Does Media Management Matter? Establishing the Scope, Rationale, and Future Research Agenda for the Discipline

References

• Amabile, T. M. (1983). The Social Psychology of Creativity. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1988). A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. Research in Organizational Behaviour. In B. M. Shaw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behaviour. Vol. 10: 123–167. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1993). Motivational Synergy: Toward New Conceptualizations of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in the Workplace. Human Resource Management Review. 3 (3): 185–201.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile T M. (1996). Creativity in Context. Bolder, Colorado: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile T M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review. September: 77–87.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., and Tighe, E. (1994). The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66: 950–967.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J. and Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal. 39 (5):1154–1184.
   Google Scholar
• Aris, A. & Bughin, J. (2005). Managing Media Companies: Harnessing Creative Value. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, C. A. & Ghoshal, S. (1993). Beyond the M-form: toward a managerial theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 4: 23–46.
   Google Scholar
• Bettis, R. A. & Hitt, M., A. (1995). The New Competitive Landscape. Strategic Management Journal. 16: 7–19.
   Google Scholar
• Caves, R. E. (2000). Creative Industries: Contracts between Art and Commerce. Cambridge MA: Harvard.
   Google Scholar
• Chaffee, E. E. (1985). Three Models of Strategy. Academy of Management Review. 10(1): 89–98.
   Google Scholar
• Chan-Olmsted, S. M. (2006). Competitive Strategy for Media Firms: Strategic and Brand Management in Changing Media Markets. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cottle, S., ed. (2003). Media Organization and Production. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Croteau, D. & Hoynes, W. (2001) The Business of Media: Corporate Media and the Public Interest. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, H. & Scase, R. (2000). Managing Creativity: The Dynamics of Work and Organization. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, H. & Scase, R. (2000). Managing Creativity: The Dynamics of Work and Organization. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Vany, A., S. & Walls, W. D. (1999). ‘Uncertainty in the Movie Industry: Does Star Power Reduce the Terror of the Box Office?’ Journal of Cultural Economics, 23 (4): 285–318.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, E. D., Wharley, S. & Sheridan, J. (2006). “Doing Digital”: An Assessment of the Top 25 US Media Companies and their Digital Strategies. Journal of Media Business Studies. 3 (1): 33–51.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, J. E. Ashford, S. J. O’Neill, R., M. Hayes, E., & Wierba, E.E. (1997). Reading the Wind: How Middle Managers Assess the Contest for Selling Issues to Top Managers. Strategic Management Journal 18 (5): 407–425.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. & Martin, J. A. (2000) Dynamic Capabilities: What are They? Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue, 21 (10/11): 1105–1121.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, R. H. & Cook, P. J., (1995). The Winner-Takes-All Society. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C. (1983). Some Tests of the Effectiveness and Functional Attributes of Miles and Snow’s Strategic Types. Academy of Management Journal, 1983, 26: 5–25.
   Google Scholar
• Hesmondhalgh, D. (2002). The Cultural Industries. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. (1987). Strategic Change and the Management Process. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1983). The Change Masters: Corporate Entrepreneurs at Work. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a Thousand Flowers Bloom: Structural, Collective, and Social Conditions for Innovation in Organization. Research in Organizational Behavior. 10: 169–211. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Küng, L. (2005). ‘When Innovation Fails to Disrupt: Successful Incumbent Change in Response to Disruptive Technology’. Habilitationsschrift University of St Gallen.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, P. (2004). The Vanishing Newspaper: Saving Journalism in the Information Age. Missouri: University of Missouri Press.
   Google Scholar
• Picard, R. G., (ed. (2002). Media Firms: Structure, Operations, and Performance. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Picard, R. G. (2006). Journalism, Value Creation and the Future of News Organizations. Working Paper Series, 2006–4. Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, S. (1981). The Economics of Superstars, American Economic Review, Vol. 71, No. 5 (December): 845–858.
   Google Scholar
• Scase, R. (2002). Create Harmony, not Harnesses, The Observer, 4 August 2002:8.
   Google Scholar
• Schatz, T. (1983). Old Hollywood/ New Hollywood: Ritual Art and Industry. Michigan: UMI Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. Harper: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Staw, B. M. (1990). An Evolutionary Approach to Creativity and Onnovation. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr, eds. Innovation and Creativity at Work: 287–308. Chichester, UK:Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Towse, R. (2000). Creativity, Incentive and Reward: An Economic Analysis of Copyright and Culture in the Information Age. PhD Thesis. Erasmus University Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H. (1986). Central Problems in the Management of Innovation. Management Science, 32: 590–607.
   Google Scholar
• Woodman R W, Sawyer J E, & Griffin R W. (1993). Toward a Theory of Oganizational Ceativity. Academy of Management Review 18 (2): 293–321.
   Google Scholar
• Yoffie, D. B., ed. (1997).Competing in the Age of Digital Convergence. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar