References
- Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2000. Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates. Washington, DC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services, 2002
- Leeton J, Harman J. Attitudes toward egg donation of thirty-four infertile women who donated during their in vitro fertilization treatment. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1986; 3:374–8
- Power M, Baber R, Abdalla H, et al. A comparison of the attitudes of volunteer donors and infertile patient donors on an ovum donation programme. Hum Reprod 1990; 5:352–5
- Soderstrom-Anttila V. Follow-up of Finnish volunteer oocyte donors concerning their attitudes to oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 1995; 10:3073–6
- Fielding D, Handley S, Duqueno L, et al. Motivation, attitudes and experience of donation: A follow-up of women donating eggs in assisted conception treatment. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 1998; 8:273–87
- Schover LR, Collins RL, Quigley MM, et al. Psychological follow-up of women evaluated as oocyte donors. Hum Reprod 1991; 6:1487–91
- Rosenberg H, Epstein Y. Follow-up study of anonymous ovum donors. Hum Reprod 1995; 10:2741–7
- Kalfoglou A, Geller G. A follow-up study with oocyte donors exploring their experiences, knowledge, and attitudes about the use of their oocytes and the outcome of the donation. Fert Steril 2000; 74:660–7
- Sauer MV, Paulson RJ. Oocyte donors: A demographic analysis of women at the University of Southern California. Hum Reprod 1992; 7:726–8
- Klock SC, Braverman AM, Rausch DT. Predicting anonymous egg donor satisfaction: A preliminary study. J Womens Health 1998; 7:229–37
- Patrick M, Smith AL, Meyer, WR, Bashford RA. Anonymous oocyte donation: A follow-up questionnaire. Fert Steril 2001; 75:1034–6.