Lessons from community participation in primary health care and water resource governance in South Africa: a narrative review

References

• World Health Organisation and United nations Children’s Fund (WHO/UNICEF). ALMA-ATA primary health care. int conf prim heal care [Internet]. 1978;1. [Cited 2020 Dec 18]. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/about/history/files/Alma_Ata_conference_1978_report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pilkington G, Panday S, Khatib MN, et al. The effectiveness of community engagement and participation approaches in low and middle income countries: a review of systematic reviews with particular reference to the countries of South Asia. [Internet]. EPPI Center, Social Science Unit, Institute of Education, University London; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Krieger MGM, Wenham C, Nacif Pimenta D, et al. How do community health workers institutionalise: an analysis of Brazil’s CHW programme. Glob Public Health [Internet]. 2021: 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider H, Lehmann U. From community health workers to community health systems: time to widen the horizon? Health Systems & Reform. 2016;2:112–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider H, Okello D, Lehmann U. The global pendulum swing towards community health workers in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review of trends, geographical distribution and programmatic orientations, 2005 to 2014. Hum Resour Health [Internet]. 2016;14:1–12. Available from.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuckler D, Basu S, Mckee M. Health care capacity and allocations Among South Africa ’ s Provinces: infrastructure – inequality Traps After the End of Apartheid. Res Pract [Internet]. 2011;101:165–172.
   Google Scholar
• Republic of South Africa. CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA no. 108 of 1996 [Internet]. 1999 cited 2020 Dec 18. Available from: https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/images/a10.
   Google Scholar
• Republic of South Africa. National Health Amendment Act [12 of 2013]. Cape Town: government Gazette No 36702: 24 July 2013, p.1–89 [cited 2020 Dec 18]. http://www.gov.za/documents/download.php?f=195193.
   Google Scholar
• Meier BM, Pardue C, London L. Implementing community participation through legislative reform: a study of the policy framework for community participation in the western cape province of South Africa. BMC International Health and Human Rights. 2012;12:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haldane V, Chuah FLH, Srivastava A, et al. Community participation in health services development, implementation, and evaluation: a systematic review of empowerment, health, community, and process outcomes. PLoS One. 2019;14:1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donkin A, Goldblatt P, Allen J, et al. Global action on the social determinants of health. BMJ Glob Heal. 2017;3:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hove J, D’Ambruoso L, Mabetha D, et al. “Water is life”: developing community participation for clean water in rural South Africa. BMJ Glob [Internet]. 2019;4:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNICEF, World Health Organisation (WHO). Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000-2017: special focus on inequalities [Internet]. Launch version July 12 Main Rep. Prog. Drink. Water, Sanit. Hyg. 2019. Available from: https://washdata.org/reports.
   Google Scholar
• Intergrated Water CM. Resource Management in South Africa. International Journal of Water Governance. 2013;1:323–328.
   Google Scholar
• Republic of South Africa. National Water Act, Act 36 of 1998 [Internet]. Gov. Gaz. 1998 p. 1–200 cited 2020 Dec 18. Available from: available: http://www.dwa.gov.za/Documents/Legislature/nw_act/%0ANWA.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Republic of South Africa. Water Services Act. Gov Gaz [Internet]. 1997;390:36 cited 2020 Dec 18. Available from: http://www.saflii.org/za/legis/num_act/wsa1997175.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta L, Alba R, Bolding A, et al. The politics of IWRM in Southern Africa. International Journal of Water Resources Development. 2014;30:528–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chibwe T, Bourblanc M, Kirsten J, et al. Reform process and performance analysis in water governance and management: a case of study of Inkomati Water Management Area in South Africa [Internet]. Water Research Commission of South Africa (Project K5/1969) and the World Bank (S-000441); 2012. [Cited 2020 Oct 20]. Available from: http://agritrop.cirad.fr/570496/1/document_570496.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Scott K, George AS, Harvey SA, et al. Beyond form and functioning: understanding how contextual factors influence village health committees in northern India. PLoS One. 2017;12:1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Participation NF, Revolution P. The reproduction of neoliberal water governance mechanisms in Durban, South Africa. Antipode. 2013;45:101–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rifkin SB. Lessons from community participation in health programmes. Health Policy Plan. 1986;1:240–249.
   Google Scholar
• van Buuren A, van Meerkerk I, Tortajada C. Understanding emergent participation practices in water governance. International Journal of Water Resources Development. 2019;35:367–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Thorne S, Malterud K. Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? Eur J Clin Invest. 2018;48:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikh K, Sriram V, Rouffy B, et al. Governance roles and capacities of ministries of health: a multidimensional framework. Int J Heal Policy Manag. 2021;10:237–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paez A. Gray literature: an important resource in systematic reviews. Evid Based Med. 2017;10:233–240.
   Google Scholar
• Mcauley L, Pham B, Tugwell P, et al. Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? Lancet. 2000;356:1228–1231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzies KM, Premji S, Ep RN, et al. Advantages and Challenges of Including Grey Literature. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. 2006;3:55–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein SR. A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. J Am Plan Assoc. 1969;35:216–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unpacking CA. “Participation” Models, meanings and practices. Community Dev J. 2008;43:269–283.
   Google Scholar
• Haricharan HJ. Rapid appraisal of health committee policies in South Africa. Cape Town: Learning Network for Health and Human Rights, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Haricharan H, Boulle T, London L Health committees as vehicles for community participation: a national colloquium on health committees in South Africa report of a national colloquium on health committees in South Africa. University of Cape Town, Cape Town; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Boulle T A review of the functioning of health committees in Nelson Mandela bay health district – with particular emphasis on identifying key challenges. School of Public Health and Family Medicine at University of Cape Town. [Internet]. 2013. [Cited 2021 Mar 15]. Available from: http://www.salearningnetwork.uct.ac.za/sites/default/files/image_tool/images/386/publications/other_reports/20131027.
   Google Scholar
• Vinet L, Zhedanov AA “missing” family of classical orthogonal polynomials. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. School of Public Health,University of the Western Cape; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Zwama G, Stuttaford MC, Haricharan HJ, et al. Enhancing engagement of health providers with communities, cape metropole, South Africa. Front Sociol. 2019;4:1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Esau N, English R, Shung-king M. An assessment of a ‘ training-of-trainers programme for clinic committees ’ in a South African district: a qualitative exploratory study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastern Cape Department of Health. Eastern Cape Provincial Health Act, No. 10 of 1999.Eastern Cape;2000 [Internet]. 2000 cited 2020 Dec 18. Available from: https://rhap.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/EC-Health-Act.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Paradath A, Friedman I The status of clinic committees in primary level public health sector facilities in South Africa [Internet]. Durban Heal. Syst. Trust. 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Spotlight. Provinces not on same page regarding clinic committees [Internet]. 2019 cited 2020 Dec 18. Available from: https://www.spotlightnsp.co.za/2019/10/17/provinces-not-on-same-page-regarding-clinic-committees/.
   Google Scholar
• Mayosi BM, Lawn JE, Van NA, et al. Health in South Africa: changes and challenges since 2009. Lancet. 2012;380:2029–2043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padarath AP The status of clinic committees in primary level clinics in three provinces of South Africa [Internet]. School of Public Health, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of the Western Cape; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Mulumba M, London L, Nantaba J. Using health committees to promote community participation as a social determinant of the right to health: lessons from Uganda and South Africa. Heal Hum Rights J HHR. 2018;20:11–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenson R, Machingura F, Kaim BT and RSC (TARSC) RI (CWGH) (2014). ‘Health centre committees as a vehicle for social participation in health systems in east and Southern Africa’ EQUINET discussion paper 101, TARSC with CWGH and Medico, EQUINET: harare. 2014. p. 0–26.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Water Affairs. Water for an Equitable and Sustainable Future. Natl Water Resour Strateg [Internet]. 2013; NWRS2:201 cited 2020 Dec 18. Available from: http://www.dwa.gov.za/nwrs/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=CIwWyptzLRk=&tabid=91&mid=496.
   Google Scholar
• Harricharan H Extending Participation: challenges of health committees as meaningful structures for community participation extending participation. Human Rights Division, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town. [Internet]. 2011. [cited 2021 Mar 15]. Available from: https://salearningnetwork.weebly.com/uploads/6/5/0/1/6501954/hanne_report_on_health_committees.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Western Cape Department of Health. Draft Policy Framework for Community Participation/Governance Structures in Health. [Internet]. 2008 cited 2020 Dec 18. Available from: http://www.salearningnetwork.uct.ac.za/sites/default/files/image_tool/images/386/publications/book_chapters/health_committee_submission_on_health_facilities_board_act.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie A, Schneider H, Schaay N, et al. Primary health care systems (PRIMASYS). School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape: Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Brown J. Evaluating participatory initiatives in South Africa: not just processes but outcomes too. SAGE Open. 2014;4:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Meissner R, Funke N, Nortje K. The politics of establishing catchment management agencies in South Africa: the case of the Breede-Overberg Catchment Management Agency. Ecol Soc. 2016;3:21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown J. Assuming too much? Partic Water Resou Gov South Afr. 2011;177:171–185.
   Google Scholar
• Seshoka J, de Lange W, Fayss N the transformation of irrigation boards into water user associations in South Africa: Case studies of the lower olifants, great letaba and vaalharts water user associations. Working Paper 72. Int Water Manag Inst. 2004;72:1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Faysse N, Gumbo J. The transformation of irrigation boards into water user associations in south africa: case studies of the umlaas, komati, lomati and hereford irrigation boards. Volume 2. Working paper 72 International water management institute (IWMI). 2004. p. 1–65; cited 2020 Dec 18. Available from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254426128
   Google Scholar
• Can Participation BJ. Change the geography of water? lessons from South Africa. Ann Assoc Am Geogr. 2013;103:271–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Water Affairs and Forestry. Integrated Water Resources Management in South Africa Synthesis of findings from an evaluation in three WMAs Key issues to consider in order to ensure the effective participation of marginalized groups in IWRM. Pretoria, South Africa; 2004 cited 2020 Dec 18. Available from: https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/dwafanrep0304.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boakye MK, Akpor OB. Community participation in water resources management in South Africa. Int J Environ Sci Dev. 2012;3:511–516.
   Google Scholar
• Boakye MK, Akpor OB. Stakeholders’ participation in water management: a case study of the msunduzi catchment management forum of kwazulu-natal, South Africa. J Sustain Dev. 2012;5:104–111.
   Google Scholar
• Faysse N An assessment of small-scale users’ inclusion in large-scale water user associations of South Africa [Internet]. Int. Water Manag. Inst. 2004. [cited 2020 Dec 18]. Available from: https://agritrop.cirad.fr/533039/#:~:text=https%3A//agritrop.cirad.fr/533039.
   Google Scholar
• Meissner R, Stuart-Hill SI, Nakhooda Z. The establishment of catchment management agencies in South Africa with reference to the Flussgebietsgemeinschaft Elbe: some practical considerations. In: Centre for Water Research Resource, University of KwaZulu-Natal, editors. Freshwater Governance for the 21st Century. Heidelberg: Springer; 2017. p. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Faysse N. CHALLENGES FOR FRUITFUL PARTICIPATION OF SMALLHOLDERS IN LARGE-SCALE WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ORGANISATIONS: SELECTED CASE STUDIES IN SOUTH AFRICA. Agrekon. 2004;43:52–73.
   Google Scholar
• Denby K, Movik S, Mehta L, et al. The “trickle down” of IWRM: a case study of local-level realities in the inkomati water management Area, South Africa. Water Altern. 2016;9:473–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleaver F. PARADOXES OF PARTICIPATION: QUESTIONING PARTICIPATORY APPROACHES TO DEVELOPMENT. J Int Dev. 1999;11:597–612.
   Google Scholar
• Akhmouch A, Clavreul D. Introduction: a call for more inclusive water governance. In: Karar E, and Gov F, editors, 21st century, global issues water policy 6 [Internet]. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2017. p. 29–49.
   Google Scholar
• Haricharan HJ, Stuttaford M, London L. The role of community participation in primary health care: practices of South African health committees. Prim Heal Care Res Dev. 2021;22:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haricharan HJ, Stuttaford M, London L. Effective and meaningful participation or limited participation? A study of South African health committee legislation. Prim Heal Care Res Dev. 2021;22:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maluka SO, Bukagile G. Community participation in the decentralised district health systems in Tanzania: why do some health committees perform better than others? Int J Health Plann Manage. 2016;31:E86–E104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falisse JB, Ntakarutimana L. When information is not power: community-elected health facility committees and health facility performance indicators. Soc Sci Med. 2020;265:1-18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falisse JB, Meessen B, Ndayishimiye J, et al. Community participation and voice mechanisms under performance-based financing schemes in Burundi. Trop Med Int Heal. 2012;17:674–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart-Hill SI, Meer R Lessons learnt from the establishment of catchment management agencies in South Africa. Water Research Commission, Pretoria, RSA, WRC Report No. 2320/1/18. Pp. 172. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Reconfiguring Agency FJ. Reconfiguring agency and responsibility in the governance of social housing in Scotland. Urban Stud. 2004;41:151–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke J. Governing the Local? A Response to Kevin Stenson. Soc Work Soc. 2008;6:9–11.
   Google Scholar
• Popay J, Whitehead M, Ponsford R, et al. Power, control, communities and health inequalities I: theories, concepts and analytical frameworks. Health Promotion International. 2020. p. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Renedo A, Miles S, Chakravorty S, et al. Not being heard: barriers to high quality unplanned hospital care during young people ’ s transition to adult services – evidence from ‘ this sickle cell life ’ research. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinyata GS, Abiodun NL. The impact of community participation on projects success in Africa: a bottom up approach. Int J Res Sociol Anthropol. 2020;6:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Loewenson R, Beznec P, Coelho V, et al. Building social power and participation in local health systems: learning from practice. Harare: Training and Research Support Centre; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• George AS, Mehra V, Scott K, et al. Community participation in health systems research: a systematic review assessing the state of research, the nature of interventions involved and the features of engagement with communities. PLoS One. 2015;10:1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison C, Dearden A. Beyond tokenistic participation: using representational artefacts to enable meaningful public participation in health service design. Health Policy (New York) [Internet]. 2013;112:179–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haldane V, Singh SR, Srivastava A, et al. Community involvement in the development and implementation of chronic condition programmes across the continuum of care in high- and upper-middle income countries: a systematic review. Health Policy (New York). 2020;124:419–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Questa K, Das M, King R, Everitt M, Rassi C, Cartwright C, et al. Community engagement interventions for communicable disease control in low- and lower- middle-income countries: evidence from a review of systematic reviews. Int J Equity Health. 2020;19:1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed MS. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol Conserv. 2008;141:2417–2431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wester P, Burton M, Mestre-Rodriguez E. Managing the water transition in the lerma-chapala basin, Mexico. In: Intersectoral manag river basins integr water manag water-stressed river basins dev ctries strateg poverty alleviation agric growth. Mexico City, Mexico; 2000. p. 161–181.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson J, Bissell P, Cooper C, et al. Credibility and the ‘ professionalized ’ lay expert: reflections on the dilemmas and opportunities of public involvement in health research. Health (Irvine Calif). 2012;16:602–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston C, Renedo A, Miles S. Community participation is crucial in a pandemic. Lancet. 2020;395:1676–1678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenson R, Colvin CJ, Szabzon F, et al. Beyond command and control: a rapid review of meaningful community-engaged responses to COVID-19. Global Public Health. 2021;16:1439–1453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar