For the love of being liked: a moderated mediation model of attachment, likes-seeking behaviors, and problematic Facebook use

References

• American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Association.
   Google Scholar
• Andangsari EW, Gumilar I, Godwin R. 2013. Social networking sites use and psychological attachment need among indonesian young adults population. Int J Soc Sci Stud. 1(2):133–138.
   Google Scholar
• Andreassen CS, Torsheim T, Brunborg GS, Pallesen S. 2012. Development of a Facebook addiction scale. Psychol Rep. 110(2):501–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek YM, Cho Y, Kim H. 2014. Attachment style and its influence on the activities, motives, and consequences of SNS use. J Broadcast Electr Media. 58:522–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartholomew K, Horowitz LM. 1991. Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model. J Personal Soc Psychol. 61(2):226–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Błachnio A, Przepiorka A, Boruch W, Bałakier E. 2016. Self-presentation styles, privacy, and loneliness as predictors of Facebook use in young people. Personal Indiv Diff. 94:26–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Błachnio A, Przepiorka A, Pantic I. 2016. Association between Facebook addiction, self-esteem and life satisfaction: a cross-sectional study. Comput Human Behav. 55:701–705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwell D, Leaman C, Tramposch R, Osborne C, Liss M. 2017. Extraversion, neuroticism, attachment style and fear of missing out as predictors of social media use and addiction. Personal Indiv Diff. 116:69–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan KA, Clark CL, Shaver PR. 1998. Self-report measurement of adult attachment: an integrative overview. In: Simpson JA, Rholes WS, editors. Attachment theory and close relationships. New York (NY): Guilford Press; p. 46–76.
   Google Scholar
• Burrow AL, Rainone N. 2017. How many likes did I get?: purpose moderates links between positive social media feedback and self-esteem. J Exp Soc Psychol. 69:232–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbonell X, Panova T. 2016. A critical consideration of social networking sites’ addiction potential. Addic Res Theor. 25:48–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casale S, Fioravanti G. 2018. Why narcissists are at risk for developing Facebook addiction: the need to be admired and the need to belong. Addic Behav. 76:312–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton RB, Nagurney A, Smith JR. 2013. Cheating, breakup, and divorce: is Facebook use to blame? Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 16(10):717–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortina JS. 1993. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. J Appl Psychol. 78(1):98–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Arienzo MC, Boursier V, Griffiths MD. 2019. Addiction to social media and attachment styles: a systematic literature review. Int J Ment Health Addic. 17(4):1094–1118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eroglu Y. 2015. Interrelationship between attachment styles and Facebook addiction. J Educ Train Stud. 4(1):4. DOI: 10.11114/jets.v4i1.1081
   Google Scholar
• Facebook. 2018. Statistics 2018. http://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/
   Google Scholar
• Flores PJ. 2001. Addiction as an attachment disorder: implications for group therapy. Int J Group Psychother. 51(1):63–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores PJ. 2004. Addiction as an attachment disorder. New York (NY): Jason Aronson, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths MD. 1996. Behavioural addictions: an issue for everybody? J Workplace Learn. 8:19–25.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths MD. 2013. Social networking addiction: emerging themes and issues. J Addic Res Thera. 4:1000e1118.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths MD. 2018. Adolescent social networking: how do social media operators facilitate habitual use? Educ Health. 36:66–69.
   Google Scholar
• Hart J, Nailling E, Bizer GY, Collins CK. 2015. Attachment theory as a framework for explaining engagement with Facebook. Personal Indiv Diff. 77:33–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höfler DZ, Kooyman M. 1996. Attachment transition, addiction and therapeutic bonding – An integrative approach. J Subst Abuse Treat. 13(6):511–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmgren HG, Coyne SM. 2017. Can’t stop scrolling!: pathological use of social networking sites in emerging adulthood. Addic Res Theory. 25:375–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong C, Chen Z, Li C. 2017. “Liking” and being “liked”: how are personality traits and demographics associated with giving and receiving “likes” on Facebook? Comput Hum Behav. 68:292–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Guarnieri MA, Wright SL, Hudiburgh LM. 2012. The relationships among attachment style, personality traits, interpersonal competency, and Facebook use. J Appl Dev Psychol. 33(6):294–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Guarnieri MA, Wright SL, Johnson BD. 2013. The interrelationships among attachment style, personality traits, interpersonal competency, and Facebook use. Psychol Popular Media Culture. 2(2):117–131.
   Google Scholar
• Kline RB. 2015. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 4th ed. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD. 2011. Excessive online social networking: can adolescents become addicted to Facebook? Educ Health. 29:68–71.
   Google Scholar
• Lafontaine M-F, Brassard A, Lussier Y, Valois P, Shaver PR, Johnson SM. 2016. Selecting the best items for a short-form of the Experiences in Close Relationships Questionnaire. Eur J Psychol Assess. 32(2):140–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaRose R, Kim J, Peng W. 2010. Social networking: addictive, compulsive, problematic, or just another media habit? In: Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: identity, community, and culture on social network sites. New York (NY): Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Marino C, Gini G, Vieno A, Spada MM. 2018. A comprehensive meta-analysis on problematic Facebook use. Comput Hum Behav. 83:262–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marino C, Vieno A, Altoe G, Spada MM. 2017. Factorial validity of the problematic Facebook use scale for adolescents and young adults. J Behav Addic. 6(1):5–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall TC, Bejanyan K, Di Castro G, Lee RA. 2013. Attachment styles as predictors of Facebook-related jealousy and surveillance in romantic relationships. Person Relat. 20(1):1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikulincer M, Shaver PR. 2007. Attachment in adulthood: structure, dynamics, and change. New York (NY): Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mikulincer M, Shaver PR, Berant E. 2013. An attachment perspective on therapeutic processes and outcomes. J Pers. 81(6):606–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monacis L, de Palo V, Griffiths MD, Sinatra M. 2017. Exploring individual differences in online addictions: the role of identity and attachment. Int J Ment Health Addic. 15(4):853–868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monacis L, de Palo V, Griffiths MD, Sinatra M. 2017. Social networking addiction, attachment style, and validation of the Italian version of the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale. J Behav Addic. 6(2):178–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén LK, Muthén BO. 1998–2017. Mplus user’s guide. 8th ed. Los Angeles (CA): Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nabi RL, Prestin A, So J. 2013. Facebook friends with (health) benefits? Exploring social network site use and perceptions of social support, stress, and well-being. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 16(10):721–727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitzburg GC, Farber BA. 2013. Putting up emotional (Facebook) walls? Attachment status and emerging adults' experiences of social networking sites. J Clin Psychol. 69(11):1183–1190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odacı H, Çıkrıkçı Ö. 2014. Problematic internet use in terms of gender, attachment styles and subjective well-being in university students. Comput Human Behav. 32:61–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldmeadow JA, Quinn S, Kowert R. 2013. Attachment style, social skills, and Facebook use amongst adults. Comput Hum Behav. 29(3):1142–1149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center 2018. Social media fact sheet. http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/social-media/
   Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. 2008. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Meth. 40(3):879–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF. 2007. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivar Behav Res. 42(1):185–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao G, Madan A. 2013. A study exploring the link between attachment styles and social networking habits of adolescents in urban Bangalore. Int J Sci Res Publ. 3:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan T, Chester A, Reece J, Xenos S. 2014. The uses and abuses of Facebook: a review of Facebook addiction. J Behav Addic. 3(3):133–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satici SA, Uysal R. 2015. Well-being and problematic Facebook use. Comput Hum Behav. 49:185–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valkenburg PM, Peter J, Schouten AP. 2006. Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents’ well-being and social self-esteem. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 9(5):584–590.
   Google Scholar
• Venkat A. 2016. A motivation-based perspective on facebook addiction. J Media Commun. 1:49–71.
   Google Scholar
• Vilca LW, Vallejos M. 2015. Construction of the risk of addiction to social networks scale (Cr.A.R.S.). Comput Hum Behav. 48:190–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiederhold BK. 2017. What predicts Facebook addiction? Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 20(5):277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods HC, Scott H. 2016. #Sleepyteens: social media use in adolescence is associated with poor sleep quality, anxiety, depression and low self-esteem. J Adolesc. 51:41–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zell AL, Moeller L. 2018. Are you happy for me … on Facebook? The potential importance of “likes” and comments. Comput Human Behav. 78:26–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zywica J, Danowski J. 2008. The faces of Facebookers: investigating social enhancement and social compensation hypotheses; predicting Facebook and offline popularity from sociability and self-esteem, and mapping the meanings of popularity with semantic networks. J Comput-Mediat Commun. 14(1):1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar