Female health-care providers’ advocacy of self-sampling after participating in a workplace program for cervical cancer screening in Ghana: a mixed-methods study

References

• Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruni LAG, Serrano B, Mena M, et al. ICO/IARC Information Centre on HPV and Cancer (HPV Information Centre). Human papillomavirus and related diseases in Ghana. Summary Report 17 June 2019. 2019 [cited 2020 Aug 21]. Available from: http://hpvcentre.net/statistics/reports/GHA.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dunyo P, Effah K, Udofia EA. Factors associated with late presentation of cervical cancer cases at a district hospital: a retrospective study. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1156.
   Google Scholar
• Olson B, Gribble B, Dias J, et al. Cervical cancer screening programs and guidelines in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;134:239–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handlogten KS, Molitor RJ, Roeker LE, et al. Cervical cancer screening in Ghana, west Africa: prevalence of abnormal cytology and challenges for expanding screening. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2014;33:197–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gakidou E, Nordhagen S, Obermeyer Z. Coverage of cervical cancer screening in 57 countries: low average levels and large inequalities. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adanu RM, Seffah JD, Duda R, et al. Clinic visits and cervical cancer screening in accra. Ghana Med J. 2010;44(2):59–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Asgary R, Adongo PB, Nwameme A, et al. mHealth to train community health nurses in visual inspection with acetic acid for cervical cancer screening in Ghana. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2016;20:239–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abotchie PN, Shokar NK. Cervical cancer screening among college students in ghana: knowledge and health beliefs. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19:412–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binka C, Doku DT, Awusabo-Asare K. Experiences of cervical cancer patients in rural Ghana: an exploratory study. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0185829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opoku CA, Browne EN, Spangenberg K, et al. Perception and risk factors for cervical cancer among women in northern Ghana. Ghana Med J. 2016;50(2):84–89.
   Google Scholar
• Williams MS, Amoateng P. Knowledge and beliefs about cervical cancer screening among men in Kumasi, Ghana. Ghana Med J. 2012;46(3):147–151.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ebu NI, Mupepi SC, Siakwa MP, et al. Knowledge, practice, and barriers toward cervical cancer screening in Elmina, Southern Ghana. Int J Womens Health. 2015;7:(31–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adanu RM. Cervical cancer knowledge and screening in Accra, Ghana. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2002;11:487–488.
   Google Scholar
• Arbyn M, Verdoodt F, Snijders PJ, et al. Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:172–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravitt PE, Belinson JL, Salmeron J, et al. Looking ahead: a case for human papillomavirus testing of self-sampled vaginal specimens as a cervical cancer screening strategy. Int J Cancer. 2011;129:517–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krings A, Duckelmann AM, Moser L, et al. Performance of OncoE6 cervical test with collection methods enabling self-sampling. BMC Womens Health. 2018;18(1):68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virtanen A, Nieminen P, Luostarinen T, et al. Self-sample HPV tests as an intervention for non-attendees of cervical cancer screening in Finland: a randomized trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20(9):1960–1969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Alba I, Anton-Culver H, Hubbell FA, et al. Self-sampling for human papillomavirus in a community setting: feasibility in Hispanic women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:2163–2168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogilvie G, Krajden M, Maginley J, et al. Feasibility of self-collection of specimens for human papillomavirus testing in hard-to-reach women. CMAJ. 2007;177:480–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbyn M, Smith SB, Temin S, et al. Detecting cervical precancer and reaching underscreened women by using HPV testing on self samples: updated meta-analyses. BMJ. 2018;363:k4823.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bakiewicz A, Rasch V, Mwaiselage J, et al. “The best thing is that you are doing it for yourself” - perspectives on acceptability and feasibility of HPV self-sampling among cervical cancer screening clients in Tanzania: a qualitative pilot study. BMC Womens Health. 2020;20(1):65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawla PC, Chawla A, Chaudhary S. Knowledge, attitude & practice on human papillomavirus vaccination: a cross-sectional study among healthcare providers. Indian J Med Res. 2016;144(5):741–749.
   Google Scholar
• Krings A, Dunyo P, Pesic A, et al. Characterization of human papillomavirus prevalence and risk factors to guide cervical cancer screening in the North Tongu District, Ghana. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0218762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovers Medical Devices. Manufacturer’s leaflet. [cited 2019 Jul 05]. Available from: https://www.roversmedicaldevices.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/ROVER0147_FOLDER-EVALYN-GEBRUIKSAANWIJZING-ENG.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bressan V, Bagnasco A, Aleo G, et al. Mixed-methods research in nursing - a critical review. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26(19–20):2878–2890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flick U. An introduction to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Delere Y, Remschmidt C, Leuschner J, et al. Human papillomavirus prevalence and probable first effects of vaccination in 20 to 25 year-old women in Germany: a population-based cross-sectional study via home-based self-sampling. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14(87). DOI:10.1186/1471-2334-14-87
   Google Scholar
• Mayring P Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: qualitative social research. 2000. [cited 2020 Aug 21]. Available from: https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089/2385.
   Google Scholar
• Birks M, Chapman Y, Francis K. Memoing in qualitative research: probing data and processes. J Res Nurs. 2008 Jan 1;13:68–75.
   Google Scholar
• Ndejjo R, Mukama T, Musabyimana A, et al. Uptake of cervical cancer screening and associated factors among women in rural Uganda: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0149696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim JN, Ojo AA. Barriers to utilisation of cervical cancer screening in Sub Sahara Africa: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017;26(1):e12444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll SD. Barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening in high incidence populations: a synthesis of qualitative evidence. Women Health. 2016;56(4):448–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman R, Clark MD, Collins Z, et al. Cervical cancer screening decentralized policy adaptation: an African rural-context-specific systematic literature review. Glob Health Action. 2019;12:1587894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong LP, Wong YL, Low WY, et al. Knowledge and awareness of cervical cancer and screening among Malaysian women who have never had a Pap smear: a qualitative study. Singapore Med J. 2009;50(1):49–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackerson K. Personal influences that affect motivation in pap smear testing among African American women. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2010;39:136–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audet CM, Silva Matos C, Blevins M, et al. Acceptability of cervical cancer screening in rural Mozambique. Health Educ Res. 2012;27(3):544–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coskun S, Can H, Turan S. Knowledge about cervical cancer risk factors and pap smear testing behavior among female primary health care workers: a study from south Turkey. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14:6389–6392.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chung SD, Pfeiffer S, Lin HC. Lower utilization of cervical cancer screening by nurses in Taiwan: a nationwide population-based study. Prev Med. 2011;53:82–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay K, Tay SK, Tesalona KC, et al. Factors affecting the uptake of cervical cancer screening among nurses in Singapore. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;130(3):230–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutyaba T, Mmiro FA, Weiderpass E. Knowledge, attitudes and practices on cervical cancer screening among the medical workers of Mulago Hospital, Uganda. BMC Med Educ. 2006;6(13). DOI:10.1186/1472-6920-6-13
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell S, Ogilvie G, Steinberg M, et al. Assessing women’s willingness to collect their own cervical samples for HPV testing as part of the ASPIRE cervical cancer screening project in Uganda. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;114(2):111–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansil P, Wittet S, Lim JL, et al. Acceptability of self-collection sampling for HPV-DNA testing in low-resource settings: a mixed methods approach. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:(596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berner A, Hassel SB, Tebeu PM, et al. Human papillomavirus self-sampling in Cameroon: women’s uncertainties over the reliability of the method are barriers to acceptance. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2013;17:235–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelle U. Sociological explanations between micro and macro and the integration of qualitative and quantitative methods. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2001 [cited 2020 Aug 20]. Available from: https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/966/2108
   Google Scholar
• Flick U. Doing triangulation and mixed methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Paudyal P, Llewellyn C, Lau J, et al. Obtaining self-samples to diagnose curable sexually transmitted infections: a systematic review of patients’ experiences. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0124310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar