A Characterization of Lower-Tier Supplier Visibility Practices in Supplier Relationship Management

References

• Atkinson, W. (2009). Economic trends and more emphasis on supplier management. http://www.purchasing.com
   Google Scholar
• Avery, S. (2007). Supplier relationship management: pathways to convergence. Purchasing, April 1.
   Google Scholar
• Becks, R. (2010). The Next Big Thing: Multi-Tier Supply Chain Management. Supply Chain Digest, available online http://www.scdigest.com/experts/E20pen_11–08–11.php?cid=4840&ctype=content accessed October 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Briscoe, J., Lee, T.N., & Fawcett, S.E. (2004). Benchmarking challenges to Supply chain integration: Managing Quality Upstream in the semiconductor industry. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 11 (2), 143–155.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D., & Fiske, D. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56 (2), 81–105.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, I.J., & Paulraj, A. (2004). Towards a theory of supply chain management: The constructs and measurements. Journal of Operations Management, 22, 119–150.
   Google Scholar
• Chikán, A. & Gelei, A. (2010). New Insight into the Competitiveness of Supplier Firms: Aligning Competences and Customer Expectations. Supply Chain Forum: an International Journal, 21(11), 30–44.
   Google Scholar
• Christopher, M., & Lee, H. (2004). Mitigating supply chain risk through improved confidence. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34 (5), 388–96.
   Google Scholar
• Churchill, G.A. (1987). Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations. (4th ed.). The Dryden Press, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Churchill, G.A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (2), 64–73.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.
   Google Scholar
• Day, M., Magnan, G., Webb, M., & Hughes, J. (2008). Strategic relationship. Supply Management Review, April, pp. 40–48
   Google Scholar
• Day, M., Magnan, G.M., & Moeller, M.M. (2010). Evaluating the bases of supplier segmentation: A review and taxonomy. Industrial Marketing Management, 39, 615–639.
   Google Scholar
• Doran, D., Thomas, P., & Caldwell, N. (2005). Examining buyer-supplier relationships within a service sector context. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 10 (4), 272–277.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, J.H., Cho, D.S., & Chu, W. (1998). Strategic supplier segmentation: The next ‘best practice’ in supply chain management. California Management Review, 40 (2), 57–77.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4), 532–550.
   Google Scholar
• Genna, A. (1997). Suppliers are keys to giving customers what they want. Purchasing, 123, 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, S. (2008). Supplier evaluation and performance excellence: A guide to meaningful metrics and successful results. J. Ross Publishing, Inc. Fort Lauderdale, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Gorsuch, R.L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Hannon, D. (2006). Down stream supplier become bigger concern. Purchasing, Boston, p.22.
   Google Scholar
• Hirakubo, N., & Kublin, M. (1998). The relative importance of supplier selection criteria: The case of electronic components procurement in Japan. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 34 (2), 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, A. (1998). Valued judgments. Supply Management, 3(25), 37–38. Hughes, J. (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Leveraging relationship to drive performance. Supplier relationship management conference, The Conference Board.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, A.T. (2004). Creating value through strategic supply management. http://www.atkearney.com/shared_res/pdf/AEP_2004_S.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, M. (1955). Rank Correlation Methods, Second Edition. Charles Griffin and Co., London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Kraljic, P. (1983). Purchasing must become supply management. Harvard Business Review, 61(5). 109–117.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, D., Scannell, T.V., & Calantone, R.J. (2000). A structural analysis of the effectiveness of buying firms’ strategies to improve supplier performance. Decision Sciences, 31. 33–55.
   Google Scholar
• Kulshrestha, R., Kulshrestha, M., Bhatnagar, S.P., & Katiyar, C. K. (2007). Supplier Performance Evaluation and Selection in the Herbal Industry. Supply Chain Forum: an International Journal, 21(8), 46–55.
   Google Scholar
• Lisanti, B. (2006). Third tier supplier requirements. Vivance, p.43.
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra, M.K., & Grover, V. (1998). An assessment of survey research in POM: From constructs to theory. Journal of Operations Management, 16, 407–425.
   Google Scholar
• Melnyk, S.A., Page, T.J., Wu, S.J., & Burns, L.A. (2012). Would you mind completing this survey: Assessing the state of survey research in supply chain management. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 18. 35–45.
   Google Scholar
• Meredith, J.R., Raturi, A., Amoako- Gyampah, K., & Kaplan, B. (1989). Alternative research paradigms in operations. Journal of Operations Management, 8 (4), 297–326.
   Google Scholar
• Meredith, J. (1998). Building operations management theory through case and field research. Journal of Operations Management, 16, 441–454.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Monczka, P.M., Handfield, R.B., Giunipero, L.C. & Patterson, J.L. (2009). Purchasing and Supply Chain Management. (4th ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning, Florence, KY.
   Google Scholar
• Olorunniwo, F.O., Jolayemi, J.K., Fan, C., & Li, X. (2011). Lower-Tier Visibility in Supplier Relationship Management: Issues and Illustrative Industry Practices. working paper, Tennessee State University, Nashville, TN.
   Google Scholar
• Pickett, C. (2006). Prepare for supply chain disruptions before they hit. Logistics Today, March 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Shil, N.C. (2010). Customized Supplier Selection Methodology: An Application of Multiple Regression Analysis. Supply Chain Forum: an International Journal, 21(11), 58–70.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, P.M., Siguaw, J.A., & White, S.C. (2002). Measuring the performance of suppliers: An analysis of evaluation processes. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38 (1). 29–41.
   Google Scholar
• Supply Chain Digest. (2012). Managing Risk in a Multi-Tier Supply Chain. http://www.e2open.com/resource-center/resource/managing-risk-in-a-multi-tier-supply-chain.
   Google Scholar
• Tae-Hoon, P. (2007). Inter-organizational relationships with Toyota’s first-, second-, and third-tier suppliers. Asian Business & Management, pp.179–198.
   Google Scholar
• Terjesen, S., Patel, P.C., & Sanders, N.R. (2012). Managing differentiation- integration duality in supply chain integration. Decision Sciences, 43. 303–339.
   Google Scholar
• Tse, Y.K., Tan, K.H. (2011). Managing product quality risk in a multi-tier global supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 49 (1), 139.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. GAO. (2006). Highlights of GAO forum: Managing the supplier base in 21st century. Washington: U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO).
   Google Scholar
• Wong, A. (2000). Integrating supplier satisfaction with customer satisfaction. Total Quality Management, 11, Nos. 4/5 and 6, S427-S432.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, Q., Dou, Y. & Sarkis, J. (2010). A portfolio-based analysis for green supplier management using the analytical network process. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 15 (4). 306–319.
   Google Scholar