355
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Free riding, empire building, and cost management prior to and post municipal enterprise mergers in Japan

&

References

  • Amihud, Y., and B. Lev. 1981. “Risk Reduction as a Managerial Motive for Conglomerate Mergers.” The Bell Journal of Economics 12 (2): 605–617. doi:10.2307/3003575.
  • Anderson, M. C., R. D. Banker, and S. Janakiraman. 2003. “Are Selling, General, And administrative Costs “Sticky”?” Journal of Accounting Research 41 (1): 47–63. doi:10.1111/1475-679X.00095.
  • Banker, R. D., and D. Byzalov. 2014. “Asymmetric Cost Behavior.” Journal of Man-agement Accounting Research 26 (2): 43–79. doi:10.2308/jmar-50846.
  • Banker, R. D., D. Byzalov, and L. T. Chen. 2013. “Employment Protection Legislation, Adjustment Costs and Cross-country Differences in Cost Behavior.” Journal of Ac-counting and Economics 55 (1): 111–127. doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2012.08.003.
  • Bertrand, M., and S. Mullainathan. 2003. “Enjoying the Quiet Life? Corporate Governance and Managerial Preferences.” Journal of Political Economy 111 (5): 1043–1075. doi:10.1086/376950.
  • Blom-Hansen, J. 2010. “Municipal Amalgamations and Common Pool Problems: The Danish Local Government Reform in 2007.” Scandinavian Political Studies 33 (1): 51–73. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2009.00239.x.
  • Bradbury, M. E., and T. Scott. 2018. “Do Managers Forecast Asymmetric Cost Behaviour?” Australian Journal of Management 43 (4): 538–554. doi:10.1177/0312896218773136.
  • Brüggen, A., and J. O. Zehnder. 2014. “SG&A Cost Stickiness and Equity-based Execu-tive Compensation: Does Empire Building Matter?” Journal of Management Control 25 (3–4): 169–192. doi:10.1007/s00187-014-0195-5.
  • Chang, Y. 2009. “Empire Building and Fiscal Illusion? An Empirical Study of Government Official Behaviors in Takings.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 6: 541–584. doi:10.1111/j.1740-1461.2009.01153.x.
  • Chen, C. X., H. Lu, and T. Sougiannis. 2012. “The Agency Problem, Corporate Govern-ance, and the Asymmetrical Behavior of Selling, General, and Administrative Costs.” Contemporary Accounting Research 29 (1): 252–282. doi:10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01094.x.
  • Cohen, S., S. Karatzimas, and V. C. Naoum. 2017. “The Sticky Cost Phenomenon at the Local Government Level: Empirical Evidence from Greece.” Journal of Applied Accounting Research 18 (4): 445–463. doi:10.1108/JAAR-03-2015-0019.
  • Copeland, T., T. Koller, and J. Murrin. 1994. Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of the Company. New Jersey: John Wiley& Sons.
  • Damodaran, A. 2006. Applied Corporate Finance. 2nd ed. New Jersey: John Wiley& Sons.
  • Deis, D. R., and G. A. Giroux. 1992. “Determinants of Audit Quality in the Public Sector.” The Accounting Review 67 (3): 462–479.
  • Dierynck, B., W. R. Landsman, and A. Renders. 2012. “Do Managerial Incentives Drive Cost Behavior? Evidence about the Role of the Zero Earnings Benchmark for Labor Cost Behavior in Private Belgian Firms.” The Accounting Review 87 (4): 1219–1246. doi:10.2308/accr-50153.
  • Guenther, T. W., A. Riehl, and R. Rößler. 2014. “Cost Stickiness State of the Art of Re-search and Implications.” Journal of Management Control 24 (4): 301–318. doi:10.1007/s00187-013-0176-0.
  • Hansen, S. W. 2014. “Common Pool Size and Project Size: An Empirical Test on Expendi-tures Using Danish Municipal Mergers.” Public Choice 159 (1–2): 3–21. doi:10.1007/s11127-012-0009-y.
  • Hinnerich, B. T. 2009. “Do Merging Local Governments Free-ride on Their Counterparts When Facing Boundary Reform?” Journal of Public Economics 93: 721–728. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.01.003.
  • Holzer, M., J. Fry, E. Charbonneau, G. Van Ryzin, T. Wang, and E. Burnash. 2009. “Literature Review and Analysis Related to Optimal Municipal Size and Efficiency.” Report prepared for the Local Unit Alignment, Reorganization, and Consolidation Commission.
  • Holzhacker, M., R. Krishnan, and M. D. Mahlendorf. 2015. “The Impact of Changes in Regulation on Cost Behavior.” Contemporary Accounting Research 32 (2): 534–566. doi:10.1111/1911-3846.12082.
  • Jacobsen, D. I. 2006. “Public Sector Growth: Comparing Politicians’ and Administra-tors’ Spending Preferences.” Public Administration 84 (1): 185–204. doi:10.1111/j.0033-3298.2006.00499.x.
  • Jensen, M. C. 1986. “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers.” American Economic Review 76 (3): 323–329.
  • Jensen, M. C., and W. Meckling. 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Capital Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305–360. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.
  • Jordahl, H., and C.-Y. Liang. 2010. “Merged Municipalities, Higher Debt: On Free-riding and the Common Pool Problem in Politics.” Public Choice 143: 157–172. doi:10.1007/s11127-009-9495-y.
  • Kama, I., and D. Weiss. 2013. “Do Earnings Targets and Managerial Incentives Affect Sticky Costs?” Journal of Accounting Research 51 (1): 201–224. doi:10.1111/j.1475-679X.2012.00471.x.
  • Kinugasa, T. 2010. “Economics of Government Corporation.” Bulletin of Otemon Gakuin University. Osaka; Otemon Gakuin economic association. https://www.i-repository.net/il/meta_pub/G0000145OTEMON_102100303
  • Kristensen, O. P. 1980. “The Logic of Political Bureaucratic Decision-making as a Cause of Governmental Growth: Or Why Expansion of Public Programs Is a “Private Good” and Their Restriction Is a “Public Good”.” European Journal of Political Research 8: 249–264. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00573.x.
  • Lee, W.-J., J. Pittman, and W. Saffar. 2020. “Political Uncertainty and Cost Stickiness: Evidence from National Elections around the World.” Contemporary Accounting Research. 37(2), 1107–1139. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1911-3846.12547
  • McGuire, T. G. 1981. “Budget-maximizing Governmental Agencies: An Empirical Test.” Public Choice 36 (2): 313–322. doi:10.1007/BF00123787.
  • Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. 1995–2013. Basic Resident Register Annual Population Report. Japan: Population Census Division, Statistics Bureau, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications.
  • Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. 1995–2013. Municipal Enterprise Yearbook, 43–61. Japan: Local Public Enterprise Division, Local Public Finance Bureau, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications.
  • Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. 2008. Evaluation, Verification and Analysis of ‘The Municipal Merger of the Heisei Area. Japan: Municipal Merger Promotion Division, Local Administration Bureau, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications.
  • Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 1990. “Do Managerial Objectives Drive Bad Acquisitions?” Journal of Finance 45 (1): 31–48. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb05079.x.
  • Nakazawa, K. 2016. “Amalgamation, Free-rider Behavior, and Regulation.” International Tax and Public Finance 23 (5): 812–833. doi:10.1007/s10797-015-9381-0.
  • Niskanen, W. A. 1968. “Nonmarket Decision Making: The Peculiar Economics of Bureaucracy.” The American Economic Review 58 (2): 293–305.
  • Noreen, E. 1991. “Conditions under Which Activity-based Costs Provide Relevant Costs.” Journal of Management Accounting Research 3: 159–168.
  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2008. “Budgeting in Greece.” OECD Journal of Budgeting 3: 1–50.
  • Pesch, U. 2006. The Predicaments of Publicness: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Ambiguity of Public Administration. Utrecht: Eburon Academic Publishers.
  • Reimer, K. 2019. Asymmetric Cost Behavior. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.
  • Richardson, S. 2006. “Over-Investment of Free Cash Flow.” Review of Accounting Studies 11: 159–189. doi:10.1007/s11142-006-9012-1.
  • Saarimaa, T., and J. Tukiainen. 2015. “Common Pool Problems in Voluntary Municipal Mergers.” European Journal of Political Economy 38: 140–152. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.02.006.
  • Saussier, S., and M. Klien. 2014. “Local Public Enterprises: A Taxonomy.” Working paper. La Chaire EPPP. Sorbonne Business School.
  • Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny. 1989. “Management Entrenchment: The Case of Manager-specific Investments.” Journal of Financial Economics 25 (1): 123–139. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(89)90099-8.
  • Shust, E., and D. Weiss. 2014. “Asymmetric Cost Behavior-Sticky Costs Expenses Ver-sus Cash Flows.” Journal of Management Accounting Research 26 (2): 81–90. doi:10.2308/jmar-10406.
  • Tavares, F. A. 2018. “Municipal Amalgamations and Their Effects: A Literature Review.” Regional Studies on Development 22 (1): 5–15.
  • Tullock, G. 1959. “Problems of Majority Voting.” Journal of Political Economy 67: 571–579. doi:10.1086/258244.
  • United Nations. 2008. Public Enterprises: Unresolved Challenges and New Opportunities. Division for Public Administration and Development Management, Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations: New York.
  • Weingast, B., K. Shepsle, and C. Johnsen. 1981. “The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs: A Neoclassical Approach to Distributive Politics.” Journal of Political Economy 89: 642–664. doi:10.1086/260997.
  • Weiss, D. 2010. “Cost Behavior and Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts.” The Accounting Re-view 85: 1441–1474. doi:10.2308/accr.2010.85.4.1441.
  • Williamson, O. E. 1964. The Economics of Discretionary Behavior: Managerial Objectives in a Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.