The owner-market fit and responses to competing logics

References

• Achtenhagen, L., Melesko, S., & Ots, M. (2018). Upholding the 4th estate—exploring the corporate governance of the media ownership form of business foundations. The International Journal on Media Management, 20(2), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2018.1482302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achtenhagen, L., & Raviola, E. (2009). Balancing tensions during convergence: Duality management in a newspaper company. The International Journal on Media Management, 11(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14241270802518505
   Google Scholar
• Altheide, D. L., & Snow, R. P. (1979). Media logic. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Ansari, S., & Phillips, N. (2011). Text me! New consumer practices and change in organizational fields. Organization Science, 22(6), 1579–1599. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, C. E. (2007). Media concentration and democracy: Why ownership matters. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.57318391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belair-Gagnon, V., Lewis, S. C., & Agur, C. (2020). Failure to launch: Competing institutional logics, intrapreneurship, and the case of chatbots. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(4), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaa008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, R., Neff, T., & Hessérus, M. (2018). Media ownership and public service news: How strong are institutional logics? The International Journal of Press/politics, 23(3), 275–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218782740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Besharov, M. L., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 364–381. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2005). “The political field, the social science field, and the journalistic field.” In Benson Rodney and Erik Neveu (ed.), Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field (pp. 29–48). Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Brants, K. (2015). Van medialogica naar publiekslogica? In J. Bardoel & H. Wijfjes (Eds.), Journalistieke cultuur in Nederland (pp. 237–255). Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brès, L., Raufflet, E., & Boghossian, J. (2018). Pluralism in organizations: Learning from unconventional forms of organizations. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(2), 364–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannella, A. A., Jones, C. D., & Withers, M. C. (2015). Family-versus lone-founder-controlled public corporations: Social identity theory and boards of directors. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 436–459. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M., & Bower, J. L. (1996). Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199603)17:3<197:AID-SMJ804>3.0.CO;2-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M., McDonald, R., Altman, E. J., & Palmer, J. E. (2018). Disruptive innovation: An intellectual history and directions for future research. Journal of Management Studies, 55(7), 1043–1078. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, C. N., & Luo, X. (2008). Institutional logics or agency costs: The influence of corporate governance models on business group restructuring in emerging economies. Organization Science, 19(5), 766–784. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates Nee, R. (2014). Social responsibility theory and the digital nonprofits: Should the government aid online news startups? Journalism, 15(3), 326–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884913482553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Demsetz, H. (1997). The firm in economic theory: A quiet revolution. The American Economic Review, 87(2), 426–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand, R., & Thornton, P. H. (2018). Categorizing institutional logics, institutionalizing categories: A review of two literatures. Academy of Management Annals, 12(2), 631–658. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duran, P., Kammerlander, N., Van Essen, M., & Zellweger, T. (2016). Doing more with less: Innovation input and output in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1224–1264. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. C., & McManus, S. E. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1246–1264. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Díaz, A. M., Li, S. X., & Lorente, J. C. (2009). The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21(2), 521–539. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., & Empson, L. (2003). The professional partnership: Relic or exemplary form of governance? Organization Studies, 24(6), 909–933. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024006005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.590299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve, H. R., & Zhang, C. M. (2017). Institutional logics and power sources: Merger and acquisition decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 60(2), 671–694. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2014). Applied thematic analysis. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hannan, M. T. (2010). Partiality of memberships in categories and audiences. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-021610-092336
   Google Scholar
• Hansmann, H. (1996). The ownership of enterprise. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, A. J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.2307/257008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., & Powell, W. W. (2009). The rationalization of charity: The influences of professionalism in the nonprofit sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(2), 268–298. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2009.54.2.268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosterich, A. (2020). Managing news nerds: Strategizing about institutional change in the news industry. Journal of Media Business Studies, 17(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2019.1639890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. S. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (ed.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (Vol. 840, pp. 243–275). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Lander, M. W., Heugens, P. P., & van Oosterhout, J. (2017). Drift or alignment? A configurational analysis of law firms’ ability to combine profitability with professionalism. Journal of Professions and Organization, 4(1), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jow011
   Google Scholar
• Lander, M. W., Koene, B. A., & Linssen, S. N. (2013). Committed to professionalism: Organizational responses of mid-tier accounting firms to conflicting institutional logics. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 38(2), 130–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leblebici, H., Salancik, G. R., Copay, A., & King, T. (1991). Institutional change and the transformation of inter-organizational fields: An organizational history of the US radio broadcasting industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 333–363. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lischka, J. A. (2020). Fluid institutional logics in digital journalism. Journal of Media Business Studies, 17(2), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2019.1699764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M. (2001). Institutional sources of practice variation: Staffing college and university recycling programs. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(1), 29–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, N., & Morris, T. (2009). Heterogeneity in professional service firms. Journal of Management Studies, 46(6), 895–922. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00826.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Membership Puzzle Project. (2017). About the Membership Puzzle Project. Retreived on July 10. 2022 at https://membershippuzzle.org/about
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D., Breton‐Miller, L., & Lester, R. H. (2011). Family and lone founder ownership and strategic behavior: Social context, identity, and institutional logics. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00896.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosco, V. (2009). The political economy of communication (second edition) ed.). Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Napoli, P. M. (1997). A principal-agent approach to the study of media organizations: Toward a theory of the media firm. Political Communication, 14(2), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846097199443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocasio, W., & Radoynovska, N. (2016). Strategy and commitments to institutional logics: Organizational heterogeneity in business models and governance. Strategic Organization, 14(4), 287–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127015625040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972–1001. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallas, J., Fredriksson, M., & Wedlin, L. (2016). Translating institutional logics: When the media logic meets professions. Organization Studies, 37(11), 1661–1684. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616655485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. J., & Zuckerman, E. W. (2001). Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets 1. American Journal of Sociology, 107(2), 379–429. https://doi.org/10.1086/324072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picard, R. G., & Van Weezel, A. (2008). Capital and control: Consequences of different forms of newspaper ownership. The International Journal on Media Management, 10(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/14241270701820473
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The logic of comparative social inquiry. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Purdy, J. M., & Gray, B. (2009). Conflicting logics, mechanisms of diffusion, and multilevel dynamics in emerging institutional fields. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 355–380. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.37308255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathenau Instituut, M. van, W. Nieuwenhuizen, M. Sanders, E. Masson, & P. van Boheemen. (ed.), (2022). Harmful Behaviour Online – an investigation of harmful and immoral behaviour online in the Netherlands. Huijstee.
   Google Scholar
• Raviola, E. (2012). Exploring organizational framings: Journalism and business management in newspaper organizations. Information, Communication & Society, 15(6), 932–958. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.696273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raviola, E., & Norbäck, M. (2013). Bringing technology and meaning into institutional work: Making news at an Italian business newspaper. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1171–1194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613492077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, M. (2018). Eigendom en businessmodellen van Europese journalistieke start-ups. Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap, 46(2), 154–172. https://doi.org/10.5117/2018.046.002.005
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, M. (2021). Owner identity and interdependent markets: An examination of ownership filters of institutional complexity, coalitional change and value creation in disrupted two sided market categories. Erasmus University Rotterdam. https://repub.eur.nl/pub/135457
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, M., & van de Vrande, V. (2024). Value creation in interdependent digital and analogue markets. Journal of Media Business Studies, 21(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2023.2300195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauerwald, S., Van Oosterhout, J., & Van Essen, M. (2016). Expressive shareholder democracy: A multilevel study of shareholder dissent in 15 Western European countries. Journal of Management Studies, 53(4), 520–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, P., & Reese, S. (2014). Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Siapera, E., & Papadopoulou, L. (2016). Entrepreneurialism or cooperativism? An exploration of cooperative journalistic enterprises. Journalism Practice, 10(2), 178–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1125760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tameling, K. (2015). Crossmediale dilemma’s op de Nederlandse nieuwsredactie. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen (RUG). https://pure.rug.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/20147470/Complete_thesis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira, M. G., Roglio, K. D. D., & Marcon, R. (2017). Institutional logics and the decision-making process of adopting corporate governance at a cooperative organization. Journal of Management & Governance, 21(1), 181–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-016-9340-x
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen, S. (2004). Corporate values and corporate governance. Corporate Governance the International Journal of Business in Society, 4(4), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700410558862
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen, S., & Pedersen, T. (2000). Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest European companies. Strategic Management Journal, 21(6), 689–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200006)21:6<689:AID-SMJ115>3.0.CO;2-Y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H. (2002). The rise of the corporation in a craft industry: Conflict and conformity in institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H. (2004). Markets from culture: Institutional logics and organizational decisions in higher education publishing. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–843. https://doi.org/10.1086/210361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford University Press on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• Tjernström, S. (2002). Theoretical approaches to the management of the public service media firm. The Journal of Media Economics, 15(4), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327736ME1504_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 1(1), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v1i1.70
   Google Scholar
• Van Oosterhout, J. (2008). Het disciplineringsmodel voorbij; over autoriteit en legitimiteit in Corporate Governance. Erasmus Research Institute of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Wall Street Journal. (2022). The Facebook Files: A Wall Street Journal investigation showed the social-media giant knows its products harm millions of people. https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-facebook-files-11642035385
   Google Scholar
• Winseck, D., & Jin D. Y. (Ed.). (2011). The political economies of media: The transformation of the global media industries. Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13(1), 443–464. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.002303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, E. W. (1999). The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1398–1438. https://doi.org/10.1086/210178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar