Organisational tensions and the relationship to CSR in the football sector

References

• Aguinis, H., & Glavis, A. (2012). What we know and don't know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38, 932–968. doi: 10.1177/0149206311436079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, S., Marshall, J., & Easterby-Smith, M. (2015). Living with contradictions: The dynamics of senior managers’ identity tensions in relation to sustainability. Organization & Environment, 28, 328–348. doi: 10.1177/1086026615575048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anagnostopoulos, C., Byers, T., & Shilbury, D. (2014). Corporate social responsibility in professional team sport organisations: Towards a theory of decision-making. European Sport Management Quarterly, 14, 259–281. doi: 10.1080/16184742.2014.897736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anagnostopoulos, C., & Shilbury, D. (2013). Implementing corporate social responsibility in English football. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 3, 268–284. doi: 10.1108/SBM-05-2013-0009
   Google Scholar
• Aragón-Correa, J. A., Hurtado-Torres, N., Sharma, S., & Garcia-Morales, V. J. (2008). Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 86, 88–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnesen, S., Folkestad, B., & Gjerde, S. (2013). Frivillig Deltakelse i Norden – Et Komparativt Perspektiv [Voluntary participation in the Nordic: A comparative perspective]. Senter for Forskning i Sivilsamfunn og Frivillig Sektor, Bergen. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/kud/samfunn_og_frivillighet/rapporter/rapport-2013-2-frivillig_deltakelse_i_norden.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Babiak, K., & Wolfe, R. (2009). Determinants of corporate social responsibility in professional sport: Internal and external factors. Journal of Sport Management, 23, 717–742. doi: 10.1123/jsm.23.6.717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballegoyen, A. (2003, December). The strategic value of corporate social responsibility. Sixth round table conference of the Executive Exchange Network, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Bansal, P. (2003). From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organization Science, 14, 510–527. doi: 10.1287/orsc.14.5.510.16765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebbington, J., Higgins, C., & Frame, B. (2009). Initiating sustainable development reporting: Evidence from New Zealand. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22, 588–625. doi: 10.1108/09513570910955452
   Google Scholar
• Birkin, F., Polesie, T., & Lewis, L. (2009). A New business model for sustainable development: An exploratory study using the theory of constraints in Nordic organizations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18, 277–290. doi: 10.1002/bse.581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw, J., Foss, N. J., & Lindenberg, S. (2014). Combining purpose with profits. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55, 49–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumrodt, J., Desbordes, M., & Bodin, D. (2013). Professional football clubs and corporate social responsibility. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 3, 205–225. doi: 10.1108/SBM-04-2011-0050
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, J., & Stahley, M. (2008). Communitas/corporatas tensions in organizational rhetoric: Finding a balance in sports public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 20, 251–270. doi: 10.1080/10627260801962707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitbarth, T., & Harris, P. (2008). The role of corporate social responsibility in the football business: Towards the development of a conceptual model. European Sport Management Quarterly, 8, 179–206. doi: 10.1080/16184740802024484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitbarth, T., Hovemann, G., & Walzel, S. (2011). Scoring strategy goals: Measuring corporate social responsibility in professional European football. Thunderbird International Business Review, 53, 721–737. doi: 10.1002/tie.20448
   Google Scholar
• Breitbarth, T., Walzel, S., Anagnostopoulos, C., & van Eekeren, F. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and governance in sport: “Oh, the things you can find if you don’t stay behind!”. Corporate Governance, 15, 254–273. doi: 10.1108/CG-02-2015-0025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 85–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Martinez, M. P., & Jackson, P. R. (2015). Collaborative value Co-creation in community sport trusts at football clubs. Corporate Governance, 15, 229–242. doi: 10.1108/CG-05-2014-0066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cevea. (2013). Den Danske Model Styrker: De empiriske argumenter for den danske arbejdsmarkedsmodel [The strengths of the danish model: Empirical arguments for the Danish labour market model]. Copenhagen. Retrieved from http://cevea.dk/filer/old/materialer/analyser/den_danske_models_styrker.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Crane, A., Palazzo, G., Spence, L. J., & Matten, D. (2014). Contesting the value of “creating shared value”. California Management Review, 56, 130–153. doi: 10.1525/cmr.2014.56.2.130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DFA. (2013). Input fra din klub til evalueringen af DBU's strategi “vejen mod 2015” [Input from your club to the evaluation of DFA’s strategy “The Road to 2015”]. Broendby: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, M. J., Buhovac, A. R., & Yuthas, K. (2015). Managing social, environmental and financial performance simultaneously. Long Range Planning, 48, 35–45. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferkins, L., Shilbury, D., & McDonald, G. (2005). The role of the board in building strategic capability: Towards an integrated model of sport governance research. Sport Management Review, 8, 195–225. doi: 10.1016/S1441-3523(05)70039-5
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Giulianotti, R. (2015). Corporate social responsibility in sport: Critical issues and future possibilities. Corporate Governance, 15, 243–248. doi: 10.1108/CG-10-2014-0120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & Society, 36, 5–31. doi: 10.1177/000765039703600102
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L., & Figge, F. (2015). Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 297–316. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2047-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J., & Figge, F. (2014). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review, 39, 463–487. doi: 10.5465/amr.2012.0341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamil, S., & Morrow, S. (2011). Corporate social responsibility in the Scottish premier league: Context and motivation. European Sport Management Quarterly, 11, 143–170. doi: 10.1080/16184742.2011.559136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlez, Y., & Malagueño, R. (2016). Examining the joint effects of strategic priorities, Use of management control systems, and personal background on hospital performance. Management Accounting Research, 30, 2–17. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2015.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayhurst, L. M. C., & Frisby, W. (2010). Inevitable tensions: Swiss and Canadian sport and development NGO perspectives on partnerships with high performance sport. European Sport Management Quarterly, 10, 75–96. doi: 10.1080/16184740903554140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, J. (2018). Talking into (non)existence: Denying or constituting paradoxes of corporate social responsibility. Human Relations, 71, 668–691. doi: 10.1177/0018726717721306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviours, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, G., & Apostolakou, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in Western Europe: An institutional mirror or substitute? Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 371–394. doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0269-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski, P. A., & Le, J. K. (2016). We have to do this and that? You must be joking: Constructing and responding to paradox through humor. Organization Studies, 38, 433–462. doi: 10.1177/0170840616640846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski, P., & Fenton, E. (2006). Strategizing and organizing in pluralistic contexts. Long Range Planning, 39, 631–648. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2006.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jay, J. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 137–159. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., & James, L. (2015). It's Not just a game: Community work in the UK football industry and approaches to corporate social responsibility. Cardiff: Cardiff University, The ESRC Centre for Business Relationships, Accountability, Sustainability and Society.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkegaard, K. L., Fester, M., & Gottlieb, P. (2014). Fodbold i danmark: Kulturer, status og udvikling [Football in Denmark: cultures, status and development]. Brøndby: Danmarks Idrætsforbund.
   Google Scholar
• Laub, T. B. (2012). Fremtidens frivillige foreningsliv i idrætten [The future of voluntary sport Life]. København K.: Idrættens Analyseinstitut.
   Google Scholar
• Marrewijk, M. V., & Werre, M. (2003). Multiple levels of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 107–119. doi: 10.1023/A:1023383229086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33, 404–424. doi: 10.5465/amr.2008.31193458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menguc, B., Auh, S., & Ozanne, L. (2010, June). The interactive effect of internal and external factors on a proactive environmental strategy and its influence on a firm's performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(2), 279–298. doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0264-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miragaia, D., Brito, M., & Ferreira, J. (2016). The role of stakeholders in the efficiency of nonprofit sports clubs. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 27, 113–134. doi: 10.1002/nml.21210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Tools for Composite Indicators Building-EUR 21682 EN. Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen, Ispra.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, E. R. G., & Gwozdz, W. (2014). From resistance to opportunity-seeking: Strategic responses to institutional pressures for corporate social responsibility in the Nordic fashion industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 119, 245–264. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1630-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, E. R. G., Rosati, F., Lauesen, L. M., & Farsang, A. (2017). What is in a business case? Business cases as a tool-in-use for promoting water management practices in the food sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 1048–1060. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89, 62–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20, 685–695. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. K. (2016). Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. Academy of Management Annals, 10, 5–64. doi: 10.5465/19416520.2016.1162422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. S., & Carroll, A. B. (2007). Integrating and unifying competing and complementary frameworks: The search for a common core in the business and society field. Business & Society, 47, 148–186. doi: 10.1177/0007650306297942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, G., & Bansal, P. (2017). Partners for good: How business and NGOs engage the commercial-social paradox. Organization Studies, 38, 341–364. doi: 10.1177/0170840616683739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. (2005). Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 159–180. doi: 10.1002/smj.439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheth, H., & Babiak, K. M. (2010). Beyond the game: Perceptions and practices of corporate social responsibility in the professional sport industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 433–450. doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0094-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slawinski, N., & Bansal, P. (2015). Short on time: Intertemporal tensions in business sustainability. Organization Science, 26, 531–549. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2014.0960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. C. T., & Stewart, B. (2010). The special features of sport: A critical revisit. Sport Management Review, 13, 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.smr.2009.07.002
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Westerbeek, H. (2007). Sport as a vehicle for deploying corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 25, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, W. K., Binns, A., & Tushmann, M. L. (2010). Complex business models: Managing strategic paradoxes simultaneously. Long Range Planning, 43, 448–461. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36, 381–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solebello, N., Tschirhart, M., & Leiter, J. (2016). The paradox of inclusion and exclusion in membership associations. Human Relations, 69, 439–460. doi: 10.1177/0018726715590166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand, R., & Freeman, R. E. (2015). Scandinavian cooperative advantage: The theory and practice of stakeholder engagement in scandinavia. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(1), 65–85. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1792-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trendafilova, S., Babiak, K., & Heinze, K. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability: Why professional sport is greening the playing field. Sport Management Review, 16, 298–313. doi: 10.1016/j.smr.2012.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Byl, C. A., & Slawinski, N. (2015). Embracing tensions in corporate sustainability: A review of research from Win-wins and trade-offs to paradoxes and beyond. Organization & Environment, 28, 54–79. doi: 10.1177/1086026615575047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303–319. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, M., & Kent, A. (2009). Do fans care? Assessing the influence of corporate social responsibility on consumer attitudes in the sport industry. Journal of Sport Management, 23, 743–769. doi: 10.1123/jsm.23.6.743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, M., & Parent, M. M. (2010). Toward an integrated framework of corporate social responsibility, responsiveness, and citizenship in sport. Sport Management Review, 13, 198–213. doi: 10.1016/j.smr.2010.03.003
   Google Scholar
• Walters, G., & Tacon, R. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in sport: Stakeholder management in the UK football industry. Journal of Management and Organization, 16, 566–586. doi: 10.1017/S1833367200001942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walzel, S., Robertson, J., & Anagnostopoulos, C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility in professional team sports organizations: An integrative review. Journal of Sport Management, 32(6), 511–530. doi: 10.1123/jsm.2017-0227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar