Member communication as network structure: Relationship with task cohesion in sport

References

• Balkundi, P., & Harrison, D. A. (2006). Ties, leaders, and time in teams: Strong inference about network structure’s effects on team viability and performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 49, 49–68. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2006.20785500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, M., Bray, S., Eys, M., & Carron, A. (2002). Role ambiguity, role efficacy, and role performance: Multidimensional and mediational relationships within interdependent sport teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 229–242. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.6.3.229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S., Everett, M., & Johnson, J. (2013). Analyzing social networks. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brands, R. A., Menges, J. I., & Kilduff, M. (2015). The leader-in-social-network schema: Perceptions of network structure affect gendered attributions of charisma. Organization Science, 26, 1210–1225. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2015.0965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carron, A. V., & Brawley, L. R. (2000). Cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues. Small Group Research, 31, 89–106. doi: 10.1177/104649640003100105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carron, A. V., Brawley, L. R., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1998). The measurement of cohesiveness in sport groups. In J. L. Duda (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 213–226). Morgantown: Fitness Information Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Carron, A. V., Colman, M. M., Wheeler, J., & Stevens, D. (2002). Cohesion and performance in sport. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 24, 168–188. doi: 10.1123/jsep.24.2.168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The group environment questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244–266. doi: 10.1123/jsp.7.3.244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright, D. (1968). The nature of group cohesiveness. In D. Cartwright, & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics: Research and theory (pp. 91–109). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Cillessen, A. H., & Marks, P. E. (2017). Methodological choices in peer nomination research. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2017, 21–44. doi: 10.1002/cad.20206
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cranmer, G. A., & Myers, S. A. (2015). Sports teams as organizations: A leader–member exchange perspective of player communication with coaches and teammates. Communication & Sport, 3, 100–118. doi: 10.1177/2167479513520487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin, M. A., Weingart, L. R., & Todorova, G. (2011). Dynamics in groups: Are we there yet? Academy of Management Annals, 5, 571–612. doi:10.1080/19416520.2011.590297 doi: 10.5465/19416520.2011.590297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, D. W., & Tenenbaum, G. (2004). Why an expert team is more than a team of experts: A social-cognitive conceptualization of team coordination and communication in sport. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 26, 542–560. doi: 10.1123/jsep.26.4.542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, M. B., Eys, M. A., & Bruner, M. W. (2012). Seeing the “we” in “me” sports: The need to consider individual sport team environments. Canadian Psychology, 53, 301–308. doi: 10.1037/a0030202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eys, M. A., Carron, A. V., Bray, S. R., & Brawley, L. R. (2007). Item wording and internal consistency of a measure of cohesion: The group environment questionnaire. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 29, 395–402. doi: 10.1123/jsep.29.3.395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hoigaard, R., Tofteland, I., & Ommundsen, Y. (2006). The effect of team cohesion on social loafing in relay teams. International Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 18, 59–73.
   Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J., Kreft, I. G., & Hermkens, P. L. (1991). The analysis of factorial surveys. Sociological Methods & Research, 19, 493–510. doi: 10.1177/0049124191019004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., Magnusen, M. J., & Andrew, D. P. S. (2016). Divided we fall: Examining the relationship between horizontal communication and team commitment via team cohesion. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 11, 625–636. doi: 10.1177/1747954116667099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, W., Shepperd, J., Suls, J., Rothman, A., & Croyle, R. (2014). Realizing the promise of social psychology in improving public health. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 77–92. doi: 10.1177/1088868314539852
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. (1997). Leader-member exchange, the “pelz effect,” and cooperative communication between group members. Management Communication Quarterly, 11, 266–287. doi: 10.1177/0893318997112004
   Google Scholar
• Loughead, T. M., Fransen, K., Van Puyenbroeck, S., Hoffmann, M. D., De Cuyper, B., Vanbeselaere, N., & Boen, F. (2016). An examination of the relationship between athlete leadership and cohesion using social network analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 34, 2063–2073. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1150601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusher, D., Robins, G., & Kremer, P. (2010). The application of social network analysis to team sports. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 14, 211–224. doi: 10.1080/1091367X.2010.495559
   Google Scholar
• McEwan, D., & Beauchamp, M. R. (2014). Teamwork in sport: A theoretical and integrative review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 7, 229–250. doi: 10.1080/1750984X.2014.932423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, C., Newland, A., Eys, M., & Newton, M. (2017). Peer-initiated motivational climate and group cohesion in youth sport. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 29, 88–100. doi: 10.1080/10413200.2016.1190423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren, C. D., & Spink, K. S. (2018a). Examining the relationship between communication as information exchange and task cohesion in sport teams. International Journal of Sport Communication, 11, 149–162. doi: 10.1123/ijsc.2018-0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren, C. D., & Spink, K. S. (2018b). Team member communication and perceived cohesion in youth soccer. Communication & Sport, 6, 111–125. doi: 10.1177/2167479516679412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehra, A., Borgatti, S. P., Soltis, S., Floyd, T., Halgin, D. S., Ofem, B., & Lopez-Kidwell, V. (2014). Imaginary worlds: Using visual network scales to capture perceptions of social networks. In D. J. Brass, G. Labianca, A. Mehra, D. S. Halgin, & S. P. Borgatti (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on organizational social networks (Vol. 40, pp. 315–336). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Passos, P., Davids, K., Araújo, D., Paz, N., Minguéns, J., & Mendes, J. (2011). Networks as a novel tool for studying team ball sports as complex social systems. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 14, 170–176. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.10.459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, M. M., Carron, A. V., & Loughead, T. M. (2005). The influence of team norms on the cohesion–self-reported performance relationship: A multi-level analysis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 6, 479–493. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2004.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, M. E. (1964). Communication networks. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 111–149). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spink, K. S., McLaren, C. D., & Ulvick, J. D. (2018). Cues to informing perceived task cohesion in the sport setting: The case for teammate effort in sport. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 49, 165–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spink, K. S., Wilson, K. S., & Odnokon, P. (2010). Examining the relationship between cohesion and return to team in elite athletes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11, 6–11. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P. J., & Short, S. (2011). Further operationalization of intra-team communication in sports: An updated version of the scale of effective communication in team Sports (SECTS-2). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 471–487. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00722 doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00722.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, S. (2014). Can a team have too much cohesion? The dark side to network density. European Management Journal, 32, 703–711. doi:10.1016/j.emp.2013.12.005 doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2013.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar