References
- Amadori, K.; Tarkian, M.; Ölvander, J.; Krus, P.: Flexible and robust CAD models for design automation, Advanced Engineering Informatics, 26(2), 2012, 180–195. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2012.01.004.
- Bhaskara, S.; Analysis and visualization of complex computer aided design models as a design structure matrix, in 13th International Dependency and Structure Modelling Conference, DSM'11, Cambridge, MA, 2011, 61–75.
- Bodein, Y.; Rose, B.; Caillaud, E.: A roadmap for parametric CAD efficiency in the automotive industry, Computer Aided Design, 45(10), 2013, 1198–1214. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2013.05.006.
- Bodein, Y.; Rose, B.; Caillaud, E.: Explicit reference modeling methodology in parametric CAD system, Computers in Industry, 65(1), 2014, 136–147. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2013.08.004.
- Boothroyd, G.; Dewhurst, P.; Knight, W.: Product Design for Manufacture and Assembly, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2002.
- Braha, D.; Maimon, O.: The measurement of a design structural and functional complexity, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 28(4), 1998, 527–535. http://doi.org/10.1109/3468.686715.
- Brissaud, D.; Garro, O.; Poveda, O.: Design Process Rationale Capture and Support by Abstraction of Criteria, Research in Engineering Design-Theory Applications and Concurrent Engineering, 14(3), 2003, 162–172. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-003-0038-0.
- Camba, J.; Contero, M.; Johnson, M.; Company, P.: Extended 3D annotations as a new mechanism to explicitly communicate geometric design intent and increase CAD model reusability, Computer-Aided Design, 57(0), 2014, 61–73. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2014.07.001.
- Camba, J. D.; Contero, M.; Company, P.: Parametric CAD modeling: An analysis of strategies for design reusability, Computer-Aided Design, 742016, 18–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2016.01.003.
- Chester, I.: Teaching for CAD Expertise, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 17(1), 2007, 23–35. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-006-9015-z.
- Chougule, R. G.; Ravi, B.: Variant process planning of castings using AHP-based nearest neighbour algorithm for case retrieval, International Journal of Production Research, 43(6), 2005, 1255–1273. http://doi.org/10.1080/00207540412331320517.
- Cohen, J.: A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 1960, 37–46. http://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104.
- Company, P.; Contero, M.; Otey, J.; Plumed, R.: Approach for developing coordinated rubrics to convey quality criteria in MCAD training, Computer-Aided Design, 63(0), 2015, 101–117. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2014.10.001.
- Conklin, E. J.; Yakemovic, K. C. B.: A process-oriented approach to design rationale, Hum.-Comput. Interact., 6(3), 1991, 357–391.
- Dankwort, C. W.; Weidlich, R.; Guenther, B.; Blaurock, J. E.: Engineers’ CAx education - It's not only CAD, Computer Aided Design, 36(14), 2004, 1439–1450. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2004.02.011.
- Denkena, B.; Schürmeyer, J. T.; Kaddour, R.; Bö, V.: Assessing mould costs analysing manufacturing processes of cavities, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 56(9–12), 2011, 943–949. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3265-y.
- Diwakaran, R. P.; Johnson, M. D.: Analyzing the effect of alternative goals and model attributes on CAD model creation and alteration, Computer-Aided Design, 44(4), 2012, 343–353. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2011.11.003.
- Frechette, S. P.: Model Based Enterprise for Manufacturing, in 44th CIRP International Conference on Manufacturing Systems, Madison, WI, 2011.
- Guilford, J. P.; Fruchter, B.: Fundamental statistics in psychology and education, McGraw-Hill, 1978.
- Gwet, K. L.: Handbook of inter-rater reliability : the definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among raters, 3rd ed.: Gaithersburg, MD : Advanced Analytics, LLC, 2012, 3rd ed.
- Hamade, R. F.; Ammouri, A. H.; Artail, H.: Toward predicting the performance of novice CAD users based on their profiled technical attributes, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 25(3), 2012, 628–639. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2012.01.004.
- Hamade, R. F.; Artail, H. A.; Jaber, M. Y.: Learning Theory as Applied to Mechanical CAD Training of Novices, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 19(3), 2005, 305–322. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc1903_2.
- Hamade, R. F.; Artail, H. A.; Jaber, M. Y.: Evaluating the Learning Process of Mechanical CAD Students, Computers & Education, 49(3), 2007, 640–661. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.009.
- Hamade, R. F.; Artail, H. A.; Jaber, M. Y.: A study of the impact of the willingness-to-learn of CAD novice users on their competence development, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 61(3), 2011, 709–720. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2011.04.024.
- Hardwick, M.: On STEP-NC and the complexities of product data integration, Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 4(1), 2004, 60–67. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.1641188.
- Johnson, M. D.; Diwakaran, R. P.: An educational exercise examining the role of model attributes on the creation and alteration of CAD models, Computers & Education, 57(2), 2011, 1749–1761. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.018.
- Joshi, D.; Ravi, B.: Quantifying the shape complexity of cast parts, Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 7(5), 2010, 685–700. http://doi.org/10.3722/cadaps.2010.685-700.
- Landis, J. R.; Koch, G. G.: The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data, Biometrics, 33(1), 1977, 159–174. http://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
- Liker, J. K.; Fleischer, M.; Arnsdorf, D.: Fulfilling the Promises of CAD, Sloan Management Review, 33(3), 1992, 74–86.
- Likert, R.; Roslow, S.; Murphy, G.: A Simple and Reliable Method of Scoring the Thurstone Attitude Scales, Journal of Social Psychology, 51934, 228–238.
- Osada, R.; Funkhouser, T.; Chazelle, B.; Dobkin, D.: Matching 3D models with shape distributions, in SMI 2001 International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications, 2001, 154–166.
- Peng, C.; Cao, Y.: Parallel LOD for CAD model rendering with effective GPU memory usage, Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 13(2), 2016, 173–183. http://doi.org/10.1080/16864360.2015.1084184.
- Rossignac, J.: Shape complexity, Visual Computer, 21(12), 2005, 985–996. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-005-0362-7.
- Salehi, V.; McMahon, C.: Methodological integration of parametric associative CAD systems in Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) enviroment, in Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference 2009, San Diego, 2010, 505–514.
- Suh, N. P.: Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications, Oxford University Press, 2001.
- Summers J. D.; Shah, J. J.: Mechanical Engineering Design Complexity Metrics: Size, Coupling, and Solvability, Journal of Mechanical Design, 132(2) 2010, 021004-1-021004-11. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4000759.
- Valentan, B.; Brajlih, T.; Drstvenšek, I.; Balič, J.: Development of a part-complexity evaluation model for application in additive fabrication technologies, Strojniski Vestnik/Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 57(10), 2011, 709–718. http://doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2010.057.
- White, D. R.; Saigal, S.; Owen, S. J.: Meshing complexity: Predicting meshing difficulty for single part CAD models, Engineering with Computers, 21(1), 2005, 76–90. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-005-0002-x.
- You, Y. H.; Kou, X. Y.; Tan, S. T.: Adaptive Tetrahedral Mesh Generation of 3D Heterogeneous Objects, Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 12(5), 2015, 580–588. http://doi.org/10.1080/16864360.2015.1014736.