Young people in coerced drug treatment: Does the UK Drug Intervention Programme provide a useful and effective service to young offenders?

References

• Aldhous P. Breaking the cycle of drugs and crime. 2006, Available from: www.newscientist.com
   Google Scholar
• Bennett T, Holloway K. Drug use and offending: Summary results of the first two years of the NEW-ADAM programme. The Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, Home Office. Findings 2004; 179
   Google Scholar
• Brecht ML, Anglin MD, Wang JC. Treatment effectiveness for legally coerced versus voluntary methadone clients. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 1993; 19: 89–106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byqvist S, Olsson B. Male drug abuse, criminality and subcultural affiliation in a career perspective. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 1998; 30: 53–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byqvist S. Criminality among female drug abusers. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 1999; 31: 353–362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• http://www.archive.official-documents.co.uk/document/cm39/3945/3945.htm, Cabinet Office 1998. Tackling drugs to build a better Britain: The Government's Ten-Year Strategy for tackling drugs misuse
   Google Scholar
• http://www.ibr.tcu.edu./evidence/CESTNormsTotal25-75.pdf, CEST score profiles Means; and Norms for client functioning. 2005
   Google Scholar
• Ciraulo DA, Piechniczek-Buczek J, Iscan EN. Outcome predictors in substance use disorders. Psychiatric Clinic of North America 2003; 26: 381–409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coid J, Carvell A, Kittler Z, Healey A, Henderson J. Opiates, criminal behaviour, and methadone treatment. Home Office, London 2000
   Google Scholar
• Davies JB. The myth of addiction. Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam 1997
   Google Scholar
• De Leon G, Melnick G, Tims FM. The role of motivation and readiness in treatment and recovery. Relapse and recovery processes in the addictions, JJ Platt, FM Leukefeld. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT 2001; 141–171
   Google Scholar
• Ditton J, Hammersley RH. The typical cocaine user. Druglink 1994; 9: 11–12
   Google Scholar
• Edmunds M, May T, Hearndenn J, Hough M. Arrest referral: Emerging lessons from research. Drugs Prevention Initiative Paper 23, Home Office. 1998
   Google Scholar
• Faupel CE. Shooting dope: Career patterns of hard-core heroin users. Gainesville University of Florida Press. 1991; 24–55
   Google Scholar
• Goldman F. Drug abuse, crime and economics: The dismal limits of social choice. The drugs–crime connection, JA Inciardi. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA 1981; 67–84
   Google Scholar
• Gossop M, Darke S, Griffiths P, Hando J, Powis B, Hall W, Strang J. The Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS): Psychometric properties of the SDS in English and Australian samples of heroin, cocaine and amphetamine users. Addiction 1995; 90: 607–614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gossop M, Marsden J, Stewart D. NTORS at one year. The National Treatment Outcome Research Study: Changes in substance use, health and criminal behaviour at one year after intake. Department of Health, London 1998
   Google Scholar
• Gossop M, Marsden J, Stewart D. The National Treatment Outcome Research Study (NTORS): 4–5 year follow-up results. Addiction 2003; 98: 291–303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison LD, Backenheimer M. Research careers in unraveling the drug-crime nexus in the U.S. Substance Use and Misuse 1998; 33: 1763–2003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway K, Bennet T, Farrington D. The effectiveness of criminal justice and treatment programmes in reducing drug-related crime: a systematic review. Home Office, London 26 May, 2005, Home Office Online Report
   Google Scholar
• Hough M, McSweeney T, Turnbull P. A review paper prepared for DrugScope's submission to the Home Affairs Select Committee. Criminal Policy Research Unit. 2000, Available from: http://www.drugscope.org.uk/druginfo/evidence-select/drugscrime.htm
   Google Scholar
• Lu NT, Taylor BG, Riley KJ. The validity of adult arrestee self-reports of crack cocaine use. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 2001; 27: 399–419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden J, Gossop G, Stewart D, Best D, Farrell M, Strang J. The Maudsley Addiction Profile (MAP): A brief instrument for assessing treatment outcome. Addiction 1998; 93: 1857–1867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morral AR, McCaffrey D, Iguchi MY. Hardcore drug users claim to be occasional users: Drug use frequency underreporting. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2000; 57: 193–202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker H, Kirby P. Methadone maintenance and crime reduction on Merseyside. Crime detection and prevention series, paper 72. Home Office Police Research Group. 1996, Available from: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/prgpdfs/cdp72bf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pearson G. The new heroin users. Basil Blackwell, Oxford 1987
   Google Scholar
• Roe S. Drug Misuse declared: Findings from the 2004/5 British Crime Survey. Home Office Statistical Bulletin 2005, Available from: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/index.htm (Accessed 24/11/06)
   Google Scholar
• Simpson DD, Sells SB. Effectiveness of treatment for drug abuse: An overview of the DARP research program. Advances in Alcohol and Substance Abuse 1982; 2: 7–29
   Google Scholar
• Simpson DD, Knight K. TCU data collection forms for correctional residential treatment. Texas Christian University, Institute of Behavioral Research., Fort Worth 1998, Available from: www.ibr.tcu.edu. (accessed 22 September 2006)
   Google Scholar
• Singleton N, Murray R, Tinsley L, editors. Measuring different aspects of problem drug use: Methodological developments, Home Office Online Report. Home Office, London 16 June, 2006
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull PJ, McSweeney T, Hough M. Drug Treatment and Testing Orders: Final evaluation report. Home Office, HORS 212. London 2000
   Google Scholar