Consumer protection in licensed online gambling markets in France: the role of responsible gambling tools

References

• Autorité de Régulation du Jeu en Ligne (ARJEL). 2015. Rapport d’activité 2014-2015 [Annual Report 2014-2015]. Paris: ARJEL.
   Google Scholar
• Auer M, Griffiths M. 2013a. Behavioral tracking tools, regulation, and corporate social responsibility in online gambling. Gam Law Rev Econ. 17:579–583.
   Google Scholar
• Auer M, Griffiths M. 2013b. Voluntary limit setting and player choice in most intense online gamblers: an empirical study of gambling behaviour. J Gambl Stud. 29:647–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auer M, Griffiths M. 2014. Personalized feedback in the promotion of responsible gambling: a brief overview. Responsib Gambl Rev. 1:27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Auer M, Malisching D, Griffiths M. 2014. Is ‘pop-up‘messaging in online slot machine gambling effective as a responsible gambling strategy? An empirical research note. J Gambl Issues. 29:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Berthaud C, Brabant M, Rivoisy J, Cholley F, Dardayrol J, Goulam Ally Y, Pouzoulet J. 2008. Rapport de la mission sur l’ouverture du marché des jeux d’argent et de hazard [Mission report on opening the gambling market]. Paris: Inspection générale des Finances. (Report no. 2007-M-107-02).
   Google Scholar
• Broda A, LaPlante D, Nelson S, LaBrie R, Bosworth L, Shaffer H. 2008. Virtual harm reduction efforts for Internet gambling: effects of deposit limits on actual Internet sports gambling behavior. Harm Reduct J. 5:27–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody A. 2015. Pour une approche du gambling en termes de jeu [An approach to gambling in terms of game]. Sci Jeu [Internet]. [cited 2016 Sep 7]. p. 1–13. Available from: https://sdj.revues.org/357.
   Google Scholar
• Costes JM, Eroukmanoff V, Richard JB, Tovar ML. 2015a. Les jeux d’argent et de hasard en France en 2014 [Gambling in France in 2014]. Paris: Observatoire des jeux.
   Google Scholar
• Costes JM, Kairouz S, Eroukmanoff V, Monson E. 2015b. Gambling patterns and problems of gamblers on licensed and unlicensed sites in France. J Gambl Stud. 32:79–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cour des comptes 2016. La régulation des jeux d’argent et de hasard [Regulation of gambling]. Paris: Comité d’évaluation de contrôle des politiques publiques de l’Assemblée nationale.
   Google Scholar
• Degermann V, Alezra JP. 2011. Le droit pénal du jeu. [Criminal law on gambling]. Pouvoirs. 139:103–118.
   Google Scholar
• Escande M. 2013. Droit des jeux d’argent et de hasard: les mutations de l’ordre public. [Gambling law: Shifts in public order]. Paris: L’Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. Online gambling in the internal market [Internet]. Commission Staff working document. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52012SC0345.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2014. Recommendation of 14 July 2014 on principles for the protection of consumers and players of online gambling services and for the prevention of minors from gambling online [Internet]. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32014H0478&from=EN.
   Google Scholar
• Gainsbury S. 2012. Internet gambling: current research findings and implications. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gainsbury S, Aro D, Ball D, Tobar C, Russell A. 2015. Optimal content for warning messages to enhance consumer decision making and reduce problem gambling. J Bus Res. 68:2093–2101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gainsbury S, Parke J, Suhonen N. 2013. Consumer attitudes towards internet gambling: perceptions of responsible gambling policies, consumer protection, and regulation of online gambling sites. Computers Hum Behav. 29:235–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Generation NT (GNT). (2016 Aug 23). Jeux d’argent en ligne: un outil pour prévenir l’addiction [Online gambling: a tool to prevent addiction]. Generation NT [Internet]. [cited 2016 Aug 23]. Available from: http://www.generation-nt.com/jeux-argent-ligne-outil-prevenir-addiction-actualite-1931951.html.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths M, Parke J, Wood R, Rigbye J. 2010. Online poker gambling in university students: further findings from an online survey. Int J Ment Health Addiction. 8:82–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths M, Wood R, Parke J. 2009. Social responsibility tools in online gambling: a survey of attitudes and behavior among Internet gamblers. Cyberpsychol Behav. 12:413–421.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guillenchimdt-Guignot A. 2013. La responsabilité des opérateurs de jeux en ligne [The responsibility of online gambling operators]. In: Guilhem J, editor. Jeu, argent et droit [Gambling, money and law]. Paris: Dalloz; p. 117–130.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock L, Schellinck T, Schrans T. 2008. Gambling and corporate social responsibility (CSR): re-defining industry and state roles on duty of care, host responsibility and risk management. Policy Soc. 27:55–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris A, Griffiths M. 2016. A critical review of the harm-minimisation tools available for electronic gambling. J Gambl Stud. 33:187–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayer T, Meyer G. 2011. Internet self-exclusion: characteristics of self-excluded gamblers and preliminary evidence for its effectiveness. Int J Ment Health Addiction. 9:296–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hing N. 2001. Changing the odds: a study of corporate social principles and practice in addressing problem gambling. J Bus Eth. 33:115–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hing N. 2003. An assessment of member awareness, perceived adequacy and perceived effectiveness of responsible gambling strategies in Sydney clubs. Sydney: Southern Cross University, School of Tourism and Hospitality Management.
   Google Scholar
• Hing N, Cherney L, Blaszczynski A, Gainsbury S, Lubman D. 2014. Do advertising and promotions for online gambling increase gambling consumption? An exploratory study. Int Gambl Stud. 14:394–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khazaal Y, Chatton A, Bouvard A, Khiari H, Achab A, Zullino D. 2011. Internet poker websites and pathological gambling prevention policy. J Gambl Stud. 29:51–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingma S. 2015. Paradoxes of risk management. Social responsibility and self-exclusion in Dutch casinos. Cult Organ. 21:1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung T, Snell R. 2015. Attraction or distraction? Corporate social responsibility in Macao’s gambling industry. J Bus Eth. [Internet]. [cited 2016 Sep 7]. Available from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-015-2890-z
   Google Scholar
• Lucar C, Wiebe J, Philander K. 2013. Monetary limits tools for internet gamblers: a review of their availability, implementation and effectiveness online. Guelph: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Lycka M. 2014. Taxation of gambling in Europe: barrier to entry into new markets? Gam Law Rev Econ. 18:288–296.
   Google Scholar
• Marionneau V. 2015. Justifications of national gambling policies in France and Finland. Nord Stud Alcohol Drugs. 32:295–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer G, Hayer T. 2010. Die Effektivität der Spielsperre als Maßnahme des Spielerschutzes [The effectiveness of self-exclusion as a measure of player protection], Frankfurt: Lang
   Google Scholar
• Ministère de l’Intérieur 2012. Comment peut-on se faire interdire de jeux? [Internet]. c2012-2016. Paris: Ministère de l’Intérieur; [cited 2016 Sep 7]. Available from: http://www.interieur.gouv.fr/A-votre-service/Mes-demarches/Loisirs/Temps-libre/Jeux-d-argent/Poker-en-ligne/Questions-Reponses/Comment-peut-on-se-faire-interdire-de-jeux.
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan S, Blaszczynski A. 2010. Impact of mode of display and message content of responsible gambling signs for electronic gaming machines on regular gamblers. J Gambl Stud. 26:67–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson S, LaPlante D, Peller A, Schumann A, LaBrie R, Shaffer H. 2008. Real limits in the virtual world: self-limiting behavior of internet gamblers. J Gambl Stud. 24:463–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission. 2010. Gambling. Canberra: Australian Government, Productivity Commission. (Report no. 50).
   Google Scholar
• Quinn F. 2001. First do no harm: what could be done by casinos to limit pathological gambling. Manage Decis Econ. 22:133–142.
   Google Scholar
• Rossow I, Hansen M. 2016. Gambling and gambling policy in Norway-an exceptional case. Addiction. 111:593–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schüll ND. 2012. Addiction by design: machine gambling in Las Vegas. Princeton: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smeaton M, Griffiths M. 2004. Internet gambling and social responsibility: an exploratory study. Cyberpsychol Behav. 7:49–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spapens T. 2014. Illegal gambling. In: Paoli L, editor. The Oxford handbook of organized crime. Oxford: University Press; p. 402–418.
   Google Scholar
• Spillemyndigheten. 2016. ROFUS: Exclusion from gambling [Internet]. [cited 2016 Dec 22]. Available at: https://spillemyndigheden.dk/en/rofus-exclusion-gambling.
   Google Scholar
• Spilka S, Le Nézet O. 2016. Consommation de tabac, alcool, cannabis et autres drogues en France et en Europe, à 16 ans. Résultats de l’enquête européenne ESPAD 2015. [Consumption of tobacco, cannabis and other drugs in France and in Europe among 16-year-olds. Results from the European ESPAD 2015 survey]. Paris: Observatoire français des drogues et des toxicomanies.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart M, Wohl M. 2013. Pop-up messages, dissociation, and craving: how monetary limit reminders facilitate adherence in a session of slot machine gambling. Psychol Addict Behav. 27:268–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tovar ML, Costes JM, Eroukmanoff V. 2013. Les jeux d’argent et de hasard sur Internet en France en 2012. [Online gambling in France in 2012]. [Internet]. Paris: Observatoire des jeux; [cited 2016 Sep 7]. Available at: http://www.economie.gouv.fr/files/note_6.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Trucy F. 2011. Les multiples aspects d'un phénomène social majeur. [Multiple aspects of a major social phenomenon]. Pouvoirs. 139:65–76.
   Google Scholar
• Valleur M. 2015. Gambling and gambling-related problems in France. Addiction. 110:1872–1876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weibe J. 2008. Internet gambling: strategies to recruit and retain customers. Guelph: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Williams RJ, West BL, Simpson RI. 2007. Prevention of problem gambling: a comprehensive review of the evidence. Guelph: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Wood R, Wohl M. 2015. Assessing the effectiveness of a responsible gambling behavioural feedback tool for reducing the gambling expenditure of at-risk players. Int Gambl Stud. 5:324–339.
   Google Scholar
• Woolley R, Livingstone C. 2010. Into the zone: innovating in the Australian poker machine industry. In: Kingma S, editor. Global gambling: cultural perspectives on gambling organization. New York: Routledge; p. 38–63.
   Google Scholar
• Yani-de-Soriano M, Javed U, Yousafzai S. 2012. Can an industry be socially responsible if its products harm consumers? The case of online gambling. J Bus Ethics. 110:481–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar