The Performance of Triple Sampling X Control Chart with Measurement Errors

References

• Arif, F., Noor-Ul-Amin, M., & Hanif, M. (2021). Joint monitoring of mean and variance using likelihood ratio test statistic with measurement error. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 18(2), 202–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/16843703.2020.1819138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asif, F., Khan, S., & Noor-ul-amin, M. (2020). Hybrid exponentially weighted moving average control chart with measurement error. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions A: Science, 44(3), 801–811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40995-020-00879-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. A. (1954). Effect of measurement error on chemical process control. Industrial Quality Control, 10(4), 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Castagliola, P., Oprime, P. C., & Khoo, M. B. (2017). The double sampling S2 chart with estimated process variance. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 46(7), 3556–3573. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2015.1066814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, Z. L., Khoo, M. B., & Castagliola, P. (2014). Synthetic double sampling np control chart for attributes. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 75 (September 2014), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.06.016
   Google Scholar
• Croasdale, R. (1974). Control charts for a double-sampling scheme based on average production run lengths. International Journal of Production Research, 12(5), 585–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207547408919577
   Google Scholar
• Daudin, J. J. (1992). Double sampling charts. Journal of Quality Technology, 24(2), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1992.12015231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haq, A., & Khoo, M. B. (2018). A new double sampling control chart for monitoring process mean using auxiliary information. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 88(5), 869–899. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2017.1408111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, D., Grigoryan, A., & Sigh, M. (2002). Design of double-and triple-sampling X-bar control charts using genetic algorithms. International Journal of Production Research, 40(6), 1387–1404. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540110118415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanazuka, T. (1986). The effect of measurement error on the power of charts. Journal of Quality Technology, 18(2), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1986.11978992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalafi, S., Salmasnia, A., & Maleki, M. R. (2020). Remedial approaches to decrease the effect of measurement errors on simple linear profile monitoring. International Journal for Quality Research, 14(4), 1019–1036. https://doi.org/10.24874/IJQR14.04-03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoo, M. B., Lee, H. C., Wu, Z., Chen, C. H., & Castagliola, P. (2010). A synthetic double sampling control chart for the process mean. IIE Transactions, 43(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/0740817X.2010.491503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. H., & Khoo, M. B. (2017). Double sampling max chart. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 46(10), 7855–7878. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2016.1255965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linna, K. W., & Woodall, W. H. (2001). Effect of measurement error on Shewhart control charts. Journal of Quality Technology, 33(2), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.2001.11980068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maleki, M. R., Amiri, A., & Castagliola, P. (2017). Measurement errors in statistical process monitoring: A literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 103 (January 2017), 316–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.10.026
   Google Scholar
• Maleki, M. R., Ghashghaei, R., & Amiri, A. (2016). Simultaneous monitoring of multivariate process mean and variability in the presence of measurement error with linearly increasing variance under additive covariate model. International Journal of Engineering, 29(4), 514–523. https://www.ije.ir/article_72703.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maleki, M. R., & Salmasnia, A. (2017). Joint monitoring of process location and dispersion based on CUSUM procedure and generalized likelihood ratio in the presence of measurement errors. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 33(7), 1485–1498. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maleki, M. R., Shamseddin, B., Eghbali, H., & Bazdar, A. (2021). The effect of gauge measurement errors on double sampling control chart. To Appear in Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2021.1958848
   Google Scholar
• Motsepa, C. M., Malela-Majika, J. C., Castagliola, P., & Shongwe, S. C. (2021). A side-sensitive double sampling monitoring scheme with estimated process parameters. To Appear in Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2020.1722835
   Google Scholar
• Noor-ul-amin, M., Javaid, A., Hanif, M., & Dogu, E. (2021). Performance of maximum EWMA control chart in the presence of measurement error using auxiliary information. To Appear in Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 91(11), 2328–2343. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2021.1891540
   Google Scholar
• Saemian, M., Maleki, M. R., & Salmasnia, A. (In Press). Performance of Max-HEWMAMS control chart for simultaneous monitoring of process mean and variability in the presence of measurement errors. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJADS.2022.10043963
   Google Scholar
• Saha, S., Khoo, M. B., Lee, M. H., & Castagliola, P. (2018). A side-sensitive modified group runs double sampling (SSMGRDS) control chart for detecting mean shifts. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 47(5), 1353–1369. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2017.1311918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmasnia, A., Maleki, M. R., & Niaki, S. T. A. (2018). Remedial measures to lessen the effect of imprecise measurement with linearly increasing variance on the performance of the MAX-EWMAMS scheme. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 43(6), 3151–3162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-017-2896-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, A., Castagliola, P., Hu, X., & Sun, J. (2019). The performance of the adaptive EWMA median chart in the presence of measurement error. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 35(1), 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teoh, W. L., Khoo, M. B., Castagliola, P., & Chakraborti, S. (2015). A median run length-based double-sampling X¯ chart with estimated parameters for minimizing the average sample size. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 80(1), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6949-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, P. H., Tran, K. P., & Rakitzis, A. (2019). A synthetic median control chart for monitoring the process mean with measurement errors. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 35(4), 1100–1116. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umar, A. A., Khoo, M. B., Saha, S., & Haq, A. (2020). A combined variable sampling interval and double sampling control chart with auxiliary information for the process mean. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 42(6), 1151–1165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142331219885525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeong, W. C., Khoo, M. B. C., Lim, S. L., & Teoh, W. L. (2017). The coefficient of variation chart with measurement error. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 14(4), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/16843703.2017.1304043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousefi, S., Maleki, M. R., Salmasnia, A., & Kiani Anbohi, M. (In Press). On the performance of multivariate homogeneously weighted moving average chart for monitoring the process mean in the presence of measurement errors. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219686723500026
   Google Scholar
• Zaidi, F. S., Castagliola, P., Tran, K. P., & Khoo, M. B. C. (2020). Performance of the MEWMA‐CoDa control chart in the presence of measurement errors. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 36(7), 2411–2440. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar