On partially observed competing risk model under generalized progressive hybrid censoring for Lomax distribution

References

• Aggarwala, R., & Childs, A. (2000). Conditional inference for the parameters of Pareto distributions when observed samples are progressively censored Balakrishnan, N., Melas, V. B., Ermakov, S. eds. . In Advances in stochastic simulation methods (pp. 293–302). Birkhruser.
   Google Scholar
• Ali Mousa, M. A. M. (2001). Inference and prediction for Pareto progressively censored data. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 71(2), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949650108812140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan, N., & Aggarwala, R. (2000). Progressive censoring: Theory, methods, and applications. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan, N., & Cramer, E. (2014). The art of progressive censoring. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, M. C. (1974). Heavy-tailed distributions: Properties and tests. Technometrics, 16(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1974.10489150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkschat, M., Cramer, E., & Kamps, U Ahsanullah, M., Raqab, M. Z. eds. . (2007). Linear estimation of location and scale parameters based on generalized order statistics from generalized Pareto distributions . In Hauppauge : Nova Science. Recent Developments in Ordered Random Variables, pp. 253–261.
   Google Scholar
• Childs, A., Chandrasekar, B., & Balakrishnan, N. (2008). Exact likelihood inference for an exponential parameter under progressive hybrid censoring schemes Vonta, Filia, Nikulin, Mikhail, Limnios, Nikolaos, Huber-Carol, Catherine eds. . In Statistical models and methods for biomedical and technical systems (pp. 319–330). Birkhruser.
   Google Scholar
• Childs, A., Chandrasekar, B., Balakrishnan, N., & Kundu, D. (2003). Exact likelihood inference based on Type-I and Type-II hybrid censored samples from the exponential distribution. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 55(2), 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02530502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, Y., Sun, H., & Lee, K. (2015). Exact likelihood inference for an exponential parameter under generalized progressive hybrid censoring scheme. Statistical Methodology, 23, 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stamet.2014.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, E., & Schmiedt, A. B. (2011). Progressively Type-II censored competing risks data from Lomax distributions. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 55(3), 1285–1303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2010.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowder, M. J. (2001). Classical competing risks. Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Dey, S., & Dey, T. (2014). On progressively censored generalized inverted exponential distribution. Journal of Applied Statistics, 41(12), 2557–2576. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2014.922165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganguly, A., Kundu, D., & Mitra, S. (2014). Bayesian analysis of a simple step-stress model under Weibull lifetimes. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 64(1), 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2014.2368871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koley, A., & Kundu, D. (2017). On generalized progressive hybrid censoring in presence of competing risks. Metrika, 80(4), 401–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-017-0611-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu, D. (2007). On hybrid censored Weibull distribution. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 137(7), 2127–2142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2006.06.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu, D. (2008). Bayesian inference and life testing plan for the Weibull distribution in presence of progressive censoring. Technometrics, 50(2), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1198/004017008000000217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu, D., & Joarder, A. (2006). Analysis of Type-II progressively hybrid censored data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 50(10), 2509–2528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2005.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu, D., & Pradhan, B. (2011). Bayesian analysis of progressively censored competing risks data. Sankhya B, 73(2), 276–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13571-011-0024-x
   Google Scholar
• Kundu, D., & Sarhan, A. M. (2006). Analysis of incomplete data in presence of competing risks among several groups. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 55(2), 262–269. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2006.874919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless, J. F. (2011). Statistical models and methods for lifetime data. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C. T., Chou, C. C., & Huang, Y. L. (2012). Inference for the Weibull distribution with progressive hybrid censoring. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 56(3), 451–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2011.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. T., & Huang, Y. L. (2012). On progressive hybrid censored exponential distribution. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 82(5), 689–709. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2010.550581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomax, K. S. (1954). Business failures: Another example of the analysis of failure data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49(268), 847–852. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1954.10501239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. W., & Olkin, I. (2007). Life distributions. Structure of nonparametric, semiparametric and parametric families. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Maurya, R. K., Tripathi, Y. M., Rastogi, M. K., & Asgharzadeh, A. (2017). Parameter estimation for a Burr XII distribution under progressive censoring. American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences, 36(3), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/01966324.2017.1334604
   Google Scholar
• Mondal, S., & Kundu, D. (2019). Point and interval estimation of Weibull parameters based on joint progressively censored data. Sankhya B, 81(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13571-017-0134-1
   Google Scholar
• Mondal, S., & Kundu, D. (2020). Bayesian inference for Weibull distribution under the balanced joint Type-II progressive censoring scheme. American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences, 39(1), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/01966324.2019.1579124
   Google Scholar
• Park, C., & Kulasekera, K. B. (2004). Parametric inference of incomplete data with competing risks among several groups. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 53(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2003.821946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsi, S., & Bairamov, I. (2009). Expected values of the number of failures for two populations under joint Type-II progressive censoring. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 53(10), 3560–3570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2009.03.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsi, S., Ganjali, M., & Farsipour, N. S. (2009). Simultaneous confidence intervals for the parameters of Pareto distribution under progressive censoring. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 39(1), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610920802687785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pena, E. A., & Gupta, A. K. (1990). Bayes estimation for the Marshall-Olkin exponential distribution. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 52(2), 379–389 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1990.tb01794.x.
   Google Scholar
• Pintilie, M. (2006). Competing risks: A practical perspective. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Pradhan, B., & Kundu, D. (2013). Inference and optimal censoring schemes for progressively censored Birnbaum-Saunders distribution. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 143(6), 1098–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2012.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raqab, M. Z., Asgharzadeh, A., & Valiollahi, R. (2010). Prediction for Pareto distribution based on progressively Type-II censored samples. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 54(7), 1732–1743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2010.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastogi, M. K., & Tripathi, Y. M. (2013). Inference on unknown parameters of a Burr distribution under hybrid censoring. Statistical Papers, 54(3), 619–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-012-0452-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, T., Bhattacharya, R., Tripathi, Y. M., & Pradhan, B. (2019). Inference and optimum life testing plans based on Type-II progressive hybrid censored generalized exponential data. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation 2020, 49 (12) , 3254–3282 https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2018.1538456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A., Kannan, N., & Kundu, D. (2003). Bayesian planning and inference of a progressively censored sample from linear hazard rate distribution. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 62, 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2013.01.003
   Google Scholar
• Sen, T., Singh, S., & Tripathi, Y. M. (2019). Statistical inference for Lognormal distribution with type-I progressive hybrid censored data. American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences, 38(1), 70–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/01966324.2018.1484826
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S. K., Singh, U., & Kumar, M. (2016). Bayesian estimation for poisson-exponential model under progressive type-ii censoring data with binomial removal and its application to ovarian cancer data. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 45(9), 3457–3475. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2014.948189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L. (2016). Estimation for exponential distribution based on competing risk middle censored data. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 45(8), 2378–2391. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2013.879893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L. (2018). Inference for Weibull competing risks data under generalized progressive hybrid censoring. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 67(3), 998–1007. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2018.2828436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar