References
- Agnes, Flavia. 2000. “Women, Marriage, and the Subordination of Rights.” In Subaltern Studies XI: Community, Gender and Violence, edited by ParthaChatterjee and PradeepJeganathan, 106–137. Delhi: Permanent Black.
- Arunima, G.1996. “Multiple Meanings: Changing Conceptions of Matrilineal Kinship in Nineteenth and Twentieth-Century Malabar.” Indian Economic and Social History Review33 (3): 283–307.
- Basu, Srimati. 2001. “The Personal and the Political: Indian Women and Inheritance Law.” In Religion and Personal Law in Secular India: a Call to Judgment, edited by Gerald JamesLarson, 163–183. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
- Bhat, M. V. Shankar. 2004. Aliyasantana Law. Mangalore: Lex.
- Brückner, Heidrun. 2009. On an Auspicious Day, at Dawn…: Studies in Tulu Culture and Oral Literature. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
- Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 1992. “Provincializing Europe: Postcoloniality and the Critique of History.” Cultural Studies6 (3): 337–357.
- Chatterjee, Partha. 1999. “The Nationalist Resolution of the Women's Question.” In Recasting Women: Essays in Indian Colonial History, edited by KumkumSangari and SudeshVaid, 233–253. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
- Claus, Peter J.1991. “Kin Songs.” In Gender, Genre, and Power in South Asian Expressive Traditions, edited by ArjunAppadurai, Frank J.Korom, and Margaret A.Mills, 136–177. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Couchman, M. E.1904. Survey and Settlement Register of Muduperar Village No. 53. Mangalore: Revenue Settlement Office.
- Ghosh, Durba. 2006. Sex and the Family in Colonial India: The Making of Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Gough, E. Kathleen. 1952. “Changing Kinship Usages in the Setting of Political and Economic Change among the Nayars of Malabar.” The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland82 (1): 71–88.
- Gough, E. Kathleen. 1974. “Nayar: Central Kerala.” In Matrilineal Kinship, edited by David M.Schneider and KathleenGough, 298–384. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Gowda, K. Chinnappa. 2005. The Mask and the Message. Mangalagangothri: Madipu Prakashana.
- Ishii, Miho. 2010. “Shinrei tono kōukan (Exchange with the Spirits).” Bunkajinruigaku75 (1): 1–26.
- Ishii, Miho. 2013. “Playing with Perspectives: Spirit Possession, Mimesis, and Permeability in the Buuta Ritual in South India.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute19 (4): 795–812.
- Jeffrey, Robin. 2004/2005. “Legacies of Matriliny: The Place of Women and the ‘Kerala Model.’” Pacific Affairs77 (4): 647–664.
- Kodoth, Praveena. 2001. “Courting Legitimacy or Delegitimizing Custom? Sexuality, Sambandham, and Marriage Reform in Late Nineteenth-Century Malabar.” Modern Asian Studies35 (2): 349–384.
- Kodoth, Praveena. 2002. “Framing Custom, Directing Practices: Authority, Property and Matriliny under Colonial Law in Nineteenth Century Malabar.” Working Paper, n.s., 338. Centre for Development Studies.
- Menon, Dilip M.1993. “The Moral Community of the Teyyattam: Popular Culture in Late Colonial Malabar.” Studies in History9 (2): 187–217.
- Parashar, Archana. 1992. Women and Family Law Reforms in India: Uniform Civil Code and Gender Equality. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
- Rao, Gangolly Krishna. 1898. A Treatise on Aliya Santana Law and Usage. Mangalore: The Codialbail Press.
- Saradamoni, K.1999. Matriliny Transformed: Family, Law and Ideology in Twentieth Century Travancore. New Delhi: Sage Publications and Altamira Press.
- Sreenivas, Mytheli. 2008. Wives, Widows, and Concubines: The Conjugal Family Ideal in Colonial India. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
- Sturrock, John. 1894. Madras District Manuals: South Canara. Vol. 1. Madras: The Superintendent, Government Press.
- Učida, N., and B. B.Rajapurohit. 2013. Kannada-English Etymological Dictionary. Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
- Upadhyaya, Uliyar Padmanabha, ed. 1988–97. Tulu Lexicon. Vol. 1–6. Udupi: Rashtrakavi Govind Pai Samshodhana Kendra.