Living ‘good lives’: using mentoring to support desistance and recovery

References

• Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD). 2013. Recovery from drug and alcohol dependence: an overview of the evidence. London (UK): Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs.
   Google Scholar
• Aitken J. 2014. Meaningful mentoring. London (UK): Centre for Social Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Bardens J, Grimwood G. 2013. Introducing ‘payment by results’ in offender rehabilitation and other reforms. London: House of Commons Library.
   Google Scholar
• BBC News. 2012. Prison gates mentor plan for released inmates. BBC News, Nov 20. Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20399401
   Google Scholar
• Beckwith M, Bliuc A-M, Best D. 2016. What the recovery movement tells us about prefigurative politics. J Soc Polit Psych. 4:238–251.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett T, Holloway K. 2007. Drug-crime connections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Best D, Andersson C, Irving J, Edwards M. 2017. Recovery identity and wellbeing: is it better to be ‘recovered’ or ‘in recovery’? J Groups Addict Recov. 12:27–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best B, Ball G. 2011. Recovery and public policy: driving the strategy through raising political awareness. J Groups Addict Recov. 6:7–19.
   Google Scholar
• Best D, Laudet A. 2010. The potential of recovery capital. London (UK): RSA.
   Google Scholar
• Best D, Loudon L, Powell D, Groshkova T, White W. 2013. Identifying and recruiting recovery champions: exploratory action research in Barnsley, South Yorkshire. J Groups Addict Recov. 8:169–184.
   Google Scholar
• Birkett G. 2017. Media politics and penal reform: influencing women’s imprisonment. London (UK): Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Boaz A, Pawson R. 2005. The perilous road from evidence to policy: five journeys compared. J Soc Pol. 34:175–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchan L. 2017. Government accused of cutting vital drug and alcohol services as £43m slashed from addiction budgets. The Independent, Sept 24. Available from: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/government-cuts-drug-alcohol-services-43m-addiction-budgets-jonathan-ashworth-nhs-a7964826.html
   Google Scholar
• Bulman M. 2017. Drug and alcohol treatment funding slashed across England by 16% in four years. The Independent, Aug 25. Available from: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/spending-on-drug-and-alcohol-treatment-slashed-by-105m-in-four-years-a7912531.html
   Google Scholar
• Brewster D. 2018. The structured ambivalence of cannabis control in England and Wales. Int J Drug Policy. 53:125–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown M, Ross S. 2010a. Assisting and supporting women released from prison: is mentoring the answer? Curr Iss Criminal Justice. 22:217–232.
   Google Scholar
• Brown M, Ross S. 2010b. Mentoring, social capital and desistance: a study of women released from prison. Aust NZ J Criminol. 43:31–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairney P, Jones M. 2016. Kingdon’s multiple streams approach: what is the empirical impact of this universal theory? Policy Stud J. 44:37–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clancy A, Lane J, Morgan B, Maguire M. 2006a. Moving forward with mentoring: an evaluation of the transitional support scheme in Wales. Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government.
   Google Scholar
• Clancy A, Hudson K, Maguire M, Peake R, Raynor P, Vanstone M, Kynch J. 2006b. Getting out and staying out: results of the resettlement pathfinders. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cloud W, Granfield R. 2008. Conceptualising recovery capital: expansion of a theoretical construct. Subst Use Misuse. 43:1971–1986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colman C, Vander Laenen F. 2012. ‘Recovery came first’: desistance versus recovery in the criminal careers of drug-using offenders. Scientific World J. 2012:657–671.
   Google Scholar
• Corcoran M, Grotz J. 2016. Deconstructing the panacea of volunteering in criminal justice. In: Hucklesby A, Corcoran M. editors. The voluntary sector and criminal justice. London (UK): Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Das J, Salam R, Arshad A, Finkelstein M, Bhutta Z. 2016. Interventions for adolescent substance abuse: an overview of systematic reviews. J Adolesc Health. 59:S61–S75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health. 2010. The Patel report: reducing drug-related crime and rehabilitating offenders. London (UK): Department of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Disley E, Donmall M, Jones A, Mason T, Moretti A, McSweeney T, Millar T, Pierce M, Rubin J, Sutton M, Taylor P, et al. 2015. Evaluation of the drugs and alcohol recovery payment by results pilot programme: final report. Manchester: University of Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Duke K. 2013. From crime to recovery: the reframing of British drugs policy? J Drug Iss. 43:39–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrall S. 2004. Social capital, probation supervision and desistance from crime. In: Maruna S, Immarigeon R, editors, After crime and punishment: ex-offender reintegration and desistance from crime. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher D, Batty E. 2012. Offender peer interventions: what do we know? Sheffield: Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University.
   Google Scholar
• Garside R, Ford M. 2015. The coalition years: criminal justice in the UK: 2010 to 2015. London (UK): Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat K. 2005. Criminogenic needs and the transformative risk subject: hybridizations of risk/need in penality. Punishment Soc. 7:29–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison R, Cochrane A, Pendlebury M, Noonan R, Eckley L, Sumnall H, Timpson H. 2017. Evaluation of four recovery communities across England: final report for the Give it up project. Liverpool (UK): Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University.
   Google Scholar
• Hills J, Stewart K. 2005. Introduction. In: Hills J, Stewart, K. editors. A more equal society? New Labour, poverty, inequality and exclusion. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. 2010. Drug strategy 2010: reducing demand, restricting supply, building recovery: supporting people to live a drug free life. London: HM Government.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. 2017. Drug strategy 2017. London: HM Government.
   Google Scholar
• HM Inspectorate of Prisons. 2001. Through the prison gate: a joint thematic review by HM Inspectorates of Prisons and Probation. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Hartlepool New Deal for Communities. 2005. Offender mentoring pilot project: evaluation report. Hartlepool: Hartlepool New Deal for Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Hucklesby A, Wincup E. 2007. Models of resettlement work with prisoners. In: Hucklesby A, Hagley-Dickinson, L, editors. Prisoner resettlement: policy and practice. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hucklesby A, Wincup E. 2010. Introduction. In: Hucklesby A, Wincup, E, editors. Drug Interventions in Criminal Justice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hucklesby A, Wincup E. 2014. Assistance support and monitoring? The paradoxes of mentoring adults in the criminal justice system. J Soc Pol.Policy. 43:373–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hucklesby A, Worrall J. 2007. The voluntary sector and prisoners’ resettlement. In: Hucklesby A, Hagley-Dickinson L, editors. Prisoner resettlement: policy and practice. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys K. 2004. Circles of support: self-help organizations for addictions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys K, Lembke A. 2014. Recovery-oriented policy and care systems in the UK and USA. Drug Alcohol Rev.Review. 33:13–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt N. 2012. Recovery and harm reduction: time for a shared, development oriented pragmatic approach? In: Pates, R, Riley D, editors. Harm reduction in substance use and high risk behaviour. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis F. 1972. Advise, assist and befriend: a history of probation and after-care. London: National Association of Probation Officers
   Google Scholar
• Jochum V, Pratten B, Wilding K. 2005. Civil renewal and active citizenship: a guide to the debate. London: NCVO.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson W. 2013. Former prisoners ‘should be paid to mentor offenders’, minister says. The Telegraph, Mar 4. Available from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9908044/Former-prisoners-should-be-paid-to-mentor-offenders-minister-says.html
   Google Scholar
• Jolliffe D, Farrington D. 2008. The influence of mentoring on reoffending. Stockholm: Swedish Council for Crime Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• Jones M, Pierce J, Herweg N, Bernal A, Raney H, Zahariadis N. 2016. A river runs through it: a multiple stream meta-review. J Subst Abuse Treat. 36:146–158.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon J. 1995. Agendas, alternatives and public policies. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster K, Ritter A, Hughes C, Hoppe R. 2017. A critical examination of the introduction of drug detection dogs for policing of illicit drug in New South Wales, Australia using Kingdon’s ‘multiple stream’ heuristic. Evid Policy. 13:583–603.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis S, Maguire M, Raynor P, Vanstone M, Vennard J. 2003. The resettlement of short-term prisoners: an evaluation of seven pathfinder programmes, finding 200. London (UK): Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Livingston W, Baker M, Jobber S, Atkins B. 2011. A tale of the spontaneous emergence of a recovery group and the characteristics that are making it thrive: exploring the politics and knowledge of recovery. J Groups Addict Recov. 6:176–196.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd C, Page G, McKeganey N, Russell C, Liebling A. 2017. The evaluation of the drug recovery wing pilots: final report. York: University of York.
   Google Scholar
• Lockyer K, Heys R. 2016. Local commissioning, local solutions: devolving offender management. London: Reform.
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes V, Pratchett L. 2012. Local governance under the coalition government: austerity, localism and the ‘big society’. Local Govt Stud. 38:21–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGregor S. 2017. The politics of drug policy: perceptions, power and policies. London (UK): Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Malloch M. 2011. The challenge of developing and sustaining a recovery group in Glasgow: Calton athletic recovery group. J Groups Addict Recov. 6:117–131.
   Google Scholar
• McKeganey N. 2014. Clear rhetoric and blurred reality: the development of a recovery focus in UK drug treatment policy and practice. Int J Drug Policy. 25: 957–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill F, Weaver B. 2010 Changing lives? Desistance research and offender management. Glasgow: The Scottish Centre for Crime & Justice Research.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill F, Farrall S, Lightowler C, Maruna S. 2012. How and why people stop offending: discovering desistance. Available from: https://www.iriss.org.uk/resources/insights/how-why-people-stop-offending-discovering-desistance
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice. 2010. Breaking the cycle: effective punishment, rehabilitation and sentencing of offenders. London: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice. 2011. Informal mentoring to help offenders with rehabilitation. June 2. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/informal-mentoring-to-help-offenders-with-rehabilitation
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice. 2013. Transforming rehabilitation: a strategy for reform. London: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan M. 2012. The recent evolution of UK drug strategies: from maintenance to behaviour change. PPP Online. 6:29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan R. 2012. Crime and justice in the ‘Big Society’. Criminol Criminal Justice. 12:463–481.
   Google Scholar
• National Treatment Drug Monitoring System (NTDMS). 2018. Statistics for adults in specialist drug and alcohol service in England. Available from: https://www.ndtms.net/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Newburn T, Shiner M. 2005 Dealing with disaffection: young people, monitoring and social inclusion. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson R. 2004. Mentoring relationships: an explanatory review. London: ESRC UK Centre for evidence based policy and practice.
   Google Scholar
• Pickard J, Laudet A, Grahovac I. 2013 The philosophy and practice of Alcoholics Anonymous and related 12-step programs. In: Vaughn M, Perron B, editors. Social work practice in the addictions. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Reissman F. 1965. The ‘helper’ therapy principle. Social Work. 10:27–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes D. 2018. Drug and alcohol services cut by £162m as deaths increase. BBC News, May 11. Available from: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-44039996
   Google Scholar
• Rodger J. 2012. Rehabilitation revolution in the Big Society. In: Silvestri A, editor. Critical reflections: social and criminal justice in the first year of the Coalition Government. London (UK): Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Roy A, Buchanan J. 2016. The paradoxes of recovery policy: exploring the impact of austerity and responsibilisation for the citizenship claims of people with drug problems. Social Policy Admin. 50:398–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddon T. 2000. Explaining the drug-crime link: theoretical, policy and research issues. J Soc Pol. 29:95–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddon T, Ralphs R, Williams L. 2008. Risk, security and the ‘criminalization’ of British drug policy. Br J Criminol. 48:818–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth G. 2014. Coaching desistance? Life coaching for mentoring in a ‘who works’ environment. Probat J. 61:365–380.
   Google Scholar
• Social Exclusion Unit. 2002 Reducing reoffending among ex-prisoners. London (UK): Social Exclusion Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor J, Burrowes N, Disley E, Liddle M, Maguire M, Rubin J, Wright S. 2013. Intermediate outcomes of mentoring interventions: a rapid evidence assessment. London (UK): National Offender Management Service.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas R, Lorenzetti D, Spragins W. 2013. Systematic review of mentoring to prevent or reduce alcohol and drug use by adolescents. Acad Pediatr. 13:292–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tober G, Raistrick D, Crosby H, Sweetman J, Unsworth S, Suna L, Copello A. 2013. Co-producing addiction aftercare. Drugs Alcohol Today. 13:225–233.
   Google Scholar
• Tolan P, Henry D, Schoeny M, Bass A. 2008. Mentoring interventions to affect juvenile delinquency and associated problems. Oslo: Campbell Collaboration.
   Google Scholar
• Travis A. 2017. Public services face real-terms spending cuts of up to 40% in decade to 2020. The Guardian, Nov 22. Available from: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/government-cuts-drug-alcohol-services-43m-addiction-budgets-jonathan-ashworth-nhs-a7964826.htm
   Google Scholar
• UK Drug Policy Commission (UKDPC). 2012. Charting new waters: delivering drug policy at a time of radical reform and financial austerity. London (UK): UK Drug Policy Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Wadia A, Parkinson D. 2015. The informal mentoring project: a process evaluation. London (UK): National Offender Management Service.
   Google Scholar
• Ward T, Brown M. 2004. The good lives model and conceptual issues in offender rehabilitation. Psychol Crime Law. 10:243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward T, Maruna S. 2007. Rehabilitation. Abingdon (UK): Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wardle I. 2012. Five years of recovery: December 2005 to December 2010–from challenge to orthodoxy. Drugs. 19:294–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weible C, Schlager E. 2016. The multiple streams approach at the theoretical and empirical crossroads: an introduction to a special issue. Policy Stud J. 44:5–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White W. 2009. The mobilization of community resources to support long-term addiction recovery. J Subst Abuse Treat. 36:146–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White W. 2011. The emerging UK recovery movement. J Groups Addict Recov. 6:5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Willis G, Ward T. 2013. The good lives model: evidence that it works. In: Craig L, Dixon L, Gannon T. editors. What works in offender rehabilitation: an evidence based approach to assessment and treatment. Chichester (UK): Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wincup E. 2013. Understanding crime and social policy. Bristol (UK): Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wincup E. 2017. Revolutionary times? The changing landscape of prisoner resettlement. In: Hudson J, Needham C, Heins E. editors. Social policy review 29: Analysis and debate in social policy, 2017. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yates R, Malloch M. 2010. The road less travelled? A short history of addiction recovery. In: Yates R, Malloch M. editors. Tackling addiction: pathways to recovery. London (UK): Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar