Assessing diversionary approaches for drug misusers in police custody in London: engagement and treatment outcomes as part of the Drug Intervention Programme

References

• Best D, Day E, Campbell A, Flynn PM, Simpson DD. 2009. Relationship between drug treatment engagement and criminal thinking style among drug-using offenders. Eur Addict Res. 15(2):71–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best D, Walker D, Aston E, Pegram C, O'Donnell G. 2010. Assessing the impact of a high-intensity partnership between the police and drug treatment service in addressing the offending of problematic drug users. Policing Society. 20(3):358–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boreham R, Cronberg A, Dollin L, Pudney S. 2007. The arrestee survey 2003–2006. Home Office Statistical Bulletin 12/07. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Bosma A, Kunst M, Reef J, Dirkzwager A, Nieuwbeerta P. 2016. Prison-based rehabilitation: predictors of offender treatment participation and treatment completion. Crime Delinquency. 62(8):1095–1120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocato JO, Wagner EF. 2008. Predictors of retention in an alternative-to-prison substance abuse treatment program. Crim Just Behav. 35(1):99–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull M. 2005. A comparative review of best practice guidelines for the diversion of drug related offenders. Int J Drug Policy. 16(4):223–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark CB, McCullumsmith CB, Redmond N, Hardy S, Waesche MC, Osula G, Cropsey KL. 2013. Factors associated with rapid failure in a Treatment Alternatives for Safer Communities (TASC) program. J Subst Abuse Treatment. 45(4):376–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastwood B, Strang J, Marsden J. 2018. Continuous opioid substitution treatment over five years: heroin use trajectories and outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend. 188:200–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmunds M, Hough M, Turnbull PJ, May T. 1999. Doing justice to treatment: referring offenders to drug services. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Edmunds M, May T, Hearnden I, Hough M. 1998. Arrest referral: emerging lessons from research. London: Central Drugs Prevention Unit, Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Evans E, Li L, Hser YI. 2009. Client and program factors associated with dropout from court mandated drug treatment. Eval Prog Plann. 32(3):204–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey C, Stewart D, Gossop M. 2004. Economic analysis of costs and consequences of the treatment of drug misuse: 2-year outcome data from the National Treatment Outcome Research Study (NTORS). Addiction. 99(6):697–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godley SH, Finch M, Dougan L, McDonnell M, McDermeit M, Carey A. 2000. Case management for dually diagnosed individuals involved in the criminal justice system. J Subst Abuse Treat. 18(2):137–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gossop M, Marsden J, Stewart D, Kidd T. 2003. The National Treatment Outcome Research Study (NTORS): 4–5 year follow-up results. Addiction. 98(3):291–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gossop M, Trakada K, Stewart D, Witton J. 2005. Reductions in criminal convictions after addiction treatment: 5-year follow-up. Drug Alcohol Depend. 79(3):295–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green A, Pickering H, Foster R, Power R, Stimson GV. 1994. Who uses cocaine? Social profiles of cocaine users. Addict Res. 2(2):141–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock J, Fearon C, McLaughlin H, Fielden B. 2012. Policing the “Drugs Intervention Programme” (DIP): an exploratory study of the Southern UK Policing Region. Policing. 6(4):431–442.
   Google Scholar
• Hayhurst KP, Leitner M, Davies L, Flentje R, Millar T, Jones A, King C, Donmall M, Farrell M, Fazel S. 2015. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of diversion and aftercare programmes for offenders using class A drugs: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 19(6):1–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiller ML, Knight K, Leukefeld C, Simpson DD. 2002. Motivation as a predictor of therapeutic engagement in mandated residential substance abuse treatment. Crim Just Behav. 29(1):56–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holdsworth E, Bowen E, Brown S, Howat D. 2014. Offender engagement in group programs and associations with offender characteristics and treatment factors: a review. Aggress Viol Behav. 19(2):102–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway KR, Bennett T, Farrington DP. 2008. Effectiveness of treatment in reducing drug-related crime: report prepared for The National Council for Crime Prevention, Sweden. Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention (BRÅ).
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. 2009. Drug interventions programme operational handbook. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office/Ministry of Justice. 2010. Integrated offender management: key principles. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter G, McSweeney T, Turnbull PJ. 2005. The introduction of drug arrest referral schemes in London: a partnership between drug services and the police. Int J Drug Policy. 16(5):343–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones A, Hayhurst KP, Millar T, Pierce M, Dunn G, Donmall M. 2016. Short-term outcomes for opiate and crack users accessing treatment: the effects of criminal justice referral and crack use. Eur Addict Res. 22(3):145–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly CE, Welsh WN. 2016. Examining treatment climate across prison-based substance abuse treatment groups. Subst Use Misuse. 51(7):902–911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothari G, Marsden J, Strang J. 2002. Opportunities and obstacles for effective treatment of drug misusers in the criminal justice system in England and Wales. Br J Criminol. 42(2):412–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouimtsidis C, Edwards J, Wallis C, Drabble K. 2008. Drug Interventions Programme: clinical profile of service users v. attendees of standard services. Psychiatr Bull. 32(7):245–247.
   Google Scholar
• Longshore D, Urada D, Evans E, Hser Y, Prendergast M, Hawken A, Bunch T, Ettner S. 2003. Evaluation of the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act 2002 Report. Report Prepared for the Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs California Health and Human Services Agency. Los Angeles: University of California Los Angeles UCLA.
   Google Scholar
• Marlowe DB. 2003. Integrating substance abuse treatment and criminal justice supervision. Sci Pract Perspect. 2(1):4–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maume MO, Lanier C, DeVall K. 2018. The effect of treatment completion on recidivism among TASC program clients. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 62(15):4776–4795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McSweeney T, Hughes C, Ritter A. 2018. The impact of compliance with a compulsory model of drug diversion on treatment engagement and reoffending. Drugs Educ Prev Policy. 25(1):56–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills H, Skodbo S, Blyth P. 2013. Understanding organised crime: estimating the scale and the social and economic costs. Home Office Research Report 73.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan N. 2014. The heroin epidemic of the 1980s and 1990s and its effect on crime trends – then and now. Home Office Research Report 79.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan N, Elliott A, Millar T, Heap D. 2016. New opiate and crack-cocaine users: characteristics and trends. Open Government Licence (OGL). London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Oerton J, Hunter G, Hickman M, Morgan D, Turnbull P, Kothari G, Marsden J. 2003. Arrest referral in London police stations: characteristics of the first year. A key point of intervention for drug users? Drugs Educ Prev Policy. 10(1):73–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olver ME, Stockdale KC, Wormith JS. 2011. A meta-analysis of predictors of offender treatment attrition and its relationship to recidivism. J Consult Clin Psychol. 79(1):6–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne A. 2013. Future delivery of the Drug Interventions Programme: do the benefits justify the costs? J Forensic Leg Med. 20(7):816–820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce M, Hayhurst K, Bird SM, Hickman M, Seddon T, Dunn G, Millar T. 2015. Quantifying crime associated with drug use among a large cohort of sanctioned offenders in England and Wales. Drug Alcohol Depend. 155:52–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson E, McSherry B. 2010. Diversion down under—programs for offenders with mental illnesses in Australia. Int J Law Psychiatry. 33(4):249–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgely MS, Willenbring ML. 1993. Application of case management to drug abuse treatment: overview of models and research issues. NIDA Res Monogr. 127:12.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen PJ, Hiller ML, Webster JM, Staton M, Leukefeld C. 2004. Treatment motivation and therapeutic engagement in prison-based substance use treatment. J Psychoact Drugs. 36(3):387–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott DA, McGilloway S, Dempster M, Browne F, Donnelly M. 2013. Effectiveness of criminal justice liaison and diversion services for offenders with mental disorders: a review. Psychiatr Serv. 64(9):843–849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skodbo S, Brown G, Deacon S, Cooper A, Hall A, Millar T, Smith J, Whitham K. 2007. The Drug Interventions Programme (DIP): addressing drug use and offending through ‘Tough Choices’. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Sondhi A, O'Shea J, Williams T. 2002. Arrest referral: emerging findings from the national monitoring and evaluation programme. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Spooner C, Hall W, Mattick RP. 2001. An overview of diversion strategies for Australian drug-related offenders. Drug Alcohol Rev. 20(3):281–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava S, Forrester A, Davies S, Nadkarni R. 2013. Developing criminal justice liaison and diversion services: research priorities and international learning. Crim Behav Ment Health. 23(5):315–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart MJ, Fulton, HG, Barrett SP. 2014. Powder and crack cocaine use among opioid users: is all cocaine the same? J Addict Med. 8(4):264–270.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart D, Gossop M, Marsden J, Rolfe A. 2000. Drug misuse and acquisitive crime among clients recruited to the National Treatment Outcome Research Study (NTORS). Crim Behav Ment Health. 10(1):10–20.
   Google Scholar
• Sturgess D, Woodhams J, Tonkin M. 2016. Treatment engagement from the perspective of the offender: reasons for noncompletion and completion of treatment—a systematic review. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 60(16):1873–1896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor LR, Caudy M, Blasko BL, Taxman FS. 2017. Differences by gender in predictors of motivation among substance abuse treatment participants. Subst Use Misuse. 52(4):468–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK Drug Policy Commission (UKDPC). 2008. Reducing drug use, reducing reoffending. Are programmes for problem drug-using offenders in the UK supported by the evidence? London: UKDPC.
   Google Scholar
• Ventura LA, Lambert EG. 2004. Recidivism 12 months after TASC. J Offend Rehabil. 39(1):63–82.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh WN, McGrain PN. 2008. Predictors of therapeutic engagement in prison-based drug treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend. 96(3):271–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Perkins DR, Stearns AE. 2018. Barriers and facilitators to treatment engagement among clients in inpatient substance abuse treatment. Qual Health Res. 28(9):1474–1485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar