On the relationship between process capability indices and the proportion of conformance

References

• Boyles, R.A. (1991). The Taguchi capability index. Journal of Quality Technology, 23, 17–26 (Corrigenda, 23, 382–383).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, W.E. (1991). A new process capability index: Parts per million. Quality Progress, 24, 152.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, L.K., Cheng, S.W., & Spiring, F.A. (1988). A new measure of process capability: Cpm. Journal of Quality Technology, 20, 162–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, B.C., & Owen, D.B. (1990). A study of a new process capability index. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 19, 1231–1245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiang, T.C., & Taguchi, G. (1985). A tutorial on quality control and assurance – the Taguchi methods. Paper presented at the ASA Annual Meeting, Las Vegas.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, N.L., & Kotz, S. (1995). Comment on: Percentages of units within specification limits associated with given values of Cpk and Cpm (by Chen, L. K. and Tang, J. H.). Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation, Vol. 24. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Juran, J.M., Gryna F.M., & Bingham, R.S. Jr (1974). Quality control handbook (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, V.E. (1986). Process capability indices. Journal of Quality Technology, 18, 41–52 (Corrigenda, 18, 265).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotz, S., & Johnson, N.L. (1993). Process capability indices. London: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kotz, S., & Johnson, N.L. (2002). Process capability indices – a review, 1992–2000. Journal of Quality Technology, 34, 2–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotz, S., & Lovelace, C.R. (1998). Process capability indices in theory and practice. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Pearn, W.L., & Kotz, S. (2006). Encyclopedia and handbook of process capability indices: A comprehensive exposition of quality control measures. Hackensack: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Pearn, W.L., Kotz, S., & Johnson, N.L. (1992). Distributional and inferential properties of process capability indices. Journal of Quality Technology, 24, 216–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearn, W.L., Yang, S.L., Chen, K.S., & Lin, P.C. (2001). Testing process capability using the index Cpmk with an application. International Journal of Reliability Quality and Safety Engineering, 8, 15–34.
   Google Scholar
• Perakis, M., & Xekalaki, E. (2002). A process capability index that is based on the proportion of conformance. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 72, 707–718. doi:10.1080/00949650214270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perakis, M., & Xekalaki, E. (2005). A process capability index for discrete processes. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 75, 175–187. doi:10.1080/00949650410001687244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiring, F., Leung, B., Cheng, S., & Yeung, A. (2003). A bibliography of process capability papers. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 19, 445–460. doi:10.1002/qre.538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannman, K. (1995). A unified approach to capability indices. Statistica Sinica, 5, 805–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, P.A. (1998). The probability density function of process capability index Cpmk. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods, 27, 1781–1789. doi:10.1080/03610929808832189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C.W., Pearn, W.L., & Kotz, S. (2009). An overview of theory and practice on process capability indices for quality assurance. International Journal of Production Economics, 117, 338–359. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, A.B., & Bhattacharya, S. (1998). A robust process capability index. Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation, 27, 565–589. doi:10.1080/03610919808813495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yum, B.J., & Kim K.W. (2011). A bibliography of the literature on process capability indices: 2000–2009. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 27, 251–268. doi:10.1002/qre.1115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar