4,275
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Positive and negative time attitudes, intrinsic motivation, behavioral engagement and substance use among urban adolescents

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 347-357 | Received 22 Jul 2020, Accepted 26 Nov 2020, Published online: 17 Dec 2020

References

  • Alansari M, Worrell FC, Rubie-Davies C, Webber M. 2013. Adolescent Time Attitude Scale (ATAS) scores and academic outcomes in secondary school females in New Zealand. Int J Quant Res Educ. 1(3):251–274.
  • Andretta JR, Worrell FC, Mello ZR. 2014. Predicting educational outcomes and psychological well‐being in adolescents using time attitude profiles. Psychol Schs. 51(5):434–451.
  • Appleton JJ, Christenson SL, Kim D, Reschly AL. 2006. Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. J School Psychol. 44(5):427–445.
  • Baraldi AN, Enders CK. 2010. An introduction to modern missing data analyses. J Sch Psychol. 48(1):5–37.
  • Chase PA, Hilliard LJ, Geldhof GJ, Warren DJA, Lerner RM. 2014. Academic achievement in the high school years: the changing role of school engagement. J Youth Adolesc. 43(6):884–896.
  • Chishima Y, Murakami T, Worrell FC, Mello ZR. 2019. The Japanese version of the Adolescent Time Inventory-Time Attitudes (ATI-TA) Scale: internal consistency, structural validity, and convergent validity. Assessment. 26(2):181–192.
  • Cole JC, Andretta JR, McKay MT. 2017. An exploratory examination of the viability and meaningfulness of time attitudes profiles in adults. Personality Individual Diff. 106:146–151.
  • Crost B, Guerrero S. 2012. The effect of alcohol availability on marijuana use: evidence from the minimum legal drinking age. J Health Econ. 31(1):112–121.
  • D’Amico EJ, Tucker JS, Pedersen ER, Shih RA. 2017. Understanding rates of marijuana use and consequences among adolescents in a changing legal landscape. Curr Addict Rep. 4(4):343–349.
  • David OA, Cardoș RA, Matu S. 2019. Is REThink therapeutic game effective in preventing emotional disorders in children and adolescents? Outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 28(1):111–122.
  • Degenhardt L, Dierker L, Chiu WT, Medina-Mora ME, Neumark Y, Sampson N, Alonso J, Angermeyer M, Anthony JC, Bruffaerts R, et al. 2010. Evaluating the drug use “gateway” theory using cross-national data: consistency and associations of the order of initiation of drug use among participants in the WHO world mental health Surveys. Drug Alcohol Depend. 108(1–2):84–97.
  • Di Domenico SI, Ryan RM. 2017. The emerging neuroscience of intrinsic motivation: a new frontier in self-determination research. Front Hum Neurosci. 11:145.
  • Diseth Å, Samdal O. 2015. Classroom achievement goal structure, school engagement, and substance use among 10th grade students in Norway. Int J School Educ Psychol. 3(4):267–277.
  • Emmons RA, Froh J, Rose R. 2019. Gratitude. In: Gallagher MW, Lopez SJ, editors. Positive psychological assessment: a handbook of models and measures. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; p. 317–332.
  • Erikson E. 1968. Identity, youth and crisis. New York (NY): Norton.
  • Ferguson CJ. 2009. An effect size primer: a guide for clinicians and researchers. Prof Psychol: Res Pract. 40(5):532–538.
  • Flory K, Lynam D, Milich R, Leukefeld C, Clayton R. 2004. Early adolescent through young adult alcohol and marijuana use trajectories: early predictors, young adult outcomes, and predictive utility. Dev Psychopathol. 16(1):193–213.
  • Frank LK. 1939. Time perspectives. J Social Phil. 4:293–312.
  • Froiland JM. 2011. Parental autonomy support and student learning goals: a preliminary examination of an intrinsic motivation intervention. Child Youth Care Forum. 40(2):135–149.
  • Froiland JM. 2018. Promoting gratitude and positive feelings about learning among young adults. J Adult Dev. 25(4):251–258.
  • Froiland JM. 2020. Parental autonomy and relatedness support. In Worrell FC, Hughes TL, Dixson DD, editors. The Cambridge Handbook of applied school psychology. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. p. 260–276.
  • Froiland JM. Forthcoming. A comprehensive model of preschool through high school parent involvement with emphasis on the psychological facets. Sch Psychol Int.
  • Froiland JM, Davison ML. 2014. Parental expectations and school relationships as contributors to adolescents’ positive outcomes. Soc Psychol Educ. 17(1):1–17.
  • Froiland JM, Davison ML. 2016a. Home literacy, television viewing, fidgeting and ADHD in young children. Educ Psychol. 36(8):1337–1353.
  • Froiland JM, Davison ML. 2016b. The longitudinal influences of peers, parents, motivation, and mathematics course-taking on high school math achievement. Learning Individual Diff. 50:252–259.
  • Froiland JM, Davison ML. 2020. Emotional intelligence, listening comprehension, and reading comprehension among diverse adolescents. J Child Fam Stud. 29(5):1385–1390.
  • Froiland JM, Davison ML, Worrell FC. 2016. Aloha teachers: teacher autonomy support promotes Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander students’ motivation, school belonging, course-taking and math achievement. Soc Psychol Educ. 19(4):879–894.
  • Froiland JM, Oros E. 2014. Intrinsic motivation, perceived competence and classroom engagement as longitudinal predictors of adolescent reading achievement. Educ Psychol. 34(2):119–132.
  • Froiland JM, Worrell FC. 2016. Intrinsic motivation, learning goals, engagement, and achievement in a diverse high school. Psychol Schs. 53(3):321–336.
  • Froiland JM, Worrell FC, Oh H. 2019. Teacher–student relationships, psychological need satisfaction, and happiness among diverse students. Psychol Schs. 56(5):856–870.
  • Froiland JM, Worrell FC. 2017. Parental autonomy support, community feeling and student expectations as contributors to later achievement among adolescents. Educ Psychol. 37:261–271.
  • Griswold MG, Fullman N, Hawley C, Arian N, Zimsen SRM, Tymeson HD, Venkateswaran V, Tapp AD, Forouzanfar MH, Salama JS, et al. 2018. Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet. 392(10152):1015–1035.
  • Hall WD, Lynskey M. 2005. Is cannabis a gateway drug? Testing hypotheses about the relationship between cannabis use and the use of other illicit drugs. Drug Alcohol Rev. 24(1):39–48.
  • Hu L, Bentler PM. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 6(1):1–55.
  • Huy`nh C, Morin AJS, Fallu J-S, Maguire-L J, Descheneaux-Buffoni A, Janosz M. 2019. Unpacking the longitudinal associations between the frequency of substance use, substance use related problems, and academic achievement among adolescents. J Youth Adolesc. 48(7):1327–1341.
  • Jackson KM, Sher KJ, Schulenberg JE. 2008. Conjoint developmental trajectories of young adult substance use. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 32(5):723–737.
  • Jensen JD, John KK, Freeman J, Carcioppolo N, Pokharel M. 2019. Drink monitoring for self and others: precollege drinkers and the bad-habit-formation hypothesis. Addict Res Theory. 27(3):198–203.
  • Kandel, DB, editor. 2002. Stages and pathways of drug involvement: examining the gateway hypothesis. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. DOI:10.1017/cbo9780511499777.003.
  • Kenny, D. 2018. Measuring model fit. www.davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm.
  • King KA, Vidourek RA, Yockey RA. 2019. Does the association of school experiences and marijuana use differ based on age of African American high school students? J Subst Use. 24(5):550–555.
  • Kowalski MJ, Froiland JM. 2020. Parent perceptions of elementary classroom management systems and their children’s motivational and emotional responses. Soc Psychol Educ. 23(2):433–448.
  • Lee W, Reeve J. 2012. Teachers’ estimates of their students’ motivation and engagement: being in synch with students. Educ Psychol. 32(6):727–747.
  • Lewin K. 1935. A dynamic theory of personality. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill.
  • Li Y, Lerner RM. 2011. Trajectories of school engagement during adolescence: implications for grades, depression, delinquency, and substance use. Dev Psychol. 47(1):233–247.
  • Loose TT, Acier D, Andretta JR, Cole JC, M T, Wagner V, Worrell FC. 2018. Time perspective and alcohol-use indicators in France and the United Kingdom: results across adolescents, university students, and treatment outpatients. Addict Res Theory. 26(2):143–150.
  • Lynskey MT, Coffey C, Degenhardt L, Carlin JB, Patton G. 2003. A longitudinal study of the effects of adolescent cannabis use on high school completion. Addiction. 98(5):685–692.
  • McKay MT, Andretta JR, Cole JC, Konowalczyk S, Wells KC, Worrell FC. 2018. Time attitudes profile stability and transitions: an exploratory study of adolescent health behaviours among high school students. J Adolesc. 69:44–51.
  • McKay MT, Andretta JR, Magee J, Worrell FC. 2014. What do temporal profiles tell us about adolescent alcohol use? Results from a large sample in the United Kingdom. J Adolesc. 37(8):1319–1328.
  • McKay MT, Healy C, O’Donnell L. 2020. The Adolescent and Adult Time Inventory-Time Attitudes Scale: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of psychometric studies. J Personal Assess. DOI:10.1080/00223891.2020.1818573.
  • McKay MT, Percy A, Cole JC, Worrell FC, Andretta JR. 2016. The relationship between time attitudes profiles and self-efficacy, sensation seeking, and alcohol use: an exploratory study. Personality Individual Diff. 97:203–209.
  • McKay MT, Perry JL, Cole JC, Worrell FC. 2018. What time is it? Temporal psychology measures relate differently to alcohol-related health outcomes. Addict Res Theory. 26(1):20–27.
  • Mello ZR, Worrell FC. 2007. The Adolescent and Adult Time Inventory – English. Berkeley (CA): Authors. https://faculty.sfsu.edu/sites/default/files/faculty_files/2270/ATI_V3.1.Manual.pdf.
  • Mello ZR, Worrell FC. 2015. The past, the present, and the future: a conceptual model of time perspective in adolescence. In: Stolarski M, Fieulaine N, van Beek W, editors. Time perspective theory: review, research, and application. Essays in honor of Phillip G. Zimbardo. New York (NY): Springer. p. 115–129.
  • Ngnoumen CT, Langer EJ. 2016. Mindfulness: the essence of well-being and happiness. In: Ivtzan I, Lomas T, editors. Mindfulness in positive psychology: the science of meditation and wellbeing. Abingdon (UK): Routledge. p. 107–117.
  • Nuttin J. 1985. Future time perspective and motivation: theory and research method. Leuven (Belgium): Leuven University Press/Erlbaum.
  • Pacula RL. 1998. Does increasing the beer tax reduce marijuana consumption? J Health Econ. 17(5):557–585.
  • Pape H, Rossow I, Storvoll EE. 2009. Under double influence: assessment of simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use in general youth populations. Drug Alcohol Depend. 101(1–2):69–73.
  • Patte KA, Qian W, Leatherdale ST. 2017a. Is binge drinking onset timing related to academic performance, engagement, and aspirations among youth in the COMPASS Study? Subst Use Misuse. 52(13):1795–1800.
  • Patte KA, Qian W, Leatherdale ST. 2017b. Marijuana and alcohol use as predictors of academic achievement: a longitudinal analysis among youth in the COMPASS Study. J Sch Health. 87(5):310–318.
  • Phillips KT, Lalonde TL, Phillips MM, Schneider MM. 2017. Marijuana use and associated motives in Colorado university students. Am J Addict. 26(8):830–837.
  • Ryan RM, Deci EL. 2017. Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York (NY): Guilford Publications.
  • Sawyer R. 2013. Beyond correlations: usefulness of high school GPA and test scores in making college admissions decisions. Appl Measurement Educ. 26(2):89–112.
  • Seligman MEP. 2004. Authentic happiness: using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York (NY): Simon & Schuster.
  • Shirai T. 1997. The life-span developmental psychology of time perspective. Tokyo (Japan): Keisoshobo.
  • Shrout PE, Bolger N. 2002. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychol Meth. 7(4):422–445.
  • Skinner EA, Kindermann TA, Connell JP, Wellborn JG. 2009. Engagement and disaffection as organizational constructs in the dynamics of motivational development. In Wentzel K, Wigfield A, Miele D, editors. Handbook of motivation at school. Abingdon (UK): Routledge. p. 223–245.
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2013. Results from the 2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings, NSDUH Series H-46, HHS Publication No. (SMA) 13-4795. Rockville (MD): Author.
  • U.S. Census Bureau. 2017. Quick Facts: San Francisco County, California. Washington (DC): Author. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/sanfranciscocountycalifornia/PST045217#viewtop
  • Vashishtha R, Livingston M, Pennay A, Dietze P, MacLean S, Holmes J, Herring R, Caluzzi C, Lubman DI. 2020. Why is adolescent drinking declining? A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Addict Res Theory. 28(4):275–288.
  • Wells KE, McKay MT, Morgan GB, Worrell FC. 2018. Time attitudes predict changes in adolescent self-efficacy: a 24-month latent transition mover-stayer analysis. J Adolesc. 62:27–37.
  • Wells KE, Morgan GB, Worrell FC, Sumnall H, McKay MT. 2018. The influence of time attitudes on alcohol-related attitudes, behaviors, and subjective life expectancy in early adolescence: a longitudinal examination using mover-stayer latent transition analysis. Int J Behav Dev. 42(1):93–105.
  • Whitney N, Froiland JM. 2015. Parenting style, gender, beer drinking and drinking problems of college students. Int J Psychol Biophys Approach. 16:93–109.
  • Worrell FC, Andretta JR. 2019. Time attitude profiles in American adolescents: educational and psychological correlates. Res Human Develop. 16(2):102–118.
  • Worrell FC, McKay MT, Andretta JR. 2018. Psychometric properties of Adolescent Time Inventory Time Attitude (ATI-TA) scores in three waves of longitudinal data. Psychol Assess. 30(1):106–115.
  • Worrell FC, Mello ZR. 2009. Convergent and discriminant validity of time attitude scores on the Adolescent Time Perspective Inventory. Diskurs Kindheits Und Jugendforschung. 4(2):185–196.
  • Worrell FC, Mello ZR, Buhl M. 2013. Introducing English and German versions of the adolescent time attitude scale. Assessment. 20(4):496–510.
  • Worrell FC, Mello ZR, Laghi F, Baiocco R, Lonigro A. 2020. Time  perspective constructs in Albanian and Italian adolescents: exploratory analyses. Psychol Rep. DOI:10.1177/0033294120913493.
  • Zimbardo PG, Boyd JN. 1999. Putting time in perspective: a valid, reliable individual-differences metric. J Personal Soc Psychol. 77(6):1271–1288.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.