354
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Does Popularity in Social Networks Influence Purchasing and Lifestyle Decisions? The Meaning Of Online Friendship

References

  • Asher, S. R., & Coie, J. D. (1990). Peer rejection in childhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Back, M. D., Stopfer, J. M., Vazire, S., Gaddis, S., Schmukle, S. C., Egloff, B., & Gosling, S. D. (2010). Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychological Science, 21(3), 372–374.
  • Bartini, M., & Pellegrini, A. D. (2001). Dominance in early adolescent boys: Affiliative and aggressive dimensions and possible functions. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 47(1), 142–163.
  • Blyth, D. A. (1983). Surviving and thriving in the social world: A commentary on six new studies of popular, rejected, and neglected children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29(4), 449–4.
  • Boman, J. H., Krohn, M. D., Gibson, C. L., & Stogner J. M. (2012). Investigating friendship quality: An exploration of self-control and social control theories’ friendship hypotheses. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(11), 1526–1540.
  • Boyd, D. B., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230.
  • Brown, J. J., & Reingen, P. H. (1987). Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 350–362.
  • Casteleyn, J., Mottart, A., & Rutten, K. (2008). How to use Facebook in your market research. International Journal of Market Research, 15(4), 439–447.
  • Chou, H. T. G., & Edge, N. (2012). They are happier and having better lives than I am: The impact of using Facebook on perceptions of others’ lives. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 117–121.
  • Chu, S. C. (2011). Viral advertising in social media: Participation in Facebook groups and responses among college-aged users. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 12(1), 30–43.
  • Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621.
  • Clifford, M. M., Walster, E. (1973). The effect of physical attractiveness on teacher expectations. Sociology of Education, 46(2), 248–258.
  • Cocking, D., & Matthews, S. (2000). Unreal friends. Ethics and information technology, 2(4), 223–231.
  • Dar-Nimrod, I., Hansen, I. G., Proulx, T., Lehman, D. R., Chapman, B. P., & Duberstein, P. R. (2012). Coolness: An empirical investigation. Journal of Individual Differences, 33(3), 175–185.
  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook ‘friends’: Social capital and college students use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168.
  • Ferguson, S. (2011). A global culture of cool? Generation Y and their perception of coolness. Young Consumers: Insight and Ideas for Responsible Marketers, 12(3), 265–275.
  • Finn, J. D., Gerber, S. B., & Boyd-Zaharias, J. (2005). Small classes in the early grades, academic achievement, and graduating from high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 214–223.
  • Fröding, B., & Peterson, M. (2012). Why virtual friendship is no genuine friendship. Ethics and Information Technology, 14(3), 201–207.
  • Gifford-Smith, M. E., & Brownell, C. A. (2003). Childhood peer relationships: Social acceptance, friendships, and peer networks. Journal of School Psychology, 41(4), 235–284.
  • Goldenberg, J., Han, S., Lehmann, D., & Hong, J. (2009). The role of hubs in the adoption processes. Journal of Marketing, 73(2), 1–13.
  • Gonzales, A. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2011). Mirror, mirror on my Facebook wall: Effects of exposure to Facebook on self-esteem. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(1–2), 79–83.
  • Hebdige, D., & Potter, A. (2008). A critical reframing of subcultural cool and consumption. European Advances in Consumer Research, 8, 527–528.
  • Hill, R. A., & Dunbar, R. I. (2003). Social network size in humans. Human Nature, 14(1), 53–72.
  • Iribarren, J. L., & Moro, E. (2010). Affinity paths and information diffusion in social networks. Social networks, 33(2), 134–142.
  • Jackson, L. A., Hunter, J. E., & Hodge, C. N. (1995). Physical attractiveness and intellectual competence: A meta-analytic review. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(2), 108–122.
  • Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business horizons, 53(1), 59–68.
  • Katona, Z., Zubcsek, P. P., & Sarvary, M. (2011). Network effects and personal influences: The diffusion of an online social network. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 425–443.
  • Krantz, M. (1987). Physical attractiveness and popularity: A predictive study. Psychological Reports, 60, 723–726.
  • La Gaipa, J. J., & Werner, R. E. (1971). Attraction and relevancy of attitude similaritydissimilarity: Impersonal topics and friendship beliefs. Psychonomic Science, 22(2), 83–84.
  • Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 390–423.
  • Lowenthal, M. F., & Weiss, L. (1976). Intimacy and crises in adulthood. The Counseling Psychologist, 6(1), 10–15.
  • Madge, C., Meek, J., Wellens, J., & Hooley, T. (2009). Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: It is more for socialising and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 141–155.
  • Marsden, P. V., & Campbell, K. E. (1984). Measuring tie strength. Social Forces, 63(2), 482–501.
  • Martino, W. (2000). Mucking around in class, giving crap, and acting cool: Adolescent boys enacting masculinities at school. Canadian Journal of Education, 25(2), 102–112.
  • Matthews, S. (2008). Identity and information technology. In J. Van den Hoven & J. Weckert (Eds.), Information technology and moral philosophy (pp. 142–160). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Muise, A., Christofides, E., & Desmarais, S. (2009). More information than you ever wanted: Does Facebook bring out the green- eyed monster of jealousy? CyberPsychology and Behavior, 12(4), 441–444.
  • Nancarrow, C., Nancarrow, P., & Page J. (2002). An analysis of the concept of cool and its marketing implications. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 1(4), 311–322.
  • Nitzan, I., & Libai, B. (2011). Social effects on customer retention. Journal of Marketing, 75(6), 24–38.
  • Olczak, P. V., & Goldman, J. A. (1976). Psychosocial maturity and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Research in Personality, 10(2), 146–154.
  • Park, H., Rodgers, S., & Stemmle, J. (2011). Health organizations’ use of Facebook for health advertising and promotion. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 12(1), 62–77.
  • Parker, J., & Asher, S. (1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 29(4), 611–621.
  • Parkhurst, J. T., & Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. Journal of Early Adolescence, 18(2), 125–144.
  • Parks, M. R. (2007). Personal networks and personal relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1(4), 80–97.
  • Pountain, D., & Robins, D. (2000). Cool rules: anatomy of an attitude. London: Reaktion.
  • Puntoni, S., & Tavassoli, N. T. (2000). The influence of mere social presence on message reception (Working paper No. 03-204). London: London Business School Centre for Marketing.
  • Raynes-Goldie, K., & Walker, L. (2008). Our space: Online civic engagement tools for youth. In W. L. Bennett (Ed.), Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth (pp. 161–188). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Ritson, M. (2002). Are you paying attention? A new study shows that people spend most of their time avoiding TV ads. Financial Times, May 14, 2.
  • Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., & Van Acker, R. (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology, 36(2), 14–24.
  • Ryu, G., & Feick, L. (2007). A penny for your thoughts: Referral reward programs and referral likelihood. Journal of Marketing, 71(1), 84–94.
  • Socialbakers. (2012). Facebook statistics. Available online: http://www.socialbakers.com/facebook-statistics/united-states.
  • Southgate, N. (2003). Coolhunting, account planning and the ancient cool of Aristotle. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 21(7), 453–461.
  • Tong, S. T., Van Der Heide, B., & Langwell, L. (2008). Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 531–549.
  • Trusov, M., Bodapati, A. V., & Bucklin, R. E. (2010). Determining influential users in Internet social networks. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(4), 643–658.
  • Uzgoren, E., & Guney, T. (2012). The snob effect in the consumption of luxury goods. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 628–637.
  • Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site? Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875–901.
  • Van den Bulte, C., & Wuyts, S. (2007). Social networks and marketing. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
  • Vigneron, F., & Johnson, L. (1999). A review and a conceptual framework of prestigeseeking consumer behaviour. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 99(1).
  • Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S., Westerman, D., & Tong, S. T. (2008). The role of friends’ appearance and behavior on evaluations of individuals on Facebook: Are we known by the company we keep? Human Communication Research, 34(1), 28–49.
  • Wilcox, K., & Stephen, A. T. (2013). Are close friends the enemy? Online social networks, self-esteem, and self-control. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(1), 90–103.
  • Zhao, H., Kim, S., Suh, T., & Du, J. (2007). Social institutional explanations of global Internet diffusion: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Global Information Management, 15(2), 28–55.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.