Availability analysis and maintenance modelling for inspected Markov systems with down time threshold

References

• Ball, F. G., & Sansom, M. S. (1988). Single-channel autocorrelation functions: The effects of time interval omission. Biophysical Journal, 53(5), 819–832.10.1016/S0006-3495(88)83161-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao, X., & Cui, L. (2010). An analysis of availability for series Markov repairable system with neglected or delayed failures. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 59(4), 734–743.10.1109/TR.2010.2055915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao, X., & Cui, L. (2012). A study on reliability for a two-item cold standby Markov repairable system with neglected failures. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 41(21), 3988–3999.10.1080/03610926.2012.700376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrade, M. D., Scarf, P. A., Cavalcante, C. A. V., & Dwight, R. A. (2013). Imperfect inspection and replacement of a system with a defective state: A cost and reliability analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 120, 80–87.10.1016/j.ress.2013.02.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, C. J., & Rosenblatt, M. (1958). A Markovian function of a Markov chain. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29(4), 1112–1122.10.1214/aoms/1177706444
   Google Scholar
• Chandra, V., & Kumar, K. V. (1997). Reliability and safety analysis of fault tolerant and fail safe node for use in a railway signaling system. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 57(2), 177–183.10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00020-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquhoun, D., & Hawkes, A. G. (1977). Relaxation and fluctuations of membrane currents that flow through drug-operated channels. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 199(1135), 231–262.10.1098/rspb.1977.0137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquhoun, D., & Hawkes, A. G. (1982). On the stochastic properties of bursts of single ion channel openings and of clusters of bursts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 300(1098), 1–59.10.1098/rstb.1982.0156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, L., & Xie, M. (2001). Availability analysis of periodically inspected systems with random walk model. Journal of Applied Probability, 38, 860–871.10.1017/S0021900200019082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, L., & Xie, M. (2005). Availability of a periodically inspected system with random repair or replacement times. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 131, 89–100.10.1016/j.jspi.2003.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, S., Cui, L., Li, H., & Zhao, X. (2013). A study on joint availability for k out of n and consecutive k out of n points and intervals. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 10(2), 179–191.10.1080/16843703.2013.11673315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, S., Zeng, Z., Cui, L., & Kang, R. (2017). Reliability analysis of Markov history-dependent repairable systems with neglected failures. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 159, 134–142.10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flage, R. (2014). A delay time model with imperfect and failure-inducing inspections. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 124, 1–12.10.1016/j.ress.2013.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golmakani, H. R., & Moakedi, H. (2012). Periodic inspection optimization model for a two-component repairable system with failure interaction. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 63(3), 540–545.10.1016/j.cie.2011.07.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajipour, Y., & Taghipour, S. (2016). Non-periodic inspection optimization of multi-component and k-out-of-m systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 156, 228–243.10.1016/j.ress.2016.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkes, A. G., Jalali, A., & Colquhoun, D. (1990). The distributions of the apparent open times and shut times in a single channel record when brief events cannot be detected. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 332(1627), 511–538.10.1098/rsta.1990.0129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, K., Maillart, L. M., & Prokopyev, O. A. (2015). Scheduling preventive maintenance as a function of an imperfect inspection interval. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 64, 983–997.10.1109/TR.2015.2417153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, J. T., & Hsu, L. F. (2013). Two EPQ models with imperfect production processes, inspection errors, planned backorders, and sales returns. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 64(1), 389–402.10.1016/j.cie.2012.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, Y., & Ng, H. K. T. (2001). A general model for consecutive-k-out-of-n: F repairable system with exponential distribution and (k−1)-step Markov dependence. European Journal of Operational Research, 129(3), 663–682.10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00474-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., & Cao, J. (1993). The limiting distribution of the residual lifetime of a Markov repairable system. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 41(2), 103–105.10.1016/0951-8320(93)90022-Q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., Li, J., Al-Khalifa, K. N., Hamouda, A. S., Coit, D. W., & Elsayed, E. A. (2013). Condition-based maintenance for continuously monitored degrading systems with multiple failure modes. IIE Transactions, 45(4), 422–435.10.1080/0740817X.2012.690930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall, J. J. (1965). Maintenance policies for stochastically failing equipment: A survey. Management Science, 11(5), 493–524.10.1287/mnsc.11.5.493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, M., Jung, K. M., & Park, D. H. (2013). Optimal post-warranty maintenance policy with repair time threshold for minimal repair. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 111, 147–153.10.1016/j.ress.2012.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierskalla, W. P., & Voelker, J. A. (1976). A survey of maintenance models: The control and surveillance of deteriorating systems. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 23(3), 353–388.10.1002/(ISSN)1931-9193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, Q., Cui, L., & Gao, H. (2017). Availability and maintenance modelling for systems subject to multiple failure modes. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 108, 192–198.10.1016/j.cie.2017.04.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, Q., Cui, L., Shen, J., & Yang, L. (2017). Optimal maintenance policy considering maintenance errors for systems operating under performance-based contracts. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 112, 147–155.10.1016/j.cie.2017.08.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, Q., Cui, L., & Shen, J. (2018). Availability and maintenance modeling for systems subject to dependent hard and soft failures. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, doi:10.1002/asmb.2319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, Q., Cui, L., Gao, H., & Yi, H. (2018). Optimal allocation of units in sequential probability series systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 169, 351–363.10.1016/j.ress.2017.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, Q., Cui, L., & Yang, L. (2018). Maintenance policies for energy systems subject to complex failure processes and power purchasing agreement. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 119, 193–203.10.1016/j.cie.2018.03.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, M. S., & Naikan, V. N. A. (2015). Availability modeling of repairable systems using Markov system dynamics simulation. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 32(5), 517–531.10.1108/IJQRM-11-2013-0184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, S. M. (1989). Introduction to probability models. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubino, G., & Sericola, B. (1989). On weak lumpability in Markov chains. Journal of Applied Probability, 26(3), 446–457.10.2307/3214403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, J., & Cui, L. (2016). Reliability performance for dynamic systems with cycles of K regimes. IIE Transactions, 48(4), 389–402.10.1080/0740817X.2015.1110266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherwin, D. (2000). A review of overall models for maintenance management. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 6(3), 138–164.10.1108/13552510010341171
   Google Scholar
• Song, S., Coit, D. W., Feng, Q., & Peng, H. (2014). Reliability analysis for multi-component systems subject to multiple dependent competing failure processes. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 63(1), 331–345.10.1109/TR.2014.2299693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taghipour, S., & Banjevic, D. (2012). Optimum inspection interval for a system under periodic and opportunistic inspections. IIE Transactions, 44(11), 932–948.10.1080/0740817X.2011.618176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaurio, J. K. (1997). Reliability characteristics of components and systems with tolerable repair times. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 56(1), 43–52.10.1016/S0951-8320(96)00133-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H. (2002). A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 139(3), 469–489.10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00197-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Jia, X., & Zhang, J. (2013). Reliability evaluation for multi-state Markov repairable systems with redundant dependencies. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 10(3), 277–289.10.1080/16843703.2013.11673414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Cui, L., Zhang, J., & Peng, J. (2016). Reliability evaluation of a semi-Markov repairable system under alternative environments. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 45(10), 2938–2957.10.1080/03610926.2014.894062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Zhao, X., Guo, X., & Li, B. (2018). Analyzing the research subjects and hot topics of power system reliability through the Web of Science from 1991 to 2015. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 700–713.10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, L., Ma, X., Zhai, Q., & Zhao, Y. (2016). A delay time model for a mission-based system subject to periodic and random inspection and postponed replacement. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 150, 96–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, L., Ma, X., & Zhao, Y. (2017). A condition-based maintenance model for a three-state system subject to degradation and environmental shocks. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 105, 210–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, L., Zhao, Y., Peng, R., & Ma, X. (2018). Hybrid preventive maintenance of competing failures under random environment. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 174, 130–140.10.1016/j.ress.2018.02.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, L., Zhao, Y., Peng, R., & Ma, X. (2018). Opportunistic maintenance of production systems subject to random wait time and multiple control limits. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 47, 12–34.10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, Z., Chen, N., & Tsui, K. L. (2015). A Bayesian approach to condition monitoring with imperfect inspections. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 31(3), 513–522.10.1002/qre.v31.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Huang, X., Fang, Y., Zhou, J., Zhang, H., & Li, J. (2016). Optimal inspection-based preventive maintenance policy for three-state mechanical components under competing failure modes. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 152, 95–103.10.1016/j.ress.2016.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., Cui, L., & Kong, D. (2016). A study on a stochastic process with state classifications based on sojourn times. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 14(2), 214–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Guo, X., & Wang, X. (2018). Reliability and maintenance policies for a two-stage shock model with self-healing mechanism. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 172(1), 185–194.10.1016/j.ress.2017.12.013
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, Z., Cui, L., & Hawkes, A. G. (2006). A study on a single-unit Markov repairable system with repair time omission. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 55(2), 182–188.10.1109/TR.2006.874933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, C., & Wang, M. (2013). Research on a new system with neglected or delayed failure impact. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 42(1), 1–10.10.1080/03610926.2012.728277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar