51,389
Views
61
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Challenging the brain disease model of addiction: European launch of the addiction theory network

, , , , , , & show all

References

  • Animal Farm. 2014. Editorial. Nature. 506:5.
  • Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. 1989. Principles of biomedical ethics. 3rd ed. New York (NY): Oxford University Press.
  • Berridge KC. 2017. Is addiction a brain disease? Neuroethics. 10:29–33.
  • Best D, Albertson K, Irving J, Lightowlers C, Mama-Rudd A, Chaggar A. 2015. UK life in recovery survey. Sheffield (UK): Sheffield Hallam University.
  • Childress JF. 1997. Practical reasoning in bioethics. Bloomington (IN): Indiana University Press.
  • Faden RR, Beauchamp TL. 1986. A history and theory of informed consent. New York (NY): Oxford University Press.
  • Fenton T, Wiers RW. 2017. Free will, black swans and addiction. Neuroethics. 10:157–165.
  • Goldstein RZ, Bechara A, Garavan H, Childress AR, Paulus MP, Volkow ND. 2009. The neurocircuitry of impaired insight in drug addiction. Trends Cogn Sci (Regul Ed) Sci. 13:372–380.
  • Goldstein RZ, Volkow ND. 2002. Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. Am J Psychiatry. 159:1642–1652.
  • Hall W, Carter A, Forlini C. 2014. The brain disease model of addiction: is it supported by the evidence and has it delivered on its promises? Lancet Psychiatry. 2:105–110.
  • Hall W, Carter A, Forlini C. 2015. Brain disease model of addiction: misplaced priorities? Lancet Psychiatry. 2:867.
  • Heather N. 2017a. Is the concept of compulsion useful in the explanation or description of addictive behaviour and experience? Addict Behav Reports. 6:15–38.
  • Heather N. 2017b. Q: Is addiction a brain disease or a moral failing? A: neither. Neuroethics. 10:115–124.
  • Heather N, Segal G. 2017. Addiction and choice: rethinking the relationship. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press.
  • Heim D. 2014. Addiction: not just brain malfunction (Letter). Nature. 507:40.
  • Heyman GM. 2009. Addiction: a disorder of choice. Cambridge (MS): Harvard University Press.
  • Heyman GM, Mims V. 2017. What addicts can teach us about addiction: a natural history approach. In Heather N, Segal G, editors. Addiction and choice: rethinking the relationship. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; p. 385–408.
  • Hibbert L, Best D. 2011. Assessing recovery and functioning in former problem drinkers at different stages of their recovery journey. Drug Alcohol Rev. 30:12–20.
  • Kelly K. 2017. Is Alcoholics Anonymous religious, spiritual, neither? Findings from 25 years of mechanisms of behaviour change research. Addiction. 112:929–936.
  • Koob GF, Le Moal M. 1997. Drug abuse: hedonic homeostatic dysregulation. Science. 278:52–58.
  • Koob GF, Volkow ND. 2010. Neurocircuitry of addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology. 35:217–238.
  • Leshner AI. 1997. Addiction is a brain disease, and it matters. Science. 278:45–47.
  • Lewis M. 2015. The biology of desire: why addiction is not a disease. New York (NY): PublicAffairs.
  • Lewis M. 2017. Addiction and the brain: development, not disease. Neuroethics. 10:7–18.
  • Longabaugh R, Wirtz PW, Zywiak WH, O'Malley SS. 2010. Network support as a prognostic indicator of drinking outcomes: the COMBINE study. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 71:837–846.
  • McQuaid RJ, Malik A, Moussouni K, Baydack N, Stargardter M, Morrisey M. 2017. Life in recovery from addiction in Canada. Ottawa, Ontario Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction.
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse. 2008. Drugs, brains, and behavior: the science of addiction, revised ed. Washington (DC): National Institute on Drug Abuse.
  • Popper K. 1992. The logic of scientific discovery. London (UK): Routledge.
  • Robinson TE, Berridge KC. 1993. The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 18:247–291.
  • Schacht JP, Anton RF, Myrick H. 2012. Functional neuroimaging studies of alcohol cue reactivity: a quantitative meta-analysis and systematic review. Addict Biol. 18:121–133.
  • Schulte MHJ, Cousijn J, den Uyl TE, Goudriaan AE, van den Brink W, Veltman DJ, Schilt T, Wiers RW. 2014. Recovery of neurocognitive functions following sustained abstinence after substance dependence and implications for treatment. Clin Psychol Rev. 34:531–550.
  • Seear K. 2017. The emerging role of lawyers as addiction ‘quasi-experts’. Int J Drug Policy. 44:183–191.
  • Sheedy CK, Whitter M. 2009. Guiding principles and elements of recovery-oriented systems of care: what do we know from the research? HHS Publication No. (SMA) 09–4439. Rockville MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
  • Snoek A, Levy N, Kennett J. 2016. Strong-willed but not successful: the importance of strategies in recovery from addiction. Addict Behav Reports. 4:102–107.
  • Vandeveer D. 1986. Paternalistic intervention: the moral bounds on beneficence. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
  • Volkow N, Koob G. 2015. Brain disease model of addiction: why is it so controversial? Lancet Psychiatry. 2:677–679.
  • Volkow ND, Koob GF, McLellan AT. 2016. Neurobiologic advances from the brain disease model of addiction. N Engl J Med. 374:363–371.
  • Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Fowler JS, Telang F. 2008. Overlapping neuronal circuits in addiction and obesity: Evidence of systems pathology. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 363:3191–3200.
  • Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Tomasi D, Baler RD. 2013. Obesity and addiction: neurobiological overlaps. Obes Rev. 14:2–18.
  • Wiers RW, Field M, Stacy AW. 2016. Passion’s slave? Conscious and unconscious cognitive processes in alcohol and drug abuse. In: Sher KJ, editor, The Oxford handbook of substance use and substance use disorders. vol 1. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; p. 1–80.
  • Witkiewitz K, Marlatt GA. 2004. Relapse prevention for alcohol and drug problems: that was zen, this is tao. Am Psychol. 59:224–235.
  • Ziauddeen H, Farooqi IS, Fletcher PC. 2012. Obesity and the brain: how convincing is the addiction model? Nat Rev Neurosci. 13:279–286.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.