Modern slavery and labor exploitation during the COVID-19 pandemic: a conceptual model

References

• International Labour Organization. Global estimates of modern slavery: forced labour and forced marriage. Geneva: ILO; 2017. 68 p.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Global report on trafficking in persons 2020. Vienna: United Nations; 2021. 175 p.
   Google Scholar
• Ottisova L, Hemmings S, Howard LM, et al. Prevalence and risk of violence and the mental, physical and sexual health problems associated with human trafficking: an updated systematic review. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2016 Aug;25:317–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramaswamy S, Seshadri S. Children on the brink: risks for child protection, sexual abuse, and related mental health problems in the COVID-19 pandemic. Indian J Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;62:S404–s413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum M. Promoting women’s capabilities. In: Benería L, Bisnath S, editors. Global tensions: challenges and opportunities in the world economy. New York: Routledge; 2004. p. 200–213.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman C, Kiss L. Human trafficking and exploitation: a global health concern. PLoS Med. 2017 Nov;14:e1002437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Groot R, Kuunyem MY, Palermo T. Ghana LEAP 1000 evaluation team. Child marriage and associated outcomes in northern Ghana: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2018 Feb;18. DOI:10.1186/s12889-018-5166-6.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Statistical Commission. Global indicator framework for the sustainable development goals and targets of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations; 2020. (A/RES/71/313, E/CN.3/2018/2, E/CN.3/2019/2, E/CN.3/2020/2). [cited 2021 Aug 2]. Available from: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/Global%20Indicator%20Framework%20after%202020%20review_Eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Todres J. Moving upstream: the merits of a public health law approach to human trafficking. NCL Rev. 2010;89:447.
   Google Scholar
• Chuang JA. Exploitation creep and the unmaking of human trafficking law. Am J Int Law. 2014;108:609–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adepoju A. Review of research and data on human trafficking in sub-Saharan Africa. Int Migration. 2005;43:75–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adesina OS. Modern day slavery: poverty and child trafficking in Nigeria. Afr Ident. 2014;12:165–179.
   Google Scholar
• Bales K. What predicts human trafficking? Int J Comparat Appl Crim Just. 2007;31:269–279.
   Google Scholar
• Cho SY. Modeling for determinants of human trafficking: an empirical analysis. Soc Inclus. 2015;3:2–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgibbon K. Modern-day slavery? The scope of trafficking in persons in Africa. Afr Secur Stud. 2003;12:81–89.
   Google Scholar
• Gezie LD, Yalew AW, Gete YK. Human trafficking among Ethiopian returnees: its magnitude and risk factors. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry KM, McEwing L. How do social determinants affect human trafficking in Southeast Asia, and what can we do about it? A systematic review. Health Hum Rights. 2013 Dec 12;15:138–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz C, Alvord D, Daley D, et al. The trafficking continuum: service providers’ perspectives on vulnerability, exploitation, and trafficking. Aff J Women Soc Work. 2019;34:116–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynes P, Burland P, Thurnham A, et al. ‘Between two fires’: understanding vulnerabilities and the support needs of people from Albania, Viet Nam and Nigeria who have experienced human trafficking into the UK. London: University of Bedfordshire, International Organization for Migration; 2019. p. 121.
   Google Scholar
• Kiss L, Zimmerman C. Human trafficking and labor exploitation: toward identifying, implementing, and evaluating effective responses. PLoS Med. 2019 Jan;16:e1002740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chon KY, Khorana S. Moving forward: next steps in preventing and disrupting human trafficking. In: Chisolm-Straker M, Stoklosa H, editors. Human trafficking is a public health issue: a paradigm expansion in the USA. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2017. p. 415–441.
   Google Scholar
• Worsnop CZ. The disease outbreak-human trafficking connection: a missed opportunity. Health Secur. 2019 Jun;17:181–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheu JC, Torres MIM, Gordon MR, et al. Potential impact of climate change on human trafficking: a narrative review. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2021 May 1;209: 324–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plambech S. Sex, deportation and rescue: economies of migration among Nigerian sex workers. Feminist Econ. 2017;23:134–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenbaum J. A public health approach to global child sex trafficking. Annu Rev Public Health. 2020 Apr 2;41: 481–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzer R. New directions in research on human trafficking. ANNALS Am Acad Political Social Sci. 2014;653:6–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Inf Libraries J. 2009;26:91–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earp JA, Ennett ST. Conceptual models for health education research and practice. Health Educ Res. 1991;6:163–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiss L, Pocock NS, Naisanguansri V, et al. Health of men, women, and children in post-trafficking services in Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam: an observational cross-sectional study. Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Mar;3:e154–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David F, Bryant K, Larsen JJ. Migrants and their vulnerability to human trafficking, modern slavery and forced labour. Geneva: International Organization for Migration; 2019. p. 110. Available from:https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/migrants_and_their_vulnerability.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pourmokhtari N. Global human trafficking unmasked: a feminist rights-based approach. J Human Traff. 2015;1:156–166.
   Google Scholar
• Kara S. Perspectives on human trafficking and modern forms of slavery [Editorial]. Soc Inclus. 2017;5:1–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao S, Presenti C. Understanding human trafficking origin: a cross-country empirical analysis. Feminist Econ. 2012;18:231–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Migration. IOM handbook: on protection and assistance for migrants vulnerable to violence, exploitation and abuse. Geneva: IOM; 2019. 286 p.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman C, Hossain M, Watts C. Human trafficking and health: a conceptual model to inform policy, intervention and research. Soc sci med. 2011 Jul;73:327–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie I, Spring D, Hynes P, et al. ‘Vulnerability’ to human trafficking: a study of Viet Nam, Albania, Nigeria and the UK: literature review. London: University of Bedfordshire, International Organization for Migration, Institute of Applied Social Research; 2018. p. 48.
   Google Scholar
• Kharel U. The global epidemic of occupational injuries: counts, costs, and compensation [dissertation]. RAND Corporation; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Migration. World migration report 2020. Geneva: IOM; 2019. 480 p.
   Google Scholar
• Hugo G. Environmental concerns and international migration. Int Migr Rev. 1996;30:105–131. Spring.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. Trafficking in persons protocol to prevent, suppress and punish trafficking in persons, especially women and children. UN; 2001. (A/RES/55/25). [cited 2021 Oct 26]. Available from: https://www.unodc.org/pdf/crime/a_res_55/res5525e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rahman MA. Human trafficking in the era of globalization: the case of trafficking in the global market economy. Trans J. 2011;2:54–71.
   Google Scholar
• Kara S. Supply and demand: human trafficking in the global economy. Harv Int Rev. 2011;33:66.
   Google Scholar
• Benería L. The crisis of care, international migration, and public policy. Feminist Econ. 2008;14:1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler A. From being aware to going there: on the awareness and decision-making of (prospective) migrants. Mass Commun Soc. 2020;23:356–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahler DG, Yonzan N, Lakner C, et al. World Bank Blog [Internet]. Updated estimates of the impact of COVID-19 on global poverty: turning the corner on the pandemic in 2021? [place unknown]: World Bank. 2021 June 24. [cited 2021 Jul 20]. Available from: https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/updated-estimates-impact-covid-19-global-poverty-turning-corner-pandemic-2021
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Organization. World employment and social outlook: trends 2021. Geneva: ILO; 2021. 162 p.
   Google Scholar
• Ratha D, Kim EJ, Plaza S, et al. Migration and development brief 34. Resilience: COVID-19 crisis through a migration lens. Washington (DC): KNOMAD, World Bank; 2021. 43 p.
   Google Scholar
• Sarrica F, Healy C, Serio G, et al. How COVID-19 restrictions and the economic consequences are likely to impact migrant smuggling and cross-border trafficking in persons to Europe and North America [Research brief]. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime; 2020. 28 p.
   Google Scholar
• Benería L, Berik G, Floro M. Gender, development and globalization: economics as if all people mattered. New York (NY): Routledge; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma N. Anti-trafficking rhetoric and the making of a global apartheid. NWSA J. 2005;17:88–111.
   Google Scholar
• Haider N, Osman AY, Gadzekpo A, et al. Lockdown measures in response to COVID-19 in nine sub-Saharan African countries. BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5:e003319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins M. COVID-19: a catastrophe for children in sub-Saharan Africa cash transfers and a Marshall plan can help. [place unknown]: United Nations Children’s Fund; 2020. 48 p.
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Organization; United Nations Children’s Fund. COVID-19 and child labour: a time of crisis, a time to act. New York: ILO, UNICEF; 2020. 35 p.
   Google Scholar
• Azevedo JP, Hasan A, Goldemberg D, et al. Simulating the potential impacts of COVID-19 school closures on schooling and learning outcomes: a set of global estimates. World Bank Res Obs. 2021;36:1–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on trafficking in persons and responses to the challenges: a global study of emerging evidence. Vienna: United Nations; 2021. 90 p.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage R, Nellums LB. COVID-19: compounding the health-related harms of human trafficking. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;24:100409.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greenbaum J, Stoklosa H, Murphy L. The public health impact of coronavirus disease on human trafficking. Front Public Health. 2020;8:561184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dottridge M. Trafficking in children in West and Central Africa. Gender Dev. 2002;10:38–42.
   Google Scholar
• Le PD. Human trafficking health research: progress and future directions. Behav Med. 2018;44:259–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Counter Trafficking Data Collaborative. Family members are involved in nearly half of child trafficking cases [Data brief]. International Organization for Migration; 2017. [cited 2021 July 8]. Available from: https://www.iom.int/sites/g/files/tmzbdl486/files/our_work/DMM/MAD/Data%20Brief%20on%20Child%20Trafficking_CTDC.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Egger D, Miguel E, Warren SS, et al. Falling living standards during the COVID-19 crisis: quantitative evidence from nine developing countries. Sci Adv. 2021;7:eabe0997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Labour Office; United Nations Children’s Fund. Child labour: global estimates 2020, trends and the road forward. New York: ILO, UNICEF; 2021. 88 p.
   Google Scholar
• Dako-Gyeke M, Kodom RB, Dankyi EK, et al. Drivers of independent migration among adolescents from selected West African countries. Child Youth Services Rev. 2020 Oct 01;117: 105293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury-Jones C, Isham L. The pandemic paradox: the consequences of COVID-19 on domestic violence. J Clin Nurs. 2020 Jul;29:2047–2049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Counter Trafficking Data Collaborative. The global dataset at a glance [Internet]. [place unknown]: International Organization for Migration; 2018c cited 2021 Jul 31. Available from: https://www.ctdatacollaborative.org/global-dataset-glance
   Google Scholar
• Patterson JM. Integrating family resilience and family stress theory. J Marr Family. 2002;64:349–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson JM. Families experiencing stress: I. the family adjustment and adaptation response model: II applying the FAAR model to health-related issues for intervention and research. Family Syst Med. 1988;6(2):202–237.
   Google Scholar
• Boss P. Family stress management. Newbury Park (CA): Sage; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Kansiime MK, Tambo JA, Mugambi I, et al. COVID-19 implications on household income and food security in Kenya and Uganda: findings from a rapid assessment. World Dev. 2021;137:105199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asian Development Bank. Addressing climate change and migration in Asia and the Pacific. Mandaluyong City (Philippines): Asian Development Bank; 2012. 83 p.
   Google Scholar
• Haug S. Migration networks and migration decision-making. J Ethnic Migrat Stud. 2008;34:585–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey DS, Arango J, Hugo G, et al. Theories of international migration: a review and appraisal. Popul Dev Rev. 1993;19:431–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kley S. Explaining the stages of migration within a life-course framework. Euro Sociol Rev. 2011;27:469–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao N, Singh C, Solomon D, et al. Managing risk, changing aspirations and household dynamics: implications for wellbeing and adaptation in semi-arid Africa and India. World Dev. 2020;125:104667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tebboth MGL, Conway D, Adger WN. Mobility endowment and entitlements mediate resilience in rural livelihood systems. Glob Environ Change. 2019 Jan 01;54: 172–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. International migration 2020 highlights. New York: United Nations; 2020. 54 p.
   Google Scholar
• Willen SS, Knipper M, Abadía-Barrero CE, et al. Syndemic vulnerability and the right to health. Lancet. 2017 Mar 4;389: 964–977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousaf FN. Forced migration, human trafficking, and human security. Curr Sociol. 2018 Mar 01;66:209–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Labour Organization. Minimum age convention. Geneva: ILO; 1973. (No. 138).
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Organization. Worst forms of child labour convention. Geneva: ILO; 1999. (No. 182).
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Organization. Worst forms of child labour recommendation. Geneva: ILO; 1999. (No. 190).
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Organization. Global estimates of child labour: results and trends, 2012-2016. Geneva: ILO; 2017. 68 p.
   Google Scholar
• Basu K, Van PH. The economics of child labor. Am Econ Rev. 1998;88:412–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Labour Organization. World report on child labour: economic vulnerability, social protection and the fight against child labour. Geneva: ILO; 2013. 80 p.
   Google Scholar
• Ersado L. Child labor and schooling decisions in urban and rural areas: comparative evidence from Nepal, Peru, and Zimbabwe. World Dev. 2005 Mar 01;33:455–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Admassie A. Explaining the high incidence of child labour in sub–Saharan Africa. Afr Dev Rev. 2002;14:251–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Glind H. Migration and child labour: exploring child migrant vulnerabilities and those of children left-behind (Working paper). Geneva: International Labour Office, International Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour; 2010. 20 p.
   Google Scholar
• van de Glind H, Kou A. Migrant children in child labour: a vulnerable group in need of attention. Geneva: International Labour Organization; 2013. 17 p.
   Google Scholar
• Anand S, Sen A. Human development and economic sustainability. World Dev. 2000;28:2029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trautrims A, Schleper MC, Cakir MS, et al. Survival at the expense of the weakest? Managing modern slavery risks in supply chains during COVID-19. J Risk Res. 2020;23:1067–1072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USA Agency for International Development. Counter-trafficking in persons policy. Washington D.C: USAID; 2012. 12 p.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connell DJ. Troubling freedom: migration, debt, and modern slavery. Migr Stud. 2013;1:176–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuang J. The challenges and perils of reframing trafficking as ‘modern-day slavery’. Anti-Traff Rev. 2015;5:146–149.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme. Human development report 2009: overcoming barriers: human mobility and development. New York (NY): United Nations; 2009. 218 p.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Global report on trafficking in persons 2018. Vienna (Austria): United Nations; 2018. 88 p.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury P, Paul SK, Kaisar S, et al. COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: a systematic review. Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev. 2021;148:102271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Such E, Laurent C, Jaipaul R, et al. Modern slavery and public health: a rapid evidence assessment and an emergent public health approach. Public Health. 2020 Mar;180:168–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner A, Northall P, Brewster B. Building slavery-free communities: a resilience framework. J Human Traff. 2020;6:1–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bermudez LG, Bahar OS, Dako-Gyeke M, et al. Understanding female migrant child labor within a cumulative risk framework: the case for combined interventions in Ghana. Int Soc Work. 2020 Mar;63:147–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Hoop J, Rosati FC. Cash transfers and child labor. World Bank Res Obs. 2014;29:202–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leroy JL, Ruel M, Verhofstadt E. The impact of conditional cash transfer programmes on child nutrition: a review of evidence using a programme theory framework. J Develop Effect. 2009;1:103–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owusu-Addo E, Renzaho AMN, Smith BJ. The impact of cash transfers on social determinants of health and health inequalities in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Health Policy Plan. 2018;33:675–696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nafees AA, Khan KS, Fatmi Z, et al. Situation analysis of child labour in Karachi, Pakistan: a qualitative study. J Pak Med Assoc. 2012;62:1075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijsmans R, Baker S. Child trafficking: ‘worst form’ of child labour, or worst approach to young migrants? Develop Change. 2012;43:919–946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Children’s Fund. MICS6 tools. [Internet]. [place unkown]: UNICEF; 2022c cited 2022 Feb 15. Available from: https://mics.unicef.org/tools
   Google Scholar
• Amaro D, Mizunoya S. Toward achieving inclusive and equitable quality education for all: a manual for statistical data analysis using Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS6) with a special focus on achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund; 2020. 72 p.
   Google Scholar
• Dayıoğlu M. Impact of unpaid household services on the measurement of child labour. In: United Nations Children’s Fund. MICS Methodological Papers, No. 2. New York: UNICEF; 2013. 68 p.
   Google Scholar
• Dayıoğlu M. How sensitive are estimates of working children and child labour to definitions? A comparative analysis MICS Methodological Papers. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund; 2012. No. 1. 118 p.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh DR, Schroeder DG, Dearden KA, et al. The power of positive deviance. BMJ. 2004;329:1177–1179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh DR, Schroeder DG. The positive deviance approach to improve health outcomes: experience and evidence from the field—Preface. Food Nutr Bull. 2002;23:3–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szablewska N, Kubacki K. Anti-human trafficking campaigns: a systematic literature review. Social Marketing Q. 2018;24:104–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davy D. Anti–human trafficking interventions: how do we know if they are working? Am J Eval. 2016;37:486–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant K, Landman T. Combatting human trafficking since Palermo: what do we know about what works? J Human Traff. 2020;6:119–140.
   Google Scholar
• Rafferty Y. Child trafficking and commercial sexual exploitation: a review of promising prevention policies and programs. Am J Orthopsych. 2013;83:559.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman C, Mak J, Pocock NS, et al. Human trafficking: results of a 5-year theory-based evaluation of interventions to prevent trafficking of women from South Asia. Front Public Health. 2021 May 17;9. DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2021.645059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar