Maintenance planning estimations and policies optimization for single-unit systems using Hawkes processes

References

• Badia, F. G., Berrade, M. D., Cha, J. H., & Lee, H. (2018). Optimal replacement policy under a general failure and repair model: Minimal versus worse than old repair. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 180, 362–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.07.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cha, J. H., Finkelstein, M., & Levitin, G. (2017). On preventive maintenance of systems with lifetimes dependent on a random shock process. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 168, 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.03.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. P., & Singpurwalla, N. D. (1997). Unification of software reliability models by self-exciting point processes. Advances in Applied Probability, 29(2), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.2307/1428006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien, Y. H., Zhang, Z. G., Su, S. P., & Sheu, S. H. (2021). Optimal periodic preventive maintenance policy for a system subject to failures/repairs which follow the non-homogeneous pure birth process. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 18(3), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/16843703.2020.1796208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coit, W. D., & Zio, E. (2019). The evolution of system reliability optimization. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 192, 106259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coit, W. D., & Zio, E. (2020). RAMS optimization. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 192, 106620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106620.
   Google Scholar
• Crognier, G., Tournebise, P., Ruiz, M., & Panciatici, P. (2021). Grid operation-based outage maintenance planning. Electric Power Systems Research, 190, 106682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, L. R., Kuo, W. L., T, H., & Xie, M. (2004a). Optimal allocation of minimal and perfect repairs under resource constraints. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 53(2), 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2004.829143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, L. R., Loh, H. T., & Xie, M. (2004b). Sequential inspection policy for multiple systems under availability requirement. European Journal of Operational Research, 155(1), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00822-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, L. R., Chen, Z. L., & Gao, H. D. (2018). Reliability for systems with self-healing effect under shock models. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 15(5), 551–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/16843703.2016.1264146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, L. R., Li, Z. P., & Yi, H. (2019). Partial self-exciting point processes and their parameter estimations. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 48(10), 2913–2935. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2018.1468463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, L. R., Hawkes, A. G., & Yi, H. (2020). An elementary derivation of moments of Hawkes processes. Advances in Applied Probability, 52(1), 102–137. https://doi.org/10.1017/apr.2019.53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, L. R., & Shen, J. Y. (2021). An extension of Hawkes processes with ephemeral nearest effects. Stochastic Models, 37(2), 335–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/15326349.2021.1880940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, L. R., & Wu, B. (2021). Moments for Hawkes processes with Gamma decay kernel functions. (accepted). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-020-09840-8.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, Q. L., & Cui, L. R. (2019). A study on stochastic degradation process models under different types of failure Thresholds. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 181, 202–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyen, L., Gaudoin, O., & Syamsundar, A. (2017). On geometric reduction of age or intensity models for imperfect maintenance. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 168, 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertekin, S., Rudin, C., & McCormick, T. H. (2015). Reactive point processes: A new approach to predicting power failures in underground electrical systems. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 9(1), 122–144. https://doi.org/10.1214/14-AOAS789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, J. E., Singpurwalla, N. D., & Vladimirsky, Y. Y. (2006). Reliability allocation for networks and systems. SIAM Review, 48(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036144503434493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouno, E., & Guérineau, L. (2015). Failure rate estimation in a dynamic environment. Economic Quality Control, 30(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1515/eqc-2015-6001
   Google Scholar
• Hawkes, A. G. (1971a). Spectra of some self-exciting and mutually exciting point processes. Biometrika, 58(1), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/58.1.83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkes, A. G. (1971b). Point spectra of some mutually exciting point processes. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Statistical Methodology, 33(3), 438–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Verheugd, J., De Oliveira da Costa, P. R., Afshar, R. R., Zhang, Y., & Boersma, S. (2020). Predicting water pipe failures with a recurrent neural Hawkes process model. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics ( SMC), pp. 2628–2633.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, R. (2009). An accurate approximate solution of optimal sequential age replacement policy for a finite-time horizon. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 94(8), 1245–1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2009.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonge, B. D., & Scarf, P. A. (2020). A review on maintenance optimization. European Journal of Operational Research, 285(3), 805–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.09.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kus, C., & Eryilmaz, S. (2021). Analysis of the two-unit cold standby repairable system with damage and repair time dependency via matrix-exponential distributions. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 18(6), 771–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/16843703.2021.1963089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledoux, J. (2008). Point processes in software reliability. In H. Catherine, L. Nikolaos, M. Mounir, & N. Mikhail. eds., Mathematical methods in survival analysis, reliability and quality of life (pp. 217–235). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Z. P., Cui, L. R., & Chen, J. H. (2018). Traffic accident modelling via self-exciting point processes. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 180, 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.07.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, H. T., Elsayed, E. A., & Chan, L. Y. (2006). Maintenance of continuously monitored degrading systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(2), 821–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X. (2021). A simple procedure for analyzing reliability data from double-stage accelerated life tests. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 18(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/16843703.2020.1766739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pant, H., & Singh, S. B. (2021). Markov process approach for analyzing periodically inspected competing-risk system embodying downtime threshold. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 19(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/16843703.2021.1972516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, Q. A., Cui, L. R., Gao, H. D., & Yi, H. (2018). Optimal allocation of units in sequential probability series systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 169, 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, Q. A., Cui, L. R., & Gao, H. D. (2019a). A bivariate replacement policy for an imperfect repair system based on geometric processes. Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers part O-journal of risk and reliability, 233( 4), 670–681.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu, Q. A., Cui, L. R., & Dong, Q. L. (2019b). Preventive maintenance policy of single-unit systems based on shot-noise process. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 35(2), 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, Q. A., Cui, L. R., & Kong, D. J. (2019c). Availability analysis and optimal inspection policy for systems with neglected down time. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 48(11), 2787–2809. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2018.1473425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, S. M. (1996). Stochastic Processes. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, S. M. (2003). Introduction to Probability Models. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, S. M. (2014). Simulation analysis of system life when component lives are determined by a marked point process. Journal of Applied Probability, 51(2), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1239/jap/1402578631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, J. Y., Cui, L. R., & Ma, Y. Z. (2019). Availability and optimal maintenance policy for systems degrading in dynamic environments. European Journal of Operational Research, 276(1), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.12.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, J. Y., Hu, J. W., & Ye, Z. S. (2020). Optimal switching policy for warm standby systems subjected to standby failure mode. IISE Transactions, 52(11), 1262–1274. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725854.2019.1709136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheu, S. H., Tsai, H. N., Wang, F. K., & Zhang, Z. G. (2015). An extended optimal replacement model for a deteriorating system with inspections. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 139, 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, Y., Xiang, Y. S., Xiao, H., & Xing, L. D. (2021). Joint optimization of budget allocation and maintenance planning of multi-facility transportation infrastructure systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 288(2), 382–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.05.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbert, K., De Schutter, B., & Babuska, R. (2017). Timely condition-based maintenance planning for multicomponent systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 159, 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vu, H. C., Do, P., Fouladirad, M., & Grall, A. (2020). Dynamic opportunistic maintenance planning for multi-component redundant systems with various types of opportunities. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 198, 106854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.106854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. Z. (2010). Distribution of the sum of independent random variables. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science), 46(1), 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Liao, H. T., Ma, X. B., & Bao, R. (2021). Remaining useful life prediction and optimal maintenance time determination for a single unit using isotonic regression and gamma process model. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 210, 107504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang, Y. S., Zhu, Z. C., Coit, D. W., & Feng, Q. (2017). Condition-based maintenance under performance-based contracting. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 111, 391–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.07.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Z. H., Cui, L. R., & Hawkes, A. G. (2006). A study on a single–unit Markov repairable system with repair time omission. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 55(2), 182–188. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2006.874933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar