The five-factor model for leisure management: pedagogies for assessing personality differences in positive youth development programmes

References

• Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, L. L., & Smith, E. A. (2006). Leisure as a context for youth development and delinquency prevention. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 39(3), 398–418. doi: 10.1375/acri.39.3.398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1992). A matter of time: Risk and opportunity in the nonschool hours. Report of the Task Force on Youth Development and Community Programs. New York, NY: Cornegie Corporation of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 5–13. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2008). The revised neo personality inventory (neo-pi-r). The SAGE Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment, 2, 179–198.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal performance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Wong, M. M. H. (2014). Motivation and academic achievement: The effects of personality traits and the quality of experience. In J. Nakamura, U. Schiefele, & S. Whalen (Eds.), Applications of flow in human development and education (pp. 437–465). Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Diseth, Å., & Martinsen, Ø. (2009). Personality traits and achievement motives: Theoretical and empirical relations between the NEO Personality Inventory-revised and the Achievement Motives Scale. Psychological reports, 104(2), 579–592. doi: 10.2466/pr0.104.2.579-592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, G. A., Mortimer, J. T., & Roberts, D. F. (1990). Leisure, work, and the mass media. In S. S. Feldman & G. R. Elliot (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 225–254). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, D. H., & Lerner, R. M. (1992). Developmental systems theory: An integrative approach. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, S. L., Caldwell, L. L., & Baldwin, C. K. (2002). That extra push: The moderating influence of parents on adolescent initiative. In Leisure Research Symposium conducted at the National Recreation and Parks Annual Congress, Tampa, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, R. W. (2000). Toward a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist, 55(1), 170–183. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, R. M., Freund, A. M., De Stefanis, I., & Habermas, T. (2001). Understanding developmental regulation in adolescence: The use of the selection, optimization, and compensation model. Human Development, 44(1), 29–50. doi: 10.1159/000057039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. J. (1991). The NEO personality inventory: Using the five-factor model in counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, 69(4), 367–372. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1991.tb01524.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr, P. T. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In R. Hogan, J. A. Johnson, & S. R. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 825–847). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 159–181). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., Costa Jr, P. T., & Martin, T. A. (2005). The NEO–PI–3: A more readable revised NEO personality inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84(3), 261–270. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8403_05
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonough, M. H., Ullrich-French, S., Anderson-Butcher, D., Amorose, A. J., & Riley, A. (2013). Social responsibility among low-income youth in physical activity-based positive youth development programs: Scale Development and associations with social relationships. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 25(4), 431–447. doi: 10.1080/10413200.2012.751563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeal Jr, R. B. (1999). Participation in high school extracurricular activities: Investigating school effects. Social Science Quarterly, 80, 291–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osgood, D. W., Wilson, J. K., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Johnston, L. D. (1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 61, 635–655. doi: 10.2307/2096397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyama, S., Griffiths, P. E., & Gray, R. D. (2001). Introduction: What is developmental systems theory. In S. Oyama, P. E. Griffiths, & R. D. Gray (Eds.), Cycles of contingency: Developmental systems and evolution (pp. 1–23). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stagner, R. (1937). Psychology of personality. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, R. H. (1976). The real self: from institution to impulse. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 989–1016. doi: 10.1086/226183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zill, N., Nord, C. W., & Loomis, L. S. (1995). Adolescent time use, risky behavior and outcomes: An analysis of national data. Rockville, MD: Westat.
   Google Scholar