Overcoming the pains of recovery: the management of negative recovery capital during addiction recovery pathways

References

• Anderson S, McNeill F. 2019. Desistance and cognitive transformations. In: Farrington D, Kazemian L, Piquero A, editors. The Oxford handbook of developmental and life course criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ashford RD, Brown A, Brown T, Callis J, Cleveland HH, Eisenhart E, Groover H, Hayes N, Johnston T, Kimball T, et al. 2019. Defining and operationalizing the phenomena of recovery: a working definition from the recovery science research collaborative. Addict Res Theory. 27(3):179–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett T., Holloway K 2004. Gang membership, drugs and crime in the UK. Br J Criminol. 44(3):305–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best D, Ivers JH. 2021. Inkspots and ice cream cones: a model of recovery contagion and growth. Addict Res Theory. 4:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best D, Hennessy EA. 2021. The science of recovery capital: where do we go from here? Addiction. 3:1–7. DOI:10.1111/add.15732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best D, Sondhi A, Brown L, Nisic M, Nagelhout G, Martinelli T, Van de Mheen D, Vanderplasschen W. 2021. The Strengths and Barriers Recovery Scale (SABRS): relationships matter in building strengths and overcoming barriers. Front Psychol. 12:663447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best D. 2019. Pathways to recovery and desistance: the role of the social contagion of hope. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Best D, Vanderplasschen W, Van de Mheen D, De Maeyer J, Colman C, Vander Laenen F, Irving J, Andersson C, Edwards M, Bellaert L, et al. 2018. REC-PATH (recovery pathways): overview of a four-country study of pathways to recovery from problematic drug use. Alcohol Treat Q. 0:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Best D, Irving J, Albertson K. 2017. Recovery and desistance: what the emerging recovery movement in the alcohol and drug area can learn from models of desistance from offending. Addict Res Theory. 25(1):1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best D, Edwards M, Mama-Rudd A, Cano I, Lehman J. 2016. Measuring an individual’s recovery barriers and strengths. Addict Prof Mag. https://goo.gl/k3XrjY.
   Google Scholar
• Best D, Laudet AB. 2010. The potential of recovery capital. London: Royal Society for the Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Betty Ford Institute Consensus Panel. 2007. What is recovery? A working definition from the Betty Ford Institute. J Subst Abuse Treat. 33:221–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biernacki P. 1986. Pathways from heroin addiction: recovery without treatment. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cano I, Best D, Edwards M, Lehman J. 2017. Recovery capital pathways: mapping the components of recovery wellbeing. Drug Alcohol Depend. 181:11–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloud W, Granfield R. 2008. Conceptualizing recovery capital: expansion of a theoretical construct. Subst Use Misuse. 43(12–13):1971–1986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis M, Scott C, Laudet A. 2014. Beyond bricks and mortars: recent research on substance abuse disorder recovery management. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 16:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis ML, Foss MA, Scott CK. 2007. An eight-year perspective on the relationship between the duration of abstinence and other aspects of recovery. Eval Rev. 31(6):585–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrall S, Hunter B, Sharpe G, Calverley A. 2014. Criminal careers in transition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Granfield R, Cloud W. 1999. Coming clean: Overcoming addiction without treatment. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grella CE. 2008. From generic to gender-responsive treatment: changes in social policies, treatment services, and outcomes of women in substance abuse treatment. J Psychoact Drugs. 40(sup5):327–343.
   Google Scholar
• Jason LA, Ferrari JR. 2010. Oxford house recovery homes: characteristics and effectiveness. Psychol Serv. 7(2) :92–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaskutas LA, Bond J, Avalos LA. 2009. 7-Year trajectories of alcoholics anonymous attendance and associations with treatment. Addict Behav. 34(12):1029–1035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay C, Monaghan M. 2019. Rethinking recovery and desistance processes: developing a social identity model of transition. Addict Res Theory. 27(1):47–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly JF, Bergman BG, Hoeppner BB, Vilsaint CL, White WL. 2017. Prevalence and pathways of recovery from drug and alcohol problems in the United States population: implications for practice, research, and policy. Drug Alcohol Depend. 181:162–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly JF, Hoeppner B. 2015. A biaxial formulation of the recovery construct. Addict Res Theory. 23(1):5–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudet AB. 2007. What does recovery mean to you? Lessons from the recovery experience for research and practice. J Subst Abuse Treat. 33(3):243–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leamy M, Bird V, Le Boutillier C, Williams J, Slade M. 2011. A conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis. Br J Psychiatry. 199(6):445–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh J, McKeganey N. 2000. Addicts’ narratives of recovery from drug use: constructing a non-addict identity. Soc Sci Med. 50(10):1501–1510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mericle AA. 2014. The role of social networks in recovery from alcohol and drug abuse. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 40(3):179–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugent B, Schinkel M. 2016. The pains of desistance. Criminol Crim Justice. 16(5):568–584.
   Google Scholar
• Patton D, Farrall S. 2021. Desistance: a Utopian perspective. Howard J Crime Justice. 60(2):209–231.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam RD, Feldstein L, Cohen DJ, 2004. Better together: restoring the American community. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• QSR International. 2022. Unlock insights in your data with powerful analysis. Qualitative Data Analysis Software. [accessed 2020 Jan 2]. NVivo (qsrinternational.com).
   Google Scholar
• Shapland J, Bottoms A. 2011. Reflections on social values, offending and desistance among young adult recidivists. Punishment Society. 13(3):256–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheedy C, Whitter M. 2009. Guiding principles and elements of recovery-oriented systems of care: what do we know from the research?’ HHS Publication No (SMA) 09- 4439. Rockville (MD): Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Standing G. 2011. Precariat: new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Striano M. 2012. Reconstructing narrative: a new paradigm for narrative research and practice. NI. 22(1):147–154.
   Google Scholar
• Squire C, Davis M, Esin C, Andrews M, Harrison B, Hydén L, Hydén M. 2014. What is narrative research? Starting out. In” What is narrative research? (The 'what is?' Research methods series). New York: Bloomsbury Academic; p. 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• White W. 2012. Recovery/Remission from substance use disorders: an analysis of reported outcomes in 415 scientific reports. Philadelphia (PA): Philadelphia Department of Behavioural Health and Intellectual Disability Services and the Great Lakes Addiction Technology Transfer Center.
   Google Scholar