Does the lived experience of gambling accord with quantitative self-report scores of gambling-related harm?

References

• Braun V, Clarke V. 2019. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health. 11(4):589–597. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne M, Goodwin BC, Rockloff MJ. 2018. Validation of the short gambling harm screen (SGHS): a tool for assessment of harms from gambling. J Gambl Stud. 34(2):499–512. doi:10.1007/s10899-017-9698-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne M, Langham E, Rawat V, Greer N, Li E, Rose J, Rockloff M, Donaldson P, Thorne H, Goodwin B, et al. 2016. Assessing gambling-related harm in Victoria: a public health perspective. Melbourne: Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Browne M, Newall P, Rawat V, Tulloch C, Rockloff M, Li E, Hing N, Russell A, Begg S. 2023. The gambling harms scales: instruments to assess impact to gamblers and affected others that are benchmarked to health utility. Melbourne: Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Browne M, Rawat V, Greer N, Langham E, Rockloff M, Hanley C. 2017. What is the harm? Applying a public health methodology to measure the impact of gambling problems and harm on quality of life. JGI. 36(36). doi:10.4309/jgi.v0i36.3978.
   Google Scholar
• Browne M, Rawat V, Tulloch C, Murray-Boyle C, Rockloff M. 2021. The evolution of gambling-related harm measurement: lessons from the last decade. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 18(9):4395. doi:10.3390/ijerph18094395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne M, Rockloff MJ. 2018. Prevalence of gambling-related harm provides evidence for the prevention paradox. J Behav Addict. 7(2):410–422. doi:10.1556/2006.7.2018.41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne M, Rockloff MJ. 2019. Measuring behavioural dependence in gambling: a case for removing harmful consequences from the assessment of problem gambling pathology. J Gambl Stud. 36(4):1027–1044. doi:10.1007/s10899-019-09916-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy R, Pisac A, Loussouarn C. 2013. Qualitative research in gambling: exploring the production and consumption of risk. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Castrén S, Lind K, Hagfors H, Salonen AH. 2021. Gambling-related harms for affected others: a Finnish population-based survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 18(18):9564. doi:10.3390/ijerph18189564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deans EG, Thomas SL, Daube M, Derevensky J. 2016. “I can sit on the beach and punt through my mobile phone”: the influence of physical and online environments on the gambling risk behaviours of young men. Soc Sci Med. 166:110–119. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delfabbro P, King DL. 2019. Challenges in the Conceptualisation and Measurement of Gambling-Related Harm. J Gambl Stud. 35(3):743–755. doi:10.1007/s10899-019-09844-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris J, Wynne HJ. 2001. The Canadian problem gambling index: final report. Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
   Google Scholar
• Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. 2006. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 18(1):59–82. doi:10.1177/1525822X05279903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hing N, Nuske E, Breen H, O’Mullan C, Mainey L, Thomas A. 2021. Problem gambling and economic abuse against women: an adaptive grounded theory analysis. Addict Res Theor. 30(3):169–179. doi:10.1080/16066359.2021.1962847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langham E, Thorne H, Browne M, Donaldson P, Rose J, Rockloff M. 2016. Understanding gambling related harm: a proposed definition, conceptual framework, and taxonomy of harms. BMC Public Health. 16(1):80. doi:10.1186/s12889-016-2747-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latvala T, Lintonen T, Konu A. 2019. Public health effects of gambling–debate on a conceptual model. BMC Public Health. 19(1):1077. doi:10.1186/s12889-019-7391-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marionneau VK, Lahtinen AE, Nikkinen JT. 2023. Gambling among indebted individuals: an analysis of bank transaction data. Eur J Public Health. 34(2):342–346. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckad117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy S, Thomas SL, Pitt H, Bellringer ME. 2021. “You don’t really see the dangers of it at the time.” Risk perceptions and behaviours of older female gamblers. Soc Sci Med. 272:113674. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLauchlan J, Browne M, Russell AM, Rockloff M. 2020. Evaluating the reliability and validity of the short gambling harm screen: are binary scales worse than likert scales at capturing gambling harm? JGI. 44. doi:10.4309/jgi.2020.44.6.
   Google Scholar
• Muggleton N, Parpart P, Newall P, Leake D, Gathergood J, Stewart N. 2021. The association between gambling and financial, social, and health outcomes in big financial data. Nat Hum Behav. 5(3):319–326. doi:10.1038/s41562-020-01045-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray Boyle C, Browne M, Rockloff M, Flenady T. 2021. Opportunity costs or not? Validating the short gambling harm screen against a set of “unimpeachable” negative impacts. J Clin Med. 10(3):549. doi:10.3390/jcm10030549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering D, Blaszczynski A. 2021. Paid online convenience samples in gambling studies: questionable data quality. Int Gambl Stud. 21(3):516–536. doi:10.1080/14459795.2021.1884735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raisamo SU, Mäkelä P, Salonen AH, Lintonen TP. 2014. The extent and distribution of gambling harm in Finland as assessed by the Problem Gambling Severity Index. Eur J Public Health. 25(4):716–722. doi:10.1093/eurpub/cku210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reith G, Dobbie F. 2013. Gambling careers: a longitudinal, qualitative study of gambling behaviour. Addict Res Theor. 21(5):376–390. doi:10.3109/16066359.2012.731116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockloff MJ, Browne M, Russell AMT, Merkouris SS, Dowling NA. 2019. A quantification of the net consumer surplus from gambling participation. J Gambl Stud. 35(4):1147–1162. doi:10.1007/s10899-019-09845-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodda SN, Hing N, Hodgins DC, Cheetham A, Dickins M, Lubman DI. 2018. Behaviour change strategies for problem gambling: an analysis of online posts. Int Gambl Stud. 18(3):1–19. doi:10.1080/14459795.2018.1432670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose G. 1992. The strategy of preventive medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rust J, Golombok S. 2014. Modern psychometrics: the science of psychological assessment. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Salonen AH, Alho H, Castrén S. 2016. The extent and type of gambling harms for concerned significant others: a cross-sectional population study in Finland. Scand J Public Health. 44(8):799–804. doi:10.1177/1403494816673529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulloch C, Browne M, Hing N, Rockloff M, Hilbrecht M. 2021. How gambling harms the wellbeing of family and others: a review. Int Gambl Stud. 22(3):522–540. doi:10.1080/14459795.2021.2002384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulloch C, Hing N, Browne M, Russell AMT, Rockloff M, Rawat V. 2024. Harm-to-self from gambling: a national study of Australian adults. J Behav Addict. doi:10.1556/2006.2024.00025.
   Google Scholar
• Van Baal ST, Bogdanski P, Daryanani A, Walasek L, Newall P. 2023. The lived experience of gambling-related harm in natural language. https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/x5edg.
   Google Scholar
• Varian HR. 1999. Intermediate microeconomics: A modern approach. New York (NY): WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. 1996. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 34(3):220–233. doi:10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Clark L. 2020. Loss-chasing in gambling behaviour: neurocognitive and behavioural economic perspectives. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 31:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar