The coefficient of variation chart with measurement error

References

• Abraham, B. (1977). Control charts and measurement error. Annual Technical Conference of the American Society for Quality Control, 31, 370–374.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. A. (1954). Effect of measurement error on chemical process control. Industrial Quality Control, 10, 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Calzada, M. E., & Scariano, S. M. (2013). A synthetic control chart for the coefficient of variation. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 83, 853–867.10.1080/00949655.2011.639772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castagliola, P., Celano, G., & Psarakis, S. (2011). Monitoring the coefficient of variation using EWMA charts. Journal of Quality Technology, 43, 249–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castagliola, P., Achouri, A., Taleb, H., Celano, G., & Psarakis, S. (2013). Monitoring the coefficient of variation using control charts with run rules. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 10, 75–94.10.1080/16843703.2013.11673309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castagliola, P., Achouri, A., Taleb, H., Celano, G., & Psarakis, S. (2013). Monitoring the coefficient of variation using a variable sampling interval control chart. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 29, 1135–1149.10.1002/qre.v29.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castagliola, P., Amdouni, A., Taleb, H., & Celano, G. (2015). One-sided Shewhart-type charts for monitoring the coefficient of variation in short production runs. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 12, 53–67.10.1080/16843703.2015.11673366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castagliola, P., Achouri, A., Taleb, H., Celano, G., & Psarakis, S. (2015). Monitoring the coefficient of variation using a variable sample size control chart. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 80, 1561–1576.10.1007/s00170-015-6985-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, S. S., & Yu, F. J. (2015). Run length distribution of CUSUM control schemes for negative binominal processes. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 12, 233–251.10.1080/16843703.2015.11673379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, W. C., & Lu, S. L. (2015). On the steady-state performance of the Poisson double GWMA control chart. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 12, 195–208.10.1080/16843703.2015.11673376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, S., Mukherjee, A., & Chakraborti, S. (2015). Distribution-free phase II CUSUM control chart for joint monitoring of location and scale. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 31, 135–151.10.1002/qre.v31.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connett, J. E., & Lee, W. W. (1990). Estimation of the coefficient of variation from laboratory analysis of split specimens for quality control in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 11, 24–36.10.1016/0197-2456(90)90029-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Costa, A. F. B., & Castagliola, P. (2011). Effect of measurement error and autocorrelation on the chart. Journal of Applied Statistics, 38, 661–673.10.1080/02664760903563627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dizabadi, A. K., Shahrokhi, M., & Maleki, M. R. (2016). On the effect of measurement error with linearly increasing-type variance on simultaneous monitoring of process mean and variability. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 32, 1693–1705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogu, E. (2014). Change point estimation based statistical monitoring with variable time between events (TBE) control charts. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 11, 383–400.10.1080/16843703.2014.11673352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, M. A., Chakraborti, S., & Mukherjee, A. (2014). Design and implementation of CUSUM exceedance control charts for unknown location. International Journal of Production Research, 52, 5546–5564.10.1080/00207543.2014.917214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haq, A., Brown, J., Moltchanova, E., & Al-Omari, A. I. (2015). Effect of measurement error on exponentially weighted moving average control charts under ranked set sampling schemes. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 85, 1224–1246.10.1080/00949655.2013.873040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, E. P., Kang, C. W., Baek, J. W., & Kang, H. W. (2008). Development of CV control chart using EWMA technique. Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 31, 114–120.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, X. L., Castagliola, P., Sun, J., & Khoo, M. B. C. (2015). The effect of measurement errors on the synthetic chart. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 31, 1769–1778.10.1002/qre.1716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iglewicz, B., Myers, R. H., & Howe, R. B. (1968). On the percentage points of the sample coefficient of variation. Biometrika, 55, 580–581.10.1093/biomet/55.3.580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanazuka, T. (1986). The effects of measurement error on the power of -R charts. Journal of Quality Technology, 18, 91–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, C. W., Lee, M. S., Seong, Y. J., & Hawkins, D. M. (2007). A control chart for the coefficient of variation. Journal of Quality Technology, 39, 151–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, S. L., Khoo, M. B. C., Teoh, W. L., & Xie, M. (2015). Optimal designs of the variable sample size and sampling interval chart when process parameters are estimated. International Journal of Production Economics, 166, 20–35.10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linna, K. W., & Woodall, W. H. (2001). Effect of measurement error on Shewhart control charts. Journal of Quality Technology, 33, 213–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linna, K. W., Woodall, W. H., & Busby, K. L. (2001). The performance of multivariate control charts in the presence of measurement error. Journal of Quality Technology, 33, 349–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maravelakis, P. E. (2012). Measurement error effect on the CUSUM control chart. Journal of Applied Statistics, 39, 323–336.10.1080/02664763.2011.590188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maravelakis, P. E., Panaretos, J., & Psarakis, S. (2004). EWMA chart and measurement error. Journal of Applied Statistics, 31, 445–455.10.1080/02664760410001681738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCracken, A. K., Chakraborti, S., & Mukherjee, A. (2013). Control charts for simultaneous monitoring of unknown mean and variance of normally distributed processes. Journal of Quality Technology, 45, 360–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittag, H. J. (1995). Measurement error effects on control chart performance. ASQC 49th Annual Quality Congress Proceedings, Cincinnati, 66–73.
   Google Scholar
• Mittag, H. J., & Stemann, D. (1998). Gauge imprecision effect on the performance of the -S control chart. Journal of Applied Statistics, 25, 307–317.10.1080/02664769823043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C., & Runger, G. C. (1994). Gauge capability and designed experiments. Part I: Basic methods. Quality Engineering, 6, 115–135.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, A., & Marozzi, M. (2016). A distribution-free phase-II CUSUM procedure for monitoring service quality. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 1–37. doi:10.1080/14783363.2015.1134266.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, A., McCracken, A. K., & Chakraborti, S. (2015). Control charts for simultaneous monitoring of parameters of a shifted exponential distribution. Journal of Quality Technology, 47, 176–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, T. P. (2011). Statistical Methods for Quality Improvement (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.10.1002/9781118058114
   Google Scholar
• Saghaei, A., Ghomi, S. M. T. F., & Jaberi, S. (2014). Economic design of exponentially weighted moving average control chart based on measurement error using genetic algorithm. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 30, 1153–1163.10.1002/qre.v30.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemann, D., & Weihs, C. (2001). The EWMA-X-S-control chart and its performance in the case of precise and imprecise data. Statistical Papers, 42, 207–223.10.1007/s003620100051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walpole, R. E., Myers, R. H., Myers, S. L., & Ye, K. (2012). Probability & Statistics for Engineers and Scientist (9th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Woodall, W. H., & Thomas, E. V. (1995). Statistical process control with several components of common cause variability. IIE Transactions, 27, 757–764.10.1080/07408179508936792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeong, W. C., Khoo, M. B. C., Lee, M. H., & Rahim, M. A. (2013). Economic and economic-statistical designs of the synthetic chart using loss functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 228, 571–581.10.1016/j.ejor.2013.02.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeong, W. C., Khoo, M. B. C., Lim, S. L., & Lee, M. H. (2015). A direct procedure for monitoring the coefficient of variation using a variable sample size scheme. Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation, Published on-line. doi:10.1080/03610918.2015.1109659.
   Google Scholar
• Yeong, W. C., Khoo, M. B. C., Teoh, W. L., & Castagliola, P. (2016). A control chart for the multivariate coefficient of variation. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 32, 1213–1225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You, H. W., Khoo, M. B. C., Castagliola, P., & Haq, A. (2016). Monitoring the coefficient of variation using the side sensitive group runs chart. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 32, 1913–1927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Li, Z., Chen, B., & Wang, Z. (2014). A new exponentially weighted moving average control chart for monitoring the coefficient of variation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 78, 205–212.10.1016/j.cie.2014.09.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar