Cult cinema and the ‘mainstreaming’ discourse of technological change: revisiting subcultural capital in liquid modernity

References

• AndrewsDavid. 2013. Theorizing Art Cinemas: Foreign, Cult, Avant-Garde and Beyond. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• AtkinDouglas. 2004. The Culting of Brands. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• BaumanZygmunt. 2000. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• BaumanZygmunt. 2005. Liquid Life. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• BestShaun. 2013. ‘Liquid Fandom: Neo-Tribes and Fandom in the Context of Liquid Modernity.’ Soccer and Society14 (1): 80–92.
   Google Scholar
• CatterallAli, and SimonWells. 2001. Your Face Here: British Cult Movies Since the Sixties. London: Fourth Estate.
   Google Scholar
• EganKate. 2007. Trash or Treasure? Censorship and the Changing Meanings of the Video Nasties. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• HerbertDaniel. 2014. Videoland: Movie Culture at the American Video Store. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• HillsMatt. 2002. Fan Cultures. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• HillsMatt. 2010. ‘Attending Horror Film Festivals and Conventions: Liveness, Subcultural Capital and ‘Flesh-and-Blood Genre Communities’.’ In Horror Zone, edited by IanConrich, 87–101. London and New York: I.B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• HunterI. Q.2013. British Trash Cinema. London: BFI Publishing/Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• JancovichMark. 2002. ‘Cult Fictions: Cult Movies, Subcultural Capital and the Production of Cultural Distinctions.’ Cultural Studies16 (2): 306–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JancovichMark, AntonioLazaro Reboll, JulianStringer, and AndyWillis. 2003. ‘Introduction.’ In Defining Cult Movies: The Cultural Politics of Oppositional Taste, edited by MarkJancovich, AntonioLazaro Reboll, JulianStringer, and AndyWillis, 1–13. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• JenkinsHenry. 1992. Textual Poachers. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• JerslevAnne. 1992. ‘Semiotics by Instinct: ‘Cult Film’ as a Signifying Practice Between Audience and Film.’ In Media Cultures: Reappraising Transnational Media, edited by MichaelSkovmand and KimChristianSchrøder, 181–198. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn-HarrisKeith. 2007. Extreme Metal: Music and Culture on the Edge. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• KlingerBarbara. 2006. Beyond the Multiplex: Cinema, New Technologies, and the Home. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• KlingerBarbara. 2010. ‘Becoming Cult: The Big Lebowski, Replay Culture and Male Fans.’ Screen51 (1): 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KlingerBarbara. 2011. ‘Re-enactment: Fans Performing Movie Scenes from the Stage to YouTube.’ In Ephemeral Media: Transitory Screen Culture from Television to YouTube, edited by PaulGrainge, 195–213. London: BFI/Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• LobatoRamon. 2012. Shadow Economies of Cinema: Mapping Informal Film Distribution. London: BFI/Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• MartinAdrian. 2008. ‘What's Cult Got To Do With It?: In Defense of Cinephile Elitism.’ CineasteXXXIV (1): 39–42.
   Google Scholar
• Mathijs, Ernest, and XavierMendik, eds. 2008. The Cult Film Reader. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MathijsErnest, and XavierMendik. 2011. 100 Cult Films. London: BFI/Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• MathijsErnest, and JamieSexton. 2011. Cult Cinema: An Introduction. Malden and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• McCullochRichard. 2011. ‘Most People Bring Their Own Spoons: The Room's Participatory Audiences as Comedy Mediators.’ Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies10 (1): 189–218.
   Google Scholar
• NewmanMichaelZ. 2014. Video Revolutions: On the History of a Medium. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• PettEmma. 2013. ‘Hey! Hey! I've Seen This One, I've Seen This One. It's a Classic: Nostalgia, Repeat Viewing and Cult Performance in Back to the Future.’ Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies8 (2): 177–197.
   Google Scholar
• RosaHartmut. 2013. Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SandvossCornel. 2005. Fans: The Mirror of Consumption. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• SandvossCornel. 2012. ‘From National Hero to Liquid Star: Identity and Discourse in Transnational Sports Consumption.’ In Bodies of Discourse: Sports Stars, Media and the Global Public, edited by CornelSandvoss, MichaelReal, and AlinaBernstein, 171–192. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• SchtinterStanley. 2014. ‘‘Welcome to Scalarama’ and ‘Scalarama Manifesto’.’ Scalarama Issue1: 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• SconceJeffrey. 2008. ‘Cult Cinema: A Critical Symposium – Jeffrey Sconce.’ CineasteXXXIV (1): 48–49.
   Google Scholar
• SextonJamie. 2014. ‘From Bad to Good and Back to Bad Again? Cult Cinema and Its Unstable Trajectories.’ In B is for Bad Cinema, edited by ClairePerkins and ConstantineVerevis, 129–145. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• SmithJustin. 2010. Withnail and Us: Cult Films and Film Cults in British Cinema. London and New York: I.B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• SmithIainRobert. 2011. ‘Bootleg Archives: Notes on BitTorrent Communities and Issues of Access.’ Flow14 (02), posted June 23rd, available online at http://flowtv.org/2011/06/bootleg-archives/, accessed 11/8/14.
   Google Scholar
• StanfieldPeter. 2008. ‘Cult Cinema: A Critical Symposium – Peter Stanfield.’ CineasteXXXIV (1): 49–50.
   Google Scholar
• Telotte, J. P., ed. 1991. Cult Film Experience: Beyond All Reason. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• ThorntonSarah. 1995. Club Cultures: Music, Media and Subcultural Capital. Oxford and Malden: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• TryonChuck. 2013. On-Demand Culture: Digital Delivery and the Future of Movies. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• VernallisCarol. 2013. Unruly Media: YouTube, Music Video and the New Digital Cinema. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• WalkerJohnny. 2014. ‘Low Budgets, No Budgets, and Digital-video Nasties: Recent British Horror and Informal Distribution.’ In Merchants of Menace: The Business of Horror Cinema, edited by RichardNowell, 215–228. New York and London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar