The dark side of institutionalism: Carl Schmitt reading Santi Romano

References

• Blasius, D. 2001. Carl Schmitt: Preussischer Staatsrat in Hitlers Reich. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
   Google Scholar
• Bobbio, N. 2007. Dalla struttura alla funzione: Nuovi studi di teoria del diritto. Laterza: Roma-Bari.
   Google Scholar
• Catania, A. 1987. “Carl Schmitt e Santi Romano.” Rivista internazionale di filosofia del diritto 64: 12–24.
   Google Scholar
• Croce, M., and A. Salvatore. 2013. The Legal Theory of Carl Schmitt. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Croce, M. 2018. “Wither the State? On Santi Romano’s The Legal Order.” In Croce, M. (Ed.). Ethics & Global Politics. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, J. 1986. “Konkretes Ordnungsdenken.” In Complexio oppositorum: Über Carl Schmitt, edited by H. Quaritsch, 319–340. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.
   Google Scholar
• Kantorowicz, E. [1957] 1985. The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• La Torre, M. 2010. Law as Institution. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Loughlin, M. 2017. “Santi Romano and the Institutional Theory of Law.” In The Legal Order, ed. S. Romano, edited and translated by M. Croce, with a foreword by M. Loughlin and an afterword by M. Croce, xi–xxix. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mehring, R. 2014. Carl Schmitt: A Biography. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Melis, G. 2004. “Il Consiglio di Stato ai tempi di Santi Romano.” In La guistizia amministrativa ai tempi di Santi Romano presidente del Consiglio di Stato, edited by A. Romano, 39–58. Torino: Giappichelli.
   Google Scholar
• Montedoro, G. 2002. “La crisi dello stato in Santi Romano e Carl Schmitt.” Diritto amministrativo: Rivista trimestrale 1-2: 105–141.
   Google Scholar
• Musumeci, A. 2015. “Santi Romano: Un guirista tra due secoli.” In I giuristi e il fascino del regime, edited by I. Birocchi and L. Loschiavo, 325–349. Roma: Tre Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pietropaoli, S. 2002. “Ordinamento guiridico e konkrete Ordnung: Per un confronto tra le teorie istituzionalistiche di Santi Romano e Carl Schmitt.” Iura gentium: Rivista di filosofia del diritto internazionale e della politica globale 2: 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Quaritsch, H., ed. 1986. Complexio oppositorum: Über Carl Schmitt. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.
   Google Scholar
• Romano, S. [1909] 1950. “Lo stato moderno e la sua crisi.” In Scritti minori: Diritto costituzionale, edited by G. Zanobi, Vol. 1, 311–325. Milan: Guiffrè. Translated as S. Romano, S. 2015. “L’état moderne et sa crise.” Translation D. Soldini. Jus Politicum 14: 1-15.
   Google Scholar
• Romano, S. [1918] 2017. The Legal Order, edited and translated by M. Croce, with a foreword by M. Loughlin and an afterword by M. Croce. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rütthers, B. 1968. Die unbegrenzte Auslegung: Zum Wandel der Privatrechtsordnung im Nationalsozialismus. Tübingen: Mohr.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, C. 1934b. “Nazionalsozialismus und Rechtsstaat.” Juristische Wochenschrift 63 (24): 713–718.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, C. [1922] 1996. Politische Theologie: Vier Kapitel zur Lehre von der Souveränität. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot. Translated as C. Schmitt. 2005. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, translated and introduced by G. Schwab, with a foreword by T. Strong. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, C. [1934a] 2006. Über die drei Arten des rechtswissenschaftlichen Denkens. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot. Translated as C. Schmitt. 2004. On the Three Types of Juristic Thought, translated by J. Bendersky. Westport: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Stolleis, M. 2002. Geschichte des öffentlichen Rechts in Deutschland: Weimarer Republik und Nationalsozialismus. Munich: Beck.
   Google Scholar