Dark nudges in gambling

References

• Akerlof GA, Shiller RJ. 2015. Phishing for phools: the economics of manipulation and deception. New York: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson G, Nichols M, Oleson T. 2000. The menace of competition and gambling deregulation. J Econ Issues. 34:621–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayton P. 1997. How to be incoherent and seductive: bookmakers' odds and support theory. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 72:99–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Gill O. 2012. Seduction by contract: Law, economics, and psychology in consumer markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blaszczynski A, Collins P, Fong D, Ladouceur R, Nower L, Shaffer HJ, Tavares H, Venisse J. 2011. Responsible gambling: general principles and minimal requirements. J Gambl Stud. 27:565–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhagiar R, Cortis D, Newall PWS. 2018. Why do some soccer bettors lose more money than others? J Behav Exp Finance. doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2018.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy R, Loussouarn C, Pisac A. 2013. Fair game: Producing gambling research - the goldsmiths report. London: Goldsmiths, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Constantinou AC, Fenton NE. 2013. Profiting from arbitrage and odds biases of the european football gambling market. J Gambl Business Econ. 7:41–70.
   Google Scholar
• Coren Mitchell V. 2017. A stupid gamble on evil machines. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/aug/19/a-stupid-gamble-on-evil-machines
   Google Scholar
• Dixon MJ, Harrigan KA, Sandhu R, Collins K, Fugelsang JA. 2010. Losses disguised as wins in modern multi‐line video slot machines. Addiction. 105:1819–1824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrest D, Simmons R. 2001. Globalisation and efficiency in the fixed-odds soccer betting market. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Gambling Commission. 2017. Industry statistics. april 2013 to march 2016. updated to include october 2015 to septmber 2016. Retrieved from http://live-gamblecom.cloud.contensis.com/PDF/survey-data/Gambling-industry-statistics.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ginley MK, Whelan JP, Pfund RA, Peter SC, Meyers AW. 2017. Warning messages for electronic gambling machines: evidence for regulatory policies. Addict Res Theory. 25:495–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths M. 1999. Gambling technologies: prospects for problem gambling. J Gambl Stud. 15:265–283.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grinols EL. 2004. Gambling in america: costs and benefits. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heidhues P, Kőszegi B, Murooka T. 2016a. Exploitative innovation. Am Econ J. 8:1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Heidhues P, Kőszegi B, Murooka T. 2016b. Inferior products and profitable deception. Rev Econ Stud. 84:323–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killick EA, Griffiths MD. 2018. In-play sports betting: a scoping study. Int J Ment Health Addict. doi: 10.1007/s11469-018-9896-6
   Google Scholar
• Kohavi R, Longbotham R. 2017. Online controlled experiments and a/b testing. In C. Sammut, & G. I. Webb (Eds.), Encyclopedia of machine learning and data mining (pp. 922–929). Boston (MA): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Korn DA, Shaffer HJ. 1999. Gambling and the health of the public: adopting a public health perspective. J Gambl Stud. 15:289–365.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langer EJ. 1975. The illusion of control. J Pers Soc Psychol. 32:311–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone C, Adams PJ. 2011. Harm promotion: observations on the symbiosis between government and private industries in australasia for the development of highly accessible gambling markets. Addiction. 106:3–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone C, Adams PJ. 2016. Clear principles are needed for integrity in gambling research. Addiction. 111:5–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Gonzalez H, Estévez A, Griffiths M. 2017. Marketing and advertising online sports betting: a problem gambling perspective. J Sport Social Issues.41:256–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mairs N. 2018. Philip hammond ‘blocked curbs on betting machines’ over lost tax revenue fears. Retrieved from https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/culture/news/94582/philip-hammond-%E2%80%98blocked-curbs-betting-machines%E2%80%99-over-lost-tax-revenue
   Google Scholar
• Markham F, Young M. 2015. “Big gambling”: the rise of the global industry-state gambling complex. Addict Res Theory. 23:1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matz SC, Kosinski M, Nave G, Stillwell DJ. 2017. Psychological targeting as an effective approach to digital mass persuasion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 114:12714–12719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller H, E, Thomas S, L. 2017. The problem with ‘responsible gambling’: impact of government and industry discourses on feelings of felt and enacted stigma in people who experience problems with gambling. Addict Res Theory. 26:85–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller HE, Thomas SL, Smith KM, Robinson P. 2016. Surveillance, responsibility and control: an analysis of government and industry discourses about “problem” and “responsible” gambling. Addict Res Theory. 24:163–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newall P. 2011. The intelligent poker player. Las Vegas, Nevada: Two Plus Two Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Newall P. 2013. Further limit hold ‘em: Exploring the model poker game. Las Vegas, Nevada: Two Plus Two Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Newall PWS. 2015. How bookies make your money. Judgm Decis Mak. 10:225–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newall PWS. 2017. Behavioral complexity of british gambling advertising. Addict Res Theory. 25:505–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orford J. 2010. An unsafe bet?: The dangerous rise of gambling and the debate we should be having. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Orford J. 2005. Disabling the public interest: gambling strategies and policies for britain. Addiction. 100:1219–1225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parke J, Griffiths M. 2004. Gambling addiction and the evolution of the “near miss”. Addict Res Theory. 12:407–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petticrew M, Katikireddi SV, Knai C, Cassidy R, Hessari NM, Thomas J, Weishaar H. 2017. ‘Nothing can be done until everything is done’: the use of complexity arguments by food, beverage, alcohol and gambling industries. J Epidemiol Community Health. 71:1078–1083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid R. 1986. The psychology of the near miss. J Gambling Stud Behav. 2:32–39.
   Google Scholar
• Reith G, Dobbie F. 2013. Gambling careers: a longitudinal, qualitative study of gambling behaviour. Addict Res Theory. 21:376–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schüll ND. 2012. Addiction by design: machine gambling in las vegas. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. 2008. Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. 2017. The world’s biggest gamblers. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2017/02/daily-chart-4
   Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1983. Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychol Rev. 90:293–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Koehler DJ. 1994. Support theory: a nonextensional representation of subjective probability. Psychol Rev.101:547–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss-Cohen L, Konstantinidis E, Speekenbrink M, Harvey N. 2018. Task complexity moderates the influence of descriptions in decisions from experience. Cognition. 170:209–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar