References
- * Aikenhead, G. 1994. “The Social Contract of Science: Implications for Teaching Science.” In STS Education: International Perspectives on Reform, edited by J. Solomon and G. Aikenhead. pp. 1–10. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Bajaj, M. 2015. “Pedagogies of Resistance’ and Critical Peace Education Praxis.” Journal of Peace Education 12 (2): 154–166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17400201.2014.991914.
- Bjerstedt, A. 1992. Peace Education and Traditional School Subjects. Peace Education Miniprints, No. 30. R&D Group. Sweden: “Preparedness for Peace” Lund University, Malmo School of Education.
- * Blades, D.W. 2006. “Levinas and an Ethics for Science Education.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 38 (5): 647–664. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2006.00217.x.
- Brantmeier, E.J. 2013. “Toward a Critical Peace Education for Sustainability.” Journal of Peace Education 10 (3): 242–258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17400201.2013.862920.
- * Bybee, R. 1987. “Science Education and the Science-technology-society (S-T-S) Theme.” Science Education 71 (5): 667–683. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730710504.
- * Cano Vásquez, L.M. 2020. Diagnóstico STEM+H: Ciencia y Desarrollo Humano para el Futuro. - in press. Medellín, Colombia: City of Medellín.
- Carlone, H. 2004. “The Cultural Production of Science in Reform-based Physics: Girls’ Access, Participation, and Resistance.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (4): 392–414. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20006.
- * Chiu, M.-H., and R. Duit. 2011. “Globalization: Science Education from an International Perspective.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48 (6): 553–566. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20427.
- * Chowdhury, T., J. Holbrook, and M. Rannikmae. 2020. “Addressing Sustainable Development: Promoting Active Informed Citizenry through Trans-contextual Science Education.” Sustainability 12 (8): 3259. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083259.
- Cremin, H., J. Echavarría, and K. Kester. 2018. “Transrational Peacebuilding Education to Reduce Epistemic Violence.” Peace Review 30 (3): 295–302. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2018.1495808.
- de Souza Santos, B. 2014. Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. Milton Park, UK: Routledge.
- * Deboer, G.E. 1991. A History of Ideas in Science Education: Implications for Practice. New York City: Teachers College Press.
- * Deboer, G.E. 2011. “The Globalization of Science Education.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48 (6): 567–591. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20421.
- Diekman, A.B., E.S. Weisgram, and A.L. Belanger. 2015. “New Routes to Recruiting and Retaining Women in STEM: Policy Implications of a Communal Goal Congruity Perspective.” Social Issues and Policy Review 9 (1): 52–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12010.
- * Fensham, P.J. 2014. “Scepticism and Trust: Two Counterpoint Essentials in Science Education for Complex Socio-scientific Issues.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 9 (3): 649–661. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9560-1.
- * Eppley, K. 2017. “Rural Science Education as Social Justice.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 12 (1): 45–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9751-7.
- FCPS: Fairfax County Public Schools. 2020. “Global Classroom.” https://www.fcps.edu/node/36977 Accessed 17 September 2020.
- Gage, N.L. 1989. “The Paradigm Wars and Their Aftermath: A “Historical” Sketch of Research on Teaching since 1989.” Educational Researcher 18 (7): 4–10.
- Galtung, J. 1964a. “An Editorial.” Journal of Peace Research 1 (1): 1–4.
- Galtung, J. 1990. “Cultural Violence.” Journal of Peace Research 27 (3): 291–305. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343390027003005.
- Galtung, J. 1996. Peace by Peaceful Means: Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilization. Oslo: International Peace Research Institute.
- * Hodson, D. 1999. “Going beyond Cultural Pluralism: Science Education for Sociopolitical Action.” Science Education 83 (6): 775–796. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199911)83:6<775::AID-SCE8>3.0.CO;2-8.
- * Kyle, W.C.J. 1999. “Science Education in Developing Countries: Challenging First World Hegemony in a Global Context.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36 (3): 255–260. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199903)36:3<255::AID-TEA1>3.0.CO;2-B.
- * Hadzigeorgiou, Y. 2015. “A Critique of Science Education as Sociopolitical Action from the Perspective of Liberal Education.” Science and Education 24 (3): 259–280. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-014-9728-4.
- * Kokka, K. 2018. “Radical STEM Teacher Activism: Collaborative Organizing to Sustain Social Justice Pedagogy in STEM Fields.” Educational Foundations 31: 1–2.
- * Jungck, J. R. & Manon, J. 2019. Brave spaces: Augmenting interdisciplinary STEM education by using quantitative data explorations to engage conversations on equity and social justice. Numeracy. 12 (1): 4.
- Lead States, N.G.S.S. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Lederman, N. 1992. “Students’ and Teachers’ Conceptions of the Nature of Science: A Review of the Research.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29 (4): 331–359. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290404.
- Levinas, E., Peperzak, A. T., Critchley, S., & Bernasconi, R. 1996. Emmanuel Levinas: Basic philosophical writings. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
- Lin, J., E.J. Brantmeier, and C. Bruhn. 2008. Transforming Education for Peace. Charlotte, NC, USA: Information Age Publishing.
- * Mansour, N. 2007. “Challenges to STS Education: Implications for Science Teacher Education.” Bullet of Science, Technology & Society 27 (6): 482–497. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467607308286.
- * Livstrom, I., A.H. Szostkowski, and G.H. Roehrig. 2018. “Integrated STEM in Practice: Learning from Montessori Philosophies and Practices.” School Science and Mathematics 119 (4): 190–202. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12331.
- McComas, W.F., and N. Nouri. 2016. “The Nature of Science and the Next Generation Science Standards: Analysis and Critique.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 27 (5): 555–576. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9474-3.
- Miller, D.I., K.M. Nolla, A.H. Eagly, and D.H. Uttal. 2018. “The Development of Children’s Gender-Science Stereotypes: A Meta-analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw-A-Scientist Studies.” Child Development 89 (6): 1943–1955. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13039.
- * Milner, A. 2015. “Universal Human Rights and STEM Education.” SSM Journal 115 (6): 257–259.
- Moore, F.M. 2008. “Preparing Elementary Preservice Teachers for Urban Elementary Science Classrooms: Challenging Cultural Biases toward Diverse Students.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 19 (1): 85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-007-9083-2.
- * Mutegi, J.W. 2011. “The Inadequacies of ‘Science for All’ and the Necessity and Nature of a Socially Transformative Curriculum Approach for African American Science Education.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 248 (3): 301–316. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20410.
- National Research Council. 2012. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- NextGenScience.org. 2013. “APPENDIX H - Understanding the Scientific Enterprise: The Nature of Science in the Next Generation Science Standards.” https://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/default/files/Appendix%20H%20-%20The%20Nature%20of%20Science%20in%20the%20Next%20Generation%20Science%20Standards%204.15.13.pdf
- NRC: National Research Council. 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Oswald Spring, Ú. 2021. “Decolonising Peace in the Anthropocene: Introduction Towards an Alternative Understanding of Peace and Security.” In Decolonising Conflicts, Security, Peace, Gender, Environment and Development in the Anthropocene, edited by Ú. Oswald Spring and H.G. Brauch. New York, NY, USA: Springer.
- Pettigrew, T.F. 1998. “Intergroup Contact Theory.” American Review of Psychology 24 (1): 65–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65.
- Pienta, R.S., and A.M. Smith. 2012. “Women on the Margins: The Politics of Gender in the Language and Content of Science Textbooks.” In The New Politics of the Textbook, edited by Heather Hickman, Brad J. Porfilio. pp. 31–47. New York, NY, USA: Brill Sense.
- Prescod-Weinstein, C. 2015. “Decolonizing Science Reading List.” https://medium.com/@chanda/decolonising-science-reading-list-339fb773d51f
- * Ramirez, J.M., V.K. Gupta, O.J. Mesa, G. Poveda, J. Saldarriaga, I.B. Gupta, and P. Arias. 2017. “A Multi-cultural Science Education Model for Sustainability at the National University of Colombia, Medellin.” Systems Research and Behavioral Science 35 (5): 577–584. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2486.
- Reardon, B.A. 2000. “Peace Education: A Review and A Projection.” In International Companion to Education, edited by B. Moon, S. Brown, and M.B. Peretz. pp. 395–425. Abingdon: Routledge.
- * Reis, G. 2014. “Developing a Global Perspective In/for Science Teacher Education: The Case of Pollination.” McGill Journal of Education 49 (2): 491–500. doi:https://doi.org/10.7202/1029431ar.
- * Ridgeway, M.L. 2019. “Against the Grain: Science Education Researchers and Social Justice Agendas.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 14 (2): 283–292. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09939-6.
- Rifkin, M. 2015. “Guest Post: Teaching Social Justice in the Physics Classroom, Part 1.” https://quantumprogress.wordpress.com/2015/02/12/guest-post-teaching-social-justice-in-the-physics-classroom-part-1/
- * Rodriguez, A.J., and D. Morrison. 2019. “Expanding and Enacting Transformative Meanings of Equity, Diversity and Social Justice in Science Education.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 14 (2): 265–281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09938-7.
- Rowbottom, D.P., and S.J. Aiston. 2006. “The Myth of ‘Scientific Method’ in Contemporary Educational Research.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 40 (2): 137–156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2006.00508.x.
- * Rutherford, F.J., and A. Ahlgren. 1991. Science for All Americans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- * Sadler, T., and D. Zeidler. 2009. “Scientific Literacy, PISA, and Socioscientific Discourse; Assessment for Progressive Aims of Science Education.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46 (8): 909–921. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20327.
- Sichangi, M.W., and J.K.K. Thuo. 2017. “Using Science to Foster Global Understanding and Peace.” Global Partnership for Education. https://www.globalpartnership.org/blog/using-science-foster-global-understanding-and-peace
- Smith, L.T. 2012. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books.
- STEPUP 4 Women in Physics. 2020. “STEPUP4Women.org” Accessed 17 September 2020.
- Sumida Huaman, E. 2011. “Transforming Education, Transforming Society: The Co-construction of Critical Peace Education and Indigenous Education.” Journal of Peace Education 8 (3): 243–258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17400201.2011.621374.
- * Tyokumber, E.T. 2010. “Does Science Education in Developing Countries Really Count?” Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 91 (4): 432–437. doi:https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9623-91.4.432.
- * UN: United Nations. 2015. “Sustainable Development Goals.” https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/
- United States. 1983. A Nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, D.C.: The National Commission on Excellence in Education.
- * Tobin, K. 2016. “Collaborating on Global Priorities: Science Education for Everyone—Any Time and Everywhere.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 11 (3): 27–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9708-2.
- * Tolbert, S., A. Schindel, and A.J. Rodriguez. 2018. “Relevance and Relational Responsibility in Justice-oriented Science Education Research.” Science Education 102 (4): 796–819. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21446.
- UNESCO. 2017. “Cracking the Code: Girls’ and Women’s Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM).” https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000253479
- Vélez-Ibáñez, C.G., and J.B. Greenberg. 1992. “Formation and Transformation of Funds of Knowledge among U.S.-Mexican Households.” Anthropology & Education 23 (4): 313–335.
- * Wellington, J.J. 1983. “Science and Peace Education - Big Bang or Damp Squib?” Physics Education 18 (3): 122–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/18/3/310.
- * Yager, R. 1996. “History of Science/Technology/Society as Reform in the United States.” In Science/Technology/Society as Reform in Science Education, edited by R.E. Yager. pp. 3–15. New York: State University of New York Press.
- Weber, H. R. 1971. The promise of the land, Biblical interpretation and the present situation in the Middle East. Study Encounter, 7 (4): 1–16