Changes in vaginal community state types reflect major shifts in the microbiome

References

• Huang B, Fettweis JM, Brooks JP, et al. The changing landscape of the vaginal microbiome. Clin Lab Med. 2014;34(4):1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravel J, Brotman RM, Gajer P, et al. Daily temporal dynamics of vaginal microbiota before, during and after episodes of bacterial vaginosis. Microbiome. 2013;1(1):29.
   Google Scholar
• Gajer P, Brotman RM, Bai G, et al. Temporal dynamics of the human vaginal microbiota. Sci Transl Med. 2012 May 2;4(132):132ra52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan S, Liu C, Mitchell CM, et al. Temporal variability of human vaginal bacteria and relationship with bacterial vaginosis. PLos One. 2010;5(4):e10197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre DA, Chandiramani M, Lee YS, et al. The vaginal microbiome during pregnancy and the postpartum period in a European population. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiGiulio DB, Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, et al. Temporal and spatial variation of the human microbiota during pregnancy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Sep 1;112(35):11060–11065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knights D, Ward TL, McKinlay CE, et al. Rethinking “enterotypes”. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;16(4):433–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arumugam M, Raes J, Pelletier E, et al. Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2011;473(7346):174–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu GD, Chen J, Hoffmann C, et al. Linking long-term dietary patterns with gut microbial enterotypes. Science. 2011;334:105–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 15;108(Suppl 1):4680–4687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fettweis JM, Brooks JP, Serrano MG, et al.; Vaginal Microbiome Consortium. Differences in vaginal microbiome in African American women versus women of European ancestry. Microbiology. 2014;160(10):2272–2282.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner HL, Dukes CD. Haemophilus vaginalis vaginitis. a newly defined specific infection previously classified nonspecific vaginitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1955;69(5):962–976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuyler JA, Mordechai E, Adelson ME, et al. Identification of intrinsically metronidazole-resistant clades of gardnerella vaginalis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;84(1):1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro J, Cerca N. Bv and non-BV associated gardnerella vaginalis establish similar synergistic interactions with other BV-associated microorganisms in dual-species biofilms. Anaerobe. 2015;36:56–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbert DW, Smith WL, Chadwick SG, et al. Development and validation of a highly accurate quantitative real-time PCR assay for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Apr;54(4):1017–1024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiGiulio DB, Romero R, Amogan HP, et al. Microbial prevalence, diversity and abundance in amniotic fluid during preterm labor: a molecular and culture-based investigation. PLoS One. 2008;3(8):e3056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwich MD Jr, Serrano MG, Fettweis JM, et al. Genomic sequence analysis and characterization of sneathia amnii sp. nov. BMC Genom. 2012;13(Suppl 8):S4. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks DN, Fiedler TL, Marrazzo JM. Molecular identification of bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis. N Engl J Med. 1899–1911;353(18):2005.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw CS, Morton AN, Hocking J, et al. High recurrence rates of bacterial vaginosis over the course of 12 months after oral metronidazole therapy and factors associated with recurrence. J Infect Dis. 2006 Jun 1;193(11):1478–1486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaban B, Links MG, Jayaprakash TP, et al. Characterization of the vaginal microbiota of healthy canadian women through the menstrual cycle. Microbiome. 2014;2(1):1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The Human Microbiome Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature. 2012;486:207–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fettweis JM, Alves JP, Borzelleca JF, et al. The vaginal microbiome: disease, genetics and the environment. Nat Prec. 2011. DOI:10.1038/npre.2011.5150.2
   Google Scholar
• Amsel R, Totten PA, Spiegel CA, et al. Nonspecific vaginitis: diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am J Med. 1983;74(1):14–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brotman RM, Ghanem KG, Klebanoff MA, et al. The effect of vaginal douching cessation on bacterial vaginosis: a pilot study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(6):628.e1–628.e7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truong DT, Franzosa EA, Tickle TL, et al. Metaphlan2 for enhanced metagenomic taxonomic profiling. Nat Methods. 2015;12:902–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks JP, Edwards DJ, Harwich MD Jr, et al. The truth about metagenomics: quantifying and counteracting bias in 16s rRNA studies. BMC Microbiol. 2015;15:66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 2015. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Huber W, Carey VJ, Gentleman R, et al. Orchestrating high-throughput genomic analysis with bioconductor. Nat Meth. 2015;12(2):115–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Boogaart KG, Tolosana R, Bren M. Compositions: compositional data analysis. R Environment. 2014. [cited 2016 Sep 30]. Available from: https://cran.r–project.org/web/packages/compositions/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-Seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:139–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausser J, Strimmer K. Entropy: estimation of entropy, mutual information and related quantities. R Environment. 2014. [cited 2016 Sep 30]. Available from: https://cran.r–project.org/web/packages/entropy/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Goulet V, Dutang C, Maechler M, et al. expm: matrix exponential. R Environment. 2015. [cited 2016 Sep 30]. Available from: http://CRAN.R–project.org/package=expm
   Google Scholar
• Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York (NY): Springer; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Baptiste A, Antonov A. gridExtra: miscellaneous functions for “grid” graphics. R Environment. 2015. [cited 2016 Sep 30]. Available from: https://cran.r–project.org/web/packages/gridExtra/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Xie Y. knitr: a general-purpose package for dynamic report generation in R. R Environment. 2016. [cited 2016 Sep 30]. Available from: https://cran.r–project.org/web/packages/knitr/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Spedicado GA, Kang TS. markovchain: discrete time Markov chains made easy. R Environment. 2015. [cited 2016 Sep 30]. Available from: https://cran.rstudio.com/web/packages/markovchain/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Zhou YH. mcc: moment corrected correlation. R Environment. 2014. [cited 2016 Sep 30]. Available from: https://cran.r–project.org/web/packages/mcc/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Jackson CH. Multi-state models for panel data: the msm package for R. J Stat Softw. 2011;38(8):1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One. 2013;8:4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, et al. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinf. 2011;12(1):1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liaw A, Wiener M. Classification and regression by randomForest. R News. 2002;2:18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham H. Reshaping data with the reshape package. J Stat Softw. 2007;21:1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler D, Murdoch D. rgl: 3D visualization device system (OpenGL). R Environment. 2012. [cited 2016 Sep 30]. Available from: http://cran.r–project.org/web/packages/rgl/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch D. rglwidget: ‘rgl’ in ‘htmlwidgets’ framework. R Environment. 2015. [cited 2016 Sep 30]. Available from: https://cran.r–project.org/web/packages/rglwidget/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Kimes P. sigclust2: statistical significance of clustering. R Environment. 2016. [cited 2016 Sep 30]. Available from: https://github.com/pkimes/sigclust2
   Google Scholar
• Ward JH Jr. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc. 1963;58(301):236–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy DJ, Chen Y, Smyth GK. Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation. Nucl Acids Res. 2012 May;40(10):4288–4297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witten DM. Classification and clustering of sequencing data using a Poisson model. Ann Appl Stat. 2011;5:2493–2518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macklaim JM, Fernandes AD, Di Bella JM, et al. Comparative meta-RNA-seq of the vaginal microbiota and differential expression by lactobacillus iners in health and dysbiosis. Microbiome. 2013;1(1):1.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert JA, John S, Sobel JD, et al. Longitudinal analysis of vaginal microbiome dynamics in women with recurrent bacterial vaginosis: recognition of the conversion process. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e82599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nodelman U, Shelton CR, Koller D. Continuous time Bayesian networks. In: Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence; Alberta; 2002 August 1–4. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.; 2002. p. 378–387.
   Google Scholar
• El-Hay T, Weissbros O, Eban E, et al. Structured proportional jump processes. In: The 30th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI); Quebec City, Canada; 2014 July 23–27. Arlington, VA: AUAI Press; 2014. p. 172–181.
   Google Scholar
• Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B. 1972;34:187–220.
   Google Scholar
• Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29:297–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sha BE, Chen HY, Wang QJ, et al. Utility of Amsel criteria, Nugent score, and quantitative PCR for gardnerella vaginalis, mycoplasma hominis, and lactobacillus spp. for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected women. J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Sep;43(9):4607–4612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45(1):5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol). 1995;57:289–300.
   Google Scholar
• Sun W, Cai T. Large-scale multiple testing under dependence. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol). 2009;71:393–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y-H, Wright FA. Hypothesis testing at the extremes: fast and robust association for high-throughput data. Biostatistics. 2015;16:611–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou YH, Brooks JP, Wang X. A hidden Markov model-based two-stage design for biomarker detection and application to microbiome research. Forthcoming 2015. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12561-017-9187-y.  doi:10.1007/s12561-017-9187-y.
   Google Scholar
• Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011;12(6):R60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber GK. The dynamic microbiome. FEBS Lett. 2014;588(22):4131–4139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar