Let’s celebrate recovery. Inclusive Cities working together to support social cohesion

References

• Achara-Abrams I, Evans A, King J. 2011. Recovery-focused behavioural health systems transformation: a framework for change and lessons learned from Philadelphia. In: Kelly J, White W, editors. Addiction recovery management: theory, research and practice. New York: Humana Press.
   Google Scholar
• ACT Reform Advisory Council. 2017. Canberra – becoming a restorative city. Issues paper on legal and justice issues relating to restorative practices. Australia: ACT Law Reform Advisory Council.
   Google Scholar
• Beckwith M, Bliuc A-M, Best D. 2016. What the recovery movement tells us about prefigurative politics. J Soc Pol Psychol. 4(1):238–251.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett T, Holloway K, Farrington D. 2008. The statistical association between drug misuse and crime: a meta-analysis. Aggress Violent Beh. 13:107–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best D. 2016. An unlikely hero? Drug Alcohol Today. 16(1):106–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best D, Albertson K, Irving J, Lightowlers C, Mama-Rudd A, Chaggar A. 2015. The UK Life in Recovery Survey 2015: the first national UK survey of addiction recovery experiences. Project Report. Sheffield: Helena Kennedy Centre for International Just ice, Sheffield Hallam University.
   Google Scholar
• Best D, Irving J, Andersson C, Edwards M. 2017. Recovery networks and community connections: identifying connection needs and community linkage opportunities in earl recovery populations, Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly. 35(7):2–15.
   Google Scholar
• Best D, Laudet A. 2010. The potential of recovery capital. RSA Projects. London, England: Royal Society for the Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Best D, Savic M. 2015. Substance abuse and offending: pathways to recovery. In: Sheehan R, Ogloff J, editors. Working within the forensic paradigm. Cross-discipline approaches for policy and practice. London: Routledge; p. 259–271.
   Google Scholar
• Best D, Beswick T, Hodgkins S, Idle M. 2016. Recovery, ambitions, and aspirations: an exploratory project to build a recovery community by generating a skilled recovery workforce. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly. 34:3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best D, Bird K, Hunton L. 2015. Recovery as a social phenomenon: what is the role of the community in supporting and enabling recovery? In: Ronel N, Segev D, editors, Positive criminology. Abingdon: Routledge; p. 194–207.
   Google Scholar
• Best D, Irving J, Albertson K. 2016. Recovery and desistance: what the emerging recovery movement in the alcohol and drug area can learn from models of desistance from offending. Add Res Theory. 25:1–10. DOI:10.1080/16066359.2016.1185661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best D, Beckwith M, Haslam C, Haslam SA, Jetten J, Mawson E, Lubman DI. 2016. Overcoming alcohol and other drug addiction as a process of social identity transition: The Social Identity Model of Recovery (SIMOR). Add Res Theory. 24(2):111–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betty Ford Institute Consensus Panel. 2007. What is recovery? A working definition from the Betty Ford Institute. J Sub Abuse Treat. 33:221–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite J. 1989. Crime, shame and reintegration. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell R, Duffy K, Gaughan M, Mochrie M. 2011. Serenity café—on the road to recovery capital. J Groups Addict Rec. 6:132–163.
   Google Scholar
• Cano I, Best D, Hamilton P, Sloan J, Beckwith M, Phillips L. in preparation. Overcoming stigma as a social problem: Health and social science students’ social distance from offenders and substance users active, in desistance or in recovery, Social Science and Medicine (in preparation)
   Google Scholar
• Colman C. 2015. Stoppen met druggebruik en criminaliteit. Een verhaal van vallen en opstaan, van rugzakjes en vangnetten. Amsterdam: Het Groene Gras, Boom-Lemma.
   Google Scholar
• Cloud W, Granfield R. 2008. Conceptualising recovery capital: expansion of a theoretical construct. Sub Use Misuse. 43(12/13):1971–1986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan P, Kuwabara SA, O’Shaughnessy J. 2009. The public stigma of mental illness and drug addiction: findings from a stratified random sample. J Soc Work. 9(2):139–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan P, River L, Lundin R, Wasowski K, Campion J, Mathisen J, Goldstein H, Bergman M, Gagnon C, Kubiak MA. 2000. Stigmatizing attributions about illness. J Comm Psychol. 28:91–102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ruysscher C, Vanheule S, Vandevelde S. 2017. ‘A place to be (me)’: a qualitative study on an alternative approach to treatment for persons with dual diagnosis. Drugs: Edu Prev Pol. DOI:10.1080/09687637.2017.1375461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingle G, Stark C, Cruwys T, Best D. 2014. Breaking good: Breaking ties with social groups may be good for your recovery from substance misuse. British J Soc Psychol. 54(2):236–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards M, Soutar J, Best D. 2018. Co-producing and re-connecting: a pilot study of recovery community engagement. Drugs Alcohol Today. 18(1):39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granfield R, Cloud W. 2001. Social context and natural recovery: the role of social capital in overcoming drug-associated problems. Sub Use Misuse. 36:1543–1570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys K, Lembke A. 2014. Recovery-oriented policy and care systems in the UK and USA. Drug Alcohol Rev. 33(1):13–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jetten J, Branscombe NR, Haslam SA, Haslam C, Cruwys T. 2015. Correction: having a lot of a good thing: multiple important group memberships as a source of self-esteem. PLOS One. 10(6):1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones R, Simonson P, Singleton N. 2010. Getting serious about stigma: the problem with stigmatizing drug users. London: UK Drug Policy Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly J, White W. 2011. Addiction recovery management. Theory, research and practice. London: Humana Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk T. 2011. Connecticut's journey to a statewide recover-oriented healthcare system: strategies, successes and challenges. In: Kelly J, White W, editors. Addiction recovery management: theory, research and practice. New York: Humana Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kretzmann JP, McKnight JL. 1993. Building communities from the inside out: a path toward finding and mobilizing a community's assets. Chicago (IL): ACTA Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Laudet AB, White WL. 2008. Recovery capital as prospective predictor of sustained recovery, life satisfaction, and stress among former poly-substance users. Sub Use Misuse. 43(1):27–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leamy M, Bird V, Le Boutillier C, Williams J, Slade M. 2011. Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis. British J Psych. 199:445–452.
   Google Scholar
• Lemert EM. 1951. Social pathology. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Longabaugh R, Wirtz P, Zywiak W, O’Malley S. 2010. Network support as a prognostic indicator of drinking outcomes: The COMBINE study. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 71:837–846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh B. 2011. Narrating desistance: identity change and the 12-step script. Irish Probation J. 8:49–68.
   Google Scholar
• Maruna S. 2001. Making good: how ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Maruna S. 2011. Reentry as a rite of passage. Punishm Soc. 13(1):3–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruna S, Farrall S. 2004. Desistance from crime: a theoretical reformulation. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. 43:171–194.
   Google Scholar
• Maruna S, Lebel TP, Mitchell N, Naples N. 2006. Pygmalion in the reintegration process: desistance from crime through the looking glass. Psychol Crime Law. 10(3):271–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill F. 2014. Three aspects of desistance. Blog-post based on a short paper prepared for a University of Sheffield Centre for Criminological Research Knowledge Exchange Seminar at the British Academy in London on 15th May 2014, accessed online at http://blogs.iriss.org.uk/discoveringdesistance/2014/05/23/three-aspects-of-desistance/
   Google Scholar
• Mikhitarian B. 2015. Many faces, one voice. Las Vegas: Central Recovery Press
   Google Scholar
• Moos RH. 2007. Theory-based processes that promote the remission of substance use disorders. Clin Psychol Rev. 27:537–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugent B, Schinkel M. 2016. The pains of desistance. Criminol Crim Just. 17(5):1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Philips LA, Shaw A. 2013. Substance use more stigmatized than smoking and obesity. J Sub Use. 18(4):247–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radcliffe P, Stevens A. 2008Are drug treatment services only for ‘thieving junkie scumbags’? Drug users and the management of stigmatised identities. Soc Sci Med. 67:1065–1073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riessman F. 1965. The “Helper” therapy principle. Soc Work. 10(2):27–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Room R. 2005. Stigma, social inequality and alcohol and drug use. Drug Alcohol Rev. 24:143–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Room R, Rehm J, Trotter RT, Paglia A, Ustun TB. 2001. Cross cultural views on stigma valuation parity and societal attitudes towards disability. Seattle (WA): Hofgrebe & Huber; p. 247–291.
   Google Scholar
• Roth JD, Best D. 2014. Addiction and recovery in the UK. Oxon: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Sloan J. 2012. ‘You Can See Your Face in My Floor’: examining the function of cleanliness in an adult male prison. Howard J Crim Just. 51(4):400–410.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, Turner JC. 1979. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin, WG, Worchel S, editors, The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey (CA): Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Triple R. 2017. Evaluation report on social reintegration, accessed online at http://www.tripler-project.eu/publi/Evaluation_report_on_Social_reintegration_%20Final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Triple R. 2018. Handbook on justice interventions and alternatives to incarceration for drug abuse offenders, accessed online at http://www.tripler-project.eu/publi/Handbook-on-justice-interventions-and-alternatives-to-incarceration-for-drug-abuse-offenders.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UKDPC. 2008. UKDPC recovery consensus group: a vision of recovery. London: UK Drug Policy Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Walker L, Kobayashi L. 2015. Restorative & Therapeutic Reentry Rituals. In: Herzog-Evans, editor. Offender release and supervision: the role of Courts and the use of discretion, Ed. Evans, Netherlands: Wolf Legal Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Weston S, Honor S, Best D. 2017. A tale of two towns: a comparative study exploring the possibilities and pitfalls of social capital among people seeking recovery from substance misuse. Sub Use Misuse. 53(3):490–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White W, Cloud W. 2008. Recovery capital: a primer for addictions professionals. Counselor. 9(5):22–27.
   Google Scholar
• White W. 2008. Recovery management and recovery-oriented systems of care: scientific rationale and promosing practices. Philadelphia: Department of Behavioral Health/Mental Retardation Services.
   Google Scholar
• White W. 2010. Recovery is contagious. Keynote lecture at the NorthEast Treatment Centers (NET) Consumer Council Recognition Dinner, April 14, 2010, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Williams A. 1999. Therapeutic landscapes: the dynamic between place and wellness, introduction. Lanham: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Wilton R, DeVerteuil G. 2006. Spaces of sobriety/sites of power: examining social model alcohol recovery programs as therapeutic landscapes. Soc Sci Med. 63:649–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2001. The World Health Report 2001. Mental health: new uderstanding, new hope. Geneva: WHO.
   Google Scholar