Exploring the effect of community institutional forces on corporate philanthropy in professional sport

References

• Ali, W., & Frynas, J. (2018). The role of normative CSR-promoting institutions in stimulating CSR disclosures in developing countries. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(4), 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amato, L., & Amato, C. (2007). The effects of firm size and industry on corporate giving. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9167-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anagnostopoulos, C., Byers, T., & Shilbury, D. (2014). Corporate social responsibility in professional team sport organisations: Towards a theory of decision-making. European Sport Management Quarterly, 14(3), 259–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2014.897736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, T., & Carlsson, B. (2009). Football in Scandinavia: A fusion of welfare policy and the market. Soccer & Society, 10(3–4), 299–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970902771365
   Google Scholar
• Babiak, K., & Kihl, L. A. (2018). A case study of stakeholder dialogue in professional sport: An example of CSR engagement. Business and Society Review, 123(1), 119–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babiak, K., & Wolfe, R. (2009). Determinants of corporate social responsibility in professional sport: Internal and external factors. Journal of Sport Management, 23(6), 717–742. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.23.6.717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babiak, K., & Wolfe, R. (2013). Perspectives on social responsibility. In J. Salcines, K. Babiak, & G. Walters (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Sport and Corporate Social responsibility (pp. 17–34). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bakija, J., Gale, W., & Slemrod, J. (2003). Charitable bequests and taxes on inheritances and estates: Aggregate evidence from across states and time. American Economic Review, 93(2), 366–370. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321947362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brammer, S., Jackson, G., & Matten, D. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: New perspectives on private governance. Socio-economic Review, 10(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwr030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitbarth, T., & Harris, P. (2008). The role of corporate social responsibility in the football business: Towards the development of a conceptual model. European Sport Management Quarterly, 8(2), 179–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184740802024484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brief, A., Butz, R., & Deitch, E. (2005). Organizations as reflections of their environments: The case of race composition. In R. Dipboye, & A. Colella (Eds.), Discrimination at work: The psychological and organizational bases (pp. 119–148). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, E. (1999). Assessing the value of volunteer activity. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764099281001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, W., Helland, E., & Smith, J. (2006). Corporate philanthropic practices. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(5), 855–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2006.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burris, V. (1987). The political partisanship of American business: A study of corporate political action committees. American Sociological Review, 52(6), 732–744. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R. (1983). Corporate profits and cooptation: Networks of market constraints and directorate ties in the American economy. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of CSR. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, P., Findlay, J., Hamil, S., Hill, J., & Morrow, S. (2000). The Celtic trust. Soccer & Society, 1(3), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970008721285
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Dong, W., Tong, J., & Zhang, F. (2018). Corporate philanthropy and tunneling: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(1), 135–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3166-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobourn, S., & Frawley, S. (2017). CSR in professional sport: An examination of community models. Managing Sport and Leisure, 22(2), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2017.1402694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dam, L., & Scholtens, B. (2013). Ownership concentration and CSR policy of European multinational enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1574-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, G., & Greve, H. (1997). Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1086/231170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elazar, D. (1984). American federalism: A view from the states (3rd ed.). Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N. (1990). The transformation of corporate control. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, G., O'Reilly, N., & Dávila, A. (2016). Sports business management: Decision making around the globe. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, W., & Washington, M. (2009). Organizational structure and home team performance. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 15(3/4), 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527590910964937
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, J., & Audia, P. (2006). Community ecology and the sociology of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 32(1), 145–169. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz, J. (1985). Interorganizational relations. Annual Review of Sociology, 11(1), 281–304. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.11.080185.001433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz, J. (1997). An urban grants economy revisited: Corporate charitable contributions in the Twin cities, 1979–81, 1987–89. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 445–471. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gammelsæter, H. (2010). Institutional pluralism and governance in “commercialized” sport clubs. European Sport Management Quarterly, 10(5), 569–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2010.524241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, J. (2018, August 27). Nashville MLS ownership reaches terms on community benefits agreement for stadium project. https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/2018 /08/27/nashville-soccer-stadium-mls-fairgrounds/1115093002/
   Google Scholar
• Gautier, A., & Pache, A. (2015). Research on corporate philanthropy: A review and assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(3), 343–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1969-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillett, A. G., & Tennent, K. D. (2018). Shadow hybridity and the institutional logic of professional sport: Perpetuating a sporting business in times of rapid social and economic change. Journal of Management History, 24(2), 228–259. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-11-2017-0060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gujarari, D. (2003). Basic econometrics (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, D. (2003). Survey on corporate–community relations. Social Sciences Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, D., Arum, R., Roksa, J., & Damaske, S. (2008). Giving to local schools: Corporate philanthropy, tax incentives, and the ecology of need. Social Science Research, 37(3), 856–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, D., & McQuarrie, M. (2008). Providing for the public good: Corporate-community relations in the era of the receding welfare state. City & Community, 7(2), 113–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6040.2008.00249.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamil, S., & Morrow, S. (2011). Corporate social responsibility in the Scottish Premier League: Context and motivation. European Sport Management Quarterly, 11(2), 143–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2011.559136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heere, B., & James, J. (2007). Sports teams and their communities: Examining the influence of external group identities on team identity. Journal of Sport Management, 21(3), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.21.3.319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinze, K., Soderstrom, S., & Zdroik, J. (2014). Toward strategic and authentic corporate social responsibility in professional sport: A case study of the Detroit lions. Journal of Sport Management, 28(6), 672–686. https://doi.org/10.1123/JSM.2013-0307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hembre, E. (2019). State income taxes and team performance. University of Illinois. https://www.ssc.wisc.edu/~hembre/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/TaxesTeamPerformance_EE_All_Revisions.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D., & Warren, D. (2008). The meaning and meaningfulness of corporate social initiatives. Business and Society Review, 113(2), 163–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8594.2008.00317.x
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, A. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.5465/257008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, R. (1989). Sport and the British: A modern history. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C. (2010). Corporate governance, corporate social responsibility and corporate performance. Journal of Management & Organization, 16(5), 641–655. https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.2010.16.5.641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue, Y., & Kent, A. (2013). Assessing social impact of sport-industry philanthropy and CSR. In J. Salcines, K. Babiak, & G. Walters (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sport and corporate social responsibility (pp. 298–308). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Inoue, Y., Kent, A., & Lee, S. (2011). CSR and the bottom line: Analyzing the link between CSR and financial performance for professional teams. Journal of Sport Management, 25(6), 531–549. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.25.6.531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, S. E., Gammelsæter, H., & Fløysand, A. (2009). The spatial embeddedness of professional football clubs in Norway. Soccer & Society, 10(2), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970802601753
   Google Scholar
• Jepperson, R. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 143–163). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kihl, L., Babiak, K., & Tainsky, S. (2014). Evaluating the implementation of a professional sport team’s corporate community involvement initiative. Journal of Sport Management, 28(3), 324–337. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2012-0258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolyperas, D., Anagnostopoulos, C., Chadwick, S., & Sparks, L. (2016). Applying a communicating vessels framework to CSR value co–creation: Empirical evidence from professional team sport organizations. Journal of Sport Management, 30(6), 702–719. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2016-0032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leins, C. (2019, December 10). The most charitable states in america. U.S. News. https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/articles/2019-12-10/the-most-charitable-states-in-america
   Google Scholar
• Lev, B., Petrovits, C., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2010). Is doing good good for you? How corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth. Strategic Management Journal, 31(2), 182–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M. (2007). A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 289–307. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24634436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden, K., Scaife, W., & Crissman, K. (2006). How and why small to medium size enterprises (SMEs) engage with their communities: An Australian study. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 11(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.40
   Google Scholar
• Marano, V., & Kostova, T. (2016). Unpacking the institutional complexity in adoption of CSR practices in multinational enterprises. Journal of Management Studies, 53(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis, J., & Walsh, J. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquis, C. (2003). The pressure of the past: Network imprinting in intercorporate communities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(4), 655–689. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquis, C., & Battilana, J. (2009). Acting globally but thinking locally? The enduring influence of local communities on organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29, 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2009.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquis, C., Davis, G., & Glynn, M. (2013). Golfing alone? Corporations, elites, and nonprofit growth in 100 American communities. Organization Science, 24(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquis, C., Glynn, M., & Davis, G. (2007). Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 925–945. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquis, C., & Lee, M. (2013). Who is governing whom? Executives, governance, and the structure of generosity in large US firms. Strategic Management Journal, 34(4), 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquis, C., & Tilcsik, A. (2016). Institutional equivalence: How industry and community peers influence corporate philanthropy. Organization Science, 27(5), 1325–1341. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of CSR. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.31193458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, M., & Rascher, D. (2000). Does bat day make cents? The effect of promotions on the demand for major league baseball. Journal of Sport Management, 14(1), 8–27. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.14.1.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minciullo, M., & Pedrini, M. (2020). Antecedents of board involvement and its consequences on organisational effectiveness in non-profit organisations: A study on European corporate foundations. Journal of Management and Governance, 24(2), 531–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-019-09480-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minnesota Twins. (2020). 2019-2020 community report. https://img.mlbstatic.com/mlb-images/image/upload/mlb/e39bzyiipt5k81emgc7s.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Molotch, H., Freudenburg, W., & Paulsen, K. E. (2000). History repeats itself, but how? City character, urban tradition, and the accomplishment of place. American Sociological Review, 65(6), 791–823. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naegele, G., Schnabel, E., van de Matt, J. W., Kubicki, P., Chiatti, C., & Rostgaard, T. (2011). Measures for social inclusion of the elderly: The case of volunteering. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_publication/field_ef_document/ef1055en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. (1985). Applied linear statistical models. Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. (2008). Networks and institutions. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Sudaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 594–621). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K., Isett, K., & Milward, H. (2004). Cooperation and compromise: A network response to conflicting institutional pressures in community mental health. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(3), 489–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764004265718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Rey-Garcia, M., Sanzo-Perez, M. J., & Álvarez-González, L. I. (2018). To found or to fund? Comparing the performance of corporate and noncorporate foundations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(3), 514–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764017750492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockerbie, D., & Easton, S. (2018). Revenue sharing in major league baseball: The moments that meant so much. International Journal of Financial Studies, 6(3), 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs6030071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romanelli, E., & Khessina, O. (2005). Regional industrial identity: Cluster configurations and economic development. Organization Science, 16(4), 344–358. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanzo, M. J., Álvarez, L. I., Rey, M., & García, N. (2015). Business–nonprofit partnerships: A new form of collaboration in a corporate responsibility and social innovation context. Service Business, 9(4), 611–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-014-0242-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2004). Institutional theory: Contributing to a theoretical research program. In K. G. Smith, & M. A. Hitt (Eds.), Great minds in management: The process of theory development (pp. 460–484). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2010). Reflections: The past and future of research on institutions and institutional change. Journal of Change Management, 10(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010903549408
   Google Scholar
• Sheth, H., & Babiak, K. (2010). Beyond the game: Perceptions and practices of CSR in the professional sport industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(3), 433–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0094-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Stewart, B. (2010). The special features of sport: A critical revisit. Sport Management Review, 13(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2009.07.002
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S., & Lipsky, M. (1993). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sparvero, E., & Chalip, L. (2007). Professional teams as leverageable assets: Strategic creation of community value. Sport Management Review, 10(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1441-3523(07)70001-3
   Google Scholar
• Sparvero, E., & Kent, A. (2014). Sport team nonprofit organizations. Journal of Applied Sport Management, 6(4), 98–116. https://trace.tennessee.edu/jasm/vol6/iss4/10
   Google Scholar
• Stock, J., & Watson, M. (2008). Heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors for fixed effects panel data regression. Econometrica, 76(1), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0012-9682.2008.00821.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, T. E., & Sorenson, O. (2003). Liquidity events and the geographic distribution of entrepreneurial activity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 175–201. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, W., & Sauerwald, S. (2018). Does corporate philanthropy increase firm value? The moderating role of corporate governance. Business & Society, 57(4), 599–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315613961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilcsik, A., & Marquis, C. (2013). Punctuated generosity: How mega–events and natural disasters affect corporate philanthropy in US communities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(1), 111–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839213475800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trendafilova, S., Babiak, K., & Heinze, K. (2013). CSR and environmental sustainability: Why professional sport is greening the playing field. Sport Management Review, 16(3), 298–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2012.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trendafilova, S., Ziakas, V., & Sparvero, E. (2017). Linking CSR in sport with community development: An added source of community value. Sport in Society, 20(7), 938–956. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2016.1221935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Commerce. (2010). 2010 Census summary file 1. https://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/sf1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, R., Bond, E., & Baer, R. (2001). Building service brands via social identity: Lessons from the sports marketplace. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2001.11501881
   Google Scholar
• von Schnurbein, G., Seele, P., & Lock, I. (2016). Exclusive corporate philanthropy: Rethinking the nexus of CSR and corporate philanthropy. Social Responsibility Journal, 12(2), 280–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-10-2014-0149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddock, S., & Graves, S. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walzel, S., Robertson, J., & Anagnostopoulos, C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility in professional team sports organizations: An integrative review. Journal of Sport Management, 32(6), 511–530. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2017-0227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westhues, M., & Einwiller, S. (2006). Corporate foundations: Their role for corporate social responsibility. Corporate Reputation Review, 9(2), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550019
   Google Scholar
• Wolpert, J. (1988). The geography of generosity: Metropolitan disparities in donations and support for amenities. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 78(4), 665–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1988.tb00237.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooten, M., & Hoffman, A. J. (2008). Organizational fields: Past, present and future. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin-Andersson, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 130–147). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zietsma, C., Groenewegen, P., Logue, D., & Hinings, C. R. (2017). Field or fields? Building the scaffolding for cumulation of research on institutional fields. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 391–450. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar