1,152
Views
34
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Comprehensive analysis on copper-iron (II, III)/oxide-engine oil Casson nanofluid flowing and thermal features in parabolic trough solar collector

, , , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 619-636 | Received 10 Aug 2021, Accepted 16 Oct 2021, Published online: 02 Nov 2021

References

  • Kreider JF, Kreith F. Solar energy handbook; 1981.
  • Granqvist CG. Solar energy materials. Adv Mater. 2003;15(21):1789–1803.
  • Ugli TJT. The importance of alternative solar energy sources and the advantages and disadvantages of using solar panels in this process. Int J Eng Inf Syst (IJEAIS). 2019;3(4):70–79.
  • Tyagi H, Agarwal AK, Chakraborty PR, et al. Introduction to applications of solar energy. In: Applications of solar energy. Singapore: Springer; 2018. p. 3–10.
  • Manikandan GK, Iniyan S, Goic R. Enhancing the optical and thermal efficiency of a parabolic trough collector–a review. Appl Energy. 2019;235:1524–1540.
  • Fernández-García A, Zarza E, Valenzuela L, et al. Parabolic-trough solar collectors and their applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2010;14(7):1695–1721.
  • Ahmed MS. Nanofluid: new fluids by nanotechnology. In: Thermophysical properties of complex materials. IntechOpen; 2019.
  • Sheikhpour M, Arabi M, Kasaeian A, et al. Role of nanofluids in drug delivery and biomedical technology: methods and applications. Nanotechnol Sci Appl. 2020;13:47.
  • Majumder SD, Das A. A short review of organic nanofluids: preparation, surfactants, and applications. Front Mater. 2021;8:1–8. Article No. 630182.
  • Wong KV, De Leon O. Applications of nanofluids: current and future. Adv Mech Eng. 2010;2:519659.
  • Dehaj MS, Rezaeian M, Mousavi D, et al. Efficiency of the parabolic through solar collector using NiFe2O4/water nanofluid and U-tube. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2021;120:136–149.
  • Alashkar A, Gadalla M. Investigation of using ag/therminol nanofluids as heating fluids in PTSC-based power plants. In: ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2017, November; Vol. 58417, p. V006T08A099.
  • Richardson S. On the no-slip boundary condition. J Fluid Mech. 1973;59(4):707–719.
  • Haq SU, Khan I, Ali F, et al. Influence of slip condition on unsteady free convection flow of viscous fluid with ramped wall temperature. In Abstract and applied analysis, Hindawi; 2015, August; Vol. 2015.
  • Sayed HM, Aly EH, Vajravelu K. Influence of slip and convective boundary conditions on peristaltic transport of non-Newtonian nanofluids in an inclined asymmetric channel. Alexandria Eng J. 2016;55(3):2209–2220.
  • Srinivasacharya D, Himabindu K. Effect of slip and convective boundary conditions on entropy generation in a porous channel due to micropolar fluid flow. Int J Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. 2018;19(1):11–24.
  • Acharya N, Das K, Kundu PK. Outlining the impact of second-order slip and multiple convective condition on nanofluid flow: a new statistical layout. Can J Phys. 2018;96(1):104–111.
  • Siddiqui A, Shankar B. MHD flow and heat transfer of Casson nanofluid through a porous media over a stretching sheet. In: Kandelousi MS, Ameen S, Akhtar MS, et al., editors. Nanofluid flow in porous media. IntechOpen; 2019.
  • Mukhopadhyay S. Casson fluid flow and heat transfer over a nonlinearly stretching surface. Chin Phys B. 2013;22(7):074701.
  • Hayat T, Shehzad SA, Alsaedi A, et al. Mixed convection stagnation point flow of Casson fluid with convective boundary conditions. Chin Phys Lett. 2012;29(11):114704.
  • Nawaz M, Hayat T, Alsaedi A. Dufour and Soret effects on MHD flow of viscous fluid between radially stretching sheets in porous medium. Appl Math Mech. 2012;33(11):1403–1418.
  • Chamkha AJ, Aly AM. Heat and mass transfer in stagnation-point flow of a polar fluid towards a stretching surface in porous media in the presence of soret, Dufour and chemical reaction effects. Chem Eng Commun. 2010;198(2):214–234.
  • Casson N. A flow equation for pigment-oil suspensions of the printing ink type. Rheology of disperse systems; 1959.
  • Eid MR, Makinde OD. Solar radiation effect on a magneto nanofluid flow in a porous medium with chemically reactive species. Int J Chem Reactor Eng. 2018;16(9):1–14. Article No. 20170212.
  • Mahanthesh B, Gireesha BJ, Gorla RS, et al. Magnetohydrodynamic three-dimensional flow of nanofluids with slip and thermal radiation over a nonlinear stretching sheet: a numerical study. Neural Comput Appl. 2018;30(5):1557–1567.
  • Sekhar KR, Reddy GV, Raju CS, et al. Multiple slip effects on magnetohydrodynamic boundary layer flow over a stretching sheet embedded in a porous medium with radiation and joule heating. Spec Top Rev Porous Media: Int J. 2018;9(2):117–132.
  • Sivaraj R, Banerjee S. Transport properties of non-Newtonian nanofluids and applications; 2021.
  • Khater AH, Callebaut DK, Malfliet W, et al. Nonlinear dispersive Rayleigh–Taylor instabilities in magnetohydrodynamic flows. Phys Scr. 2001;64(6):533.
  • Khater AH, Callebaut DK, Seadawy AR. Nonlinear dispersive instabilities in Kelvin–Helmholtz magnetohydrodynamic flows. Phys Scr. 2003;67(4):340.
  • Khater AH, Callebaut DK, Helal MA, et al. Variational method for the nonlinear dynamics of an elliptic magnetic stagnation line. Eur Phys J D-At Mol Opt Plasma Phys. 2006;39(2):237–245.
  • Seadawy AR. Stability analysis for two-dimensional ion-acoustic waves in quantum plasmas. Phys Plasmas. 2014;21(5):052107.
  • Seadawy AR. Fractional solitary wave solutions of the nonlinear higher-order extended KdV equation in a stratified shear flow: part I. Comput Math Appl. 2015;70(4):345–352.
  • Thumma T, Wakif A, Animasaun IL. Generalized differential quadrature analysis of unsteady three-dimensional MHD radiating dissipative Casson fluid conveying tiny particles. Heat Transfer. 2020;49(5):2595–2626.
  • Abdelsalam SI, Bhatti MM. The study of non-Newtonian nanofluid with Hall and ion slip effects on peristaltically induced motion in a non-uniform channel. RSC Adv. 2018;8(15):7904–7915.
  • Niu J, Fu C, Tan W. Slip-flow and heat transfer of a non-Newtonian nanofluid in a microtube. Plos one. 2012;7(5):e37274.
  • Hayat T, Khan MI, Farooq M, et al. Impact of Cattaneo–Christov heat flux model in flow of variable thermal conductivity fluid over a variable thicked surface. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2016;99:702–710.
  • Abel MS, Mahesha N. Heat transfer in MHD viscoelastic fluid flow over a stretching sheet with variable thermal conductivity, non-uniform heat source and radiation. Appl Math Model. 2008;32(10):1965–1983.
  • Sharma PR, Singh G. Effects of variable thermal conductivity and heat source/sink on MHD flow near a stagnation point on a linearly stretching sheet; 2009.
  • Chiu CH. A decomposition method for solving the convective longitudinal fins with variable thermal conductivity. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2002;45(10):2067–2075.
  • Usman M, Hamid M, Zubair T, et al. Cu-Al2O3/Water hybrid nanofluid through a permeable surface in the presence of nonlinear radiation and variable thermal conductivity via LSM. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;126:1347–1356.
  • Lahmar S, Kezzar M, Eid MR, et al. Heat transfer of squeezing unsteady nanofluid flow under the effects of an inclined magnetic field and variable thermal conductivity. Physica A. 2020;540:123138.
  • Irfan M, Khan M, Khan WA. Numerical analysis of unsteady 3D flow of Carreau nanofluid with variable thermal conductivity and heat source/sink. Results Phys. 2017;7:3315–3324.
  • Mahian O, Kianifar A, Kleinstreuer C, et al. A review of entropy generation in nanofluid flow. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2013;65:514–532.
  • Roşca NC, Pop I. Hybrid nanofluids flows determined by a permeable power-Law stretching/shrinking sheet modulated by orthogonal surface shear. Entropy . 2021;23(7):813.
  • Selimefendigil F, Öztop HF. Thermal management and modeling of forced convection and entropy generation in a vented cavity by simultaneous use of a curved porous layer and magnetic field. Entropy . 2021;23(2):152.
  • Yang L, Du K, Zhang X. A theoretical investigation of thermal conductivity of nanofluids with particles in cylindrical shape by anisotropy analysis. Powder Technol. 2017;314:328–338.
  • Oyelakin IS, Mondal S, Sibanda P. Unsteady Casson nanofluid flow over a stretching sheet with thermal radiation, convective and slip boundary conditions. Alex Eng J. 2016;55:1025–1035.
  • Mukhopadhyay S, Vajravelu K, Gorder RAV. Casson fluid flow and heat transfer at an exponentially stretching permeable surface. J Appl Mech. 2013;80:054502–054502.
  • Mustafa M, Khan JA. Model for flow of Casson nanofluid past a non-linearly stretching sheet considering magnetic field effects. AIP Adv. 2015;5:077148.
  • Jamshed W. Numerical investigation of MHD impact on Maxwell nanofluid. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2021;120:104973.
  • Bhaskar N, Reddy P, Sreenivasulu P. Influence of variable thermal conductivity on MHD boundary layar slip flow of ethylene-glycol based CU nanofluids over a stretching sheet with convective boundary condition. J Eng Math. 2014: 1–10. Article No. 905158.
  • Arunachalam R, Rajappa NR. Forced convection in liquid metals with variable thermal conductivityand capacity. ACTA MECH. 1978;31:25–31.
  • Maxwell J. A treatise on electricity and magnesium. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1881.
  • Xu X, Chen S. Cattaneo–Christov heat flux model for heat transfer of Marangoni boundary layer flow in a copper–water nanofluid. Heat Transfer Res. 2017;46:1281–1293.
  • Jamshed W, Nisar KS, Ibrahim RW, et al. Computational frame work of Cattaneo-Christov heat flux effects on Engine Oil based williamson hybrid nanofluids: a thermal case study. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2021;26:101179.
  • Jamshed W. Thermal augmentation in solar aircraft using tangent hyperbolic hybrid nanofluid: a solar energy application. Energy Environ. 2021;1–44. Article in press.
  • Al-Hossainy AF, Eid MR. Combined theoretical and experimental DFT-TDDFT and thermal characteristics of 3-D flow in rotating tube of [PEG + H2O/SiO2-Fe3O4]C hybrid nanofluid to enhancing oil extraction. Waves Random Complex. 2021: 1–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17455030.2021.1948631.
  • Jamshed W, Aziz A. A comparative entropy based analysis of Cu and Fe3O4 /methanol Powell-Eyring nanofluid in solar thermal collectors subjected to thermal radiation variable thermal conductivity and impact of different nanoparticles shape. Results Phys. 2018;9:195–205.
  • Shahzad F, Jamshed W, Ibrahim RW, et al. Comparative numerical study of thermal features analysis between Oldroyd-B copper and molybdenum disulfide nanoparticles in engine-oil-based nanofluids flow. Coatings. 2021;11(10):1196.
  • Brewster MQ. Thermal radiative transfer and properties. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley and Sons; 1992.
  • Keller HB. A New difference scheme for Parabolic problems. In: Hubbard B, editor. Numerical solutions of partial differential equations. New York: Academic Press; 1971. (vol. 2), p. 327–350.
  • Sumalatha C, Bandari S. Effects of radiations and heat source/sink on a Casson fluid flow over nonlinear stretching sheet. WJM. 2015;5:257–265.
  • Asif M, Jamshed W, Aziz A. Entropy and heat transfer analysis using Cattaneo-Christov heat flux model for a boundary layer flow of Casson nanofluid. Results Phys 2018;10:640–649.
  • Jamshed W, Kumar V, Kumar V. Computational examination of Casson nanofluid due to a nonlinear stretching sheet subjected to particle shape factor: Tiwari and Das model. Numer Methods Partial Differ Equ. 2020; doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/num.22705.
  • Ishak A, Nazar R, Pop I. Mixed convection on the stagnation point flow towards a vertical, continuously stretching sheet. J Heat Transf. 2007;129:1087–1090.
  • Ishak A, Nazar R, Pop I. Boundary layer flow and heat transfer over an unsteady stretching vertical surface. Meccanica. 2009;44:369–375.
  • Abolbashari MH, Freidoonimehr N, Nazari F, et al. Entropy analysis for an unsteady MHD flow past a stretching permeable surface in nanofluid. Adv Powder Tech. 2014;267:256–267.
  • Das S, Chakraborty S, Jana RN, et al. Entropy analysis of unsteady magneto-nanofluid flow past accelerating stretching sheet with convective boundary condition. Appl Math Mech. 2015;36(2):1593–1610.