Frameworks of gambling harms: a comparative review and synthesis

References

• Abbott MW. 2020. Gambling and gambling-related harm: recent World Health Organization initiatives. Public Health. 184:56–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott MW, Binde P, Clark L, Hodgins DC, Johnson MR, Manitowabi D, Quilty L, Spånberg J, Volberg R, Walker D, et al. 2018. Conceptual framework of harmful gambling: an international collaboration. 3rd ed. Guelph (Canada): Gambling Research Exchange Ontario (GREO).
   Google Scholar
• Abbott MW, Binde P, Clark L, Hodgins DC, Korn D, Pereira A, Quilty L, Thomas A, Volberg R, Walker D, et al. 2015. Conceptual framework of harmful gambling: an international collaboration revised September 2015. Guelph (Canada): Gambling Research Exchange Ontario (GREO).
   Google Scholar
• Abbott MW, Binde P, Hodgins D, Korn D, Pereira A, Volberg R, Williams R. 2013. Conceptual framework of harmful gambling: an international collaboration. Guelph (Canada): Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre (OPGRC).
   Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O'Malley L. 2005. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Method. 8(1):19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Ashton J, Seymour H. 1988. The new public health. Vol. 1. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter DG, Hilbrecht M, Wheaton CTJ. 2019. A mapping review of research on gambling harm in three regulatory environments. Harm Reduct J. 16(1):12–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blaszczynski A, Ladouceur R, Shaffer HJ. 2004. A science-based framework for responsible gambling: the Reno model. J Gambl Stud. 20(3):301–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne M, Bellringer M, Greer N, Kolandai-Matchett K, Rawat V, Langham E, Rockloff M, Palmer Du Preez K, Abbott M. 2017. Measuring the burden of gambling harm in New Zealand. Auckland (New Zealand): Central Queensland University and Auckland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Browne M, Greer N, Rawat V, Rockloff M. 2017. A population-level metric for gambling-related harm. Int Gambl Stud. 17(2):163–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne M, Rawat V, Greer N, Langham E, Rockloff M, Hanley C. 2017. What is the harm? Applying a public health methodology to measure the impact of gambling problems and harm on quality of life. J Gambl Issues. 36:28–50.
   Google Scholar
• Browne M, Rockloff M. 2018. Prevalence of gambling-related harm provides evidence for the prevention paradox. J Behav Addict. 7(2):410–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne M, Rawat V, Newall P, Begg S, Rockloff M, Hing N. 2020a. A framework for indirect elicitation of the public health impact of gambling problems. BMC Public Health. 20(1):1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne M, Volberg R, Rockloff M, Salonen A. 2020b. The prevention paradox applies to some but not all gambling harms: Results from a Finnish population-representative survey. J Behav Addict. 9(2):371–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne M, Rawat V, Tulloch C, Murray-Boyle C, Rockloff M. 2021. The evolution of gambling-related harm measurement: lessons from the last decade. IJERPH. 18(9):4395.
   Google Scholar
• Browne M, Volberg R, Rockloff M, Salonen AH. 2020a. The prevention paradox applies to some but not all gambling harms: results from a Finnish population-representative survey. J Behav Addict. 9(2):371–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delfabbro P, King DL. 2019. Challenges in the conceptualisation and measurement of gambling-related harm. J Gambl Stud. 35(3):743–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gainsbury SM, Blankers M, Wilkinson C, Schelleman-Offermans K, Cousijn J. 2014. Recommendations for international gambling harm-minimisation guidelines: comparison with effective public health policy. J Gambl Stud. 30(4):771–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbrecht M, Baxter D, Abbott M, Binde P, Clark L, Hodgins DC, Manitowabi D, Quilty L, SpÅngberg J, Volberg R, et al. 2020. The conceptual framework of harmful gambling: a revised framework for understanding gambling harm. J Behav Addict. 9(2):190–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korn D, Shaffer H. 1999. Gambling and the health of the public: adopting a public health perspective. J Gambl Stud. 15(4):289–365.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langham E, Thorne H, Browne M, Donaldson P, Rose J, Rockloff M. 2015. Understanding gambling related harm: A proposed definition, conceptual framework, and taxonomy of harms. BMC Public Health. 16(1):1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Latvala T, Lintonen T, Konu A. 2019. Public health effects of gambling–debate on a conceptual model. BMC Public Health. 19(1):1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorains FK, Cowlishaw S, Thomas SA. 2011. Prevalence of comorbid disorders in problem and pathological gambling: systematic review and meta‐analysis of population surveys. Addiction. 106(3):490–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marionneau V, Egerer M, Nikkinen J. 2021. How do state gambling monopolies affect levels of gambling harm? Curr Addict Rep. 8(2):225–234.
   Google Scholar
• Marionneau V, Nikkinen J. 2020. Does gambling harm or benefit other industries? A systematic review. J Gambl Iss. 44:4–44.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon N, Thomson K, Kaner E, Bambra C. 2019. Effects of prevention and harm reduction interventions on gambling behaviours and gambling related harm: an umbrella review. Addict Behav. 90:380–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, the PRISMA Group. 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 6(7):e1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muggleton N, Parpart P, Newall P, Leake D, Gathergood J, Stewart N. 2021. The association between gambling and financial, social and health outcomes in big financial data. Nat Hum Behav. 5(3):319–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcombe R. 1992. The reduction of drug-related harm: a conceptual framework for theory, practice, and research. O’Hare PA, Newcombe R, Matthews A, Buning EC, Drucker E, editors. The reduction of drug-related harm. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, et al. 2021. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg. 88:105906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price A, Hilbrecht M, Billi R. 2021. Charting a path towards a public health approach for gambling harm prevention. Z Gesundh Wiss. 29(1):37–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raybould JN, Larkin M, Tunney RJ. 2021. Is there a health inequality in gambling related harms? A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 21(1):1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Room R, Ferris J, Laslett AM, Livingston M, Mugavin J, Wilkinson C. 2010. The drinker’s effect on the social environment: a conceptual framework for studying alcohol’s harm to others. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 7(4):1855–1871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M, Docherty S, Emden C. 1997. Qualitative metasynthesis: issues and techniques. Res Nurs Health. 20(4):365–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulkunen P, Babor TF, Cisneros Örnberg J, Egerer M, Hellman M, Livingstone C, Marionneau V, Nikkinen J, Orford J, Rossow I. 2019. Setting limits: Gambling, science, and public policy. Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wardle H, Reith G, Best D, McDaid D, Platt S. 2018. Measuring gambling-related harms: a framework for action. Gambling Commission: Birmingham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Wardle H, Reith G, Langham E, Rogers RD. 2019. Gambling and public health: we need policy action to prevent harm. BMJ. 365:l1807.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wardle H, Degenhardt L, Ceschia A, Saxena S. 2021. The Lancet public health commission on gambling. Lancet Public Health. 6(1):e2–e3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westbrook M, Harvey M. 2022. Framing health, behavior, and society: a critical content analysis of public health social and behavioral science textbooks. Critical Public Health, p. 1–12. [AQ]
   Google Scholar