Advanced search
Publication Cover
Ethics & Global Politics Volume 13, 2020 - Issue 4: On Anna Elisabetta Galeotti’s book Political Self-Deception
Submit an article Journal homepage
888
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Reality check: can impartial umpires solve the problem of political self-deception?

Alfred MooreDepartment of Politics, University of York, York, UKCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7252-5039
ORCID Icon
Pages 16-25 | Received 09 Jun 2020, Accepted 12 Oct 2020, Published online: 10 Dec 2020

References

  • Bok, S. 1980. “The Self-Deceived.” Social Science Information 19 (6): 16–25. doi:10.1177/053901848001900602.
  • Douglas, H. 2009. Science, Policy, and the Value-free Ideal. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Ellsberg, D. 2002. Secrets: A Memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers. New York: Penguin Books.
  • Galeotti, A. E. 2018. Political Self-Deception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Janis, I. 1982 [1972]. Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Kuhn, T. 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Landemore, H. 2013. Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. doi:10.23943/princeton/9780691155654.001.0001
  • Mackie, G. 2006. “Does Deliberation Change Minds? Politics.” Philosophy & Economics 5 (3): 279–303. doi:10.1177/1470594X06068301.
  • Mercier, H., and D. Sperber. 2011. “Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34: 57–111. doi:10.1017/S0140525X10000968.
  • Moore, A. 2017. Critical Elitism: Deliberation, Democracy, and the Politics of Expertise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ober, J. 2008. Democracy and Knowledge: Innovation and Learning in Classical Athens. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Pamuk, Z. 2020. “‘The People Vs the Experts: A Productive Struggle’, in Moore, A., Invernizzi-Accetti, C., Markovits, E. et al. Beyond Populism and Technocracy: The Challenges and Limits of Democratic Epistemology.” Contemporary Political Theory. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-020-00398-1.
  • Rudner, R. 1953. “The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments.” Philosophy of Science 20 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1086/287231.
  • Steele, K. 2012. “The Scientist Qua Policy Advisor Makes Value Judgments.” Philosophy of Science 79 (5): 893–904. doi:10.1086/667842.
  • Turner, S. P. 2003. Liberal Democracy 3.0: Civil Society in an Age of Experts. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Winsberg, E. 2012. “Value Uncertainties in the Predictions of Global Climate Models.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 22 (2): 111–137. doi:10.1353/ken.2012.0008.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.