2,106
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Sport club consultants as street-level bureaucrats in sport policy processes: conceptualising micro-level interaction styles and their macro-level consequences

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Åberg, P. (2008). Translating popular education: Civil society cooperation between Sweden and Estonia [Doctoral dissertation], Stockholm University, Department of Political Science.
  • Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Penguin.
  • Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE.
  • Cureton, K., & Frisby, W. (2011). Staff perspectives on how social liberal and neo-liberal values influence the implementation of leisure access policy. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 3(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2010.544665
  • Czarniawska-Joerges, B. (1990). Merchants of meaning: Management consulting in the Swedish public sector. In B. A. Turner (Ed.), Organizational symbolism (pp. 139–150). Walter de Gruyter.
  • DBU. (2020). Sammen rykker vi jeres klub. DBU.
  • Fahlén, J. (2017). The trust–mistrust dynamic in the public governance of sport: Exploring the legitimacy of performance measurement systems through end-users’ perceptions. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 9(4), 707–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2017.1348965
  • Fahlén, J., Eliasson, I., & Wickman, K. (2015). Resisting self-regulation: An analysis of sport policy programme making and implementation in Sweden. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 7(3), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2014.925954
  • Fahlén, J., & Stenling, C. (2019). ( Re)conceptualizing institutional change in sport management contexts: The unintended consequences of sport organizations’ everyday organizational life. European Sport Management Quarterly, 19(2), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2018.1516795
  • Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational institutionalism (pp. 232–267). Chicago University Press.
  • Garrow, E. E., & Grusky, O. (2013). Institutional logic and street-level discretion: The case of HIV test counseling. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus009
  • Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
  • Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorising change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 58–80.
  • Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
  • Hoogendam, A. (2020). Front-line professionals and local sport policy: A theoretical framework. European Journal for Sport and Society. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/16138171.2020.1839706
  • Hupe, P., & Buffat, A. (2014). A public service gap: Capturing contexts in a comparative approach of street-level bureaucracy. Public Management Review, 16(4), 548–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.854401
  • Hupe, P. (2019). Contextualizing government-in-action. In P. Hupe (Ed.), Research handbook on street-level bureaucracy: The ground floor of government in context (pp. 1–13). Edward Elgar.
  • Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2014). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). SAGE.
  • Landessportverband, B. (2020). Vereinsberater. https://www.blsv.de/blsv/vereinsservice/vereinsberatung.html?fbclid=IwAR24eboWdfvd8wsqS-q0Jh1LqROFln1awYYfqhCs3tB9OIi6jExpiUV_FF8
  • Lehmann-Nielsen, V. (2016). Law enforcement behaviour of regulatory inspectors. In P. Hupe, M. Hill, & A. Buffat (Eds.), Understanding street-level bureaucracy (pp. 115–131). Bristol University Press.
  • Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service (30th Anniversary ed.). Russel Sage Foundation.
  • McDonald, S. (2005). Studying actions in context: A qualitative shadowing method for organizational research. Qualitative Research, 5(4), 455–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794105056923
  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2004). The logic of appropriateness (ARENA Working Papers WP 04/09). Centre for European Studies.
  • May, P. J., & Wood, R. S. (2003). At the regulatory front lines: Inspectors’ enforcement styles and regulatory compliance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(2), 117–139. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mug014
  • May, P. J., & Winter, S. C. (2009). Politicians, managers, and street-level bureaucrats: Influences on policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 453–476. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum030
  • May, P. J., & Winter, S. (1999). Regulatory enforcement and compliance: Examining Danish agro-environmental policy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18(4), 625–651.
  • May, P. M., & Winter, S. (2000). Reconsidering styles of regulatory enforcement: Patterns in Danish agro-environmental inspection. Law & Policy, 22(2), 143–173.
  • Nagel, S., Schlesinger, T., Bayle, E., & Giauque, D. (2015). Professionalisation of sport federations—A multi-level framework for analysing forms, causes and consequences. European Sport Management Quarterly, 15(4), 407–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2015.1062990
  • Sam, M. (2009). The public management of sport. Public Management Review, 11(4), 499–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030902989565
  • Sam, M. (2012). Targeted investments in elite sport funding: Wiser, more innovative and strategic? Managing Leisure, 17(2–3), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/13606719.2012.674395
  • Sam, M. P. (2011). Building legitimacy at sport Canada: Pitfalls of public value creation? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(4), 757–778. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311419389
  • Sam, M. P., & Macris, L. I. (2014). Performance regimes in sport policy: Exploring consequences, vulnerabilities and politics. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 6(3), 513–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2013.851103
  • Sieber, S. D. (1981). Fatal Remedies: The ironies of social intervention. Springer.
  • SISU. (2019). Verksamhetsberättelse 2018. https://www.rf.se/globalassets/riksidrottsforbundet-rim/dokument/rf–och-sisu-stammorna-2019/07.4-07.6.1-sisus-verksamhetsberattelse-2018.pdf?w=900&h=900
  • Skille, E. Å. (2008). Understanding sport clubs as sport policy implementers. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 43(2), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690208096035
  • Skille, E. Å., & Stenling, C. (2018). Inside-out and outside-in: Applying the concept of conventions in the analysis of policy implementation through sport clubs. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 53(7), 837–853. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690216685584
  • Sport, O. (2020). Our staff. http://www.sportotago.co.nz/About-Us/Our-Staff
  • Stenling, C. (2013). The introduction of drive-in sport in community sport organizations as an example of organizational non-change. Journal of Sport Management, 27(6), 497–509. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.27.6.497
  • Stenling, C. (2014). Sport programme implementation as translation and organizational identity construction: The implementation of drive-in sport in Swedish sports as an illustration. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 6(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2013.766900
  • Stenling, C., & Fahlén, J. (2016). Same same, but different? Exploring organizational identities of Swedish voluntary sports: Possible implications of sports clubs’ self-identification for their role as implementers of policy objectives. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 51(7), 867–883. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690214557103
  • Stenling, C., & Sam, M. (2020a). Professionalization and its consequences: How active advocacy may undermine democracy. European Sport Management Quarterly, 20(5), 577–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2019.1637915
  • Stenling, C., & Sam, M. (2020b). Sport advocacy: The art of persuasion and its by-products. Sociology of Sport Journal, 37(4), 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2019-0047
  • Stenling, C., & Sam, M. (2020c). Can sport clubs be represented? Pre-packed policy advocacy and the trade-offs for democratic responsiveness. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 12(4), 583–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2020.1821079
  • Strittmatter, A.-M. (2016). Defining a problem to fit the solution: A neo-institutional explanation for legitimising the bid for the 2016 Lillehammer Youth Olympic Games. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 8(3), 421–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2016.1138990
  • Swedish Sports Confederation. (2002). Sports in Sweden. Riksidrottsförbundet.
  • Swedish Sports Confederation. (2017). Protokoll RIM 2017. Riksidrottsförbundet. https://www.rf.se/globalassets/riksidrottsforbundet-rim/dokument/2017/rf-stamman-2017/13.01-proposition-strategisk-plan-2018-2021_v1.1.pdf?w=900&h=900
  • Thompson, A., Bloyce, D., & Mackintosh, C. (2021). It is always going to change:” examining the experiences of managing top-down changes by sport development officers working in national governing bodies of sport in England. Managing Sport and Leisure, 26(1–2), 60–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2020.1800507
  • Tummers, L. L. G., Bekkers, V., Vink, V., & Musheno, M. (2015). Coping during public service delivery: A conceptualization and systematic review of the literature. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1099–1126. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu056
  • Van Parys, L., & Struyven, L. (2018). Interaction styles of street-level workers and motivation of clients: A new instrument to assess discretion as used in the case of activation of jobseekers. Public Management Review, 20(11), 1702–1721. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1438501
  • Van Parys, L. (2019). Specifying the dependent variable in street-level bureaucracy research. In P. Hupe (Ed.), Research handbook on street-level bureaucracy: The ground floor of government in context (pp. 49–69). Edward Elgar.