Civic integration and the negation of collective selfhood: A normative analysis through Paul Ricoeur’s notions of identity

References

• Abizadeh, Arash. 2008. Democratic theory and border coercion: No right to unilaterally control your own borders. Political Theory 36, no. 1: 37–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamo, Silvia. 2022. ‘Please sign here’: Integration contracts between municipalities and foreigners in Denmark. Journal of International Migration and Integration 23, no. 1: 321–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agamben, Giorgio. 1999. Potentialities: Collected essays in philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Antony, Anghie. 1996. Francisco De Vitoria and the colonial origins of international law. Social & Legal Studies 5, no. 3: 321–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldi, G., and S.W. Goodman. 2015. Migrants into members: Social rights, civic requirements, and citizenship in Western Europe. West European Politics 38, no. 6: 1152–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banting, K., and W. Kymlicka. 2006. Introduction multiculturalism and the welfare state: Setting the context. In Multiculturalism and the welfare state: Recognition and redistribution in contemporary democracies, eds. K. Banting, and W. Kymlicka. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–46.
   Google Scholar
• Barwick, Christine. 2017. Are immigrants really lacking social networking skills? The crucial role of reciprocity in building ethnically diverse networks. Sociology 51, no. 2: 410–28.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, Simon, Tommaso M. Milani, Kerstin von Brömssen, and Andrea Spehar. 2023. Constructing the “good citizen”: Discourses of social inclusion in Swedish civic orientation. Social Inclusion 11, no. 4: 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blankvoort, Nadine, Margo van Hartingsveldt, Debbie Laliberte Rudman, and Anja Krumeich. 2021. Decolonising civic integration: A critical analysis of texts used in Dutch civic integration programmes. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 47, no. 15: 3511–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonjour, S. 2010. Between integration provision and selection mechanism. Party politics, judicial constraints, and the making of French and Dutch policies of civic integration abroad. European Journal of Migration and Law 12, no. 3: 299–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brubaker, Rogers. 2001. The return of assimilation? Changing perspectives on immigration and its sequels in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies 24, no. 4: 531–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carens, Joseph. 2010. The most liberal citizenship test is none at all. In How liberal are Citizenship tests? RSC Working Paper, eds. R. Bauböck, and C. Joppke, EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2010/41, 19–20.
   Google Scholar
• de Leeuw, M., and S. van Wichelen. 2012. Civilizing migrants: Integration, culture and citizenship. European Journal of Cultural Studies 15, no. 2: 195–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deweer, Dries. 2022. Creation and renunciation in Ricoeur’s political ethics of compromise. Philosophy & Social Criticism 48, no. 6: 813–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferwerda, J., and H. Finseraas. 2021. Do Integration courses promote refugees’ social and political integration? Evidence from Norway. OSF Preprints 87w6e, Center for Open Science, 1--49.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández, Christian. 2019. The unbearable lightness of being Swedish? On the ideological thinness of a liberal citizenship regime. Ethnicities 19, no. 4: 674–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, Margaret, 2014. Joint commitment: How we make the social world. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, S.W. 2010. Integration requirements for integration’s sake? Identifying, categorising and comparing civic integration policies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36, no. 5: 753–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, S.W. 2012. Fortifying citizenship: Policy strategies for civic integration in Western Europe. World Politics 64, no. 4: 659–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, S.W. 2014. Immigration and membership politics in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, Randall. 2010. Citizenship tests: an unapologetic defense. In How Liberal Are Citizenship Tests? RSC Working Paper eds. R. Bauböck and C. Joppke. San Domenico di Fiesole: EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2010/41, 25-28.
   Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, J., D. Hangartner, and G. Pietrantuono. 2015. Naturalization fosters the long-term political integration of immigrants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112, no. 41: 12651–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heins, V.M., and C. Unrau. 2018. Refugees welcome: Arrival gifts, reciprocity, and the integration of forced migrants. Journal of International Political Theory 14, no. 2: 223–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, Kristian. 2019. Theorizing national models of integration: An ideational perspective. Ethnicities 19, no. 4: 614–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joppke, Christian. 2007. Transformation of immigrant integration: Civic integration and antidiscrimination in the Netherlands, France, and Germany. World Politics 59, no. 2: 243–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joppke, Christian. 2008. Immigration and the identity of citizenship: The paradox of universalism. Citizenship Studies 12, no. 6: 533–46.
   Google Scholar
• Joppke, Christian. 2010a. Citizenship and immigration. Cambridge MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joppke, Christian. 2010b. How liberal are citizenship tests? In How liberal are citizenship tests? RSC Working Paper, eds. R. Bauböck, and C. Joppke, EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2010/41, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Klarenbeek, Lea M. 2021. Reconceptualising ‘integration as a two-way process’. Migration Studies 9, no. 3: 902–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klekowski von Koppenfels, A. 2010. Citizenship tests could signal that European states perceive themselves as immigration countries. In How liberal are citizenship tests? RSC Working Paper, eds. R. Bauböck, and C. Joppke, EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2010/41, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Kostakopoulou, Dora. 2010a. Matters of control: Integration tests, naturalisation reform and probationary citizenship in the United Kingdom. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36, no. 5: 829–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostakopoulou, Dora. 2010b. The anatomy of civic integration. The Modern Law Review 73, no. 6: 933–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostakopoulou, Dora, 2010c. What liberalism is commited to and why current citizenship policies fail this test. In How Liberal Are Citizenship Tests? RSC Working Paper eds. R. Bauböck and C. Joppke. San Domenico di Fiesole: EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2010/41, 15–14.
   Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, Will. 2001. Politics in the vernacular: Nationalism, multiculturalism, and citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larin, S.J. 2020. Is it really about values? Civic nationalism and migrant integration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46, no. 1: 127–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindahl, Hans. 2014. Fault lines of globalization: Legal order and the politics of a-legality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindahl, Hans. 2018. Authority and the globalisation of inclusion and exclusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lucassen, L. 2005. The immigrant threat: The integration of old and new migrants in Western Europe since 1850. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, Dawne. 2012. Who am I and who are we? Conflicting narratives of collective selfhood in stigmatized groups. American Journal of Sociology 117, no. 5: 1336–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouritsen, Per, Daniel Faas, Nasar Meer, and Nynke de Witte. 2019a. Leitkultur debates as civic integration in North-Western Europe: The nationalism of ‘values’ and ‘good citizenship’. Ethnicities 19, no. 4: 632–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouritsen, Per, K Kriegbaum Jensen, and Stephen J Larin. 2019b. Introduction: Theorizing the civic turn in European integration policies. Ethnicities 19, no. 4: 595–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozetič, K. 2022. A help or hindrance? Highly educated refugees’ perceptions of the role of civic integration programmes in accessing the labour market in Oslo, Malmö and Munich. Comparative Migrations Studies 10, no. 8: 1–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pettersson, Jonna. 2018. The question of political community: Sameness, logos, space. London: Rowman & Littlefield International Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Phillimore, Jenny, Rachel Humphries, and Kamran Khan. 2018. Reciprocity for new migrant integration: Resource conservation, investment and exchange. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44, no. 2: 215–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, Paul. 1996. The erosion of tolerance and the resistance of the intolerable. Diogenes 44, no. 176: 189–201.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, Paul. 2008. Oneself as another. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, Paul. 2010. Being a stranger. Theory, Culture & Society 27, no. 5: 37–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Roermund, Bert. 2013. Legal thought and philosophy: What legal scholarship is about. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• van Roermund, Bert. 2020. Law in the first person plural: Roots, concepts, topics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Somers, Margaret R. 1994. The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network approach. Theory and Society 23, no. 5: 605–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SOU. 2021:2. Krav på kunskaper i svenska och samhällskunskap för svenskt medborgarskap. https://regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/statens-offentliga-utredningar/2021/01/sou-20212/.
   Google Scholar
• Spehar, Andrea. 2021. Navigating institutions for integration: Perceived institutional barriers of access to the labour market among refugee women in Sweden. Journal of Refugee Studies 34, no. 4: 3907–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vink, Maarten, Anna Tegunimataka, Floris Peters, and Pieter Bevelander. 2020. Long-term heterogeneity in immigrant naturalization: The conditional relevance of civic integration and dual citizenship. European Sociological Review 37, no. 5: 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visker, R. 2004. The inhuman condition: Looking for difference after Levinas and Heidegger. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Zahavi, Dan. 2021. We in me or me in we? Collective intentionality and selfhood. Journal of Social Ontology 7, no. 1: 1–20.
   Google Scholar