The Learning Loss Scale as an Assessment Tool: An Empirical Examination of Convergent Validity with Performative Measures

References

• AACU. (2005). An introduction to LEAP. Retrieved from http://www.aacu.org/leap/documents/Introduction_to_LEAP.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Beckman, L. (1970). Effects of students' performance on teachers' and observers' attributions of causality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 76–82. doi:10.1037/h0028821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 1–62. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60024-6
   Google Scholar
• Bensur, B. J. (2001). Is one item an adequate measure of cognitive learning? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 92, 606. doi:10.2466/pms.2001.92.2.606
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berger, C. R. (1975). Proactive and retroactive attribution processes in interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 2, 33–50. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00467.x
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Book 1 cognitive domain. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S., Engleheart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). A taxonomy of educational objectives: The cognitive domain. New York, NY: McKay.
   Google Scholar
• Chesebro, J. L., & McCroskey, J. C. (2000). The relationship between students' reports of learning and their actual recall of lecture material: A validity test. Communication Education, 49, 297–301. doi:10.1080/03634520009379217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesebro, J. L., & McCroskey, J. C. (2001). The relationship of teacher clarity and immediacy with student state receiver apprehension, affect and cognitive learning. Communication Education, 50, 59–68. doi:10.1080/03634520109379232
   Google Scholar
• Frisby, B. N., & Martin, M. M. (2010). Instructor–student and student–student rapport in the classroom. Communication Education, 59, 146–164. doi:10.1080/03634520903564362
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. O. (1988). Cognitive processes: Methods for probing the black box. In C. H. Tardy (Ed.), A handbook for the study of human communication: Methods and instruments for observing, measuring and assessing communication processes (pp. 37–106). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Henson, J. R., & Denker, K. J. (2009). Political difference and perceptions of silencing in university classrooms. Communication Research Reports, 26, 208–214. doi:10.1080/08824090903084349
   Google Scholar
• Hess, J. A., Smythe, M. J., & Communication 451 (2001). Is teacher immediacy actually related to student cognitive learning? Communication Studies, 52, 197–219. doi:10.1080/03634520802511233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmstrom, A. J., & Burleson, B. R. (2011). An initial test of a cognitive-emotional theory of esteem support messages. Communication Research, 38, 326–355. doi:10.1177/0093650210376191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsey, M., & Gallois, C. (2010). Toward the development of interdisciplinary theory. In C. T. Salmon (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 34, pp. 133–140). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. J., Feigenbaum, R., & Weiby, M. (1964). Some determinants and consequences of the teacher's perception of causation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 237–246. doi:10.1037/h0043389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney, P., & Plax, T. G. (1992). Student resistance to control. In V. P. Richmond & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Power in the classroom: Communication, control, and concern (pp. 85–100). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kelsey, D. M., Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Allen, T. H., & Ritter, K. J. (2004). College students' attributions of teacher misbehaviors. Communication Education, 53, 40–55. doi:10.10/0363452032000135760
   Google Scholar
• King, P., & Witt, P. (2009). Teacher immediacy, confidence testing, and the measurement of cognitive learning. Communication Education, 58, 110–123. doi:10.1080/03634520802511233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linvill, D. L., & Mazer, J. P. (2013). The role of student aggressive communication traits in the perception of instructor ideological bias in the classroom. Communication Education, 62, 48–60. doi:10.1080/03634523.2012.721889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure, J. (2011). Attributions, causes, and actions: Is the consciousness of will a perceptual illusion? Theory and Psychology, 22, 402–419. doi:10.1177/0959354310386845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure, J., & Hilton, D. (1997). You can't always get what you want: When circumstances are better explanations than goals. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 223–240. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01129.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure, J., & Hilton, D. (1998). Are goals or preconditions better explanations: It depends on the question. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 897–911. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(1998110)28:6<897::AID-EJSP902>3.0.CO;2-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C. (1977). Classroom consequences of communication apprehension. Communication Education, 26, 28–33. doi:10.1080/03634527709378196
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & McCroskey, L. L. (2006). Instructional communication: A historical perspective. In T. P. Mottet, V. P. Richmond, & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Handbook of instructional communication (pp. 33–47). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1992). Increasing teacher influence through immediacy. In V. P. Richmond & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Power in the classroom: Communication, control, and concern (pp. 101–119). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McManus, T. G., & Donovan, S. (2012). Communication competence and feeling caught: Explaining perceived ambiguity in divorce related communication. Communication Quarterly, 60, 255–277. doi:10.1080/01463373.2012.669328
   Google Scholar
• Metts, S., Sprecher, S., & Cupach, W. R. (1991). Retrospective self-reports. In B. M. Montgomery & S. Duck (Eds.), Studying interpersonal interaction (pp. 163–178). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, K. R. (2007). Student engagement in the classroom: An examination of student silence and participation. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, K. R. (2010). Student silence as a form of communicative engagement. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Morreale, S. P., Worley, D. W., & Hugenberg, B. (2010). The basic communication course at two and four-year U.S. colleges and universities: Study VIII the 40th anniversary. Communication Education, 59, 405–430. doi:10.1080/03634521003637124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P. (1992). Teacher power in the classroom: Defining and advancing a program of research. In V. P. Richmond & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Power in the classroom: Communication, control, and concern (pp. 67–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, V. P., Gorham, J. S., & McCroskey, J. C. (1987). The relationship between selective immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In M. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 10, pp. 574–590). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., Kearney, P., & Plax, T. G. (1987). Power in the classroom VII: Linking behavior alteration techniques to cognitive learning. Communication Education, 36, 1–12. doi:10.1080/03634528709378636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, R. B. (2009). Measurement in instructional communication. In R. B. Rubin, A. Rubin, E. Graham, E. Perse, & D. Seibold (Eds.), Communication research measures II: A sourcebook (pp. 43–56). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, D. S., Hastorf, A. H., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1979). Person perception ( 2nd ed.). Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C.A., Haynes, K. N., Lazarus, R. S., & Pope, L. K. (1993). In search of the “hot” cognitions: Attributions, appraisals, and their relation to emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 916–929. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.65.5.916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, C. R., & Clair, M. (1976). Effects of expected and obtained grades on teacher evaluation and attribution of performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 75–82. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.68.1.75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (1985). An attribution theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.92.4.548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (2010). The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation: A history of ideas. Educational Psychologist, 45, 28–36. doi:10.1080/00461520903433596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, B., & Kukla, A. (1970). An attribution analysis of achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 1–20. doi:10.1037/h0029211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, B., & Sierad, J. (1975). Misattribution for failure and enhancement of achievement striving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 415–421. doi:10.1037/h0076510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willson, V. L., & Putnam, R. R. (1982). A meta-analysis of pretest sensitization effects in experimental design. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 249–258. doi:10.3102/00028312019002249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar