614
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Variety in hybridity in sport organizations and their coping strategies

&

References

  • Algemene Rekenkamer (Ed.). (2008). Goed bestuur in uitvoering. De praktijk van onderwijsinstellingen, woningcorporaties, zorgorganisaties en samenwerkingsverbanden [The implementation of Good governance. The practice of educational institutions, housing associations, care organizations and alliances]. Den Haag: Algemene Rekenkamer.
  • Alm, J. (Ed.). (2013). Action for good governance in international sports organisations. Final report. Copenhagen: Play the Game/Danish Institute for Sports Studies.
  • Anthonissen, A., & Boessenkool, J. (1998). Betekenissen van besturen. Variaties in bestuurlijk handelen in amateursportorganisaties [Meanings of governance. Variations in administrative practice in amateur sport organizations]. Utrecht: ISOR.
  • Aquina, L. (2015). 5 vragen aan Paul Sanders, algemeen directeur van de KNSB [5 questions for Paul Sanders, Managing Director of the KNSB] . SportKnowhowXL, (18 Augustus 2015). Retrieved from http://www.sportknowhowxl.nl/nieuws-en-achtergronden/5-vragen-aan/item/98647/
  • Baarsma, B. (2005). Nederland Toezichtland – een economisch perspectief [Netherlands Supervision Land - an economic perspective]. Amsterdam: SEO.
  • Bayle, E., & Robinson, L. (2007). A framework for understanding the performance of national governing bodies of sport. European Sport Management Quarterly, 7, 249–268, DOI: 10.1080/16184740701511037.
  • Billis, D. (2010). Towards a theory of hybrid organisations. In D. Billis (Ed.), Hybrid organisations and the third sector. Challenges for Practice, Theory and policy (46–69). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Brands, H., Kusters, E., & Til, S.v. (2014). Sportbonden Monitor 2013. Ontwikkeling van organisaties in de sport [Sport Federations Monitor 2013. Development of sports organizations]. Arnhem: NOC*NSF.
  • Brandsen, T., Donk, W. v. d., & Kenis, P. (Eds.). (2006). Meervoudig bestuur. Publieke dienstverlening door hybride organisaties [Plural Governance. Public services by hybrid organizations]. Den Haag: Boom/Lemma, DOI: 10.1081/PAD-200067320.
  • Brandsen, T., Donk, W. v. d., & Putters, K. (2005). Griffins or chameleons? Hybridity as a permanent and inevitable characteristic of the third sector. Journal of Public Administration, 28, 749–765.
  • Braun, S. (2003). Freiwillige Vereinigungen zwischen Staat, Markt und Privatsphäre [Voluntary associations between state, market and privat domain.]. In J. Baur & S. Braun (Eds.), Integrationsleistungen von Sportvereinen als Freiwilligen Organisationen [Integration achievements of sports clubs as voluntary organizations] (43–87). Aachen: Meyer & Meyer Verlag.
  • Coalter, F. (2007). A wider social role for sport: who's keeping the score? London/New York: Routledge.
  • Cornforth, C., & Spear, R. (2010). The governance of hybrid organisations. In D. Billis (Ed.), Hybrid organisations and the third sector. challenges for practice, theory and policy (pp. 70–90). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Cuskelly, G., & Hoye, R. (2007). Sport governance. Oxford: Elsevier (Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd).
  • Defourny, J., & Pestoff, V. (2008). Images and concepts of the third sector in Europe. Paper presented at the WP 08/02 EMES European Research Network. Download from: https://orbi.ulg.ac.be/simple-search?query=pestoff.
  • De Vries, J., Nagtegaal, K., Baatenburg de Jong, R., Bekker, G., Lowik, S., & Wardenaar, R. (2007). Besturen als sport; een onderzoek naar de competenties van besturen in de Nederlandse sportsector [Governance as a sport; an inquiry into the competences of board members in the Dutch sports sector]. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden.
  • Evers, A. (2005). Mixed welfare systems and hybrid organizations: Changes in the governance and provision of social services. International Journal of Public Administration, 28, 737–748, DOI: 10.1081/PAD-200067318.
  • Evers, A., & Laville, J. L. (2004). Social services by social enterprises; on the possible contributions of hybrid organisations and a civil society. In A. Evers & J. L. Laville (Eds.), The third sector in Europe (237–256). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.
  • Gammelsaeter, H. (2010). Institutional pluralism and governance in 'commercialized' sport clubs. European Journal for Sport Management, 10, 569–594, DOI: 10.1080/16184742.2010.524241.
  • Gemeente Enschede (2008). Enschede beweegt! Sportnota 2008-2015 [Enschede moves! Sports policy plan 2008-2015]. Enschede: Gemeente Enschede.
  • Geurtsen, A., & Doornbos, F. (2007). Onderzoek kosten sportinfrastructuur. Eindrapportage [Costs of sports infrastructure. Final research report]. Utrecht: Berenschot.
  • Grix, J. (2010). The ‘governance debate’ and the study of sport policy. International Journal of Sport Policy, 2, 159–171, DOI: 10.1080/19406940.2010.488061.
  • Groot, H. d. (2010). Evidence-based Public Management. Rede uitgesproken bij de aanvaarding van het ambt van hoogleraar public management aan de faculteit management en bestuur van de Universiteit Twente op donderdag 3 juni 2010 [Evidence-based Public Management. Lecture delivered at the acceptance of the position of professor of public management at the Faculty of Management and Administration of the University of Twente on Thursday, June 3rd, 2010]. Enschede: Universiteit Twente.
  • Harris, M. (2010). Third sector organisations in a contradictory policy environment. In D. Billis (Ed.), Hybrid organisations and the third sector. Challenges for practice, theory and policy (25–45). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Houlihan, B. (2013). Accountability and good governance. In J. Alm (Ed.), Action for good governance in international sports organisations. Final report. 22–24, Copenhagen: Play the Game/Danish Institute for Sports Studies.
  • Houlihan, B., & Green, M. (2009). Modernization and sport: The reform of sport England and UK Sport. Loughborough: PSA.
  • Hoye, R. (2006). Governance reform in Australian horse racing. Managing Leisure, 11, 129–138, DOI:10.1080/13606710500520338.
  • Huizenga, F., & Tack, P. (2011). Architectuur van verenigingen [Architecture of associations]. Lelystad: VM uitgevers.
  • Ibsen, B., & Ottesen, L. (2004). Sport and welfare policy in Denmark: The development of sport between state, market and community. In K. Heinemann (Ed.), Sport and welfare policies. Six European case studies (31–86). Schorndorf: Hofmann.
  • Ibsen, B., & Seippel, Ø. (2010). Voluntary organized sport in Denmark and Norway. Sport in Society 13, 593–608, DOI: 10.1080/17430431003616266.
  • Jonker, L. (2015). Hoe future proof zijn de sportbonden? [How future-proof are the sports associations?] Sport&StrategieOnline, (21 Juni 2015). Retrieved from http://www.sportenstrategie.nl/2015/sportdeelname/statistieken-en-trends/hoe-future-proof-zijn-de-sportbonden/
  • Karré, P. M. (2011). Heads and tails: Both sides of the coin. An analysis of hybrid organisations in the Dutch waste management sector. Den Haag: Eleven International Publishers.
  • King, N. (2009). Sport policy and governance. Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Kjær, A. M. (2004). Governance. London: Polity Press.
  • Koski, P., & Heikkala, J. (1998). Professionalization and organizations of mixed rationales: The case of Finnish National Sport Organizations. European Journal for Sport Management, 5, 7–29.
  • Lagendijk, E., Postma-de Groot, M., & Verweij, S. (2012). Omgevingsanalyse KNVB [Environmental analysis Royal Netherlands Football Association]. Amsterdam: DSP Groep.
  • Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organisation and environment. Cambridge (MA): Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration.
  • Loorbach, J. (2015). (Answers to) De vraag van Jan Kossen aan Jan Loorbach [(Answers to) The question from Jan Kossen to Jan Loorbach]. SportKnowhowXL, (1 September 2015). Retrieved from http://www.sportknowhowxl.nl/nieuws-en-achtergronden/vraag-en-antwoord/item/98779/de-vraag-van-jan-kossen-aan-jan-loorbach
  • Lucassen, J., & Van der Roest, J.-W. (2011a). Samenwerking, hybridisering en fusies bij sportverenigingen [Co-operation, hybridisation and fusions of sports clubs]. In J. Boessenkool, J. Lucassen, M. Waardenburg & F. Kemper (Eds.), Sportverenigingen: tussen tradities en transities, (pp. 95–114), [Sports clubs: between tradition and transition]. Nieuwegein/'s-Hertogenbosch: Arko Sports Media/WJH Mulier Instituut.
  • Lucassen, J., & Van der Roest, J. W. (2011b). Management of hybrid organisations in the voluntary sports sector. Paper presented at the 19th Conference of the European Association for Sport Management Congres, Madrid, 7-10 September 2011.
  • Lucassen, J. M. H., Bakker, S, de, & Straatmeijer, J. (2014). Governance of sport monitor 2011-2012. Actuele uitdagingen en antwoorden van sportbestuurders. [Governance of sport monitor 2011-2012. Current challenges and responses from managers]. Utrecht: Mulier InsPtuut.
  • NOC*NSF. (2009). Olympisch Plan 2028. Heel Nederland naar Olympisch niveau. Plan van aanpak op hoofdlijnen [The Netherlands to an Olympic level. Plan outline]. Arnhem: NOC*NSF.
  • NOC*NSF Commissie goed sportbestuur. (2005). De 13 aanbevelingen voor goed sportbestuur [The 13 recommendations for good governance in sport]. Arnhem: NOC*NSF.
  • Noordegraaf, M. (2008). Professioneel bestuur. De tegenstelling tussen publieke managers en professionals als ‘strijd om professionaliteit’. Rede 4 Februari 2008 [Professional governance. The contrast between public managers and professionals as a ‘struggle for professionalism’. Speech February 4th, 2008]. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht, Utrechtse School voor Bestuurs- en Organisatiewetenschap (USBO)
  • Oldenboom, E., Hopstaken, P., & Meer, F. v. d. (1996). De nationale bestedingen aan sport [National spending on sport]. Amsterdam: SEO.
  • Putters, K. (2009). Besturen met duivelselastiek [Governance with devils elastics]. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.
  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, XLIV, 652–667, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x.
  • Rhodes, R.A.W. (1997). Understanding governance: policy networks, governance, reflexivity, and accountability. London: Open University Press.
  • Rijksoverheid (Government). (2014). Deentralisatie van overheidstaken naar gemeenten [Decentralization of central government tasks to municipalities.]. Retrieved from https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/gemeenten/inhoud/decentralisatie-van-overheidstaken-naar-gemeenten
  • Schouten, F., Verschuren, B., & Brands, H. (2012). Sportbonden Monitor 2011 [Sports federations Monitor 2011]. Arnhem: NOC*NSF.
  • Shilbury, D., & Ferkins, L. (2011). Professionalisation, sport governance and strategic capability. Managing Leisure, 16, 108–127.
  • Siekmann, R., & Soek, J. (2010). Models of sport governance in the European Union: The relationship between state and sport authorities. The International Sports Law Joumal, 10, 93–102, doi: 10.1177/1012690208096035.
  • Skille, E. A. (2008). Understanding sport clubs as sport policy implementers. International Review for the Sociology of Sport 43(2), 181–200.
  • Skirstad, B., & Chelladurai, P. (2011). For ‘love’ and money: A sports club’s innovative response to multiple logics. Journal of Sport Management 25, 339–353.
  • Smith, E. (2009). The sport of governance – A study comparing swedish riding schools. European Sport Management Quarterly, 9, 163–186, DOI:10.1080/16184740802571435.
  • Stammes, H. (2013). Van sportbond naar brancheorganisatie? Of van ledenorganisatie naar klantorganisatie? [From federation to industry association? Or from membership organization to customer organization?] Sport Knowhow. Retrieved from http://www.sportknowhowxl.nl/OpenPodium/8024
  • Stokvis, R. (2010). De sportwereld. Een inleiding [The world of sports. An Introduction]. Nieuwegein: ARKO Sports Media.
  • Thibault, L., Slack, T., & Hinings, B. (1991). Professionalism, structures and systems: The impact of professional staff on voluntary organizations. International Review for Sociology of Sport, 26, 83–97, doi: 10.1177/101269029102600202.
  • Thiel, A., & Mayer, J. (2009). Characteristics of voluntary sportsclub management: a sociological perspetive. European Sport Management Quarterly, 9, 81–98, DOI:10.1080/16184740802461744.
  • Transparency International. (2012). Aandacht voor integriteit in de sport urgent! Verslag congres Integriteit in de Sport – Arnhem, 16 februari 2012 [Attention to integrity in sport urgent! Congress Report Integrity in Sport – Arnhem, 16 February 2012]. Den Haag: Transparency International.
  • Trommel, W. (2009). Gulzig bestuur. Rede op 17 September 2009 uitgesproken bij de aanvaarding van het ambt van hoogleraar beleids- en bestuurswetenschappen aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam [Greedy government. Speech delivered on September 17, 2009 on acceptance of the post of professor of policy and administrative sciences at the Free University of Amsterdam]. Den Haag: Boom/Lemma.
  • Van ’t Verlaat, M. (2010). Marktgerichte sportbonden: een paradox? Onderzoek naar de achtergronden en gevolgen van een marktbenadering door Nederlandse sportbonden [Market-oriented sports associations: a paradox? Research into the background and consequences of a market approach by Dutch sports fedearations]. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht.
  • Van Hout, E. (2007). Zorg in spagaat. Management van hybride, maatschappelijke organisaties [Care in splits. Management of hybrid, civil organisations]. Den Haag: Lemma.
  • Van Puffelen, F., Reijnen, J., & Velthuisen, J. W. (1988). De macro-economische betekenis van sport [The macroeconomic significance of sport]. Amsterdam: Stichting voor Economisch Onderzoek (SEO) der Universiteit van Amstedam.
  • Verweel, P. (2015). Lessons learnt? Het bestuurlijk veranderingsproces van de KNVB [Lessons learned? The administrative change of the KNVB]. SportKnowhowXL, (10 Mach 2015). Retrieved from http://www.sportknowhowxl.nl/achtergronden/feedback-xl/item/97408/
  • Walters, G., Trenberth, L., & Tacon, R. (2010). Good governance in sport: A survey of UK national governing bodies of sport. London: Birkbeck Sport Business Centre.
  • Winand, M., Zintz, T., Bayle, E., & Robinson, L. (2010). Organizational performance of Olympic sport governing bodies: Dealing with measurement and priorities. Managing Leisure, 15, 279–307, DOI:10.1080/13606719.2010.508672.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.