Screening for gestational diabetes: examining a breakfast meal test

References

• HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. The hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome (HAPO) study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;78(1):69–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR, et al. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. New Engl J Med. 2005;352(24):2477–86.10.1056/NEJMoa042973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker J. NICE guidance on diabetes in pregnancy: management of diabetes and its complications from preconception to the postnatal period. NICE clinical guideline 63. London, March 2008. Diabetic Med. 2008;25(9):1025–7.10.1111/dme.2008.25.issue-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger BE. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(3):676–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miailhe G, Kayem G, Girard G, et al. Selective rather than universal screening for gestational diabetes mellitus? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;191:95–100.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall D, du Toit M, Mason D, et al. Diabetes mellitus in pregnancy, still changing. JEMDSA. 2015;08(12):1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Ekeroma AJ, Chandran GS, McCowan L, et al. Impact of using the international association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups criteria in South Auckland: prevalence, interventions and outcomes. Aust New Zealand J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;55(1):34–41.10.1111/ajo.2015.55.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley BS, Harreiter J, Damm P, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus in Europe: prevalence, current screening practice and barriers to screening. A review. Diabet Med. 2012;29(7):844–54.10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03541.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrović O. How should we screen for gestational diabetes? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;26(2):54–60.10.1097/GCO.0000000000000049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maternal Guideline Reference Group and the Subcommittee of the Society for Maternal and Foetal Medicine in South Africa. Diabetes in pregnancy, provincial guideline of the Western Cape, for the management of diabetes and its complications from pre-conception to the postnatal period. Western Cape: Provincial Government; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Mooy JM, Grootenhuis PA, de Vries H, et al. Intra-individual variation of glucose, specific insulin and proinsulin concentrations measured by two oral glucose tolerance tests in a general Caucasian population: the Hoorn study. Diabetologia. 1996;39(3):298–305.10.1007/BF00418345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheard NF, Clark NG, Brand-Miller JC, et al. Dietary carbohydrate (amount and type) in the prevention and management of diabetes: a statement by the American diabetes association. Diabetes Care. 2004 September;27(9):2266–71.10.2337/diacare.27.9.2266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolever TM, Bolognesi C. Prediction of glucose and insulin responses of normal subjects after consuming mixed meals varying in energy, protein, fat, carbohydrate and glycemic index. J Nutr. 1996 November;126(11):2807–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuttall FQ, Mooradian AD, DeMarais R, et al. Tihe glycemic effect of different meals approximately isocaloric and similar in protein, carbohydrate, and fat content as calculated using the ADA exchange lists. Diabetes Care. 1983 Sep–Oct;6(5):432–5.10.2337/diacare.6.5.432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolmarans P, Danster N. Condensed food composition tables for South Africa. Medical Research Council; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Utz B, Kolsteren P, De Brouwere V. Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus: are guidelines from high-income settings applicable to poorer countries? Clin Diabetes. 2015;33(3):152–8.10.2337/diaclin.33.3.152
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. Diagnostic criteria and classification of hyperglycaemia first detected in pregnancy. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bonongwe P, Lindow SW, Coetzee EJ. Reproducibility of a 75G oral glucose tolerance test in pregnant women. J Perinat Med. 2015;43(3):333–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolever TM, Chiasson JL, Csima A, et al. Variation of postprandial plasma glucose, palatability, and symptoms associated with a standardized mixed test meal versus 75 g oral glucose. Diabetes Care. 1998 March;21(3):336–40.10.2337/diacare.21.3.336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harano Y, Miyawaki T, Nabiki J, et al. Development of cookie test for the simultaneous determination of glucose intolerance, hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance and postprandial dyslipidemia. Endocr J. 2006;53(2):173–80.10.1507/endocrj.53.173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traub ML, Jain A, Maslow BS, et al. The ‘muffin test’–an alternative to the oral glucose tolerance test for detecting impaired glucose tolerance. Menopause. 2012 January;19(1):62–6.10.1097/gme.0b013e318221bfc9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racusin DA, Antony K, Showalter L, et al. Candy twists as an alternative to the glucola beverage in gestational diabetes mellitus screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212:522.e1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Owen B, Wolever TM. Effect of fat on glycaemic responses in normal subjects: a dose-response study. Nutr Res. 2003;23(10):1341–7.10.1016/S0271-5317(03)00149-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Normand S, Khalfallah Y, Louche-Pelissier C, et al. Influence of dietary fat on postprandial glucose metabolism (exogenous and endogenous) using intrinsically C-enriched durum wheat. Br J Nutr. 2001;86(01):3–11.10.1079/BJN2001359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papakonstantinou E, Triantafillidou D, Panagiotakos D, et al. A high protein low fat meal does not influence glucose and insulin responses in obese individuals with or without type 2 diabetes. J Human Nutr Dietetics. 2010;23(2):183–9.10.1111/jhn.2010.23.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar