FUZZY TOPSIS Application in Materials Analysis for Economic Production of Cashew Juice Extractor

References

• Adegunwa MO, Kayode BI, Kayode RMO, et al. Characterization of wheat flour enriched with cashew apple (Anacardium occidentale L.) fiber for cake production. J Food Meas Charact. 2020. doi: 10.1007/s11694-020-00446-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair KP. The agronomy and economy of important tree crops of the developing world. London: Elsevier; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ogunsina BS. Crackability and chemical composition of pre-treated cashew nuts using a hand-operated knife cutter. Agric Eng Int CIGR J. 2013;15(2):275–283.
   Google Scholar
• Azam-Ali SH, Judge EC. Small-scale cashew nut processing. Coventry: ITDG Schumacher Centre for Technology and Development Bourton on Dunsmore; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• USDA. USDA/FAS food for progress LIFT-cashew SeGaBi value; 2018. Available from: https:/www.climatefinancelab.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/SeGaBi-study_final_18.03.02_pub.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Akinnibosun FI, Oyetayo AM. Turning agricultural wastes to wealth in Nigeria: a review of cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) peduncle (apple) potentials. Niger Res J Eng Environ Sci. 2018;3(1):57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Aviara NA, Lawa AA, Nyam DS, et al. Development and performance evaluation of a multi-fruit juice extractor. Glob J Eng Des Technol. 2013;2(2):16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Aremu AK, Ogunlade CA. Development and evaluation of a multipurpose juice extractor. NY Sci J. 2016;9(6):7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Sylvester AA, Abugh A. Design and construction of an orange juice extractor. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, Vol. 3; 2012. p. 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Olaniyan AM. Development of a small scale orange juice extractor. J Food Sci Technol. 2010;47(1):105–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adebayo AA, Unigbe OM, Atanda EO. Fabrication and performance evaluation of a portable motorized pineapple juice extractor. Innov Syst Des Eng. 2014;5(8):22–29.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain SAI, Mandal UK. Entropy based MCDM approach for selection of material. National Level Conference on Engineering Problems and Application of Mathematics; 2016. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Moradian M, Modanloo V, Aghaiee S. Comparative analysis of multi criteria decision making techniques for material selection of brake booster valve body. J Traffic Transp Eng (Engl Ed). 2019;6(5):526–534.
   Google Scholar
• Manalo MVG, Magdaluyo ER Jr. Integrated DLM-COPRAS method in materials selection of laminated glass interlayer for a fuel-efficient concept vehicle. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, Vol. 2; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Sen B, Bhattacharjee P, Mandal UK. A comparative study of some prominent multi criteria decision making methods for connecting rod material selection. Perspect Sci. 2016;8:547–549.
   Google Scholar
• Carpitella S, Certa A, Izquierdo J, et al. A combined multi-criteria approach to support FMECA analyses: a real-world case. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2018;169:394–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang TH. Fuzzy VIKOR method: a case study of the hospital service evaluation in Taiwan. Inf Sci (NY). 2014;271:196–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolga AC, Parlak IB, Castillo O. Finite-interval-valued type-2 Gaussian fuzzy numbers applied to fuzzy TODIM in a healthcare problem. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2020;87:103352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anter AM, Gupta D, Castillo O. A novel parameter estimation in dynamic model via fuzzy swarm intelligence and chaos theory for faults in wastewater treatment plant. Soft Comput. 2020;24(1):111–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang CL, Yoon K. Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In: Multiple attribute decision making. Berlin: Springer; 1981. p. 58–191.
   Google Scholar
• Chen SJ, Hwang CL. Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making methods. In: Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Berlin: Springer; 1992. p. 289–486.
   Google Scholar
• Yazdani-Chamzini A, Yakhchali SH. Tunnel Boring machine (TBM) selection using fuzzy multicriteria decision making methods. Tunn Undergr Space Technol. 2012;30:194–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Inf Control. 1965;8(3):338–353.
   Google Scholar
• Zarandi MHF, Asl AAS, Sotudian S, et al. A state of the art review of intelligent scheduling. Artif Intell Rev. 2020;53(1):501–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagunes ML, Castillo O, Valdez F, et al. Multi-metaheuristic competitive model for optimization of fuzzy controllers. Algorithms. 2019;12(5):90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kore NB, Ravi K, Patil SB. A simplified description of FUZZY TOPSIS method for multicriteria decision making. Int Res J Eng Technol. 2017;4(5):1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Azizi A, Aikhuele DO, Souleman FS. A fuzzy TOPSIS model to rank automotive suppliers. Procedia Manuf. 2015;2:159–164.
   Google Scholar
• Sodhi B, Tadinada P. A simplified description of fuzzy TOPSIS. arXiv preprint arXiv:1205.5098; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Chen CT. Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2000;114(1):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh I, Biswas S. A comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision models for ERP package selection for improving supply chain performance. Asia-Pac J Manag Res Innov. 2016;12(3-4):250–270.
   Google Scholar
• Emovon I, Norman RA, Alan JM, et al. An integrated multicriteria decision making methodology using compromise solution methods for prioritising risk of marine machinery systems. Ocean Eng. 2015;105:92–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karande P, Chakraborty S. Application of multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) method for materials selection. Mater. & Design. 2012;37:317–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Ray A. Selection of material for optimal design using multi-criteria decision making. Procedia Mater Sci. 2014;6:590–596.
   Google Scholar