The effect of direct press support on the diversity of news content in Norway

References

• Allern, S. (1996). Kildenes makt: Ytringsfrihetens politiske økonomi [The Power of Sources: The Political Economy of Freedom of Expression.]. Oslo: Pax.
   Google Scholar
• Allern, S., & Blach-Ørsten, M. (2011). The news media as a political institution: A Scandinavian perspective. Journalism Studies, 12(1), 92–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allern, S., & Pollack, E. (2017). Journalism as a public good: A Scandinavian perspective. Journalism. doi:10.1177/ 1464884917730945.
   Google Scholar
• Aslama, M., Hellman, H., & Sauri, T. (2004). Does market-entry regulation matter? Competition in television broadcasting and programme diversity in Finland 1993-2002. Gazette: the International Journal for Communication Studies, 66(2), 113–132.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, C. E. (2007). Media concentration and democracy: Why ownership matters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beckers, K., Masini, A., Sevenans, J., van der Burg, M., De Smedt, J., Van Den Bulck, H., & Walgrave, S. (2017). Are newspapers’ news stories becoming more alike? Media content diversity in Belgium, 1983–2013. Journalism. doi:10.1177/1464884917706860.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, R. (2016). Institutional forms of media ownership and their modes of power. In M. Eide, H. Sjøvaag, & L. O. Larsen (Eds.), Journalism reexamined: Digital challenges and professional reorientations. Lessons from Northern Europe (pp. 29–47). Bristol: Intellect.
   Google Scholar
• Blei, D. M., Ng, A., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research., 3(Jan), 993–1022.
   Google Scholar
• Bulck, H. V. D., & Moe, H. (2012). To test or not to test: Comparing the development of ex ante public service media assessments in Flanders and Norway. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 8(1), 31–49.
   Google Scholar
• Chaffee, S. H., & Wilson, D. G. (1977). Media rich, media poor: Two studies of diversity in agenda-holding. Journalism Quarterly, 54(3), 466–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, T. E. (1998). Governing with the news: The news media as a political institution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elgesem, D., Feinerer, I., & Steskal, L. (2016). Bloggers’ responses to the Snowden affair: Combining automated and manual methods in the analysis of news blogging. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 2(25), 167–191.
   Google Scholar
• Furhoff, L. (1967). Upplagesspiralen [The circulation spiral.]. Stockholm: Svenska Bokförlaget/Norstedts.
   Google Scholar
• Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2008). Competition and Truth in the market for news. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(2), 133–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasser, T. L. (1984). Competition and diversity among radio formats: Legal and structural issues. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 28(2), 127–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, J. T. (2007). News that sell: Media competition and news content. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 8(1), 7–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellmann, H. (2001). Diversity – An end in itself? Developing a multi-measure methodology of television programme variety studies. European Journal of Communication, 16(2), 181–208. doi:10.1177/0267323101016002003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjarvard, S., & Kammer, A. (2015). Online news: Between private enterprise and public subsidy. Media, Culture & Society, 37(1), 115–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, S., & Hoffmann, A. (2008). Is there a “true” diversity? Ecological Economics, 65(2), 213–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwitz, R. B. (2005). On media concentration and the diversity question. The Information Society, 21(3), 181–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Høst, S. (2015). Avisåret 2015. [Newspapers 2015.] Volda: Høgskulen i Volda.
   Google Scholar
• Høst, S. (2016). Blindsoner og halvskygger i det norske avislandskapet [Blind spots and half shadows in the Norwegian newspaper landscape]. Notat 5/2016. Volda: Høgskulen i Volda.
   Google Scholar
• Humprecht, E., & Esser, F. (2017). Diversity in online news: On the importance of ownership types and media system types. Journalism Studies, 19(12), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffres, L. W., Cutietta, C., Sekerka, L., & Lee, J. W. (2000). Newspapers, pluralism, and diversity in an urban context. Mass Communication & Society, 3(2–3), 157–184.
   Google Scholar
• Jonkman, J. G., Trilling, D., Verhoeven, P., & Vliegenthart, R. (2016). More or less diverse: An assessment of the effect of attention to media salient company types on media agenda diversity in Dutch newspaper coverage between 2007 and 2013. Journalism, 19(11), 1608–1627 doi:10.1177/1464884916680371.
   Google Scholar
• Junge, K. (1994). Diversity of ideas about diversity measurement. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 35(1), 16–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just, N. (2009). Measuring media concentration and diversity: New approaches and instruments in Europe and the US. Media, Culture & Society, 31(1), 97–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kammer, A. (2016). A welfare perspective on Nordic media subsidies. Journal of Media Business Studies, 13(3), 140–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kind, H. J., & Møen, J. (2013). Bør den indirekte pressestøtten gis som momsfritak eller skattefradrag? Norsk medietidsskrift, 20(01), 29–48.
   Google Scholar
• Krumsvik, A. H. (2011). Medienes privilegier – En innføring i mediepolitikk Media privileges: An introduction to media policy. Fredrikstad: IJ Forlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C. A. (1995). Diversity of network prime-time program formats during the 1980s. Journal of Media Economics, 8(4), 17–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LLA. (2016). Innspel frå Landslaget for lokalaviser [Statement from Landslaget for lokalaviser]. Oslo: The Ministry of Culture. Retrieved March 16, 2017 from https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/94cf1453c2d247ba8f3f8fc1deeeb3e4/lla_landslaget_for_lokalaviser.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lund, A. B. (2016). A stakeholder approach to media governance. In G. F. Lowe & C. Brown (Eds.), Managing media firms and industries (pp. 103–120). Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, A. B., & Berg, C. E. (2009). Denmark, Sweden and Norway: Television diversity by duopolistic competition and co-regulation. International Communication Gazette, 71(1–2), 19–37.
   Google Scholar
• McCallum, A. K. (2002). Mallet: A machine learning for language toolkit. Retrieved from http://mallet.cs.umass.edu.
   Google Scholar
• McChesney, R. W. (2015). Rich media, poor democracy: Communication politics in dubious times. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, D. G., & Dimmick, J. (2003). The conceptualization and measurement of diversity. Communication Research, 30(1), 60–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus, J. H. (1994). Market-driven journalism: Let the citizen beware? Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McQuail, D. (1992). Media performance: Mass communication and the public interest. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Medienorge. (2017). Netto reklameomsetning i norske medier [Net advertising revenues in Norwegian media]. Medienorge. Retrieved March 16, 2017 from http://medienorge.uib.no/statistikk/medium/avis/362.
   Google Scholar
• Moeller, J., Trilling, D., Helberger, N., Irion, K., & De Vreese, C. (2016). Shrinking core? Exploring the differential agenda setting power of traditional and personalized news media. Info, 18(6), 26–41.
   Google Scholar
• Møen, J. (2010). Samfunnsøkonomiske perspektiver på pressestøtten [Social economic perspectives on the press support.] Arbeidsnotat nr. 49/10. Bergen: Samfunns-og næringslivsforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Murschetz, P. (1998). State support for the daily press in Europe: A critical appraisal: Austria, France, Norway and Sweden compared. European Journal of Communication, 13(3), 291–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napoli, P. M. (1999). Deconstructing the diversity principle. Journal of Communication, 49(4), 7–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, R. K., & Linnebank, G. (2011). Public support for the media: A six-country overview of direct and indirect subsidies. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Noam, E. (2009). Media ownership and concentration in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• NOU 2000:15. Pressepolitikk ved et årtusenskifte [ Press politics at the turn of the millennium]. Oslo: The Ministry of Culture.
   Google Scholar
• NOU 2017: 7. Det norske mediemangfoldet - En styrket mediepolitikk for borgerne [ Media pluralism in Norway - A strengthened media policy for citizens]. Oslo: The Ministry of Culture.
   Google Scholar
• Ohlsson, J. (2015). The Nordic nedia market. Gothenburg: Nordicom.
   Google Scholar
• Ots, M. (2009). Efficient servants of pluralism or marginalized media policy tools? The case of Swedish press subsidies. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 33(4), 376–392.
   Google Scholar
• Ots, M., Krumsvik, A. H., Ala-Fossi, M., & Rendahl, P. (2016). The shifting role of value-added tax (VAT) as a media policy tool: A three-country comparison of political justifications. Javnost-The Public, 23(2), 170–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottosen, R., Røssland, L. A., & Østbye, H. (2012). Norsk pressehistorie Andre utgave [Norwegian press history. Second Edition.]. Oslo: Det Norske Samlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Picard, R. G. (1985). The press and the decline of democracy: The democratic socialist response in public policy. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Picard, R. G. (2003). Press support and company performance. In U. Carlsson, G. A. Brihner, & K. E. Gustafsson (Eds..), Pennan, penningen & politiken: Medieföretag förr och nu [Media companies then and now] (pp. 95–108). Gothenburg: Nordicom.
   Google Scholar
• Picard, R. G. (2007). Subsidies for newspapers: Can the Nordic model remain viable?. In H. Bohrmann, E. Klaus, & M. Machill (Eds.), Media industry, journalism culture and communication policies in Europe (pp. 236–246). Köln: Halem.
   Google Scholar
• Picard, R. G., & Grönlund, M. (2003). Development and effects of Finnish press subsidies. Journalism Studies, 4(1), 105–119.
   Google Scholar
• Powers, M., & Benson, R. (2014). Is the internet homogenizing or diversifying the news? External pluralism in the US, Danish, and French press. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(2), 246–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raaum, O. (1999). Pressen er løs! Fronter i journalistenes faglige frigjøring [Fronts in journalism’s professional liberation.]. Oslo: Pax.
   Google Scholar
• Rosse, J. N. (1980). The decline of direct newspaper competition. Journal of Communication, 30(2), 65–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schibsted. (2016). Mediepolitisk unntakstilstand - Innspill til Mediemangfoldsutvalgets arbeid [A media policy state of emergency - Statement to the Media Pluralism Commission.] Retrieved March 16, 2017 from https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/94cf1453c2d247ba8f3f8fc1deeeb3e4/schibsted_norge.pdf. Oslo: Ministry of Culture.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sjøvaag, H. (2014). The principles of regulation and the assumption of media effects. Journal of Media Business Studies, 11(1), 5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Sjøvaag, H. (2016). Media diversity and the global superplayers: Operationalising pluralism for a digital media market. Journal of Media Business Studies, 13(3), 170–186. doi:10.1080/16522354.2016.1210435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjøvaag, H., & Krumsvik, A. H. (2018). In Search of Journalism Funding: Scenarios forfuture media policy in Norway. Journalism Practice, 12(9), 1201–1219. doi:10.1080/17512786.2017.1370972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjøvaag, H., & Pedersen, T. A (2018). Female voices in the news: Structural conditions of gender representations in Norwegian newspapers. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. doi:10.1177/1077699018789885.
   Google Scholar
• Stavelin, E. (2017). SorteKat. Retrieved May 31, 2018 from https://github.com/eiriks/sortekat.Github.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. (1998). On the economics and analysis of diversity. Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU). Electronic Working Papers Series.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. (2007). A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 4(15), 707–719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storsul, T. (2011). Sosiale medier–Nye muligheter for allmennkringkasterne [Social media: New opportunities for public service broadcasting.]. Nordicom-Information, 33(1–2), 69–73.
   Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J. (2005). In search of a standard: Four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 331–345.
   Google Scholar
• Syvertsen, T., Mjøs, O. J., Enli, G. S., & Moe, H. (2014). The media welfare state: Nordic media in the digital era. Ann Arbour: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, Y., & Weaver, D. H. (2013). Agenda diversity and agenda setting from 1956 to 2004: What are the trends over time? Journalism Studies, 14(6), 773–789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Cuilenburg, J. (1998). Diversity revisited: Towards a critical rational model of media diversity. In K. Brants, J. Hermes, & L. van Zoonen (Eds.), The media in question: Popular cultures and public interests (pp. 38–50). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• White Paper no 32. (1992-1993). Media i tida [Contemporary media]. Oslo: The Ministry of Culture.
   Google Scholar