The role of drug courts in promoting desistance and recovery: a merging of therapy and accountability

References

• Andrews D, Bonta J. Wormith J. 2011. The Risk-Needs-Responsivity (RNR) model. Crim J Behav. 38:735–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anglin MD, Longshore D, Turner S. 1999. Treatment alternatives to atreet crime: an evaluation of five programs. Crim Justice Behav. 26:168–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen I, Fishbein M. 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bassuk E, Hanson J, Greene R, Richard M, Laudet A. 2016. Peer-delivered recovery support services for addictions in the United States: a systematic review. J Subst Abuse Treat. 63:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belenko S. 2001. Research on drug courts: a critical review. 2001 update. New York: The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Belenko S. 2002. The challenges of conducting research in drug treatment court settings. Subst Use Misuse. 37:1635–1664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belenko S. 2006. Assessing released inmates for substance-abuse related service needs. Crime Delinq. 52:94–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belenko S, Bodas LaPollo A, Gesser N, Weiland D, Peters A. 2018. Integrating peer recovery support specialists into the adult drug court: lessons learned from a randomized experiment. Presented at National Association of Drug Court Professionals annual conference, Houston TX.
   Google Scholar
• Belenko S, DeMatteo D, Patapis N. 2007. Drug courts. In: Springer DW, Roberts AR, editors. Handboook of forensic mental health with victims and offenders. New York: Springer, p. 385–423.
   Google Scholar
• Belenko S, Fabrikant N, Wolff N. 2011. The long road to treatment: models of screening and admission into drug courts. Crim Just Behav. 38:1222–1243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belenko S, Foltz C, Lang MA, Sung H-E. 2004. Recidivism among high-risk drug felons: a longitudinal analysis following residential treatment. J Offender Rehab. 40:105–132.
   Google Scholar
• Belenko S, Hiller M, Hamilton L. 2013. Treating substance use disorders in the criminal justice system. Curr Psychiat Rep. 15:414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belenko S, Johnson I, Taxman F, Rieckmann T. 2016. Probation staff attitudes toward substance abuse treatment and evidence-based practices. Int J Offend Ther Comp Criminology. Online ahead of print.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belenko S, Peugh J. 2005. Estimating drug treatment needs among state prison inmates. Drug Alc Depend. 77:269–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belenko S, Spohn C. 2015. Drugs, crime, and justice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Belenko S, Sung H-E, Swern A, Donhauser C. 2008. Prosecutors and treatment diversion: The Brooklyn (NY) DTAP program. In: Worrall JL, Nugent ME, editors. The changing role of the american prosecutor. New York: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennet T, Holloway K. 2004. Drug use and offending: summary results of the first two years of the NEW-ADAM programme. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Bennet TH, Holloway K, Farrington DP. 2008. The statistical association between drug misuse and crime: a meta-analysis. Aggress Violent Behav. 13:107–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best D, Albertson K, Irving J, Lightowlers C, Mama-Rudd A, Chaggar A. 2015. UK Life in recovery survey 2015. Sheffield, UK: Helena Kennedy Centre for International Justice, Sheffield Hallam University.
   Google Scholar
• Best D, Beckwith M, Haslam C, Haslam A, Jetten J, Mawson E, Lubman D. 2015. Overcoming alcohol and other drug addiction as a process of social identity transition: the social identity model of recovery (SIMOR). Addict Res Theory. 24:111–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best D, de Alwis S. 2017. Community recovery as a public health intervention: the contagion of hope. Alc Treat Quart. 35:187–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best D, Irving J, Albertson K. 2017. Recovery and desistance: what the emerging recovery movement in the alcohol and drug area can learn from models of desistance from offending. Addict Res Theory. 25:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best D, Laudet A. 2010. The potential of recovery capital. London: RSA.
   Google Scholar
• Best D, Lubman I, Savic M, Wilson A, Dingle G, Alexander Haslam S, Jetten J. 2014. Social and transitional identity: exploring social networks and their significance in a therapeutic community setting. Therap Commun. 35:10–20.
   Google Scholar
• Betty Ford Institute Consensus Panel. 2007. What is recovery? A working definition from the Betty Ford Institute. J Subst Abuse Treat. 33:221–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhati A, Roman J. 2010. Treating drug involved offenders: simulated evidence on the prospects of going to scale. J Exp Criminol. 6:1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boles S, Miotto K. 2003. Substance abuse and violence: a review of the literature. Aggression Viol Beh. 8:155–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borkman T. 1999. Understanding self-help/mutual aid: experiential learning in the commons. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bottoms A. 2007. Place, space, crime, and disorder. In: Maguire M, Morgan, R, Reiner RT, editors. The Oxford handbook of criminology. 4th ed. Oxford York: Oxford Univ. Press, p. 528–574.
   Google Scholar
• Brantingham P, Brantingham P. 1995. Criminality of place. Eur J Crim Pol Res. 3:5–26.
   Google Scholar
• Burdon WM, Farabee D, Prendergast ML, Messina NP, Cartier J. 2003. Prison-based therapeutic community substance abuse programs—implementation and operational issues. Fed Probat. 66:3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler RK, Fletcher BW, Volkow ND. 2009. Treating drug abuse and addiction in the criminal justice system: improving public health and safety. JAMA. 301:183–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloud W, Granfield R. 2001. Natural recovery from substance dependency: lessons from treatment providers. J Social Work Pract Addict. 1:83–104.
   Google Scholar
• Colman C, Vander Laenen F. 2012. ‘Recovery came first:’ desistance versus recovery in the criminal careers of drug-using offenders. Scient World J. 2012:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Corrigan P, Kurabawa S, O’Shaughnessy J. 2009. The public stigma of mental illness and drug addiction: findings from a stratified random sample. J Social Work. 9:139–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen F, Agnew R. 2010. Criminological theory: past and present. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duwe G. 2007. Prison-based chemical dependency treatment in Minnesota: an outcome evaluation. J Exp Criminol. 6:57–81.
   Google Scholar
• Evans E, Jaffe A, Urada D, Anglin MD. 2012. Differential outcomes of court-supervised substance abuse treatment among California parolees and probationers. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 56:539–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezell M, Cohen L 2005. Desisting from crime: continuity and change in long-term crime patterns of serious chronic offenders. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fagan J. 1990. Intoxication and aggression. In: Tonry M, Wilson JQ, editors. Drugs and crime (crime and justice: a review of research, vol. 13). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, p. 241–320.
   Google Scholar
• Farrall S. 2002. Rethinking what works with offenders: probation, social context and desistance from crime. Devon: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Farrall S, Calverley A. 2006. Understanding desistance from crime. Crime and justice series. London: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farrall S, Maruna S. 2004. Desistance-focused criminal justice policy research: Introduction to a special issue on desistance from crime and public policy. Howard J Crim Just. 43:358–367.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington D. 2003. Developmental and life-course criminology: key theoretical and empirical issues. Criminology. 41:221–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher J, Fisher W, Williams S, Malloy T. 1994. Empirical tests of an information-motivation-behavioral skills model of AIDS preventive behavior. Health Psych. 13:238–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann PD, Hoskinson Jr R, Gordon M, Schwartz R, Kinlock T, Knight K, Flynn PM, Welsh WN, Stein LA, Sacks S, et al. 2012. Medication-assisted treatment in criminal justice agencies affiliated with the criminal justice-drug abuse treatment studies (CJ-DATS): availability, barriers and intentions. Subst Abuse. 33(1):9–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano P, Cernkovich S, Rudolph L. 2002. Gender, crime and desistance: towards a theory of cognitive transformation. Am J Sociol 107:990–1064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldkamp J, White M, Robinson J. 2001. Do drug courts work? Getting inside the drug court black box. J Drug Issues. 31:27–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldkamp J, White M, Robinson J. 2002. An honest chance: perspectives on drug courts. Fed Sent Reporter. 14:369–372.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein P. 1985. The drugs/violence nexus: a tripartite conceptual framework. J Drug Issues. 15:493–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfredson D, Kearley B, Najaka S, Rocha C. 2007. How drug treatment courts work: an analysis of mediators. J Res Crime Delinq. 44:3–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfredson M, Hirschi T. 1990. A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Government Accountability Office. 2005. Adult Drug Courts: evidence indicates recidivism reductions and mixed results for other outcomes. Washington (DC): U.S. Government Printing Office. GAO Publication No.05-219.
   Google Scholar
• Hedrich D, Alves P, Farrell M, Stöver H, Møller L, Mayet S. 2012. The effectiveness of opioid maintenance treatment in prison settings: a systematic review. Addiction. 107:501–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendershot C, Witkiewitz K, George W, Marlatt GA. 2011. Relapse prevention for addictive behaviors. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 6:1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiller M, Belenko S, Taxman F, Young D, Perdoni M, Saum C. 2010. Measuring drug court structure and operations: key components and beyond. Crim Just Behav. 37:933–950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hora P., Schma W, Rosenthal J. 1999. Therapeutic jurisprudence and the drug treatment court movement: revolutionizing the criminal justice system’s response to drug abuse and crime in America. Notre Dame Law Rev. 74:439–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddleston W, Marlowe D. 2011. Painting the current picture: a national report on drug courts and other problem solving courts in the United States. Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hynes C, Swern A. 2013. Drug treatment alternative-to-prison: twenty-second annual report. Brooklyn, NY: Office of the Kings County District Attorney.
   Google Scholar
• Inciardi JA, Martin SS, Butzin, CA. 2004. Five-year outcomes of therapeutic community treatment of drug-involved offenders after release from prison. Crime Delinq. 50:88–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaskutas LA, Borkman T, Laudet A, Ritter L, Witbrodt J, Subbaraman M, Stunz A, Bond J. 2014. Elements that define recovery: the experiential perspective. J Stud Alc Drugs. 75:999–1010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keene J. 2005. A case-linkage study of the relationship between drug misuse, crime, and psychosocial problems in a total criminal justice population. Addict Res Theory. 13:489–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King M, Wager J. 2005.Therapeutic jurisprudence and problem-solving judicial case management. J Judicial Admin. 15:28.
   Google Scholar
• Kras K. 2012. Offender perceptions of mandated substance abuse treatment: an exploratory analysis of offender experiences in a community-based treatment program. J Drug Issues. 43:124–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs CP, Brady T, Laird G. 2003. Jail-based substance user treatment: an analysis of retention. Subst Use Misuse. 38:1227–1258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kretzmann JP, McKnight JL. 1993. Building communities from the inside out: a path toward finding and mobilizing a community’s assets. Evanston, Ill.: Center for Urban Affairs and Policy Research, Northwestern University.
   Google Scholar
• Kumpfer K, Turner C. 2009. The social-ecology model of adolescent substance abuse: implications for prevention. Int J Addict. 25:435–463.
   Google Scholar
• Larney S, Lai W, Dolan K, Zador D. 2016. Monitoring a prison opioid treatment program over a period of change to clinical governance arrangements, 2007–2013. J Subst Abuse Treat. 70:58–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laub J, Sampson R. 2001. Understanding desistance from crime. In: Tonry M, editor. Crime and justice: annual review of research. Vol. 28. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; pp. 1–69.
   Google Scholar
• Laub J, Sampson R. 2006. Shared beginnings, divergent lives: delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laudet A. 2013. ‘Life in Recovery.’ Report on the survey findings. Washington DC; Faces and Voices of Recovery.
   Google Scholar
• Laudet A. Humphreys K. 2013. Promoting recovery in an evolving policy context: what do we know and what do we need to know about recovery support services? J Subst Abuse Treat. 45:126–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudet A, White W. 2008. Recovery capital as prospective predictor of sustained recovery, life satisfaction, and stress among former poly-substance users. Subst Use Misuse. 43:27–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp CT, Holsinger AM, Latessa EJ. 2006. Are drug courts effective: a metaanalytic review. J Comm Correct. 15:5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Marlowe D, Hardin C, Fox C. 2016. Painting the current picture: a national report on drugs and other problem-solving courts in the United States. Alexandria VA: National Drug Court Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Marlowe D, Kirby K. 1999. Effective use of sanctions in drug courts: lessons from behavioral research. National Drug Court Inst Rev. 2:11–40.
   Google Scholar
• Maruna S. 1999. Desistance and development: the psychosocial process of ‘going straight.’ Belfast, Northern Ireland: Brit Criminol Conf: Selected Proceedings. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Maruna S. 2001. Making good: how ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Maruna S, Farrall S. 2004. Desistance from crime: a theoretical reformulation. Ko¨lner Zeitschrift fu¨r Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. 43:171–94.
   Google Scholar
• Maruna S, LeBel T. 2003. Welcome home? Examining the ‘re-entry court’ concept from a strengths-based perspective. West Criminol Rev. 4(2):91–107.
   Google Scholar
• Matusow H, Dickman S, Rish J, Fong C, Dumont D, Hardin C, Marlowe D, Rosenblum A. 2013. Medication-assisted treatment in US drug courts: results from a nationwide survey of availability, barriers, and attitudes. J Subst Abuse Treat. 44:473–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCollister K, Baumer P, Davis M, Greene A, Stevens S, Dennis M. 2018. Economic evaluation of the Juvenile Drug Court/Reclaiming Futures (JDC/RF) model. J Behav Health Serv Res. 45:321–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIvor G. 2010. Beyond supervision: judicial involvement in offender management. In McNeill F, Raynor P, Trotter C, editors. Offender supervision: new directions in theory, research and practice, Cullompton: Willan Publishing; p. 215–238.
   Google Scholar
• McKay JR, Lynch KG, Shepard DS, Pettinati HM. 2005. The effectiveness of for alcohol and cocaine dependence: 24-month outcomes. Arch Gen Psychiat. 62:199–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill F. 2006. A desistance paradigm for offender management. Criminol Crim Just. 6:39–62.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill F. 2009. Towards effective practice in community supervision. Glasgow: The Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research. Retrieved from http://www.sccjr.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/McNeil_Towards.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill F, Weaver B. 2010. Changing lives? Desistance research and offender management. Glasgow, Scotland: The Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill F, Farrall S, Lightowler C, Maruna S. 2012. How and why people stop offending: discovering desistance. Glasgow: Institute for Research and Innovation in Social Services.
   Google Scholar
• Milano G, Saenz E, Clark N, Busse A, Gale J, Campello G, Mattfeld E, Maalouf W, Heikkila H, Martelli A, et al. 2017. Report on the international workshop on drug prevention and treatment in rural settings organized by United Nation Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and World Health Organization (WHO). Subst Use Misuse. 52:1801–1807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell O, Wilson D, Eggers A, MacKenzie D. 2012. Drug court’s effects on criminal offending for juveniles and adults. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 8(4):1–86.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell O, Wilson DB, MacKenzie DL. 2007. Does incarceration-based drug treatment reduce recidivism? A meta-analytic synthesis of the research. J Exp Criminol. 3:353–375.
   Google Scholar
• Mulvey E, Steinberg L, Fagan J, Cauffman E, Piquero A, Chassin L, Knight G, Brame R, Schubert C, Hecker T, Losoya S. 2004. Theory and research on desistance from antisocial activity among serious adolescent offenders. Youth Viol Juv Just. 2:213–236.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mulvey E, Steinberg L, Piquero A, Besana M, Fagan J, Schubert C, Cauffman E. 2010. Trajectories of desistance and continuity in antisocial behavior following court adjudication among serious adolescent offenders. Develop Psychopath. 22:453–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumola C, Karberg J. 2006. Drug use and dependence, State and Federal prisoners, 2004 (Pub. NCJ 213530). Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Drug Court Professionals. 2013. Adult drug court best practice standards (v. 1). Alexandria VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Drug Court Professionals. 2015. Adult drug court best practice standards (v. 2). Alexandria VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute on Drug Abuse. 2012. Principles of drug abuse treatment for criminal justice populations: a research-based guide (4th rev). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse. http://www.drugabuse.gov/sites/default/files/podat_cj_2012.pdf.Accessed 12 Jul 2013.
   Google Scholar
• National TASC. 2013. About National TASC. http://www.nationaltasc.org/about/. Accessed 10 Apr 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Nugent B, Schinkel M. 2016. The pains of desistance. Criminol Crim Just. 16:568–584.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Justice Programs. 2004. Defining drug courts: the key components (National Criminal Justice Reference No. NCJ 205621). Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs.
   Google Scholar
• Office of National Drug Control Policy. 2012. National drug control strategy, 2012: data supplement. Washington DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Pager D. 2007. Marked: race, crime, and finding work in an era of mass incarceration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson FS, Prendergast ML, Podus D, Vazan P, Greenwell L, Hamilton Z. 2012. Meta-analyses of seven of the National Institute on Drug Abuse’s principles of drug addiction treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 43:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters RH, Kearns WD, Murrin MR, Dolente AS, May RL. 1993. Examining the effectiveness of in-jail substance abuse treatment. J Offend Rehab. 19:1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Peyton E. 2001.TASC in the 21st century: a guide for practitioners and policymakers. Washington (DC): National TASC.
   Google Scholar
• Rengert G, Ratcliffe J, Chakravorty S. 2005. Policing illegal drug markets: geographic approaches to crime reduction. Monsey NY: Criminal Justice Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rex S. 1999. Desistance from offending: experiences of probation. Howard J Crim Justice. 36:366–383.
   Google Scholar
• Rose D, Clear T. 1998. Incarceration, social capital and crime: examining the unintended consequences of incarceration, Criminology. 36:441–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudes D, Lerch J, Taxman F. 2011. Implementing a reentry framework at a correctional facility: challenges to the culture. J Off Rehab. 50:467–491.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson R, Laub J. 1992. Crime and deviance in the life course. Ann Rev Sociol. 18:63–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson R, Laub J. 1993. Crime in the making: pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press,
   Google Scholar
• Sampson R, Laub J. 2003. Life course desisters? Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70. Criminology. 41:555–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satel S. 1998. Observational studies of courtroom dynamics in selected drug courts. National Drug Court Inst Rev. 1:56–87.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder R, Giordano P, Cernkovich. 2007. Drug use and desistance processes. Criminology. 45:191–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott CK, Dennis ML. 2012. The first 90 days following release from jail: findings from the Recovery Management Checkups for Women Offenders (RMCWO) experiment. Drug Alc Depend. 125:110–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheedy C, Whitter M. 2009. Guiding principles and elements of recovery-oriented systems of care: what do we know from the research? HHS Publication No. (SMA) 09-4439. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Spohn C, Holleran D. 2002. The effect of imprisonment on recidivism rates of felony offenders: a focus on drug offenders. Criminology. 40:329–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies. 2008. Results from the 2007 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings (NSDUH Series H-34, DHHS Publication No. SMA 08-4343). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2014a). Results from the 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: summary of national findings. NSDUH Series H-48, HHS Publication No. (SMA) 14-4863. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2014b). The NSDUH Report: trends in substance use disorders among males aged 18 to 49 on probation or parole. Rockville, MD: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality.
   Google Scholar
• Taxman FS. 2008. No illusion, offender and organizational change in Maryland’s proactive community supervision model. Criminol Publ Pol. 7(2):275–302.
   Google Scholar
• Taxman FS. 2014. Second generation of RNR: the importance of systemic responsivity in expanding core principles of responsivity. Fed Probation. 78:79–91.
   Google Scholar
• Taxman FS, Belenko S. 2012. Implementing evidence-based practices in community corrections and addiction treatment. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Taxman FS. Marlowe D. 2006. Risk, needs, responsivity: in action or inaction? Crime Delinq. 52:3–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taxman FS, Perdoni ML, Harrison LD. 2007. Drug treatment services for adult offenders: the state of the state. J Subst Abuse Treat. 32(3):239–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taxman FS, Thanner M. 2004. Probation from a therapeutic perspective: results from the field. Cont Issues Law. 7:39–63.
   Google Scholar
• Taxman FS, Thanner, M. 2006. Risk, need, & responsivity: it all depends. Crime Delinq. 52(1):28–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler T. 2009. Procedural justice, identity and deference to the law: what shapes rule-following in a period of transition? Aust J Psych. 61:32–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyner E, Fremouw W. 2008. The relation of methamphetamine use and violence: a critical review Aggression Viol Beh. 13:285–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uggen C. 2000. Work as a turning point in the life course of criminals: a duration model of age, employment, and recidivism. Am Sociol Rev. 65(4):529–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Roeyen S, Anderson S, Vanderplasschen W, Colman C, Vander Laenen F. 2017. Desistance in drug-using offenders: a narrative review. Eur J Criminol. 14:606–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vîlcică E, Belenko S, Hiller M, Taxman F. 2010. Exporting court innovation from the United States to continental Europe: compatibility between the drug court model and the inquisitorial justice system. Int J Compar Appl Crim Just. 34:139–172.
   Google Scholar
• Wanberg K, Milkman H. 2014. Social and Community Responsibility Therapy (SCRT): a cognitive-behavioral model for the treatment substance-abusing judicial clients. In: Tafrate RC, Mitchell D, editors. Forensic CBT: a handbook for clinical practice. 1st ed. Chapter 13. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; p. 252–277.
   Google Scholar
• Ward T, Maruna S. 2007. Rehabilitation: beyond the risk paradigm. In: Newborn T, editor. Key ideas in criminology series. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver B. 2012. The relational context of desistance: some implications and opportunities for social policy. Soc Pol Admin. 46(4):395–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh WN. 2007. A multi-site evaluation of prison-based TC drug treatment. Crim Just Behav. 34:1481–1498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Western B, Braga A, Davis J, Sirois C. 2015. Stress and hardship after prison. Amer J Sociol. 120:1512–1547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler D. 2016. Guiding court conversation along pathways conducive to rehabilitation: integrating procedural justice and therapeutic jurisprudence. 1 Int J Therapeutic Juris 367. Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 15-33. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract =2677431
   Google Scholar
• White H, Jackson K, Loeber R. 2009. Developmental sequences and comorbidity of substance use and violence. Chapter 21. In: Krohn MD, Lizotte AJ, Hall GP, editors. Handbook on crime and deviance. New York: Springer; p. 433–468.
   Google Scholar
• Wild T. 2006. Social control and coercion in addiction treatment: towards evidence-based policy and practice. Addiction. 101:40–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild T, Yuan Y, Rush B, Urbanoski K, 2016. Client engagement in legally-mandated treatment: a prospective study using self-determination theory. J Subs Abuse Res. 69:35–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson DB, Mitchell O, MacKenzie DL. 2006. A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism. J Exp Criminol. 2:459–487.
   Google Scholar
• Winick B. 2002. Therapeutic jurisprudence and problem-solving courts. Fordham Urban Law J. 30:1055.
   Google Scholar
• Winick B, Wexler D. 2009. Therapeutic jurisprudence. In: Ries R, Fiellin D, Miller S, Aaltz R, editors. Principles of addiction medicine. 4th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; p. 1519.
   Google Scholar
• Wittouck C, Dekkers A, De Ruyver B, Vanderplasschen W, Vander Laenen F. 2013. The impact of drug treatment courts on recovery: a systematic review. Scient World J. 2013:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Wittouck C, Dekkers A, Vanderplasschen W, Vander Laenen V. 2014. Psychosocial functioning of drug treatment court clients: a study of the prosecutor’s files in Ghent, Belgium. Therap Commun. 35:127–140.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. 2001. The world health report. Mental health: new understandings, new hope. Geneva: World Health Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• Young D, Belenko S. 2002. Program retention and perceived coercion in three models of mandatory drug treatment. J Drug Issues. 32:297–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarkin G, Cowell A, Hicks K, Mills M, Belenko S, Dunlap L, Keyes V. 2015. Lifetime benefits and costs of diverting substance abusing offenders from state prison. Crime Delinq. 61:829–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarkin G, Dunlap L, Belenko S, Dynia P. 2005. A benefit-cost analysis of the Kings County District Attorney’s Office Drug Treatment Alternative to Prison (DTAP) Program. Just Res Policy. 7:1–25.
   Google Scholar