational account of affect. European Journal of Social Theory 21, no. 1: 39–59. doi:10.1177/1368431017690007
  • Wacquant, L. 2014a. Homines in extremis: What fighting scholars teach us about habitus. Body & Society 20: 3–17. doi:10.1177/1357034X13501348
  • Wacquant, L. 2014b. Putting habitus in its place: Rejoinder to the symposium. Body & Society 20, no. 2: 118–139. doi:10.1177/1357034X14530845
  • Weik, E. 2004. From time to action: The contribution of Whitehead’s philosophy to a theory of action. Time & Society 13, no. 2–3: 301–319.
  • Weik, E. 2010. Research note: Bourdieu and Leibniz: Mediated dualisms. The Sociological Review 58, no. 3: 486–496. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2010.01931.x
  • Wetherell, M. 2012. Affect and emotion: A new social science understanding. Los Angeles, Calif.: SAGE.
  • Whitehead, A. N. [1925]1948. Science and the modern world. New York: Macmillan.
  • Whitehead, A. N. [1938]1985. Modes of thought. Free Press: New York.
  • Whitehead, A.N. [1933] 1967. Adventures of ideas. [S.l.]: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  • Whitehead, A.N. 2004. The concept of nature: The Tarner lectures delivered in Trinity college, November 1919. Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications.
  • Whitehead, A.N., D.R. Griffin, and D.W. Sherburne. 1978. Process and reality: An essay in cosmology. New York: Free Press.